Mary said (September 10, 2026):

Some strains of Judaism are satanic, but not all. The mainstream purpose and goal of Pure Judaism was to bring the Messiah into the world. This pure form was fulfilled in Jesus Christ and His teachings. Jesus fulfilled over 300 Old Testament prophecies. "He came unto His Own, and His Own received Him not, but to as many as received HIM, to them gave He the power to become the Sons of God."

The fact that the chief priests and scribes rejected Him does not wipe out the fact that thousands of Jews RECEIVED HIM AS SAVIOR AND LORD AND THUS BECAME THE SONS OF GOD AGAIN, that which Adam lost for us all in the fall, as Christ made total reconciliation with God possible for mankind once more through the blood atonement of His cross as the Promised Lamb of God Who came to take away the sin of the world.

Judaism is NOT Satanism. In its original, purest and intended form, it was the forerunner of Christ and Christianity, the very antithesis of Satanism.

rh said (September 9, 2026):

Good advice all around in this article. Unfortunately, we have moved from young couples being married and beginning families, say in their early 20s, a generation or two ago, to shaming young people if they were consider marriage that young today. Consequently, marriage age for men is near 31 and women is 28 in the USA. If I tell people not shame a young people with children, they become quite angry…so I let it go. But we need to see that it’s okay to have children in our early 20s and we need to MYOB. IMHO.

Anonymous said (September 7, 2026):

As a former college philosophy major, discovering the truth about Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre leaves me in a state of absolute shock and disgust. In academia, philosophy is taught as if it exists in a sterile vacuum—completely cut, cleaned, and detached from the actual human beings who wrote it. We are never taught the real underpinnings of these thinkers' lives or how their personal pathologies shaped their theories.

It’s the exact same sanitized lie we were fed about Socrates—that I learned years later after college. Scholars love to frame his execution as a high-minded debate over abstract theology or political dissent, claiming he was sentenced to death for "impiety." But the "impiety" charge was just a respectable legal cover for the public outrage over what was actually happening: Socrates and his entire homosexual inner circle were engaged in the systemic exploitation and sexual grooming of young boys. Many modern classicists and historians emphasize that the idea of ancient Greece as a modern-style, openly "gay-friendly" society is largely a myth created by misinterpreting ancient texts through contemporary lenses. In reality, Athenian law heavily penalized passive adult homosexual behavior with the loss of civic rights (atimia), and using intellectual authority to prey on young students was viewed with deep anger, distrust, and disgust by the public. Yet modern education completely scrubs these predatory dynamics from the curriculum to protect the mythical narrative of the "great thinker."

This compartmentalization in education is a massive failure. You cannot separate a thinker’s philosophy from their underlying personal depravity, just as you cannot separate an addict’s daily choices from their addiction. Severe compulsions and perversity dominate a person's mind, fundamentally distorting how they view power, consent, and human worth. Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche famously argued that every great philosophy is essentially "the personal confession of its author and a kind of involuntary and unconscious memoir."

Beauvoir and Sartre’s brand of existentialism—with its radical rejection of traditional morality—was never a noble pursuit of human freedom. It was a self-serving, post-hoc rationalization designed to give themselves ideological permission to sexually exploit and groom young people. Framing predatory behavior as "intellectual liberation" is a sick lie. When a philosopher’s private life is built on exploitation, that toxic core saturates their entire worldview. Academia needs to stop protecting these icons and start teaching the truth: their philosophy isn't a breakthrough, it’s the blueprint of their own sickness.

JC said (September 7, 2026):

Child sacrifice, cannibalism, the worship of demons, rule by the money power, children and women, etc., are all described in biblical prophecy. Yet nobody seems to see how biblical prophecy describes current and ongoing conditions so accurately. IMO, the primary reason for this spiritual blindness is that the bible and religion in general have been incredibly discredited by the actions and inactions of so-called "Christian and Israeli Zionists."

Everyone with an IQ above 70 should be able to make the connections, but the Zionists by their incredibly wicked and evil deeds have discredited the only source that actually tells it as it actually is, biblical prophecy. It's not just the movie "They Live" that describes the Epstein Class; biblical prophecy predicted it all centuries ago.

Andrew said (September 6, 2026):

While I accept that our mass media, leaders of both major political parties and heads of big business, banking and government are under satanic control, your average readers cannot think beyond what they see on TV, Internet, etc.,,,,

JUST HARD TO BELIEVE which results in paralysis of the average reader, CRICKETS-- The average person is overwhelmed by the thought of bankruptcy of the US Dollar in order to introduce CBDC as explained by CA FITTS…so more CRICKETS

Although most people (CHRISTIAN ZIONISTS) equate Benjamin Netanyahu and Israeli Zionists with Jews, real Jews and their Talmud teach the exact opposite. Remember that Theodore Herzl,, founder of Zionism, was an outspoken ATHEIST…

Insider said (September 6, 2026):

{ Well, first I would like to say ( John Carpenter's They Live ) was based on true stories !!!!! }

{ And I will state that there are E.T.'s and they do help with controlling the world !!!!! }
{ Lets just say that the so-called jew is an implant from an E.T. !!!!! }

{ All of your politicians are nothing more then puppets too whom would love a seat at the real table !!!!! }

{ But there's no need for them, as Catherine Austin Fitts Says: ( They are just chew toys ) !!!!! }

{ And this world is going to get so much more crazier and crazier as time moves on !!!!! }

DA said (September 5, 2026):

Henry (Mike is right about taking away women's voting rights) yes its harsh but its too late.

Voting would work if people understood who really controls the world. Women are led by their emotions- end of argument. I understand not all women are psychopaths in their thinking. If we are being honest, most women vote based on how they feel and not facts or Truth. Men are more objective than women, the Bible says women are the weaker vessel and due to the Clancy case you can see why.

Women tend to lie to themselves alot. They need to be led because women left to their thoughts always ends in bad choices. Men need God to lead them and Women need Men of God to lead them.

Mike is right, men have drop the ball and allowed women to do what every they want. What has allowing them to vote gotten us? We allowed them to vote, enter politics and lead and they are just as corruptible if not more than men..More than ever women are in leadership positions and have things gotten any better.

Even the video game industry is a mess cause women and beta Men are in charge and are injecting female empowerment and LGBT values and politics into games;

I don't like Andrew Tate, but he made a good point in one of his recent interviews.."Men and Women are equally important", but they are not the same. Men are better at some things than women and women are better at some things than men. Check out this video by "Living a life of Abundance"

https://youtu.be/u8s8NicmMRc?si=9O6Sa6ukhqat0W8X

you really want these women voting on anything.. ]

The Lindsey Clancy case has exposed how far women have fallen and like Mike says this is on men..Social Media needs to be destroyed, and to be honest the internet along with it. Now everyone is a dam scholar/intellectual. I know there are good women out there who are against the madness of the Lindsey Clancy case. The problem, thanks to social media the idiots have the loudest voice.

Men are messed up but women are on another level. I have to admit thanks to social media, women are exposing themselves and in my opinion its coming from God..Our Sin and Disobedience is why both men and women are in this mess. We need God Henry, we need Jesus. I found an interesting bible verse that made me think about the Lindsey Clancy case and all the crazy women who support her. Deuteronomy 28: 56-57, most of this chapter is about the "Results of Disobedience". "(56)

The tender and delicate women among you, which would not adventure to set the sole of her foot upon the ground for delicateness and tenderness, her eye shall be evil toward the husband of her bosom and toward her son, and toward her daughter, (57) And toward her young one that cometh out from between her feet, and toward her children which she shall bear: for she shall eat them for want of all things secretly in the siege and straightness (hardship) wherewith thine enemy shall distress thee in thy gates....Men just need to be bold and tell these Modern Women to sit down and shut the F up. more crazy women post

RH said (September 5, 2026):

Your post on “They Live” is great! My only thought is we must be careful in who we say are human and those who are not. If all men are created equal by God, then all men fall under God’s Natural Law (reference: Mere Christianity, which I am reading.). If an alien force comes to conquer, I see it as war between species. If men believe they are above their fellow men, we are witnessing mental illness and criminal behavior. It is not war, but crimes to be prosecuted. I do not believe this is behavior is new to mankind at all.

JD said (September 5, 2026):

"Governments are moving quickly to roll out digital ID systems that tie together identity, payments, and access to everyday life. In the United Kingdom, we're already seeing the push to make digital
identification mandatory. Once money is fully digitized, every purchase can be tracked, limited, or even denied."

True. However is this "only" happening because Jews control most of most governments,or is it happening because its what governments must always_ do to try to maintain power over their [newly] dissatisfied,
partially awake, slaves ? In other words, if jews were not controlling governments, would not exactly the same process of further power
centralization still occur? I say "yes", while yourself and most other followers of your site will presumably assume "no".

Reality Fact: Government, regardless of which idiotic religious cult runs it, is the enemy!

"Government is a cancer masquerading as its own cure" ~ onebornfree

"All government, of course, is against liberty.”
H.L. Mencken

"Dreams, that governments will keep you free,
Dreams, that they ain't just war and slavery"~ onebornfree
Song "Dreams[Anarchist Blues]":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zbs7_zH7p8C

Jennifer said (September 7, 2026):

As an American woman of mixed heritage—Northern European and Native American. I disagree with the idea that many women are supporting Lindsay Clancy simply out of gender loyalty but I agree they are supporting her for an anti-depressant defense. The women and men, I personally know supporting Lindsay Clancy are people, who are on anti-depressants themselves and they have a vested interest in having the anti-depressant-get-out-of-jail-free card.

I’ve seen firsthand how these medications can alter behavior and trigger unprovoked aggression. While visiting a family to help with funeral arrangements after their mother passed, I was alone late one night watching a movie. One of her adult sons entered the room in a zombie-like state and suddenly started kicking my feet.

When I screamed, it shocked him out of a sleepwalking episode. He claimed he was dreaming he was in a soccer game. It turned out he was dealing with serious health issues and on heavy antidepressants—he adamantly defends Clancy.

In another terrifying incident, I was driving through a slow, crowded parking lot with passengers. A man in his early 50s sitting directly behind me—who was also taking antidepressants—suffered a sudden panic attack. Disoriented and misjudging a car stopped at a stop sign, he panicked and reflexively wrapped his hands around my neck, trying to choke me out to "stop the car." I was forced to slam on the brakes to protect my life. Afterwards, he admitted his panic attack drove him to react violently as he mistakenly thought I was driving into a car.

Despite witnessing how these drugs impact people, I still believe Lindsay Clancy must be held fully accountable and convicted of murder.

The argument that her actions should be excused because she was on multiple medications ignores the fundamental principle of personal autonomy and responsibility. Every prescription antidepressant comes with a long, explicit list of warnings regarding severe side effects, including agitation, violence, and suicidal thoughts. Taking those medications—and compounding them—involves a choice and a known risk. It is no different than someone making the choice to drive drunk or becoming consumed by an addiction; the decision to engage with the substance or behavior carries responsibility for the consequences that follow.

When I experienced depression over a decade ago, I was well aware of the dangerous side effects associated with these drugs and chose not to take them. Adults cannot treat their doctors like authoritarian parents and abdicate responsibility for what they put into their own bodies. Furthermore, accumulating 13 different prescriptions often means navigating multiple providers without full transparency—another layer of personal misuse of the medical system.

If society allows medication to serve as a complete shield against criminal conviction for murder, it establishes a dangerous legal precedent. The doctor is not on trial here, nor is the pharmaceutical company. Lindsay Clancy needs to be held accountable under the law to make it clear that taking prescription drugs does not grant anyone immunity from the consequences of taking a human life.

According to data from the CDC, roughly 65% of American adults—over 130 million people—take at least one prescription medication, with millions on psychiatric drugs that carry black-box warnings for extreme mental and behavioral side effects. If we create a legal precedent where taking a prescribed drug absolves a person of criminal intent or personal responsibility, tens of millions of people suddenly gain a legal shield for violent behavior. We are moving into a dangerous era where people want a pharmaceutical get-out-of-jail-free card for murder.

rh said (September 6, 2026):

Clearly, Mr. Stone blames men! I say it’s bigger than that. The destruction of Family probably did more harm to the capital structure of the working American family than anything else. Expenses rise for both ex-spouses. Child support is a huge financial setback for most displaced fathers. I would argue that this is part of the socialist's plan…keep the masses stupid and poor. Socialism does not tolerate your individual monetary success. Only theirs. And the greedy so-called "capitalist" employer needs broke employees to show up for thirty years too, at skinflint wages.

In their barnyard, it's not good enough for these pigs to eat all the corn; but it's just as important that you eat none of it for them to feel okay. Destroying the Family served their ends. Now, we need to rebuild. Can we?

When I was quite young, my parents’ generation looked down on divorcees, especially women. They just saw it as wrong I guess. We have moved a long way from that position in 70 years.

JM said (September 5, 2026):

mike stone is 100% correct about women. glad im single never wasted time and money on women. had to work in a factory once with them ghastly money grubbers

Thanks J

"Men are no longer women any more" because women are no longer women.

rh said (September 3, 2026):

From Steinem’s bio on Wikipedia: her mother was insane, her father a traveling salesman but she graduates Phi Beta Kappa from Smith College!

Groomed by CIA or whomever all the way is plausible IMHO.

Anon said (July 12, 2015):

In relation to feminism channeling people to look at the world a certain way - psychotherapy/psychiatry does the same.

Both serve the state. As Hillman says, "Psychotherapy has become a servant of the state." Keeping people passive and feeling helpless. Paying another $300 to "look within" to solve issues better suited to putting better people in Congress or organising a meeting for better working conditions and pay. Or maybe organising a meeting to speak about banking enforcing slavery via a mortgage.

Hillman talks of a client he knew that spent 10 years in therapy with a low level depression. She had a high paying job. She decided to move away from LA to Colorado. Her therapist said she shouldn't as they were making progress with her "inner work". She went anyway and immediately her depression lifted. Hillman call's it "moving van therapy".

The internet is the same - people staring blankly at their screens terrifying themselves with Alex Jones screaming the government is coming to take their guns and their kids to forcibly vaccinate them. I'd say the internet has become a "servant of the state" letting people think they are changing the world via a Facebook "like".

I hope the context is more clear.

Kure said (July 9, 2015):

Thank you for your efforts to bring valuable articles to your readers' attention. This write-up is strikingly awakening about the level of destruction meted on normal lives; the responses that follow are equally revealing.

I have decided to store it in my mails because I want to revisit it. Then I can reach you again for proactive initiatives. For it is easier to destroy than to build. If the cynics about Family and Marriage are working tirelessly to achieve their aims, the builders should be ready to sacrifice double to counter them.

Duane said (July 9, 2015):

Betty's and Gloria's work were very effective (if only indirectly...)....

Have you notice what is becoming more and more prevalent among each succeeding generation of amerikan "women"?

1) No Husband
2) No Children (always dogs or cats, sometimes 15 animals...)....
3) a new "boyfriend every 6-18 months until they become menopausal, looks crash and men don't want to go near them anymore....
Quite honestly...by the time they've been out whoring around for as little a 2 years could they EVER properly bond with ANY man?
What normal man would want this type of whore to bear their children? I DON'T.....
My mother was a crazed vicious whore who had children from three different men and mostly followed the pattern I aforementioned
except she didn't work, mostly collected welfare.... I didn't ever psychologically start to recover from that mess until I was in my late 30's.
I'm still thankful everyday for the loving maternal Grandparents I had who saved me.....

I have several pathetic females in my family currently in various stages of this mess......Not looking good for them....

Ann Diamond said (July 9, 2015):

Steinem was never one of my heroines, although I joined "the women's movement' in 1970 at age 19 -- it was part of my transition out of my parents' world and into the exciting world of my peers. We believed we were changing the world. Most feminist leaders at the time were disappointing up close -- I met Marlene Dixon, Germaine Greer, Phyllis Chesler between 1970 and 1974 when I abandoned women's groups. In person, Chesler seemed like any self-centered New York Jewish Princess, like Ms. editor Robin Morgan who I saw in a video, browbeating her pathetic mouse of a husband. Anyone with a sense of smell could sense the heavy aura of cynicism and arrogance surrounding these supposed leaders.What's interesting in retrospect is their stellar rise to fame and fortune, which only happens when you have CIA-Rockefeller backing.

Sixties culture saturated with 'stars' from intelligence backgrounds.Columbia's psychiatry institute locked up people like Allen Ginsberg, training them via mind control imported from Nazi German to unleash them later as leaders of a generation. J.D. Salinger appeared on the cover of LIFE and TIME on the basis of a first novel. Naturally young writers dreamed of repeating his formula. Sylvia Plath wanted to write a feminist Catcher in the Rye featuring a female Holden Caulfield -- if you read her novel The Bell Jar, set in 1953, it's full of Cold War mind control references. By 1963, she'd committed suicide -- I think she actually had a soul that could not survive in a world of lies. Her ex-husband, Ted Hughes, was a renowned Mason and became Poet Laureate composing verses on the Queen Mother's birthday.

It's much clearer sorting all this out in retrospect, rather than living through it as a confused young person. But who did these puppets really influence -- other than the other up-and-coming phonies who struggle to climb the ladder of fakery? Seen from any angle, it's all just Voodoo --

Mary said (July 8, 2015):

Gloria Steinem article is amazing Henry! My exact thoughts...she "Eve" has ruined the world! How she pulled it off is even more amazing.....people need to listen to God and not female who think they are a god!

Al Thompson said (July 8, 2015):

If there is anything rotten or evil in society, most of the problems come from government. Feminism is just like the homosexual movement. Both are anti-social and they do great harm to the bulwark of society which is the family. No one can overstate the damage these ideas do to society. And religions are of no help as they stand by and watch the carnage without lifting a finger to help. They don't want to lose their tax privileges that they get from the government.

I suggest that people look more at the results of the last few decades as that will tell us everything we need to know. Society has been stressed to the limit with feminism. I had to deal with that nonsense in my early twenties. Women then were a real problem for a man like me who just wanted to have a nice family and a good career to support that family. And there's no point in looking to the same people to fix the problem because they are the ones who created these problems: government and religion. In my opinion, women are not attractive if they are feminists. Today, many are nasty wenches who want to feed their own selfishness.

Steinem is supposed to be a Jew yet she supports the same exact system of communism-socialism that got millions of Jews killed. In fact, millions of non-Jews have lost their lives too, more so than the Jews. I ask the question: How can Jew libtards support such an evil system that breaks down the family?

To support the evil of destroying the proper relationship between men and women, people like Steinem are just rotten to the core. Given the satanic symbol she uses we can see that she knows exactly who she works for; the Devil. Notice that the closer she gets to the end of her life, her appearance is old. She has flabby arms and a wrinkled face. This happens to all of us, but you would think she'd be more aware of her mortality. She knows she has done wrong but continues to do it out of an evil pride. It is best to separate from people like this.
http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2014/09/government-and-religion-are-obsolute.html