Tyrone said (March 23, 2015):

Racism was first coined by mass murdering "Jew" Trotsky as a way to de-legitimize whites/Europeans racial collective interests and thereby empowering "Jews" and other non whites ethnic interests.

The more ethnic diversity a society has the weaker it becomes. Old America is a PERFECT example. The reason we rose above our former divisions (civil war etc) was because we increased the flow white/Europeans into America dramatically decreasing the minorities among us.

Race is a biological reality. It is a fact of life. It is NOT a social construct. Every other ethnic collective around the world is "racist" and it's to their GREAT BENEFIT.Only whites are told we must not discriminate in favor of our own and now we are on the verge of the all out physical genocide of our people in our own lands.

Would you work for the interests of your neighbor and his family at the peril of your own?

No sane person would.

Be a "racist"! In fact, you can call me Mr Racist because you "anti racists" are directly responsible for the destruction of our nation, our people, our children and one day you will me made to give an account of your suicidal pathology.

Kurt B said (March 23, 2015):

Conflicts between groups are always presented in the MSM as ‘racial’.

I contend the problem is cultural. People want to associate with people who more closely share their world view and customs.

I get along great with the minorities I work with because we share common interests; plus we dress and talk similarly. They are mostly Hispanic and Asian and are as assimilated as you could ask for.

A couple of decades ago I had hillbilly neighbors who had barking dogs in a kennel, let the feral cats rip open and spread their garbage around, played loud music all hours of the night and parked their cars on my lawn. I was at their door threatening to kick their ass a dozen times, but little changed until they moved out in the middle of the night. And they were just as white as I was.

I think the MSM is trying to gin up a race war to deflect attention from the plans of the Cryptocracy to reshape society and the world order.

Dan said (March 22, 2015):

I think that may be worded backwards. Should say "what's good for America and South Africa is good for Israel."

Americans don't want to return to state sponsored Apartheid of our grandfathers. What we want is for Media to stop telling us what we want. There's always a few people of any demographic identity that's going to fall for race baiting from the media and government. And those are always they ones they put on television under a magnifying glass.

Americans don't admire the Israeli State's 'intermarriage laws'. On the contrary, it's something that rings dissonant with American's infatuation with the 'Holy Land'.

--

Thanks Dan

I'm not advocating Apartheid just whatever it takes for countries to maintain their racial character.

henry

Andrew said (March 22, 2015):

The words, racist and racism, are not even in my 1929 edition of Webster’s Unabridged English Dictionary which confirms etymology.com and your observations that these words were coined to condemn the recognition of racial distinctions as symptoms of racism. 'Racist’ once meant racial supremacist ideology but when extended to recognition of distinctions — it become censorship and political correctness (thought stopping) which is another form of communist mind control.

In regard to modern Israel we must remember God Destroyed Israel twice to emphasize Jew are NOT the chosen people — at least — NOT ANY MORE.

Nice timely essay.

---
Notes: Observation from Etymology.com:

racism (n.) 1936; see racist.

Racist 1932 as a noun, 1938 as an adjective, from race (n.2); racism is first attested 1936 (from French racisme, 1935), originally in the context of Nazi theories. But they replaced earlier words, racialism (1871) and racialist (1917), both often used early 20c. in a British or South African context. In the U.S., race hatred, race prejudice had been used, and, especially in 19c. political contexts, negrophobia.
/

Wade said (March 22, 2015):

I am a white male of European decent. I voted for a black man who ran against George Bush senior for the Republican Presidential nomination. The black man's name is Alan Keyes. I did this because I searched out this man's beliefs and values and I agreed with him. I still think he would have made an excellent President. How many black people would EVER vote for a white man over a black man for any reason whatsoever. No... black people will 95% of the time vote for a black person regardless of how horrible a candidate the black person may be.

Let us be honest for a change...The truth is that yes, there are prejudice white people, but in no where near the numbers and percentages as we see in Blacks and Hispanics. Blacks and Hispanics are America's most prejudiced people by far. Most of this is very much secret. When alone together the true feelings of the majority of Blacks and Hispanics come out, and would shock most white Americans. Their prejudice and hatred against whites is actually a badge of honor and acceptance among themselves.

It is not the color of the skin, but rather the reputation of the breed that makes most any rational person move to the other side of the street when they see a guy walking a pit bull coming towards them. Now pit bulls come in white, black, tan, and two tone. The color has nothing to do with peoples response to that breed.

Every race of people on earth has a reputation that does not apply to every person who belongs to that race, but the reputation of that race in general is well known to all other races. Reputations and other people's response to that reputation is not conferred on a race of people. It is EARNED over time and experience.

Since this comment is not politically correct...I will be called a racist. This is the technique used to shut down people who tell the truth.