Direct Link to Latest News


Understanding the Cabalist Jewish "Left vs Right" Charade

June 12, 2022

lya_otto_h_kahn.jpg(left, Otto Kahn, 1867-1934)

"We Control Both Left & Right" -- Kuhn Loeb Banker 

In a candid dinner conversation after WW1, Kuhn Loeb partner Otto Kahn
was asked why the Capitalist bankers supported Communism. 

He replied they both have "an identical purpose, the remaking 
of the world from above by the control of riches, [Right] 
and from below by revolution [Left.]"  They are all Freemasons (Cabalists.) 
Their final goal is the deification of the Rothschild banking cartel posing as 
representatives of the Jewish people. 

Hence we have the Communist faction on the Left (globalist, homosexual, migration, US Demonrats, Canada, EU, Sweden) and the  Zionist faction on the Right (nationalist, heterosexual, US GOP, Brazil, Hungary.) Israel is at the fulcrum. No nationalist is ever critical of Israel. 

"We shall purify the idea [of God] by identifying it with the nation of Israel, which has become its own Messiah. The advent of it will be facilitated by the final triumph of Israel... " 

by Henry Makow Ph.D.
(Revised from Oct. 19, 2011 and Nov 25, 2019) 

Otto Kahn, (1869-1934) was a partner with Jacob Schiff and Paul Warburg in America's most influential investment bank Kuhn Loeb . 
Thus, it is worth recalling what he said about the Illuminati Jewish strategy.

AugusteComtedeSaintAulair251h.jpgIn his book Geneva Versus Peace (1937,) the Comte de St. Aulaire, who was the French ambassador to London from 1920-24, recalled a dinner conversation with Otto Kahn which took place shortly after WWI. This shocking expose is fast disappearing down the memory hole. 

Asked why bankers would back Bolshevism, a system supposedly inimical to private ownership, Kahn tugged on his enormous cigar and explained that the bankers create apparent opposites to "remake the world" according to their specifications:

"You say that Marxism is the very antithesis of capitalism, which is equally sacred to us. It is precisely for this reason that they are direct opposites to one another, that they put into our hands the two poles of this planet and allow us to be its axis. These two contraries, like Bolshevism and ourselves, find their identity in the International. [Presumably, he means the Comintern.]

"These opposites ... meet again in the identity of their purpose and end in the remaking of the world from above by the control of riches, and from below by revolution.

"Our mission consists in promulgating the new law and in creating a God, that is to say in purifying the idea of God and realizing it, when the time shall come. We shall purify the idea by identifying it with the nation of Israel, which has become its own Messiah. The advent of it will be facilitated by the final triumph of Israel...

"Our essential dynamism makes use of the forces of destruction and forces of creation but uses the first to nourish the second...Our organization for revolution is evidenced by destructive Bolshevism and for construction by the League of Nations which is also our work.

"Bolshevism is the accelerator and the League is the brake on the mechanism of which we supply both the motive force and the guiding power. 

"What is the end? It is already determined by our mission. It is formed of elements scattered throughout the whole world, but cast in the flame of our faith in ourselves. We are a League of Nations which contains the elements of all others...Israel is the microcosm and the germ of the city of the future."   

 People who presume to take the place of God are Satanists. Satanists redefine reality and morality, turning them upside down. They seek a worldwide political, economic and cultural monopoly institutionalized in a world government.

obamahitler.jpgThis is achieved by a Hegelian dialectical process of creating adversaries (thesis-antithesis) and achieving a synthesis which corresponds to their goals. In the process, potential opponents are eliminated.


In the Red Symphony revelation, insider Christian Rakovsky showed how Communism and Capitalism were part of this dialectical process. . In each case, the Illuminati Jewish banking cartel controls all wealth and power.

"In Moscow, there is Communism: in New York capitalism. It is all the same as thesis and antithesis. Analyze both. Moscow is subjective Communism but [objectively] State capitalism. New York: Capitalism subjective, but Communism objective. A personal synthesis, truth: the Financial International, the Capitalist Communist one. 'They.' "

In the USSR, the State owned the corporations and the bankers owned the State, i.e. State Capitalism. The US also has Communism objectively because the same bankers control most of the corporations.

gaither.jpgOf course, this is consistent with the famous 1954 quote from Rowan Gaither, 1909-1961, (left) President of the Ford Foundation: "We operate here under directives which emanate from the White House... The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shall use our grant-making power to alter life in the United States such that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union."


We are in the final stages of a long-term conspiracy by Cabalist Jewish bankers and their Masonic lackeys to erect a world police state and to control us by fraud and force (their watchwords.)This has been achieved by a contrived "dialectical process" best exemplified by World War Two and the Cold War where they fabricated and financed the adversaries. 

goldman-destruction.jpgDomestically, the Illuminati dialectic is mirrored by George Soros who funds the left, and the Koch Brothers who fund and control the right. 
Both are Illuminati Jews. The radical Left and Islam are also funded by corporations through the Tides foundation.  You can bet that this funding extends to media control through ownership or advertising. It also extends to universities, foundations and thinktanks.

Mass protests like Occupy Wall Street are part of this false dialectic. This would be real if they demanded 1. Nationalizing the Fed, creation of debt-free currency and disowning that portion of the national debt created by book entry. 2. Independent investigation of 9-11 and prosecution of those responsible for the attack and the cover-up. 3. All national political campaigns be publicly funded.  For the price of one battle cruiser, we could have real democracy.
4. Media monopolies be broken up. 5. NATO (Rothschild) Interventions be stopped. As is, popular resistance is a banker Punch and Judy Puppet Show.    

The Libertarian Movement and the anti-Communist movements of the 1950's were similarly motivated. We have no real political freedom, just as we have no real culture. Everything is designed to advance the NWO agenda, a total economic, political and cultural monopoly by the Illuminati bankers.
See part two - "We Will Dissolve All Nations" 

Related- Who are the One Percent?

-------------  The Cabalist Conspiracy Behind Covid


Otto Kahn also exemplifies how these bankers create reality by controlling what passes for culture. Kahn financed many movies and virtually created the New York's Metropolitan Opera. He was responsible for introducing Stanislavski, Nijinski, the Abbey Players, the Moscow Art Theater, and practically every other important personage and event in the most vigorous era of American theatrical history. He subsidized, sponsored, and had close relationships with Toscanini, Caruso, Chaliapin, Pavlova, Pirandello, Eugene O'Neill, Paul Robeson, Grace Moore, and hundreds of other artists whose names are now part of that history.

Apparent to all with eyes to see, their satanic agenda includes destroying marriage and family and mainstreaming satanism, homosexuality, pornography, promiscuity, pederasty, and incest. 


Related: Makow:   Our Illuminati Reality Bubble
Makow   Libertarianism Created to offset Communism
The Hidden Agenda beyond Occupy Movement

Freud - Don't Get Fooled Again

The Marxist Nature of the Occupy Movement

First Comment from Dan Butler (1955-2018):

This quote of the mighty Otto Kahn from no less than the French ambassador to Great Britain between world wars knocked me off my chair this morning.   I checked it out - the book does exist, so it's indisputable that Comte de St. Aulaire wrote. To my dismay, I found that no internet encyclopedia mentions ambassador St. Aulaire.  Seems somebody's tried to throw him down Orwell's 'memory hole'.

I kept digging and found undeniable proof of his existence in a 1921 newspaper including photographs

Here also is a scan of a 1937 book review of 'Geneva vs Peace':

"The thesis of this violent little essay on international politics is that League of Nations*, created to prevent war, has done nothing butk breed and foster it."

* The League of Nations was resurrected and rebranded in 1945 as the UNITED NATIONS.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for " Understanding the Cabalist Jewish "Left vs Right" Charade"

BR said (June 12, 2022):

Socialism/Communism is industrial vassalage/slavery thus is antithetical
to both democracy (partial individual freedom-to-operate) and USA-republic (full individual freedom-to-operate).

All forms of Socialism are killing local-initiative thus regressing their lands. All their currencies are weak (at least abroad),
because only holding private-property (one's wage) sacrosanct (unrobbed e.g. untaxed) keep a currency in strong-demand.

Socialism/communism is the most horrid form of fascism (no individual freedom-to-operate), including being the greatest agent of genocide. 'National' socialism stomps on all other nations while dumbing down one's own,
e.g. Hitler demolished the Academia thus lost the war (which was highly-scientific and vastly-technological).

'International' (read: between, thus outside of, nations) is pitted against all nationalities,
i.e. forms a global melting-pot (e.g. Israel and Obomunism) which is LGBT (down to drag-queens in kindergartens), because straight-inclinations don't mix racially from a sexual and familial perspective. Socialism screws you over.

Linde said (November 25, 2019):

The Judaic Supremacy (Zionism) is national supremacy and hegemon that tolerates no others. Communism is its imperium for the conquest of nations, land, wealth. Its Gentile Masonry is its middle managerial and overseer class which owes its allegiance to non-separation of Synagogue and state within that hegemon. And true to form: the Official Narrative and yada yada in the public forums is now completely dominated by the Jewish Privilege which demonizes the American or Canadian nationalism in its legitimate interests of its demographics and the land it occupies.

In the crack-up of the big corporate states founded by European nations ( now ZOGs), but originally founded upon Jacobin principles of the French Revolution, states which have Masonry as the basis of the social order, the crack-up is going to be along the demographic lines of ethnic heritage, language, culture and national origin – exactly as the crack-up after the Great War. Americans who have always identified just as ‘Americans’ and with others so identified will split along ethnic lines. White Americans will not tolerate Hatified cities that are being transformed into the US version of Pretoria or Harare This is where we are going in terms of the Big Tax-Exempt Foundations pushing Open Borders, Communism, UN Charter ‘equalist’ elections with ZOG protections and enablement for all the Federally funded racial interest/hate groups: CAIR, La Raza, NAACP.

The experience of the nationalist Chinese forces under General Chiang Kai Shek mopping up the Communist forces of Genocider of the Century Mao Tse Dong (funded by Kuhn Loeb) or the Rhodesian and South African forces mopping up the genociders of the Communist Revolution south of the Zambezi could well be repeated in the US and Canada – but if the Whites win, there won’t be any compromises with the Communist ZOGs or UN Charter elections with all Communist parties standing candidates under ZOG protections. No one wants to go there. But the Eurocode is taking us thereby great strides.

Anonymous said (November 25, 2019):

If you're as cynical as you sound why do you even bother to speak out?

You basically say that there is no hope EVER for ANYONE so why should we even try or learn about what's happening?

If I fight for our and my independence you say I'm playing into the Zionists hands. Or, if I fight against that I'm playing into the Communists hands. Is there a third way or is all life hopeless? If theres no point struggling because you are doing exactly what they want bo matter what you do, why should I even stay alive?

I love your site, have learned a ton yet do not have a defeatist outlook. I believe if we fight for the ideals set up in our Declaration Of Independence we can live the lives we want and not be completely under the thumb of evil bastards. Why wait with baited breath for Jesus to return if it is all hopeless anyway?

Thanks Troy

seems to me that the first requirement for realistic hope is to have a realistic understanding of our predicament


Bob A said (October 1, 2018):

Great article - not good for my paranoia!
As I was reading the thought occurred to me 'Why fight it? Maybe they ARE God incarnate?
Like a boiling frog, here in Canada, we're safe, affluent, well fed with a roof over our heads'
So what's the downside? Is there a bullet waiting for us ala Winston Smith (1984)?

Always enjoy your website



alas their ultimate aim is to enslave

they are doing it before out eyes

James C said (October 1, 2018):

I think Gary North said it best in his foreword to Antony C. Sutton book The Best Enemy Money Can Buy: "The United States financed the economic and military development of the Soviet Union. Without this aid, financed by U.S. taxpayers, there would be no significant Soviet military threat, for there would be no Soviet economy to support the Soviet military machine, let alone sophisticated military equipment."

It's the Hegelian Dialectic: problem, reaction, solution. In his book America's Secret Establishment (1986), Sutton also predicted the construction of "the new dialectic arm: Communist China" (p. 180). Brendon O'connell has thoroughly documented this ongoing fact. I vetted his sources and they checked out. For years, the Israelis have been transferring technology and business to Communist China. And yet president Trump is one of Israel's biggest supporters. This is inexplicable unless we're all being played, once again.

Pedro said (October 1, 2018):

Actually, From Major Jordan's Dairies says he was working for "the United Nations" shipping everything (for free) to the Russians via Alaska. A bit like the PNAC document for endless conflict against the "terrorists" being spelled out before 911. "Notice that on May 10, 1942, Major Jordan reported to "UNITED NATIONS DEPOT NO. 8, LEND-LEASE DIVISION, NEWARK AIRPORT, NEWARK,..."

This little gem of a publication from ~1952 Frank L Britton's Behind Communism is full of Jews, all those involved in the Communist takeover of Russia, and all those involved in Hollywood. If not Jewish, then married to one. Often he quotes philo semites from America at the time quite proud of their achievement and offering all the promises that Satan (and Mephistopheles) offers to dupes and victims bringing them nothing but an ugly world of pain. Care for a trendy "tiny house " that costs as much as a California Bungalow did in 1952?


Henrique said (February 6, 2014):

Great article, that's basically all there is to know of the practical side of the conspiracy. They force people to the cities, where there's less individualism and more socialization, thus more social coercion and resentment, as we compare our lives with each other, to then create and foment ideological movements that explore exactly those sources of resentment - keeping people fighting each other over oppressed minorities, bickering, writing thousands of books and engaging in absolutely sterile identity politics through their whole lives, never leaving their arrested development state to look up at the feasting Elite.

That's why Marxism was toxic from the beginning, not emphasizing Usury and preaching absurdities as the abolition of the family for being a "bourgeois institution that objectifies women". If in the mid-nineteenth century instead of Marxism a strong anti-usury movement had risen, all their plans would be at least delayed, but then again they would never allow such a movement. Usury from above, resentment-driving from below - recipe for where we are now.

Mike said (January 24, 2014):

A masterful job on once again highlighting, via fact and verifiable quote, the all to sad reality that our planet is controlled by a few. The more layers I peel I off the onion only reaffirm the correctness of your position.

To those that scoff upon your posits, I say, "If one steps back and examines history; the players, the outcomes, the results, the financial boons....a very clear picture emerges".

Please keep up the great articles. I've whittled down the sea of sites to just three. You are one of them.

David S said (January 23, 2014):

I think it is far from certain that Putin and his crew are working for the NWO. Of course it is possible that the apparent opposition to NATO moves is all theatre. However, that ignores some compelling arguments against that.

1) If it is all theatre, it is very elaborate theatre as it gives all appearances of being something of a cold war with genuine subversive efforts and cultural battles being waged (especially by the West vs Russia). It looks real enough. Note the following report from Wayne Madsen;

2) Putin's gang came in with the agenda of removing the western backed robber barons who were sacking the country. I think they really hated that bunch of carpet baggers and were determined to take matters into their own hands. They seem to have largely done just that and have maneuvered to maintain Russian economic independence, expand its economic-political sphere and find allies who will oppose the Western led elites.

3) Never underestimate the inherent distrust among the Russians for the West. It is there in other slavs especially the Serbs and the Bulgarians but it is clearly strongest in Russia. There are also slavs who look for assistance against Russian domination but just reinforces Russian paranoia. Even if there is some kind of tacit understanding among all the world leaders, the Russians will never want to see themselves as subordinate to the West.

I am sure there are plenty of traitors and agents within the Russian establishment working with the Western led elites but I am also sure that there is solid block there that sees itself as independent and will struggle to maintain that and will work against the West. They are not "good guys" or "white hats" but rather other mobsters who think they have their own territory and will do whatever they think they have to toward maintaining their independence. I think Putin's gang is part of that block.

Jim C said (January 23, 2014):

Once again you have brought to your readers more revealing information about the "big illuminati players" and "the plan". Don't quit.

The real conflict between "the big players" and those few warriors who openly opposed them such as Fagen and Lindbergh and many others took place before WWII.

Since the end of the WWII we have been witness to only minor "mop up squirmishes". There is no real resistance to "them" today. They have won "the war".

The complete degeneration of the soul of the American people as a whole is almost complete. Certainly there are pockets of resistance, but they are few and far between.

What passes as a "normal family" and an uplifting culture in America today would be one from outer space in 1920. Virtue, fidelity, honesty, truth, and loyalty to family members have no place in America today. Americans are all about pursuing fun, pleasure, self-gratification, and happiness. They took the bait, hook, line, and sinker. And soon there will be no family, just a bunch of men and women doing their "own thing". I feel sorry for the children.

Mariel said (January 22, 2014):

I am so grateful for the information you give us in this article, Henry.

But I equally astonished by the inferred condemnation of the theater productions of Otto Khan. I read the list, and on it are productions which
have been very important to me.

For instance, just this last Sunday I watched on Live from the Metropolitan Opera (PBS channel) "Eugene Onegin" the opera with the Tchaikovsky
score, taken from the poem of Pushkin. This opera was so great (and the entire performance) that it made my day bearable, a day which otherwise would have been passed in misery. It did what great art does, taking us out of ourselves into transcendence and what meaning there can be found for our painful lives. This opera glorified moral behavior and family life, (things that you also urge, Henry), and showed the sad end of the anti-social dilettante, Eugene Onegin.

Other things on the list of Kahn productions have also been important in my life. But of course I'm aware that "Hollywood" and "Broadway" have
given us some bad propaganda. Not all "art" is worthy. I am, for instance, aware that SOME of Richard Rogers' work (with Hammerstein or Lowe)
has put forth a message which drags down the spirit (I am thinking particularly of "Carousel", as that is the only example I can remember at the moment).

I would like it if you'd write something on how these productions by Khan were deleterious. My career was devoted to teaching literature (as well
as forming the vocabulary habits of those injured by inadequate high school preparation). So I am vitally interested. I made a habit, while teaching in community college, to use good literature instead of some of the porno stuff (like some of the "Southern" writers) which the other teachers used.

I would have considered "Eugene Onegin", the opera from the Me which I saw on PBS, a classical tragedy of the highest quality.



I am not familiar with this opera but modern art is Illuminati propaganda. Otherwise, they wouldn't fund it.


Robert K said (January 21, 2014):

Kahn is quoted here as saying, "Our mission consists in promulgating the new law and in creating a God, that is to say in purifying the idea of God and realizing it, when the time shall come. We shall purify the idea by identifying it with the nation of Israel, which has become its own Messiah."

This offers an explanation for the otherwise mystifying veneration by Canadian Cabinet Ministers of the State of Israel, as exemplified by their current pilgrimage there. They do indeed act as if they perceive Israel as God, or at least as the seat of God.

Of what bizarre notions can the mind of man not be persuaded?

Joe said (October 26, 2011):

As for the "Occupy Wall Street" movement with its spinoff "Occupy fill-in-the-blank(location)." May I offer some distinction between OWS and the TEA Party movement?

The TEA Party movement seeks to keep the government (specifically the Federal Gov't) from taking what is not theirs, that being the hard-earned wages of hard-working, productive Americans.

OWS on the other hand, wants the government to give to them, the OWS protestors, what is not theirs to have. Their whole "constitution" of demanding a $20/hour minimum wage along with loan forgiveness plus free everything stands completely juxtaposed to what the TEA Party stands for.

OWS is entirely Marxist in its origins and values. These protestors who want to "occupy" anything should try occupying some responsibility. Better yet, they should try occupying an outhouse or some shithole where they likely crawled out of.

The violence against them is going to be used by them to further their agenda leading to even further radicalized ideas. What's more, it seems some people think they are recreating the protests of the 1960's from which they believe actual changes took place. A closer look at policy during those times might show that it wasn't the protests against the Viet Nam War which lead to our withdrawel from Southeast Asia but rather budgetary issues.

When Occupy Fresno comes into play, I'll think otherwise about things...

Matt said (October 21, 2011):

This whole Occupy movement is very interesting. Ive been down to the Vancouver Art Gallery twice and I must say it is VERY odd with the "peoples microphone" with everyone repeating the speaker. Its funny because they have a PA system and they still use this CREEEEEPY neuro linguistic programming technique! I even saw a sign showing the hand signals for the crowd to follow. I am going to return next week to take some pics.

Here is the Live Steam of the Vancouver.
If they are not streaming live, they are just looping videos.
At 1pm and 7pm (pacific time) they have General Assembly which is usually streamed, I think. Last night they were trying to decide to LIMIT the amount of WHITE MALES in some of their committees and working groups! It was hilarious! Im sure they will discuss it again tonight because it started an uproar. Most of the people in the online chat did not agree, which was good to see.

Ryan said (October 21, 2011):

What I find most striking is traditional Roman Catholics with their social teaching on economics have seen right through this dialectic. For example, in "Beyond Capitalism and Socialism" (Norfolk, Virginia: Light in the Darkness Publications, 2008), the introduction provides the following comment:

"Monopolistic capitalism concentrates wealth in the hands of a few capitalists, and communism in the hands of a few bureaucrats, and both end in the proletarianization of the masses . . . Concentration of wealth is wrong whether it is done on the Hudson or the Volga" (page xix).

Or as Isaiah the prophet said long ago,

NAU Isaiah 5:8 "Woe to those who add house to house and join field to field, Until there is no more room, So that you have to live alone in the midst of the land!"

Pope Leo XIII, standing on centuries of Christian tradition and biblical teaching on social mores opposed by capitalism and socialism in his Rerum Novarum. They might not have been the experts you are in analyzing the ways of the enemies, but they had the Bible and Christian tradition.

I would encourage you to acquaint yourself with Light in the Darkness Publications and the Distributists and their strong defense of the family and rural life and opposition to the dialectic of capitalism and socialism.

Mark said (October 20, 2011):

Your, 'Banker Explained "Occupy America" Scam', is vary much key. What more proof of a conspiracy does anyone need? They have all the motive, capasity and oppertunity to bring about what has already largely come to pass. They speak it, and then magically it happens. Truly a strange code of legality that they live by: leaking out some of the truth of their agenda (albeit in veiled form) amidst all the lies, so that we will then consent by our silence, But some of us do object , vociferously, when given a voice (if only in authorised free speech zones), but they either get slandered, silenced, destroyed or killed. Surely they must know the minimum numbers taking to the streets in active protest or with force-of-arms, required to shortcircuit their plans? Typical of the psychopath to blame his victims for the evil that he does to them.

Debra said (October 20, 2011):

Eventually, "money has to go", but not in the system that created it, for that would create the worse means of a control. Money is a manipulative tool and can be devalued easily, by evil manipulation.

I disagree Fed should be nationalized. If by the Fed you refer to the Federal Reserve, it should be abolished. As above, it is the tool for the manipulation of the works and efforts of the labor of men.

'Nationalization", Political Campaigns" were both N.W.O. creations for the people's enslavement.

Each family (under the greater Tribe to which the family belongs) has no need for the government.

Satan (is spirit, not human) thinks steps ahead of men. Mankind cannot defeat Satan without God.

The Four Horsemen of The Apocalypse and The Two Witnesses (U.K. and the U.S.A.):-

Rob said (October 20, 2011):

I believe you in your concerns about how the Bankers are trying to direct the OWS into a socialist/communist control system. It is obvious that much is at stake here. There are people involved in OWS etc. around the world that are well aware of what is happening and the wanting the end goal to be that of freedom. Basically the end of all forms of money and bartering would bring about balance to our world. You can not control that which has no value upon it. It would also decimate the legal system in all it’s fraud, because it is currently based upon money.

I don’t doubt for a second that the Bankers are trying to co-opt this movement. Ethics is about to trump power and that is what this is truly about. There is no ethics in business, it is about money and exploitation of the poor. For one to be rich another must be poor. We are all created equal and thus we do not need to be slaving hours in a day to make the few rich. We need to focus on doing things that make everyone free. When you eliminate money you create freedom.

It is time to pull away from fear and go into love and truth. There is no love in terms of exploitation of humanity, thus money has to go. I do see that this goal is beginning to get legs and is the way of our future. The Bankers want a cashless society but everything of value assigned a credit mark and of course embedded chips that nobody wants. When money disappears and it will, the power associated with it will also go. People want to move into love and are tired of being slaves. The changes you suggest only put a band aid on the situation, it doesn’t free humanity, but it does stabilize things. But as long as we are ego centered in our thinking, there will always be people who will be dumpster diving for a living. Money has to go.



I posted this but I think it is nonsense.


Dan said (October 20, 2011):

In 2009 we saw the creation of the 'Tea Party Movement' which seemed spontaneous at first, but soon as I observed the cell that formed where I live I recognized all the features of 'handled' opposition. In September 2009 over million of them marched on the National Mall in Washington D.C. Rather than gathering consensus of the entire disfranchised public that should properly be on the same side, they fell right into the old pro-war neo-con mold and turned their hostility on the unemployed and aliens.

After all, the genesis of the Tea Party came out of the "town hall meetings" held by John McCain during the 2008 election.
The 'Tea Party' was created first and given time and media coverage to mature into full blown right wing controlled opposition. This bred a sufficient reaction from youth to want to oppose it, and lo and behold out popped the Occupy Together Movement. Not created by 'Anonymous', by the way.

The average person doesn't see that such events are set up as staging areas for handfuls of professional organizers to recruit people for what they believe are informal house gatherings to discuss what members of a community can do. They're never told that the organizers spend months in planning meetings. The protesters we see on TV are genuinely unaware of the organizational iceberg behind the 'movement'.

I venture to say the rough sketch planning for OWS and the Tea Parties was on the drawing board no later than 2006.
My street sense reasoning goes like this:

The American Political Dialectic is "Iron Fist" alternates with "Velvet Glove" . Bush and the NeoCons were obviously 'Iron Fist'. Once Iron Fist has accomplished it's stage of the long term business plan, you need "Velvet Glove" to act out policies not credible for Iron Fist to do. A perfect example of how 'Velvet Glove' is used is from a letter by Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger to one of her funders on how to keep black mothers from figuring out that Planned Parenthood's goals was reduction of black population strictly for racist reasons.
“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

Looking at current events this way, one can see why Obama been able to order US jets to bomb largely black Libyan villages, and just invaded Uganda last week.

"Barrack Obama is the most dangerous president in recent memory for Africa" - T. West, Afri-Synergy

Roger (General response) said (October 19, 2011):

Thank you! I had the distinct pleasure to read your book. Normally a book of that length I would finish in a day, however I took it very slow and concentrated on every thought. It is a masterpiece of truth!!

For years I have researched why the world is the way it is. I began my quest for the truth at age 30 while working on a trading desk. It was obvious to me nothing was as it seemed. An elderly gentleman at the firm overheard my questions and disgust about the way I saw things. He called me aside and asked me to read a book. The book was Tragedy & Hope. I read it, and since that time I have always been searching for truth. I found,as you have,that the truth is within. Everything outside of us is a reflection of our thoughts, we cannot change the outside without first changing our innermost thoughts. I long ago gave up caring about the outside, money and material things mean nothing to me. I realized how worthless they truly are years ago as I became successful, the more money I had, the less I wanted things it could buy. I was the opposite of most, I found "success" in the worldly sense very unsatisfying. My wife and children and our happiness through a simple family lifestyle was what brought me joy.

When Lehman Brothers collapsed so did my business, but the material loss had no lasting impact on us. I had awakened to the fact that money was an illusion, a trap, many years ago and therefore never let it get its hold on me or my family. I thank God everyday for the opportunity to experience life and I always put Him first. I gave up on organized religion many years ago also. Everything of this world is of men, my true home is with God. I look at our human body as a vehicle to experience this life. Our physical bodies are not who we are, sadly most have been tricked to believe our bodies are all we are. What a shame to fall into that trap.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at