Direct Link to Latest News


Lori Douglas' "Defense" is a Disgrace

July 25, 2012

(l.  Karen Busby, Professor of Law, University of Mantoba )

Manitoba's disgrace is compounded by Lori Douglas' lies, & feminists who defend the indefensible.

by Henry Makow Ph. D.

The Lori Douglas scandal disgraces the people of Manitoba, and discredits its justice system. The shame is compounded by Douglas' obvious lying and the Winnipeg Establishment's desire to condone her outrageous behavior.

Lori-Douglas2.jpgLori Douglas is not just any judge. She is the Chief Family Court Judge of Manitoba.  Will anyone accept her judgments on marriage and child custody when the following pictures are on the Internet?

Justice Douglas lies on a bed, eyes closed, her hands shackled to the bed frame.

A topless Justice Douglas has a dog collar and chain around her neck.

Her Honor is urinating on the grass.

"Waiting for Black C**k." Justice Douglas performs fellatio on a man.

The Canadian Judicial Council is holding an inquiry on whether to dismiss her. She should have resigned long ago. She claims to be an innocent victim, that her husband, Jack King, betrayed her by putting these pics on the Internet.

king.jpegIn fact, she is still married to Jack King, left, which is proof of her complicity. He solicited a Black man, Alex Chapman to have kinky sex with her in 2003 and take pictures. She actually met Chapman twice and cooed over the size of his abs. Admittedly she wasn't a judge yet, but certainly this behavior disqualifies her.

"What do you think? Are you interested?" King asked  Chapman in a May 8, 2003 email.

"I am making progress. She seems more interested at the moment in another woman + bondage, with her being the one tied up,"
King wrote.

"She suggested this evening... that you should be invited out here,"
King wrote three weeks later.

Are we supposed to believe King made this up? Douglas posed for the pictures. She knew they were online and she was willing to pose with Chapman until he decided to charge the couple with sexual harassment.  
Douglas thinks she can keep her $250,000 sinecure because she is part of the corrupt and decadent Winnipeg Masonic establishment.

Douglas maintains that the facts "were well known in the legal community" and even by the judicial committee which appointed her -- right down to details about the nude photo which Douglas describes as graphic, explicit pictures including bondage.

"Even the Chief Justice of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench was aware of the issue and supported her bid to become a judge, the documents state."

"Senior members of the bench and bar made it clear to Ms. Douglas that her husband's conduct did not reflect negatively on her. She was urged by them to apply for judicial appointment,"
her lawyers say.

As this appears to be true, then the whole justice system is rotten and more heads should roll. Why were they so anxious to get Douglas to be a family court judge despite her known character and example? Was it because of their rush to appoint feminists? The Masonic political agenda is to corrupt society.  

douglas.jpegDouglas, (left) is compounding her crime  by claiming to be an innocent victim. "The system of justice would be brought into disrepute if the victim of wrongdoing were punished," her lawyers state.

Give me a break!


Karen Busby is typical of feminist zealots who have reduced our "education" system to Illuminati (Communist)  re-education centers.

This is what her students think of her, from "Rate Your Professor." 

"She is terribly unfriendly, and more interested in her political agenda than anything else. Will quote "facts" not in the judgement to justify why the courts are wrong and she is right. Like many profs, if your conclusion is one she does not politically agree with, your mark will be lower as a result. Drier than dried mud in a dryer."

"Worst Prof at Robson Hall. She brings her political views into the classroom and God help you if you don't agree. Hates students and hates life. Transfer out of Manitoba or go to the other section if you are going to have her!"

On Monday, she published a defense of Douglas, "Judge not lest ye be Spanked" in the Globe and Mail. In my opinion, it calls into question her fitness to teach.

She begins by complaining that this inquiry should not be taking place. She says that posing nude online is now commonplace:

 "A 2008 U.S. survey found that one in five teens had electronically shared nude or semi-nude images of themselves and that almost 50 per cent of teens had participated in "sexting," the electronic sharing of sexualized images and texts." 

We're not talking about teenagers. We're talking about a Family Court Judge.

"If Judge Douglas loses her place on the bench simply because someone distributed nude photos of her - after promising to destroy all paper and electronic copies - many leaders of tomorrow will live in fear that they could face the same fate."

si-chapman-220-cp02957576.jpgHere, she is twisting the facts. Lori Douglas' husband posted the pictures, not Alex Chapman (left). Then Busby makes the case that bondage is mainstream and acceptable:

"Does it matter that these photos apparently show a judge in bondage gear? Research indicates that interest in bondage is higher than one might expect. A 1993 U.S. study found that 12.5 per cent of adults had engaged in sexual sado-masochism (S&M) at some time in their life. More recent studies indicate growing interest. A 1999 Canadian study found that 65 per cent of university students have fantasies of being tied up, whereas 62 per cent fantasize about tying up a partner. "

 This is typical of how feminists mainstream decadence.
Satanism makes what is sick and deviant seem healthy and natural.

This is satanic worship, whether Busby knows it or not. Where true Christians might perform acts of charity, Satanists perform deviant sex & prey on children.

Conversely, Satanism makes what is healthy seem evil, as when Betty Friedan compared being a mother & housewife to an inmate in a Nazi concentration camp.

Busby is also a "gay rights" activist.  Her argument continues:  

"If S&M expressions are mainstream and ubiquitous, how can it be concluded that the integrity of the judiciary is undermined just because a judge, prior to appointment, permitted her spouse to take photos of her wearing bondage gear?"

I would wager that Karen Busby is not married, has no children, and may even be a lesbian. She doesn't understand that the debauchery of S & M is antithetical to healthy families. Families require monogamy, fidelity and love; S&M requires promiscuity and emotions very different from love. Children require parents who focus on their welfare, not on titillating themselves sexually.

I don't want Karen Busby training future family lawyers. I don't want Lori Douglas deciding the fate of Manitoba families. They remind me of the network of elite perverts that extends to Jerry Sandusky in Pennsylvania and to Nebraska, Portugal and Belgium. 

The whole spectacle reeks of moral squalor and cowardice.  The church is silent. The media makes excuses. Politicians hide.

Society indeed is satanically possessed. Sexual debauchery is the drug. The Illuminati, and their feminist and freemason shills, are the dealers.


  Latest! - Canada Anxious to Bury Porn Judge Inquiry

-  Makow - Lori Douglas Scandal Exposes Masonic Underground 

Winnipeg Disgrace Now International - The Daily Mail Features Story

Jack King Tries to Save Wife's $250K Job

Is Manitoba Legislature a Disguised Pagan Temple?

Finally, some criticism of local Judges/Lawyers in Wpg Free Press 

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Lori Douglas' "Defense" is a Disgrace "

Sandra said (July 27, 2012):

What a den of vipers! The only difference between Lori and Jack, and the rest of our esteemed legal profession, is that Lori & Jack got caught. By the way, Chapman is not some paragon of virtue. His greed is quite remarkable, just for starters. The folks who commentate and generally run things want us to think that the only problem is that poor Lori got caught with her pants down (and her mouth full). Well, no, it's not the only problem. She is depraved, mentally ill and utterly without shame, trying (with Jack's help) to retain her job as judge of lesser souls. Amazing. Apparently this creature has a young son...I wonder how he enjoys reading the daily reports in the Free Press.

So she & Jack are still together, in spite of his extreme betrayal. Gee, they do think we're dolts. Any normal woman would head for the hills and file for divorce. Mind you, a normal woman wouldn't be doing these things in the first place, but still, you get my point, I am sure.

Brian said (July 26, 2012):

Great article on the elites defense of Lori Douglas! Believe me, people are actually buying into her charade of the innocent victim.

Both my wife and mother in law have swallowed this lie completely, blaming the men around her and forgetting she was part of it all along. I would not want this woman anywhere near my children, let alone passing judgment on families in this province.

Anthony said (July 25, 2012):

The passion in your article was really heartfelt, it jumped off the lines.

And it is insane, it's just difficult to even allow in the brain, even for a seasoned guy like me or your other readers. You stand before a judge, telling you: it's in the children's interest not to see their father.

Next she submissively accepts her husbands orders to suck black c**k while getting filmed.

You know: all her colleagues knew about it, so what's the problem?

And the power that women derive from this kind of submission. It's amazing. It's the same with hookers: in Sweden it's illegal to go to a whore, but being one is just fine.

That's feminism of course. But the truth is that many hookers love the powertrip of men coming to them because they are ruled by their cock and by their mother.

The real power is with the whore.

Dani said (July 25, 2012):

Hi Henry - The Daily Mail website covered the Lori Douglas story the other day, here's the link:

Figured you might find it interesting to see what people's comments were. Pretty much everybody was in favor of her. Nobody got what the problem was here. My comment is under the handle "The Mad Hatter," as you'll see, where I name check you. (click on "View All Comments" and then scroll about halfway down the comments to see mine.) Several people quoted me and poked fun at my stance, but surprisingly I managed to get over 50 thumbs up for my comment. None of the naysayers who poked fun of my comment got as many thumbs up. Leads me to think that many more people out there see it the way you do, but for whatever reason didn't post anything.

Also, I think it's good that you posted a couple pics even with black squares that illustrate exactly what she was getting up to, along with quotes of things her husband was posting about her online. As titillating as it may seem, that's unfortunately the only way people are going to understand. I agree with you that there was no way that she didn't know what her husband was doing. It's obvious they had an open marriage and where the husband played the role of cuckold. A lot of couples engage in that sort of thing and it seems to be a common fantasy for men to see their wives with somebody else, whether male or female, but now she's trying to back peddle and pretend she didn't know. She knew.

Adam said (July 25, 2012):

Wow, talk about [readers below] "straining at gnats".

Pornography is images in which the purpose is to produce sexual excitement. I presume these pictures are intended as exhibits to make it clear that this isn't just hyperbole. Instead of acting like school children -- given that this is a mature subject matter and presuming that the readers here are adults -- the repugnant nature of the images ought to cause deep concern over what kind of person would be presiding over you in court. Some readers may need to grow-up fast because our cushy living is about to end and we will be left with these kinds of people Governing/ruling over us.

A said (July 25, 2012):

With such a perv heading Shamily Court it's an assurance that the vile system is just that ... & must be exposed! Small wonder child hellfare has been shielded & perpetuated! Let's keep waging warfare prayer v. it,

Al Thompson said (July 25, 2012):

People want to think the best for our government but the sad fact is that government is just too destructive and they don't really help anyone. The judicial system is as corrupted as it gets. No surprise there.

Henry, you made an interesting move showing these photos.

Joe said (July 25, 2012):

Something for your perusal, this website "Secrets In Plain Sight"

contains some fascinating research regarding how the world's capitols are designed using Egyptian esoteric architecture.

Episode 13 Jerusalem Part 2 details how the Winnipeg state house is designed as a Masonic temple. Your website has mentioned much of this previously. Interesting fact is how Winnipeg appears to be the geographic center of North America. This only seems possible if Mexico and Central America are not included. In such a case, only British commonwealth and its derivative USA are included.

What do we really know about Winnipeg? It may be an escape zone for governmental types once society breaks down seeing how isolated the city seems to be. Or maybe it's something like a Bohemian Grove without the quick and easy access.

If there is anything anyone can add to our understanding about Manitoba and Winnipeg in particular, please publish it. For the shenanigans taking place there -- as if there aren't enough stupid things happening everywhere else -- what is the significance of this place? Apparently Vancouver, Regina, Edmonton and Yellowknife are not as critical in their importance to Canada's esoteric history, or are they?

A from Winnipeg said (July 25, 2012):

It concerns me greatly that Lori Douglas, who rules on the fate of families, has been compromised, both in moral value and moral example--not to mention other hidden skeletons waiting to be unearthed. She lacks the integrity one would hope to find in her position of such high public trust.

Furthermore, that she appears to be lying should indicate that she is corrupt, and absolutely unqualified to do the work she was appointed to do. It should also reflect on those who hired her.

David said (July 25, 2012):

I think your coverage of the Douglas case is good and the pictures are not out-of-place. People need to come to terms with what this is about. It might not be pretty but the Douglas case is a mild example of what is going on.

Christine said (July 25, 2012):

Really Henry,

Aren't you in favor of family values?

Isn't pornography AGAINST family values?

Then WHY are you publishing pornographic photos of depraved judges?

Whose side are you on?

With great disappointment,



I'm doing it because this is the only way to get a rise out of people. There were practically no comments before I did this. Nor were there any for the excellent Sandusky piece that preceded it.


Rolph said (July 25, 2012):

When depraved and wicket minds who have infiltrated the political and judicial system, a country is in deep trouble because real justice is lost, and all the cover-ups and excuses
wont restore it. Unless there is an intestinal fortitude for change by its people.

For all the debauchery we see and hear today has been the result of decades of 'brainwashing' by an entertainment, media and educational establishment system. So what was sown than,
we are reaping today. Unless there is an general awakening and peace uprising to take back of what we have been robbed, the spiraling descent into the abyss will continue.

Inas said (July 25, 2012):

Dear Henry,

I really respect the work that you are doing to expose horrific wrongs but why should our eyesight be corrupted by images we would rather not be exposed to. I would guess that many of your readers are not used to viewing pornographic images so I don't think that you should unwittingly contribute to the agenda of normalizing this. You know more than anyone else that even negative exposure is still exposure. ( Also a few weeks ago I couldn't open your site because of an article about porn in Brazil or something to that effect.)

Wishing you all the best


I'd like to hear from other readers on this issue, and the story in general.


Steven said (July 25, 2012):

In the eyes of many what justice Douglas was involved in isn't any thing worse than being embarrassing and only due to it being made known to the public. If you were to quit bringing it up I am sure the public would soon forget all about it. The public and their government don't care about right and wrong. They only care about power, money, real estate values, Israel and political correctness.

Truth, morality and fiscal rectitude are not on their agenda and they get annoyed when such things are brought to their attention. It is possible to save and correct some individuals through instruction and example but you can not do the same with nations with out spilling alot of blood and wiping out societies leadership,criminals and perverts especially after it has gone almost totally rotten. People follow the example and teaching of their leaders. If their leaders are wicked immoral people there will be a tendency for the public to do or tolerate what their leaders approve of. As above ,so below.

To have a good moral country you have to have leaders that lead by example and don't allow moral decay and crime in society. There is behavior that society and its leaders like and then there is behavior that preserves society and its leaders. That behavior is not always the same thing.

Joe said (July 25, 2012):

Holy Crap! the photos being on the Internet seems secondary to me. What kind of degenerates are on the bench these days.
If the photos never appeared on the Internet who knows how long this whore would be making decisions based on her perverted way of thinking, destroying countless lives.

it obvious she will not resign.

Some one should be reviewing all her cases, I bet more than half should be thrown out along with her.

Al Thompson said (July 24, 2012):

I'm not surprised at all by this kind of behavior. I'd say that most government people are perverts one way or another. Seeing the complete lack of morality within the government really does take their authority away. Government as we know it today is worthless and destructive.

A family court judge who does these unseemly things shouldn't be let loose in public let alone make these kinds of decisions. The tolerance of all sexual morality gets this garbage started, and it get progressively worse as time goes on. All of us go do better and this is a typical example of why people should raise their moral standards. Everyone would benefit.

E said (July 24, 2012):

Yes, & it seems like they're setting up the "husband," such as he is, for taking the heat off his wife so she can be a victim. Pathetic & dangerous.

The people of Manitoba should be outraged. Where are they?

The CBC has also shut down comments for this story. Musn't have anything nasty said about debauched judges must we? This way they can also spin the story in the "proper" direction. And she's just one who was exposed.

Where are the true suffragettes when you need them?

"Protest to be effective, must be followed by resolute action and at this crisis in world history when materialistic energy aims at overthrowing spiritual energy and moral values, action needs to develop into a world crusade for the Spiritual Humanity." Vida Goldstein, 1946

Judge's husband tells inquiry of sexual fantasies

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at