Why the Illuminati Hated Monarchies
June 23, 2013
(left. Nicholas II Czar of Russia, 1868-1918)
James Perloff says the great monarchies of Europe
were the last redoubt of Christendom against the tyranny
of the Masonic Jewish bankers (i.e. NWO.)
He maintains "God's model for government was monarchy."
Everyone must submit himself to
the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that
which God has established. The authorities that exist have been
established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority
is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so
will bring judgement on themselves. Romans 13:1-2
by James Perloff
When the Bible
was written, "government" usually meant kings and emperors. It's
true that the ancient Greeks experimented with democracy, and the
Romans with a republic. But from the time of Christ until about 200
years ago, most nations were monarchies. Emperors reigned in China
for over 2,000 years until 1911. The czars governed Russia until
1917; the Kaisers Germany until 1918. All the European countries -
Spain, Italy, Portugal, Belgium, etc. - were once overseen by
kings.
But where are all
the monarchs now? Mostly gone or reduced to figureheads. The
government forms of the two last centuries - republics,
democracies, communism, socialism, fascism - were relatively new.
What type of
government exists in heaven? Socialism? A democracy where we elect a
new God every four years? Of course, it's a monarchy, under "God,
the blessed and only Ruler, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords."
(1 Tim 6:15)
Earthly monarchs
could be very bad; some were notoriously cruel. Nevertheless,
monarchy was the form of government most clearly structured
on heaven's model.
Also: In Eden, how did Satan persuade Adam and Eve to disobey God and eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil? The Bible says:
He said to the woman, "Did God really say, 'You must not eat from any tree in the garden'?"
The woman said to the serpent, "We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, 'You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will surely die.'"
"You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil."
The core of the temptation was "you will be like God." The entire "power to the people" movement - from communism to democracy - involved a similar temptation. It's as though Satan said, "Did God say to obey kings? He didn't mean that. Just get rid of those kings, and you'll have the political power, you'll all be kings! So, send King Louis to the guillotine! Murder the Czar and his family! Throw off King George! Power to the people, baby!"
Of course, I
don't equate the American Revolution with the Russian Revolution.
But God's model for government was monarchy. Had we not eliminated
kings, Christians wouldn't face the problems they do today -
abortion, banning of school prayer, etc. Christian monarchs would
not have allowed these developments. However imperfect he may have
been, the personal motto of Czar Nicholas II was: "Christ Above
All." On older European coins, you'll see crosses and other
Christian emblems. Many British coins, for example, were marked with
the Latin "Fid def" - short for fidei defensor,
"defender of the faith." Yes, kings could be tyrants, but could
also uphold God's commandments.
Suppose that
under Austrian emperor Franz Joseph, someone had proposed gay
marriage. He would have said: "No! God shall not be mocked! By my
royal decree, there shall be no homosexual marriage!" End of
story. God wanted rulers with the power to enforce his laws....
While European monarchs inscribed crosses and "defender of the
faith" on their coins, we Americans put Lady Liberty on ours. We
have the Liberty Bell and the Statue of Liberty. Don't get me wrong
- I'm for liberty, but when you make it a kind of idol, is
it surprising that people eventually demand the liberty to have
abortions or redefine marriage?
Satan knew that
once "democracy" replaced kings, he would only need 51% of the
vote to dismantle Christian culture. And when you control the media,
getting 51% is a cinch.
Another reason the
Illuminati sought to destroy monarchies: national sovereignty was
strongly tied to kings - the heart and symbol of nationhood. While
prime ministers and presidents are loyal to their party (if
not donors and lobbyists), a king was loyal to the
whole country. He was a unifying force behind whom the people would
rally.
VIETNAM
Earlier we described the U.S. policies that caused the Vietnam disaster. Few people recall that, until 1954, Vietnam had an emperor, even during French colonization. The last was Bao Dai, whom the United States insisted step down in favor of "democracy." The emperor himself stated: "If your country had given me one-thousandth of the sum they spent to depose me, I could have won that war."
Bao Dai was a
friend of Hilaire du Berrier, who wrote: "When the throne was
destroyed, fragmentation resulted because only the man on the throne
was above the regional, racial, and religious hatreds dividing the
national family." I believe this comment embodies a universal
principle concerning monarchies.
The Illuminati's policy on monarchs: remove them. Protocols of Zion 1:26 declared:
In all corners of the earth the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-being of the goyim, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the goya states. As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph: it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card - the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the goyim, that class which was the only defense peoples and countries had against us.
And Protocol 5:3:
In the times when the peoples looked upon kings on their thrones as on a pure manifestation of the will of God, they submitted without a murmur to the despotic power of kings: but from the day when we insinuated into their minds the conception of their own rights they began to regard the occupants of thrones as mere ordinary mortals. The holy unction of the Lord's Anointed has fallen from the heads of kings in the eyes of the people, and when we also robbed them of their faith in God the might of power was flung upon the streets . . . .
---
James Perloff, author of the pioneering conspiracy book, The Shadows of Power, has just released a new Kindle book, Truth Is a Lonely Warrior, which comprehensively examines the methods the Illuminati have used to create a satanic New World Order. The preceding article is a modified excerpt from this book.
---
First Comment from Marcos:
Even though it is true that Marxists hated the monarchies, it was not because they were all good and honorable. They were just an obstacle for the advancement of their agenda.
The author shows little knowledge of the Bible. God was against monarchy from the start. He openly warned Israel that a king would steal from them and use their daughters and sons as semi-slaves. He equaled desire for a king with rejection of God Himself. It is basically the OPPOSITE of the author's thesis.
1 Samuell 8 -4 So all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah. 5 They said to him, "You are old, and your sons do not follow your ways; now appoint a king to lead[b] us, such as all the other nationshave."
6 But when they said, "Give us a king to lead us," this displeased Samuel; so he prayed to the Lord. 7 And the Lord told him: "Listen to all that the people are saying to you; it is not you they have rejected, but they have rejected me as their king. 8 As they have done from the day I brought them up out of Egypt until this day, forsaking me and serving other gods, so they are doing to you. 9 Now listen to them; but warn them solemnly and let them know what the king who will reign over them will claim as his rights."
10 Samuel told all the words of the Lord to the people who were asking him for a king. 11 He said, "This is what the king who will reign over you will claim as his rights: He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and horses, and they will run in front of his chariots. 12 Some he will assign to be commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and others to plow his ground and reap his harvest, and still others to make weapons of war and equipment for his chariots. 13 He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers. 14 He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive groves and give them to his attendants. 15 He will take a tenth of your grain and of your vintage and give it to his officials and attendants. 16 Your male and female servants and the best of your cattle[c] and donkeys he will take for his own use. 17 He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become his slaves.18 When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, but the Lord will not answer you in that day."
19 But the people refused to listen to Samuel. "No!" they said. "We want a king over us. 20 Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to lead us and to go out before us and fight our battles."
Perloff replies:
Tracy said (June 26, 2013):
Not to belabor the point, but I will just reiterate what respondent Marcos said. And reference those same scriptures!
The Bible indicates that monarchy is NOT God's preferred form of government. What he indicates
he wants is tough for most of us to understand, because we almost never see it. God wanted to have a prophet who was faithful to him, and upheld his ideas and precepts and passed them on
to the population. When and if there was a problem, a group of 12 judges were there to help
administer justice. No King. No premier, prelate, president, etc. The cultures of the day worshiped their monarchs as semi-divine beings.( see Nebuchadnezzar, the pharaohs, etc) The God of the Bible did NOT go for this. Also remember, Israel's kings, with just a few exceptions ( David being one) were mostly a bunch of losers. Sorry, they were. All this was to show us something about life, and how it was to be lived on Earth. The lesson was basically ' leave government to God. Respect and love each other, and handle your affairs, public and private with maturity, love and respect for others.' Looking forward to the day we actually finally achieve this. I respect Perloff's statements, I just disagree with them.