Patrick O'Carroll - The Top Ten Nuclear Hoaxes (Part Two)
May 14, 2025
Freemason science is based on many false assumptions.
STEVEN YOUNG'S TOP TEN NUCLEAR HOAXES
FUZZY OR DUBIOUS FALLACIES IN FREEMASONIC "SCIENCE"
#1 THE APPEAL TO "AUTHORITY" FALLACY: This would include claims such as "Einstein said it" or "Einstein proved it in 1905" which is an appeal to "authority" that ignores the fact that Einstein was really a fake-"scientist". Einstein plagiarized "his" 1905 relativity theory and also included no references in it. This known plagiarism forced the Nobel Committee (nicknamed "the IgNobel Soviet") to award Einstein a Nobel Physics Prize "for his services to theoretical physics and especially for his discovery of the law of the PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT". The top four fake-"scientists" of all time were: Newton, Einstein, Oppenheimer, and Hawking.
#2 THE REIFICATION FALLACY: Reification means treating something abstract as if it were concrete. One example of this in Freemasonic "Science" is as follows: "Atoms and molecules are real because we have precise models of them". But, in reality, there is still no evidence that atoms or molecules even exist.
#3 CIRCULAR REASONING: One example of this in Freemasonic "Science" would be Brownian Motion, which is essentially the claim: "Atoms cause things to wiggle, so if something wiggles that must be caused by atoms". In reality, it is heat that causes wiggling but Einstein covered that with his folly called "the molecular-kinetic theory of heat". Another example of this in Freemasonic "Science" would be: "Quantum mechanics can only be understood by the smartest people; therefore those who understand quantum mechanics must be the smartest people".
#4 HASTY GENERALIZATIONS: A good example of this would be the "Double-Slit Experiment", which only proves that light is a wave. But Freemasonic "Science" extrapolated it to falsely claim: "this proves we have infinite parallel selves in alternative realities and that Schrödinger's Cat in a box can be dead and alive at the same time".
Quantum Physics also makes the sensational claim that everything that does not happen must be happening "in other universes". When Freemasonic "Science" claims that the "Double-Slit Experiment" "proves" that "particles can be waves, and waves can be particles", that is actually untrue. In fact, it does not prove that at all.
#5 AD HOMINEM ATTACKS: A good example of this might be simply: "That critic of Freemasonic 'Science' is not a credible 'scientist' because he has lost the plot".
Steven says the ATOM is a an idol, and that Atomic Physics is therefore a form of idolatry
· The atom is a false image or representation of God.
· The atom is loved, feared, and admired.
· The atom has the ("divine") power to create and destroy worlds.
· The atom is structured as a trinity (proton, electron, neutron).
· The atom embodies both genders (plus and minus).
· The atom hides the reality of the ETHER and helps Freemasonic "Science" to suppress experiments proving that the ether exists, e.g. George Airy's Experiment (1871), or the Sagnac Experiment (1895).
· The atom hides the reality of transmutation, whereby one metal can be transmuted to a different kind of metal through the application of heat. Instead, Freemasonic "Science" claims that each metal is a specific type of atom and that you cannot change one type of atom into another type of atom.
· The atom hides, or inverts, the reality of ALCHEMY (or maybe the atom was invented for this very purpose in the spirit of the "Age of En-Darken-ment").
· Like some "Deus Ex Machina", every tyrannical regime uses the atom to scare people.
Freemasonic philosopher Manly-Palmer Hall said: "We are the gods of the atoms that make up ourselves, but we are also the atoms of the gods that make up the universe".
The ETHER is symbolized by the Hexagram or Star of Remphan (of the Antichrist State of Israel)
But, the Atom is also symbolized by a quasi-hexagram.
STEVEN'S CONCLUSIONS ABOUT ATOMIC PHYSICS AND QUANTUM PHYSICS
· It is a 20th-century version of Ancient Atomism, or a case of "Ancient Atomism Re-branded".
· It is bizarre and illogical, and it makes unverifiable claims.
· It fails to prove the existence of the "particles" and "sub-particles" on which it is based, and which it also claims to describe.
· For over 100 years, people have been talking about it, but it never yielded any tangible benefit to humanity.
· Philosophically, it is rooted in idolatry, materialism, nihilism, and hedonism.
· Theoretically, it is riddled with misinterpretation and paradoxes, and can lead to solipsism.
· Practically, it has some ability to model energy and matter because wave equations DO work, irrespective of the fact that "particles" and "sub-particles" probably do not exist. At the same time, Freemasonic "Science" also misinterprets waves to be "probability distributions", although they are not that; they are just waves.
· It features a lot of fruitless pedagogy and intellectual posturing.
· Most Quantum Physics involves using the word "quantum" to bolster something or to make something sound more mystical or magical.
· Quantum Physics is often about making a single literal interpretation of an entire statistical distribution.
· Quantum Physics is incomplete as a theory and is often (or properly) viewed as a SOFT SCIENCE.
LINKS
This 1921 news-clipping urged folks to drink radioactive water.
The following link shows how the Rockefeller Death-Care Business buried "radium" and "radioactive" treatments by reusing those words in the nuclear hoaxes, and how this was a clear case of re-branding the good as "bad":
US geneticist Hermann Muller was awarded the 1946 Nobel Prize for Medicine for discovering that X-rays can induce mutations. But Muller deliberately LIED when he claimed there was no safe level of radiation exposure, which led to the Linear No-Threshold Model (LNT) or that "there is no safe level of radiation". A press release from his university stated bluntly: "Muller knowingly lied". Source: https://www.science.org/content/article/attack-radiation-geneticists-triggers-furor.
Dr Sadao Hattori was a proponent of the hormetic effect of radiation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis). Dr Kiyohiko Sakamoto showed how low-dose irradiation of the torso was the most effective treatment for malignant lymphoma.
So maybe God did not "make a mistake"? Maybe mild radiation was designed with a beneficial purpose in mind?
----------------
