Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below- James Traficant - Americans are Prisoners of the Fed - Scroll Down

Americans Duped by Jewish Press, Polish Ambassador Reported in 1939

September 30, 2014

(left, Ambassador Count Jerzy Potocki leaving the White House)

A secret 1939 report by the Polish Ambassador to Washington demonstrates how
Illuminati bankers used organized Jewry to bring America into the Second World War.

First, they brought Hitler to power; then they used the Jews to ensure Germany
was destroyed.

Apart from being very profitable, the Second World War advanced the Illuminati's satanic
"New World Order" agenda by
killing 60 million goyim and by destroying Europe and the 'old order.' 

"Besides this propaganda, a war psychosis is being artificially created... These groups of people who occupy the highest positions in the American government and want to pose as representatives of 'true Americanism' and 'defenders of democracy' are, in the last analysis, connected by unbreakable ties with international Jewry."   - Count Jerzy Potocki

by Mark Weber
President Roosevelt's Campaign To Incite War in Europe:
The Secret Polish Documents

(Excerpt by

On 9 February 1938, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, Count Jerzy Potocki, reported to the Foreign Minister in Warsaw on the Jewish role in making American foreign policy:

"The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State Department is becoming ever more powerful ...

judea_declares_war_on_germany_02.jpg("Judea declares war on Germany while 500,000 Jews live there)

... The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general catastrophe. This mood is becoming more and more apparent.

In their definition of democratic states, the Jews have also created real chaos: they have mixed together the idea of democracy and communism and have above all raised the banner of burning hatred against Nazism.

This hatred has become a frenzy. It is propagated everywhere and by every means: in theaters, in the cinema, and in the press. The Germans are portrayed as a nation living under the arrogance of Hitler which wants to conquer the whole world and drown all of humanity in an ocean of blood.

In conversations with Jewish press representatives I have repeatedly come up against the inexorable and convinced view that war is inevitable. This international Jewry exploits every means of propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of conciliation and understanding between nations. In this way, the conviction is growing steadily but surely in public opinion here that the Germans and their satellites, in the form of fascism, are enemies who must be subdued by the 'democratic world.'...."


Of all the documents in this collection, the most revealing is probably the secret report by [the Polish Ambassador to Washington] Count Jerzy Potocki on 12 January 1939 which dealt with the domestic situation in the United States. This report is given here in full:

"The feeling now prevailing in the United States is marked by a growing hatred of Fascism and, above all, of Chancellor Hitler and everything connected with Nazism. Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews who control almost 100 percent radio, film, daily and periodical press. Although this propaganda is extremely coarse and presents Germany as black as possible -- above all religious persecution and concentration camps are exploited -- this propaganda is nevertheless extremely effective since the public here is completely ignorant and knows nothing of the situation in Europe.

NightmareBg.pngRight now most Americans regard Chancellor Hitler and Nazism as the greatest evil and greatest danger threatening the world. The situation here provides an excellent platform for public speakers of all kinds, for emigrants from Germany and Czechoslovakia who don't spare any words to incite the public here with every kind of slander. They praise American liberty which they contrast with the totalitarian states.

It is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign which is conducted above all against National Socialism, [the] Soviet Russia is almost completely excluded. If mentioned at all, it is only in a friendly manner and things are presented in such a way as if Soviet Russia were working with the bloc of democratic states. Thanks to the clever propaganda the sympathy of the American public is completely on the side of Red Spain.

Besides this propaganda, a war psychosis is being artificially created. The American people are told that peace in Europe is hanging only by a thread and that war is unavoidable. At the same time the American people are unequivocally told that in case of a world war, America must also take an active part in order to defend the slogans of freedom and democracy in the world.

President Roosevelt was the first to express hatred against Fascism. In doing so he was serving a double purpose: First, he wanted to divert the attention of the American people from domestic political problems, especially the problem of the struggle between capital and labor. Second, by creating a war psychosis and by spreading rumors about danger threatening Europe, he wanted to get the American people to accept an enormous armament program which exceeds the defense requirements of the United States.

3.pngRegarding the first point, it must be said that the internal situation on the labor market is steadily growing worse. The unemployed today already number twelve million. Federal and state expenditures are increasing daily. Only the huge sums, running into billions, which the treasury expends for emergency labor projects, are keeping a certain amount of peace in the country. Thus far there have only been the usual strikes and local unrest. But how long this kind of government aid can be kept up cannot be predicted. The excitement and indignation of public opinion, and the serious conflict between private enterprises and enormous trusts on the one hand, and with labor on the other, have made many enemies for Roosevelt and are causing him many sleepless nights.

As to point two, I can only say that President Roosevelt, as a clever political player and an expert of the American mentality, speedily steered public attention away from the domestic situation to fasten it on foreign policy. The way to achieve this was simple. One needed, on the one hand, to conjure up a war menace hanging over the world because of Chancellor Hitler, and, on the other hand, to create a specter by babbling about an attack of the totalitarian states against the United States. The Munich pact came to President Roosevelt as a godsend. He portrayed it as a capitulation of France and England to bellicose German militarism. As people say here: Hitler compelled Chamberlain at pistol-point. Hence, France and England had no choice and had to conclude a shameful peace.

Franklin-D-Roosevelt--Bernard-Baruch.jpg(left, Rothschild agent Bernard Baruch & FDR)

The prevalent hatred against everything which is in any way connected with German Nazism is further kindled by the brutal policy against the Jews in Germany and by the émigré problem. In this action, various Jewish intellectuals participated: for instance, Bernard Baruch; the Governor of New York State, Lehman; the newly appointed judge of the Supreme Court, Felix Frankfurter; Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau; and others who are personal friends of President Roosevelt. They want the President to become the champion of human rights, freedom of religion and speech, and the man who in the future will punish trouble-makers. These groups of people who occupy the highest positions in the American government and want to pose as representatives of 'true Americanism' and 'defenders of democracy' are, in the last analysis, connected by unbreakable ties with international Jewry.

For this Jewish international, which above all is concerned with the interests of its race, to portray the President of the United States as the 'idealist' champion on human rights was a very clever move. In this manner they have created a dangerous hotbed for hatred and hostility in this hemisphere and divided the world into two hostile camps.

The entire issue is worked out in a masterly manner. Roosevelt has been given the foundation for activating American foreign policy, and simultaneously has been procuring enormous military stocks for the coming war, for which the Jews are striving very consciously. With regard to domestic policy, it is very convenient to divert public attention from anti-Semitism, which is constantly growing in the United States, by talking about the necessity of defending religion and individual liberty against the onslaught of Fascism.

Makow Comment- Remind you of 2003? "The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history." Remind you of Ukraine 2014?

First Comment from John:

Mark Weber at the IHR has done more responsible work on Germany and WW2 than maybe anyone else I've read. This article here is no exception and is possibly the best condensed summary of America's role in the Illuminati's plan to unite democracy with communism on the battlefield.

The media first creates the "boogeyman", Hitler, then manufactures the bogus intel on his nation, and then with their power in the high places of their foreign host nations like America, England, Russia, and France begin to force under pressure through media propaganda and this bogus intel these heads of states to act by declaring war on the Illuminati's enemy, Germany.

End result; 60 million Russians, Asians, Jews, and Europeans dead and the forming of Modern Day Israel as a nation which would be the headquarters for the New World Order in their quest for hegemony over the world.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Americans Duped by Jewish Press, Polish Ambassador Reported in 1939 "

Dan said (October 1, 2014):

Count Potoski was basically assuring the Polish government they could depend on American intervention in the event of war with Germany. That could have only been good news to the Polish military in 1938.

After WWI Poland demanded and got large concessions in the Treay of Versaille. They wanted most of Prussia, but settled for a large swath cutting off West Prussia and most importantly, the sea port of Danzig on the Baltic coast. The League of Nations declared Danzig "free", but gave Poland control of railways, roads, even the postal system.

It also helps to know that the Polish army was more powerful that Germany's until 1934. During the weakest years of the Weimar republic Poland's diplomacy reflected that. They'd been aggressive against both Germany and Russia when both were collapsed.

Here's the point. In 1938 Poland had reason to fear the rearmament of Germany, but in 1936 they refused to take Reichsmarks for their transit fees, threatening to effectively stop import/export flow from the Danzig port to Germany.

Now, in October 1938 Germany offered to recognize Polish sovereignty over much of West Prussia in return for railroad corridors connecting the goods between Danzig and Germany. Despite the fact that the Weimar Republic had rejected such an offer from Poland after the war, Poland stalled - while the Polish General Staff secretly prepared for war.

In this context, that's why it struck me that Count Potocki's report intended to reassure the Polish government that the United States was preparing to deal with Hitler. Keep in mind that in 1938, Britain's Prime Minister was Neville Chamberlain, whose policy was "appeasement".

If history had gone differently and Count Potocki reported that President Huey Long intended to keep the U.S. out another European war, I suspect Poland would been appeasement too.

Another important time frame to consider is that the German-Soviet 'Non-aggression Pact' was made on August 23, 1939 - less than one month before Germany and the Soviet invaded Poland.

Below - DeValera- Was Irish President a British Agent? (scroll down)

James Traficant - Americans are Prisoners of the Fed

September 29, 2014

traf.jpgAmerican Patriot, Congressman James Traficant, left, died Saturday at age 73. He represented Youngstown Ohio from 1985-2002 - re-elected eight times. He was framed for "corruption" in 2002, expelled from Congress and spent seven years in prison.

In a 1993 speech (below), he explained that Americans had lost their freedom because their personal property and wealth are pledged against the national debt. No doubt, this is the rationale behind the emergence of the US Police State. The international bankers are ensuring they can collect.  Terrorism is just a pretext. Just two months ago, Traficant began a grassroots campaign "Project Freedom USA" to put people pressure on Congress to get rid of the IRS and "divorce" the Federal Reserve.

"We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest is a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this unpayable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it."  James Trafficant in 1993

The Bankruptcy of the United States
(Abridged by

Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House of Representative March 17, 1993:

"Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner's report that will lead to our demise.

It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.

United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303)

The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: "The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States.' ....

The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender or underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same.

Assets of the debtor can also be hypothecated (to pledge something as a security without taking possession of it.) as security by the lender or underwriter. The Federal Reserve Act stipulated that the interest on the debt was to be paid in gold. There was no stipulation in the Federal Reserve Act for ever paying the principle.

Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913.)

"Hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.

In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.

t39__t625.jpg (Trafficant's incarceration symbolizes our own)

Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged one master for another.

This has been going on for over eighty years without the "informed knowledge" of the American people, without a voice protesting loud enough. Now it's easy to grasp why America is fundamentally bankrupt.

Why don't more people own their properties outright?

Why are 90% of Americans mortgaged to the hilt and have little or no assets after all debts and liabilities have been paid? Why does it feel like you are working harder and harder and getting less and less?

We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest is a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this unpayable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it.

America has become completely bankrupt in world leadership, financial credit and its reputation for courage, vision and human rights. This is an undeclared economic war, bankruptcy, and economic slavery of the most corrupt order! Wake up America! Take back your Country."


Youngstown native Scottie Spencer's Tribute to local hero

First Comment from Dan:

Traficant was still at it this summer.  You can see he was strong as a bull and would have lived a century if he hadn't had an accident.
Tractor accidents aren't rare, but the story has lot's of red flags that can't be checked out.   As his death is so very convenient I can only assume it was caused, though it's pointless to suggest it because they did such a good job of making it look like bad luck.

Jim Traficant Vs ADL Attack Of Pokerface Paul Topete Speech@Freedompalooza 3 (July 5, 2013)

Traficant was pretty well the last known voice we had speaking out on these issues, and he'd have never stopped.

In this video, you can hear his message was that the only way we get the country back is for all the groups to get together.
He means blacks, whites, rednecks, rich or poor.  That's exactly what media and government has been working so hard to prevent from ever happening.

Part2- Just found this talk by Trafficant from 2013.  He was leading an organized investigation of Bilderberg.   He explained the way to penetrate the secrecy is to look for tax dollars being used to fund anything to do with the meetings. 

"You've got to go beyond [protests] and you have to secure evidence," he said, as onlookers at this year's protest site listened intently. "We're announcing that me, Jim Traficant, in conjunction with AMERICAN FREE PRESS, will be serving on the U.S. government only, a broad-based federal Freedom of Information Act inquiry into the activities of Bilderberg." He then centered on this key question: Is there any money budgeted in any federal government account, or has there been any expenditure of public funds, that have gone, in any way, in subsidizing Bilderberg?"

"Therefore, citizens of nearly any nation--given what happens to nations ensnared in Bilderberg's assault since 1954 on economic and political sovereignty--also should seek hard evidence of their tax dollars being used for Bilderberg, since the involvement of any public officials with Bilderberg could then more easily be questioned--and ideally brought to a halt."

Bilderberg 2013 Jim Traficant 'It's About Money'   and

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "James Traficant - Americans are Prisoners of the Fed "

Robert G said (September 30, 2014):

Not only was he defender of the little guy against the IRS, he stood up for religious liberty protection against the IRS also. Thanks for writing the essay. I am surprised you knew about him. Ppl tried to cast him as an oddball, a poseur. This he was not. He was a man of deeply held convictions on freedom and liberty.

Mary said (September 30, 2014):

You made the situation understandable to thousands of us.

It is now no wonder why Nick Rockefeller told Aaron Russo about the time "to chip the serfs." It is how they view us and what the paperwork says!

Bert said (September 29, 2014):

Not only is the interest owed, as stated in the article, on the fraudulent creation of fictitious "currency," and not only was it owed in gold, but thanks to Nixon and his Attorney General (Katzenbach?), it was owed at the legal statutory value of gold. There was an obscure Supreme Court decision on this.

As to the first point, if I lend you 100 fictitious paper cows, and charge you only 1% interest, then you owe me back my 100 paper cows, plus you owe me 1 (one) living breathing cow. This the actual meaning of usury. I lend you an empty bottle of wine, and as interest, you owe me back my bottle, now filled with your wine.

This is satanism, in that it is the substitution or displacement of our Creator. It is the conversion of something completely fictitious, into something made of Life. As Christ said, render back unto Caesar, the frauds that are created by Caesar, but, render unto Christ, that which is created by God. Said in the negative form, Do not render unto Caesar, as interest owed on bank fraud, that which is created by God.

As to the second point, I believe the current statutory value of gold is $40 per ounce. This is fixed by declaration of Congress, and it stands even though today's market value is $1,200 per ounce. Thus, if "We the People" owe $1,200 in fictitious debt fraud to Caesar, and if the statutory value of gold is $40 per ounce, then we owe Caesar 30 (thirty) ounces of gold, as interest. If the interest was paid in gold at market value, we would owe only 1 (one) ounce.

In short, the more the Fed inflates our currency, the faster they take away our gold ... at an exponential rate.

"Our" Congress could easily change the statutory rate. They won't do that. The reason is, the Fed is a mafia operation and they like their interest paid in gold, valued at a nice low statutory rate.

Larry x said (September 29, 2014):

If you look up the Congressional records, you won't find the many paragraphs attributed to Traficant - or at least I couldn't and I've tried. A website picks up a bogus quote and it is repeated over and over till we take it as authentic. It tends to discredit the messenger and probably not by accident.

Traficant's official speech touches on the key without any embellishment; that is that Congress is presiding over a financially bankrupt nation. I would underscore the importance of such a sorry state of affairs by presenting you with this nugget:

The United States is bankrupt by choice and not by necessity. Anytime Congress wants, it may unilaterally create new money, free from private banker debt/interest. We are drowning in debt and inexplicably; the lifeboat (sovereign money) is well within our reach. It is absurd to think that any nation may borrow itself out of debt. Under this scheme, all a nation may do is continue the pyramid scheme a little while longer while pledging more assets in the process that will be lost as a mathematical certainty.

JG said (September 29, 2014):

Thank you for posting this article on James Traficant Henry and paying tribute to him as the true American Patriot that he was.Thank you also Scottie for your tribute and research on James with excellent historic links to be archived.

A lot of people still don't know that the "FED" has it chartered in the 1913 agreement that the interest on the US Debt was to be paid in gold. This makes sense because to pay them back with the very fiat dollars they print would have totally divorced American currency from a gold standard making their fiat money worthless. While the American monetary system today may be off the gold standard the House of Rothschild isn't.

James Traficant once said on his radio show years ago, shortly after he was released from prison, that the real reason he was sent to jail was for defending John Demjanjuk as his lawyer. He was the only congressman in Washington that had the courage to do so. The other congressmen for "fear of AIPAC" remained silent.

James also vehemently opposed unfair foreign trade agreements and illegal immigration. He also went to jail once when he was Deputy Sheriff in Ohio for refusing to sign off on eviction orders for tenants who had lost their jobs because of plant foreclosures.

Let it be known to all Americans that last Saturday they lost a fighter for them and their families with the passing of James Traficant. And with this loss a piece of what was once America has gone with it.

Below- Chutzpah! "Anti Semitism Proof Jews are Fulfilling Divine Mission" (SCROLL DOWN)

DeValera - Was Irish President a British Agent?

September 28, 2014

(left, Eamon deValera (1882-1975) was one of the dominant political figures in twentieth-century Ireland. His political career spanned from 1917 to 1973 and he served multiple terms as head of state.)

"The English.. operated the greatest espionage system in history....The English "mole" or "sleeper" planted--often for decades- in rival political circles, was part of this tradition of espionage" - John Turi

Makow- I believe Hitler and Bormann were other examples of the British "Sleeper."

In England's Greatest Spy- Eamon deValera, (2009)  US Naval Intelligence veteran John J. Turi made the case that the "Father of Ireland" was a British agent. DeValera's actions consistently were disastrous for the Irish people and beneficial to England.  The unanimous derision the book received from Irish "intelligentsia"
lends credence to Turi's claims.  Here he provided a rebuttal to one contemptuous review.

turi_2861146304.jpgby John J. Turi

I have recently been apprised of Mr. O Ruairc's comments regarding my book, England's Greatest Spy, Eamon deValera.

He charges that my book "rallies against the perceived orthodoxy and whole fabric of accepted Irish politics and twentieth century Irish history." In that regard he is correct, but is Mr. O Ruairc suggesting that an historian should never challenge prevailing public opinion, or only when it applies to Eamon deValera? He fails to comprehend the fact that his "perceived orthodoxy" script was written by deValera and it was the counterfeit republicans of Fianna Fail who acted out the farce of "accepted modern Irish politics and twentieth century Irish history."

It is understandable, however, that after more than a half-century of deValera propaganda and Fianna Fail lies, Mr. O Ruairc has come to believe deValera to be some sort of Irish folk hero. In fact, the Irish are in national denial as to the dark deeds of deValera.

Throughout his commentary, not once does Mr. Ruairc refute, disprove or contradict a single premise as set forth in my book. His critique is a polemic of name-calling, insults, sarcasm and ridicule in lieu of legitimate historical analysis. In fact, no reviewer of my book to date has disproved, refuted or contradicted my position.

Regarding the misconceptions and misleading statements of Mr. O Ruairc, he dismisses the undeniable results of deValera's actions in which every major decision of the Great Pretender resulted in enormous benefit to England and monumental disasters to Ireland. He attempts to deflect deValera's treachery by attributing it to merely "bad luck, chance, incompetence or poor decision-making."

MI-dev.jpg(Ireland's Savior?)

He scoffs at my contention that the British were fully aware of the 1916 Rising and allowed it to take place in order for the English not to be perceived in American eyes as having initiated another repression of the Irish. His misplaced reference to a "machine gun massacre" was actually the words of Francis Sheehy-Skeffington, a Dublin pacifist, who recognized the obvious British plot to instigate a rebellion. John MacNeill also noted the British scheme to provoke the Irish into insurgency.

I set forth in great detail the fact that the British had access to German secret codes and were privy to the communications between John Devoy and Berlin regarding the plans for the Rising.


Mr. O Ruairc casts aspersions on my assertion that deValera initiated the civil war, not because the Free State Treaty failed to include an Irish Republic or the Irish President's false claim that it contained an oath of allegiance to the King of England but to prevent Michael Collins from coming to the aid of the Catholics and Nationalists of Northern Ireland who were being terrorized by the Unionists.

michael-collins.jpg(Left, Michael Collins)

Though he failed to recognize the conspirator, author Tim Pat Coogan actually set forth the real reason for the civil war. He noted Collins' fateful words to the IRA men of the North, "With this civil war on my hands, I cannot give you men the help I wish to give and mean to give. I now propose to call off hostilities in the North." The civil war was a boon for England as deValera created chaos in Southern Ireland before Collins could create chaos in Northern Ireland and it didn't cost the English a penny or a single soldier. The Irish people paid deValera's price.

Mr. O Ruairc disregards the incontrovertible fact that deValera and the Dail members abandoned their demand for recognition of an Irish republic on at least four occasions prior to sending the Irish delegation to the London Peace Conference. The Irish delegation presented the final Free State Treaty draft to deValera, the Cabinet and other leaders on December 3, 1920. For more than seven hours of discussion, not once did deValera inform the delegation that he was opposed to the Treaty because it failed to include recognition of an Irish Republic. His only instruction to the delegation was that the oath be amended to the satisfaction of the delegation.

DeValera, himself, had proposed two oaths. There was no oath of allegiance to the King in the Free State Treaty, only a promise to be faithful to the King as head of an association (Commonwealth) of which Ireland was but one member.

Three days later, on December 6, deValera flip-flopped and was a 'born again' republican fanatic charging that the delegation, Collins and Griffith, in particular were traitors for signing a treaty that did not include recognition of an Irish Republic.

Mr. O Ruairc cannot be serious in denying the economic catastrophe deValera wrought upon the Irish people. It is irrefutable. He also inexplicably does not want the truth of the murders of Michael Collins and Arthur Griffith to see the light of day and growls, "What would be the purpose for these exhumations?"


The greatest hoax deValera and Winston Churchill played on the Irish is the conception that the Irish were neutral during WWII. Mr. O Ruairc fails to acknowledge the disaster that deValera's phony 'neutrality' was to Ireland and its enormous benefit to England. As many as 200,000 Irish flocked to England's colors to fight against one of the most evil regimes in history. The Irish suffered proportionately more casualties than the English or Americans.

Surely, no rational person can believe that if the Nazis won the war, Ireland would not suffer a similar fate as the other conquered small countries. WWII was not only England's finest hour but also Ireland's as the Irish set aside centuries of repression and shipped every morsel of surplus food to feed the starving British. Hundreds of thousands of Irish men and women labored in English and Northern Ireland factories producing the sinews of war to sustain England until America could organize her industrial might to relieve the hard-pressed English. DeValera mobilized the entire country to provide England with every necessity Ireland could provide, turning over Ireland's entire fleet of oil tankers, cooperating militarily, economically and much, much more.

After the war, deValera refused to admit Ireland's magnificent contribution to the Allied victory over Germany. Mr. O Ruairc also ignores the fact that the Irish President destroyed all records of Ireland's involvement in WWII thereby depriving Irish historians of valuable insight into deValera's neutrality scam on the Irish people. The result of his 'neutrality' was that partition was etched in stone, Ireland was ostracized as being pro-Nazi and the doors to Irish immigration to America were slammed shut. One million Irish, one fourth the entire population of Ireland, preferred to live in England, the land of the 'oppressor' rather than deValera's dystopia. Ireland was denied membership in the UN, Marshall Plan aid was a pittance and America considered partition to be an internal matter of England and refused to intervene on Ireland's behalf. Of greater import to the English, however, was that deValera's 'neutrality' and 'pro-Nazi' stance destroyed Irish-American political influence and eliminated opposition to Anglo-American cooperation, a repeat of his Irish disaster in America in 1919-20....

the-irish-national-army-free-state-army-bombards-the-four-courts-using-british-supplied-artillery-and-ammunition-the-battle-of-dublin-1922.jpg(L.NATIONAL ARMY BOMBARDS COURTS IN DUBLIN)


Furthermore, Mr. Ruairc was critical of my categorizing the counterfeit republicans who followed deValera in making war on their own people as poor imitations of Hitler's Brown Shirts. After abandoning their demands for recognition of an Irish Republic on at least four occasions, they pontificated their republican credentials and their contempt for the rights of the majority of the Irish people who voted three to one in favor of the Free State Treaty. Under his absurd banner, "The majority has no right to do wrong," deValera unleashed his counterfeit republicans upon their own countrymen rampaging throughout Ireland murdering, beating, robbing and looting. They burned down the houses of their fellow countrymen solely because they supported the Free State Government and majority rule.

They torched Sean McGarry's home with his children inside. Mrs. McGarry pleaded with the counterfeit republicans to no avail and rushed into the blazing home to rescue her children. One little child died of horrible burns the following morning and Mrs. McGarry suffered serious burns as well. They wrecked newspaper offices because they dared to print news contrary to their liking, destroying printing presses, beating pressmen and setting fire to the buildings. The Hierarchy excommunicated these counterfeit republicans, rightly characterizing them as murderers and assassins. Mr. O Ruairc cannot grasp the significance that deValera, who initiated a civil war over the lack of recognition of an Irish Republic in the Free State Treaty, refused to declare an Irish Republic in all the years he was in office.

It is understandable that Mr. O Ruairc remains silent as to these terrible deeds, for after so many years of Fianna Fail disinformation, he has come to view the traitors as heroes and the real heroes, the true fathers of the Irish nation, Collins and Griffith, as traitors.

He also finds fault with my calling for a posthumous trial of deValera ignoring the fact that deValera himself requested such a trial. John Devoy, the great Irish-American leader, described deValera as "the most malignant man in Irish history."

I liken myself to the boy who cried, "Look the Emperor has no clothes," while everyone else is pretending what a fine specimen King deValera makes in all his invisible finery.

As James O'Mara stated, "The Irish people are the most easily humbugged people on earth."


You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "DeValera - Was Irish President a British Agent? "

BB said (September 29, 2014):

I think that DeValara was a flawed but essentially well meaning character. The civil war was was largely his fault but I doubt whether
it was caused by his loyalty to the Crown.

Dev set about creating an Irish Republic (which he achieved after a number of years in power). He confined Irish Freemasons to the Seanead
(Senate) where they became largely irrelevant. He also worked closely with the Catholic Church, which helped to maintain high moral standards in the country for decades (divorce was only introduced in 1995, abortions are still illegal).

I have also noticed that Mr. Turi
refers to De Valera's Catholicism as "Papism" in a related discussion which leads me to believe he is coming from a Protestant background
and therefore he appears biased.

De Valera also kept Ireland out of the fratricide in Europe. Many Irishmen fought for the Brits, some fought for the Germans, but these were all volunteers.

Dan said (September 29, 2014):

To call anyone England's greatest spy is quite the boast: they've had so many of them.

I'm suspicious however, because Hollywood tipped it's hand with a major movie in 1996 that demonized De Valera's role in Irish history. (I think it was timed to coincide with Bill Clinton's mid-90's meddling in Irish politics).

You know it's a smear when they cast a professional movie villain like Alan Rickman as De Valera. Even Chicago movie reviewer Roger Ebert complained that "the film "portrays De Valera as a weak, mannered, sniveling prima donna".

De Valera was such a puppet of Churchill that he kept the Republic of Ireland neutral during World War II. He did however allow the Americans to use Irish embassies to spy on the Nazis.

It was the first British war in over a century that the Brits didn't have the Irish as cannon fodder. Meanwhile, British held Northern Ireland was bombed along with England in the Blitz. De Valera sent firemen and humanitarian assistance to Belfast.

The Brits even attempted to entice De Valera to join the war in return for ceding Northern Ireland, but he knew that as soon as they got their way they'd foment another Irish civil war. He refused; there's "no guarantee that in the end we would have a united Ireland."

Ireland today is in the process of being swallowed whole by the same EU bankers swallowing Ukraine. Naturally there are powerful interests working to erase or at least rewrite the brief history of Irish independence.
De Valera wasn't a Irish nationalist, not socialist. Another reason he's on the revisionist shit list is the Preamble to the Irish Constitution. He wrote this:

"In the Name of the Most Holy Trinity, from Whom is all authority and to Whom, as our final end, all actions both of men and States must be referred, We, the people of Éire, Humbly acknowledging all our obligations to our Divine Lord, Jesus Christ, Who sustained our fathers through centuries of trial, Gratefully remembering their heroic and unremitting struggle to regain the rightful independence of our Nation".

Irish history too long and complicated to understand from reading one book or a movie. A good place to start might be this review of the 1996 film 'Michael Collins' (1996): An Analysis

And from another review of 'England's Greatest Spy' ,

"Are the Irish people so stupid that they need some Yank to tell them De Valera was a British spy?"

Now men must wear high heels to placate Illuminazis

September 29, 2014

Now men must wear high heels to placate Illuminazis 

It's explicit - Anti domestic violence
campaign is a pretext to demonize and feminize men. 
Now men are fundraising by walking in high heels.
The Illuminati will seize at any opportunity to
humiliate and neuter men.

Football player charged with child abuse - for disciplining his son by Dan

September 14, 2014

L.The Vikings' Adrian Peterson

Football player charged with child abuse - for disciplining his son  by Dan

Here's an example of a father being treated like a criminal for behaving like a father. 

First a little history.  In my grandparents day before WWII parents use to discipline small children with a 'switch'.  Nobody seems to know that work meant a thin green branch from a tree, about the width of a pencil, and about three feet long.   It's not a weapon. it can't do any damage, no matter how strong the arm is that wield's it.  But it sure can smart. 

The flexibility of a switch made it good for 'whipping'.   I got a 'whupping' once when I was six for being half an hour late coming home from school.   That was nothing compared to the PADDLING I got from my first grade teacher for talking with another student during her lecture.  The latter experience included humiliation of being dominated by the teacher in front of the class.   

It never occurred to me that I'd been 'abused' or 'assaulted'.  I knew exactly what I'd done to warrant the punishment, and I learned to take warnings seriously.  If it hadn't been allowed, I would have started coming home whenever I felt like it, and disrupting class.  The whippings worked. The thing about whippings was, it's something that only had to be experienced a few times at most, and then you never needed it again because you'd been taught to think about consequences before you act. 

The following clip of a typical American 'wuppin' scenario isn't from a story by Marquis de Sade, but from Mark Twain.  Tom took the blame for something Becky did, and gets whipped with the teacher's switch. 
It's a manly thing to do.  It shows us that Tom is courageous, chivalrous, and a good man in tight corner. 

So this big media scandal this week is about a football player disciplining his son with a switch, while the boy was on loan to him for visitation from his ex-wife.    When she found out about it, she filed charges.  Now it's a media circus.

Black women mating with thugs and criminals?

September 4, 2014

thumbnail.jpgBlack women mating choices are the root cause of black dysfunction in America

Black Americans had it MUCH worse in the past, and they still managed to create relatively strong communities, businesses, and families. So, what changed between then and now?

1. Female sexual selection within the black community was altered by the mass expansion of the Welfare State.

2. Sexual access, marriage, and reproduction was removed from stable, productive beta males with jobs and transferred to "alpha" douchebag criminals.

3. Most of the black ghetto dysfunction in America today is rooted in dysgenic mating on the part of black women, (i.e. mating that promotes degenerate traits.)

It's Bad Boy Gina Tingles on a cultural scale.

When women are no longer forced to rely on the stability of the beta male and his productive capacities for sustenance and the survival of their offspring, and can instead collect easy money from the State, they quickly revert to a pre-Agricultural Revolution mating strategy in which the meanest, most violent men are rewarded with the greatest level of reproductive access.

Such men do not stick around to raise their children, they move on to the next ho and knock her up too.

Such men not build communities, they poison them with violence and crime.

Such men do not create progress, they destroy it by creating a downward spiral in which each generation is more dysfunctional than the previous one.

Over 70% of black children in this country are born out of wedlock. Most of them are fathered by thugs and criminals, because that is what black women choose to reproduce with.

It's a numbers game: black American men who are stable, intelligent, and productive are simply being bred out of existence. The same principle is found in the movie Idiocracy, which most people consider to be less of a comedy and more of a prophesy.

40% of ALL American children are now being born into the same circumstances which have destroyed the black community, and that number will continue to rise as women double-down on the bad boy cock carousel, celebrate bastardy, and claim their cash and prizes from the State.

If this nation collapses into dystopian nightmare in the future, it will have exactly fuck all to do with transdimensional space aliens and everything to do with the fact that American women have spent the last 20+ years (longer in the black community) creating hordes of fatherless thug spawn.

Advice for young American women: Stop having your children out of wedlock with the first "totally hawt" convicted felon with a neck tattoo you come across, and try reproducing with men who have positive attributes like, I don't know, a job and an education and the desire to raise a family