Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

On my radio show Sunday May 18, I explore pornography,pedophilia and homosexuality with world renown author and expert Dr. Judith Reisman (www.drjudithreisman.org)-- the lady that blew the whistle on the Kinsey Report. That's 10 PM Central Time at www.republicbroadcasting.org

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Illuminati Murdered at least Two More Presidents (Encore)

May 16, 2008

harrison.jpg 
By Henry Makow Ph.D.

(Originally posted a year ago.)

"The bane of our civil institutions is to be found in Masonry, already powerful and daily becoming more so. I owe to my country an exposure of its dangers." - Captain William Morgan, murdered Sept 11, 1826


A curious but very credible Internet document called "The Mardi Gras Secrets" states that Illuminati agents poisoned and killed Presidents William Henry Harrison (1773-1841) and Zachary Taylor (1784-1850). They also poisoned James Buchanan in 1857 but he survived. All three were obstructing Illuminati- House of Rothschild plans for the US Civil War (1860-1865).

The document also describes the Illuminati role in the murders of Abraham Lincoln and Senator Huey Long. We know they also killed Presidents Garfield, McKinley and Kennedy and probably Warren Harding and possibly FDR. If George W. Bush weren't doing such an awful job, he probably would be poisoned as well.

The Mardi Gras Secrets website   was created in Dec. 2005 by Mimi L. Eustis, the daughter of Samuel Todd Churchill, a high level member of the secret New Orleans Mardi Gras Society called "The Mystick Crewe of Comus."

This Society, which reorganized the Mardi Gras festivities in 1857, was a chapter of the Skull and Bones. It began as a front for the activities of Masons Albert Pike, Judah Benjamin and John Slidell who became leaders of the Confederacy.

This information is based on Samuel Churchill's deathbed confessions, when he was dying of lung cancer. Mrs. Eustis later decided to make them public after she also contracted the terminal disease.

The Illuminati ringleader was Caleb Cushing (1800-1879), the partner of William Russell, the opium smuggler who founded the Yale Skull and Bones Society in 1832. In order to rise in this society, one had to participate in a "killing of the king" rite of passage.

According to Eustis, the Skull and Bones (or Brotherhood of Death) is "nothing more than a political assassination hit team against those United States politicians who do not fall in line with the House of Rothschild's plans for a blood elitist domination and control over the world's economy...For example Caleb Cushing was involved in the arsenic
poisoning deaths of United States presidents William Henry Harrison on April 4, 1841 and Zachary Taylor on July 9, 1850. These two Presidents had opposed admitting Texas and California as slave states."

William Henry Harrison was the first President ever to die in office, serving only 31 days. According to Wikipedia he died of "pneumonia."

On July 3, 1850, Zachary Taylor threatened to hang those ``taken in rebellion against the Union.'' The next day the President fell ill, vomited blackish material, and died July 9. (Kentucky authorities recently dug up Taylor's body looking for evidence of arsenic poisoning.)


THE ASSASSINATION OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN

I paraphrase Mrs. Eustis: During the Civil War (from 1861-1865), President Lincoln needed money to finance the War . The loan shark-bankers wanted 24% to 36% interest. Instead, Lincoln got Congress to authorize the printing of 450 million dollars worth of "Greenbacks" debt and interest-free money. It served as legal tender for all debts,
public and private.

The House of Rothschild recognized that sovereign governments printing interest-free and debt-free paper money would break their power.

Lincoln's assassin, John Wilkes Booth, was a member of Pike's Knights of
the Golden Circle. He was in New Orleans during the winter of 1863-64
and conspired with Pike, Benjamin, Slidell and Admiral G.W. Baird to assassinate Lincoln. Baird later identified the body of Captain James William Boyd as Booth's. (Boyd was in fact a Confederate spy who resembled Booth and was used as a patsy. His body was dumped into an Arsenal Prison sinkhole used to dump dead horses.)

Eustis says her father emphasized that most Masons below the 3rd degree were good hardworking people. The Illuminati-Skull and Bones used the Masons as a disguise. Those who rose past the 33 degree level did so by participating in the "Killing of the King" ritual. The lower levels did as they were told without realizing their part in the "Killing of the King".

For assassinating Abraham Lincoln, Pike, Benjamin, Slidell and August Belmont (Rothschild's Northern agent) were made secret Kings of the Mystick Krewe of Comus. Andrew Johnson Vice -President became President and pardoned Albert Pike. Albert Pike awarded Andrew Johnson the thirty-third degree rite of passage.

" Doctors were an essential part of the Illuminati plan to kill U.S. political leaders [who] hindered the take over of the U.S. Republic by the international banking elite," Eustis writes.

" Illuminati doctors eventually did in both U.S. President William Henry Harrison and Zachary Taylor. They also played a death role in the shooting assassinations of U.S. Presidents Abraham Lincoln on April 14, 1865 (died April 15, 1865), James Garfield on July 2, 1881 (died September 19, 1881), and William McKinley Jr. on September 6, 1901 (died September 14, 1901)."

"Teddy Roosevelt became President after William McKinley was shot. Roosevelt received passage into the 33rd. degree and became a secret king of the Mystick Krewe of Comus. During his presidency, the Skull and Bones became firmly entrenched and controlled the U.S. Republic."

HUEY LONG

Huey Long ("Kingfish") was a populist who mounted a powerful challenge to FDR from his power base as Governor of Louisiana and later as US
Senator. Unlike FDR, he was not a Mason and not a shill for the bankers.
His "Share Our Wealth" program represented a genuine threat to the Illuminati.

An Illuminati member, Dr. Carl Austin Weiss shot Long Sept 8, 1935 and Dr. Arthur Vidrine ensured that Long did not recover. According to Eustis, Weiss was supposed to hit Long in the face, and Long's bodyguard Murphy Roden was supposed to shoot both Weiss and Long.This may indeed be what happened.

Roden was a "spy for J. Edgar Hoover." Roden pumped 60 bullets into Weiss'body. Dr. Weiss was told his baby would be killed if he reneged on the mission.

Both FDR and J. Edgar Hoover won their 33 degree rite of passage for their participation in this murder.

"Franklin Delano Roosevelt was made King of Comus in 1937. When J. Edgar Hoover came down to New Orleans to act out his reign as King of Comus, he was involved in a sexual revelry of homosexuality and cross-dressing with various elitist bloodline members of the Mystick Krewe of Comus."


LINDBERG AND HARDING

"Agents of Skull and Bones with blessing and involvement of J. Edgar Hoover FBI Director and 33rd level executioner-cover up specialist for the elitist bloodline of the House of Rothschild murdered Freemason Charles Lindberg's son. This killing of Freemason Charles Lindberg's son was to set an example that the isolationist stand was not the will of the Illuminati."

Mrs. Eustis doesn't touch upon the poisoning death of President Warren Harding (1865-1923) but this is how Wikipedia describes it:

"At the end of July, while traveling south from Alaska through British Columbia, [Harding] developed what was thought to be a severe case of  food poisoning. At the Palace Hotel in San Francisco, he developed pneumonia. Harding died of either a heart attack or a stroke at 7:35 p.m. on August 2, 1923, at the age of 57. The formal announcement,
printed in the New York Times of that day, stated that 'a stroke of apoplexy' was the cause of death.' He had been ill exactly one week."

For FDR, see Emanuel Josephson, "The Strange Death of Franklin D.
Roosevelt." (1948)


CONCLUSION

The "Mardi Gras Secrets" suggest that, given the depth of corruption, the US political system cannot be taken seriously as a democracy. There is a pattern of Illuminati-Rothschild control throughout US history. People who deny this are living in a fantasy.

The United States was created to advance the Illuminati New World Order based on Rothschild control of credit. American ideals were designed to dupe the masses, not to be realized.

The founders and heroes of the US were mostly Masons including Paul Revere, John Paul Jones and Benjamin Franklin. Francis Scott Key who wrote the national anthem was a Mason. John Hancock and most of the signatories of the Declaration of Independence were also Masons.

More-than-half the Presidents were Masons. These include Washington, Madison, Adams, Jefferson, Monroe, Jackson, Van Buren, Tyler, Polk, Taylor, Pierce, Buchanan, Johnson, Garfield, McKinley, TR, Taft, Harding, FDR, Truman, LBJ, Ford, Reagan, Clinton and Bush I and II.

Some of these really thought Masonry was about "making good men better" and had to be assassinated. Other Presidents who weren't Masons, like Eisenhower, Nixon and Carter, were still controlled by the same dark forces.

Throughout its history the United States has been in the clutches of a satanic cult empowered by the Rothschild central banking cartel. Many courageous Presidents and other politicians tried to free their countrymen and died unrecognized, their killers unpunished and triumphant.

The US is a nation decapitated, a headless giant led by demons.
--------

A survey of Masonic Influence in US History.

JFK On Secret Societies (Google video)

 



You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/002009.html
Articles >>

Comments for "Illuminati Murdered at least Two More Presidents (Encore)"

Jeff said (May 17, 2008):

Hi, Henry.

The video on youtube re: JFK [warning of secret societies] has been removed. I did find it on google, though.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3908846596928425757&q=jfk+secret+societies

Again, another excellent article. JFK's resistance to the Illuminati has dramatically increased my admiration of him. I was actually afraid for Texas Representative Ron Paul, who was running for president. I knew if he got it, he would be "taken care of". He's for Constitutional government and against the poisonous Federal Reserve. He certainly would not do their bidding.

It is so interesting to see the pressure increasing on the middle class with gas and food prices soaring. The USA is a breath away from economic collapse. The treasonous legislation and treaties, as well as excessive consumerism in the USA, has resulted in many of our jobs being transferred overseas. This hurts the middle class. Now, with prices soaring, the Illuminati plan of further dessimating the middle class is accelerating. They want two classes - those in poverty (like much of the rest of the world) and them. Poor people are easier to control.

In reading my favorite websites recently, a light bulb turned on for me. All this increased surveillance and monitoring of innocent American people, in the name of terrorism, is not to "protect" us. On the surface, "we" are not the threat; the "terrorists" are. So why is our government focusing on us and not the "terrorists"? In reality, we ARE the potential terrorists - terrorists who will resist the coming world government. The noose is tightening on the American people and nearly all are not even aware of it. Once they realize, it will be too late and those who resist the massive change in governance will be labeled terrorists or enemy combatants. That's why all these concentration camps are being covertly built within the USA. We will be the terrorists. Those who revolt and want revolution to rid ourselves of this treasonous cancer, called world government, will be seen as the enemy.

BTW, you don't have to post any of this on your site. I just wanted to chat with someone who understands and whose eyes are open.

Liberty Forum Comment said (May 7, 2007):

Wow! Yes, that is the very expression that I felt after reading this very imporant and most intriguing article. I have opened up into an even wider world of U.S. history. This whole article is a completely unbiased and non-spiked history lesson. You can just feel the truth coming out of this article. It definitely beats out any history book, and more specifically, a U.S. history books. This is stuff not covered in my Honors U.S. history class or any U.S. history class in particular. Sure wished my U.S. history teacher was one of you guys because he is a terrific U.S. history teacher.

This article also rightly proves a suspicion or suspicions that I had developed on certain U.S. presidents and certain political events(i.e. political assasinations). Like, for example, Gerald Ford, Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson, The Clintons( Bill & current presidental candidate, Hillary), The Bushes, the Rockefellers just to name a few. Some I had recently developed, and some growing.

God knows that all those evil rich bastards mentioned above had a hand in the assasinations of President John F. Kennedy, the last TRUE President of the U.S.; Sen./A.G. Robert F. Kennedy; John F. Kennedy, Jr, Martin L. King, Jr,and countless others.

Down with the Illuminati, down with the Zionists, down with the NAU and NWO, and down with all evil secret societies!!!

Nan said (May 7, 2007):

Your article on the Illuminati control of the presidency was very depressing. I guess you are saying there is no hope for America. If the people like what Ron Paul says and actually support him in great numbers, then his life would probably be in danger. I wonder if he knows this.
----

Nan,

Paul can't win because the mass media will never give him a fair shake. Depressing but liberating to know where we stand. Thanks for writing.

Henry
----

But the Internet WILL give Ron Paul a fair shake. More and more people are turning to the Internet for their news. We heard Mr. Paul speak at Iowa State University last month, and he said he was very encouraged at how his message is spreading across the Internet. According to a C-Span poll, 74% of the respondents said he won the MSNBC debate. And because of public demand, FoxNews has decided to allow all the candidates in their debate, last I heard. They were originally only going to allow the top 3. This is incredible!!

Nancy from Iowa
---

Hope you're right!

-H

Robert said (May 5, 2007):

Henry: Regarding "Pattern of Satanic Control Throughout US History," fascinating. Do we really think we know all that has gone on among the powerful down through the ages? Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to John Adams in their later years, wrote "Who will write the history of the Revolution? Who will ever be able to write it?" Hopefully, more and more comes to light as time goes on, and our understanding grows. This is why the scientific, engineering, gear-head, tech-head types are wrong when they say science is ever-changing, ever-growing, history is dead, static, and never changes.

Tony said (May 5, 2007):

Henry, not all our "American ideals" are all that laudable when thought through. Our constitution is truly a mercantile document with no
mention of the necessity to include the spiritual as the basis of law.

Plus, it made a religion of the English speaking world's deadly mistake of worshiping the cult of the individual instead of basing our law on
the family, where all proper power would lie in a rightly constructed material law. The Irish were light years ahead of us in their constitutional law - which, of course, is no longer followed (when the chips are down) as it is unabashedly Christian.

Come to think of it, the cult of the individual is what masonry really caters to and builds upon. It might be as accurately called the "cult
of the overblown ego." One can easily see the errors and crimes such a mind set leads to. Those who thrive and rule under such a national
construction were once called "mattoids" - people usually defined as possessing great intellect but without any sort of right ethics; a form
of insanity.

On my radio show Sunday May 18, I explore the Cult of Sex (pornography,pedophilia etc.) with world renown author and expert Dr. Judith Reisman (www.drjudithreisman.org)-- the lady that blew the whistle on the Kinsey Report. That's 10 PM Central Time at www.republicbroadcasting.org

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Kevin Annett Rips the Mask from Power

May 14, 2008

annett2.jpgby Henry Makow Ph.D.


If Christ returned, he'd be crucified again, not by Jews or Romans but by the church, which has been invaded by His enemies.

This is obvious from the fate of Kevin Annett, a young United Church of Canada minister who took Christ's teachings to heart, and suffered everything but Crucifixion. (To date, Christ's enemies are reluctant to create another martyr.)

I have been studying the New World Order for eight years but no book has laid bare the true hypocritical face of  power in Western society as Kevin Annett's self published memoirs, "Love and Death in the Valley." Many books have left me winded, but none like this.

I have met Kevin Annett and he doesn't have a halo. But he does exude a transparency and a dogged determination to make sure we learn the truth about the genocide of (he claims) "roughly" 80-90 million North American Indians. He is the closest thing to a genuine dissident in this society, the closest thing to a real hero.  Although he's been fighting this lonely battle for 15 years,  we haven't heard of him, proof our "heroes" are manufactured for us.

Kevin is the kind of "innocent" or "true believer"  organizations like the Communist Party or United (Methodist-Presbyterian) Church hire to provide an artifice.  But "every group has rules"  as Kevin was told repeatedly, and Kevin didn't adapt.  A real Christian represents Christ --not the corrupt impostors who profit from his teaching. Kevin was a Minister of Christ.

WHAT PAINT CAN'T HIDE

"Give the place a bit of Spirit," his boss at Fred Victor Mission, a residence for the homeless near Toronto's seedy district told him, as if talking to a painter.

In the course of his work, Kevin learned the Church Mission was a center for drug trafficking and prostitution and the staff were on the take. He learned that large donations to the Mission were embezzled, while there wasn't any money for Bibles.  When he took these matters to the top of the church hierarchy, they knew and didn't want to know.

This was his first glimpse of the United Church of Canada as a four billion dollar corporation that provides a nice tax-exempt front for a lot of rich people  and a lot of shady dealings. But that's just scratching the surface of  a potential nightmare for the 2.8 million bland well meaning Canadians affiliated with this empty shell of a church.

When Kevin (what an exquisitely Canadian name) took up his next position as Minister in a British Columbia logging town, he opened his sanctuary to the poor and the non-White. He began to hear stories from his Aboriginal parishioners about ethnic cleansing at government funded church-run "residential schools."

Native children  were abducted by the RCMP and forced to attend these "schools" which were concentration camps in disguise. Here helpless children were physically and sexually abused, sterilized and exposed to deadly viruses. Many were subjected to medical experimentation from Illuminati doctors. The death rate was 50%  Annett estimates over 50,000 children died at these schools.  

In an email Tuesday, he wrote: "Continually, eyewitnesses describe that most of them never received formal education, besides religious instruction. Maybe one or two hours of schooling a week, the rest of the time working as manual labour and farmed out as cheap labour or domestics to white families. The ones who got a better education were the collaborators, being trained to be puppets of the government and churches - they're often the ones who now run the big aboriginal groups, band councils, etc. I also have letters from Indian Agents confirming that the kids were not to receive "too much" education."

The blurring of class and color lines strained relations with the church "Old Guard" but the deal breaker was when Kevin publicly opposed the lucrative sale of Aboriginal lands the church held in trust to a large logging company.

Kevin was stripped of his Ministry, the only United Church Minister ever to be defrocked. His supporters were expelled from the church and his wife was pressured to divorce him and take their two children.

ACADEMIA

Next stop on Kevin's voyage of discovery was a Ph.D. program at the University of British Columbia. There he had access to government archives which documented a deliberate agenda of ethnic cleansing which (he says) claimed one to two million Aboriginals in British Columbia alone over a century.

Just as the Church represents Christ, the university is dedicated to free inquiry and truth. Thus Kevin's funding disappeared and he had to leave. "Unless you play the game, you'll never work in this province again," he was told.

Is it any wonder society is drifting toward Fascism when the institutions that are dedicated to  truth and moral leadership are rotten to the core? You can smell the stench of moral compromise, like rotting garbage, everywhere.

The same applies to the corporate media. Kevin did get a couple of good stories but they dried up with mention of the Supreme Court  judges using Indian children for pedophilia. Similarly, when Kevin was beaten up or his documents stolen, the police and courts refused to act despite video footage of the theft. Why would they? They regarded the murder of thousands of Aboriginal children as "too big a task to investigate."

Church. Corporations. Academia. Media. Law. Police. That leaves the government. Recently the Canadian government absolved the Church of any liability for its crimes. Kevin wrote to me Tuesday:

"Yes, all the churches have been granted effective immunity; Indian Affairs announced so last February when they said there will be no criminal prosecution for anything that went on in the rez schools. Disgusting. Natives cannot sue the churches after the settlement - that was part of the deal the AFN (Assembly of First Nations) did on behalf of all the survivors, without consulting them once. It's as bad a crime as the original atrocities."

CONCLUSION

 Kevin's Love and Death in the Valley is available here. He  is  an excellent writer.  I also recommend you visit Kevin's webpage 
and donate if you can. He represents the single greatest threat to the Illuminati  in Canada today. He is being followed by police and subject to increasing organized Internet smear attacks. He ministers to the homeless and lives on a shoe string.

The Illuminati want the land and the water rights. The Aboriginals are the only people standing in their way. Vancouver is hosting the 2010 Winter Olympics and Canada's misdeeds, like China's, could attract worldwide attention.

In his book, Love and Death in the Valley, Kevin muses on the disconnect between what people profess and what they actually do.

"The most successful minister in the church I found is the man or woman who can function as an efficient dissociated personality, regularly professing one thing and practising the opposite." (151)

Kevin Annett demonstrates the impact people can have when they act on their beliefs. As such, he is an inspiration to me.
------------------------------
See also my  "Did the Illuminati Exterminate Canadian Indian Children?"

and    "When Pedophile Judges Fear Exposure"

 



You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/kevin_annett_rips_the_mask_fro.html
Articles >>

Comments for "Kevin Annett Rips the Mask from Power"

Dan 2 said (May 17, 2008):

adn't heard back yet from Kevin on the question of evidence of state-side sterilization: but found it through Russell Means comment in Mohawk Radio interview. He mentioned that 34% of native women, 42% Puerto Rican women in the US had been sterilized during 4 years in the early 70's. The interviewer asked him 'where do you get these statistics'. Russell exclaimed, "We got it from the government's files! The Public Health Service...AIM exposed that in 1974!"

And so they did. Here's the documentation.


* The Indian Health Service and the Sterilization of Native American Women
* Jane Lawrence
* American Indian Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 3 (Summer, 2000), pp. 400-419 (article consists of 20 pages)
* Published by: University of Nebraska Press


http://faculty.utep.edu/LinkClick.aspx?link=lawrence.pdf&tabid=19869&mid=71730

http://muse.jhu.edu/demo/american_indian_quarterly/v024/24.3lawrence.html

www.ihs.gov/MedicalPrograms/MCH/M/MCHdownloads/HallieMontoyasterilepaper.doc -

Dan said (May 16, 2008):

Kevin has a great lecture recording on the origins of genocidal policy at the beginning of the colonial era. If you haven't heard it it's worth a listen as the real history lesson. The file title is HFH-04-06-28.mp3

You're quite right that there's always the outer artifice structure of religions and institutions, insulated from the reality of the secret structure behind all our institutions. Since he got wise, Kevin's traced the history of insitutional Christianity back to it's root as the convenient new cover for the Roman empire as it's ability to control the world through military force was on the wane. He identifies this beast as Christendom (the 'Kingdom of Christs') as opposed to the early gnostic form.
I think of the insulated 'nice' outer temple of institutional Christianity as 'Christen-dumb'. The useful public is always given this insulated institution which is so much the antithesis of the dark orders within political core. They can't believe it when atrocities committed by their church come to light, since their experience all their lives with their church is entirely different. For example, to my knowledge, the wealthier Catholic diocese of the world weren't given pedophile priests. This protected them for a long time, though church pedophilia went too far into blue collar, lower middle class Catholic diocese. I suppose that's why they've gotten caught.

Once we understand this it's evident that we cannot 'save' the institutional churches. No matter how good the ministers and people currently in the insulated artifice churches, they are still controlled and funded through the old Establishment. Whether it be the Vatican, or the Protestant heirarchy. Currently these institutions are being deliberately collapsed and morphed by the Illuminati heads of these establishments into their own new artifice. Beware -- the New Age model they're morphing us toward have also co-opted the gnostic and native religion concepts too in order to 'own' them, just as they owned Jesus for 18 centuries.

Sincere Christians and ministers must to go back further, and create their own self controlled churches.

Don said (May 16, 2008):

Reading the article from Kevin Annett made me think about a late friend of mine. Mr. Andrews was a Tlingit from Southeast Alaska. He told me that he and other Tlingit children were taken from their families and sent to missionary schools. At the age of three, he was forcibly taken by the authorities to one of these schools. Once in school all the children were denied any contact with anything of their culture. If they spoke in their native tongue, they were beaten. I can’t use the exact words he used to describe the Jesuit teachers. To say that he hated them is to put it mildly. Mr. Andrews went into the U.S. Army after leaving the missionary school and didn’t see his family again until he was 19 years old.

Not many people know that things like this happened. I would not have known if he didn’t tell me about it. Te hear him describe the terror and sadness of being taken from his home shocked me. What a cruel thing to do.

Richard said (May 16, 2008):

I got his book since you recommended it so highly, the .pdf version so I can go ahead and read it.

My whole attitude has revived up since you published your article on Annett a few weeks ago. Thanks for that, I'd not have heard of any of this otherwise. I recognized quickly that yes, what he's uncovered and what he's doing is the biggest threat to ripping the mask off the whole damn illusion of the masonic double-faced, double-talk system. It screams the Emperor has no clothes. When people finally get it, the
whole artifice of the culture of death masquerading as government and institutional religions will collapse.

Coincidently I had been corresponding on email with the Anishinaabe woman in Michigan, and her story had me looking into current events in
native culture again. It always has affected me deeply. Since then, she vanished and her email address bounces.

Seems like kismet, to have all this native stuff coming into personal view at once this year. Maybe we've tuned in. There's a Seven Fires prophecy which said that this culture (the Masonic
one) represents a forked direction humankind took, and they said it can't hold, and is destined to collapse under the weight of it's own
evil. The last prophecy said that in this time, some carried on that path (non-Indians) will renounce it's ways an the future of humanity
hangs in that balance.

Jean said (May 15, 2008):

Thank you for your article titled "Kevin Annett Rips Mask from Power."

Thank you for modeling truth and righteousness in your actions, something that is NOT happening in my local Roman Catholic church and its "Office of Pro-Life Activities - Diocese of Austin.

Kevin Annett's video shows that is was not only the "United Church" of Canada that committed these NAZI attrocities, but it also cites the names of several Roman Catholic children's residential homes as the places of these heinous mortal sins.

We are in NAZI Germany NOW in the U.S.A. I pray for the strength and courage to be not conformed to this satanically corrupt world system and to fight in prayer and in my self discipline, but also fight in the streets against these atrocities.

The Roman Catholic church was complicit also in the Franklin Cover-up involving Boys Town in Omaha, Nebraska. The Roman Catholic church is silent and therefore complicit (they call it "sin of omission" - "in what I have done and in what I have FAILED TO DO" ) regarding what is happening in El Dorado Texas right now and what has happened at the Texas Department of Youth and the long-term NAZI practices of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, aka the Texas Department of Child Abduction and Child Rape.

Here is a link to an article equally as important as yours, Dr. Makow, and the comments area gives many other important links.

http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2008/05/ordinary-face-of-everyday-evil.html

"
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Ephesians 6:12

The only thing the "Christian" church in the U.S.A. is "protecting" or "wrestling against" is its 501c3 corporate tax exempt status and those in the "church" who would model the Truth and Righteousness Who is Christ.

Deb said (May 15, 2008):

Mr. Makow: Another wonderful but sad article. Years ago I met an Ojibwa (spelling?) woman from St. John (I think New Brunswick) who grew up in an orphanage run by the Catholic Church. She got almost no education in literacy until an adult, I think she learned some reading and writing in adult ed. As with the BC natives, she was forced to work (and yes she had sex with some bishop there I remember her saying) and when she tried to run away several times, they'd lock her in solitary each time except to work, usually laundry or floor cleaning. Anyway, she was involved in a class action suit against the church over this orphanage and the abuse/slavery conditions. I don't remember how it resolved...do you? Also, there was a book about it (believe it or not she wanted me to ghost write a book about this, but since I live in west Texas that was impractical.)

Dean said (May 14, 2008):

For several months I have enjoyed and benefitted from your informative website. Your recent article on Kevin Arnnett is quite interesting. I have a couple of native friends, one whose mother was forced to grow up in one of the government/church orphanages. I do believe their should be an investigation into what happened over the years at these orphanages. However the way that Kevin Arnnett is going about this is very
destructive. He is accusing people wholesale of being murderers without any concrete evidence or without giving them a chance to defend themselves. Worst of all was his protest at a Catholic Church during Easter
Mass. It was a horrible way of getting the message
across. He interrupted a religious service as people were worshipping. Some of his followers yelled out "murderers" to innocent churchgoers, some of them children. Any respect or credit I had for the man went right out the door.

I thank you for getting this subject out in the open. This should be investigated in a proper manner and any crimes that were committed should be punished to the full extent of the law. Thank you again for the many excellent articles and for your great site! Peace and God Bless.


Kevin Annett replies:

Hi Dean,

Thanks for writing. It's unfortunate that the mainstream media has portrayed our action at the holy rosary church as disruptive, when it was quite the opposite. A few very angry survivors who saw friends murdered in the residential schools yelled at some church goers, and the media latched onto that and blew it up. Most of us spoke gently to the church goers and even to the priest who was yelling at us. We simply asked them to take responsibility for the children who died under their care.

Even when we entered the church that Palm Sunday, we did so respectfully and ceremonially. We walked to the front of the sanctuary and stood there quietly, holding a banner in memory of the disappeared children. After five minutes, we left the sanctuary so as not to interrupt the communion service. Our elders led us out to drum beat, and the entire congregation stood up in respect as we passed.

None of that made it into the media, even though there were cameras and reporters in there with us. The press was determined to make the whole event look angry and confrontational when it wasn't.

The refusal of the churches to say where these children are buried is the issue, and we have always raised this respectively and non-violently.

I urge you, Dean, to see for yourself how we act and meet me in person before you judge as on the basis of very biased media coverage. Please see our website www.hiddenfromhistory.org and feel free to write to me, if you have other concerns.

Kevin-

hiddenfromhistory@yahoo.ca

Tina said (May 14, 2008):

Thanks Henry for writing about Kevin Annett and his efforts in enlightening the public of the plight for our aboriginals in Canada and how those within the church have participated in genocide.

In a recent article in the Macleans magazine, with its front cover page entitled, “B.C. WORLD CRIME SUPERPOWER” it gives Canadians and others some knowledge of how very corrupt, the bar and judiciary is in this country and how such organization have given the appearance of being working with and for organized crime.

For example, it was reported last year that Glen Hehn’s, a full patch member of the elite Nomads of the Hells Angels in B.C., had been charged with trafficking wherein one-kilo cocaine bricks worth a total of $1.5 million were seized from his vehicle and his storage locker.

The case went before Justice Peter Leask, a former criminal lawyer and former special prosecutor for the A-G of the province of British Columbia.

It became evident to any reasonable person that last year Justice Leask was an advocate for Mr. Hehn on the bench when he engaged in impermissible conjecture and speculation during cross-examination of the Crown’s expert witness and again during submissions. Mr. Hehn was naturally acquitted by Justice Leask and the Crown appealed his decision.

On April 28, 2008, the B.C. Court of Appeal, the old stumping grounds of Wally Oppal, the panel, which consisted of, The Honourable Madam Justice Huddart, The Honourable Mr. Justice Mackenzie, The Honourable Madam Justice Kirkpatrick, unanimously upheld the decision of Justice Peter Leask. The Crown claimed in its submissions that there were no error revealed in the trial judge’s reasons for judgment and naturally the Appeal Court of B.C. agreed with the Crown and dismissed its appeal. – It is not unreasonable to conclude that the Crown deliberately made the case against itself in order to upheld the decision of Justice Leask who failed to show absolute neutrality with respect to Mr. Glen Hehn and therefore he no longer was impartial but rather became an advocate behind the bench for Mr. Hehn. In effect, it is blatant in the Crown and the bench assists each other to either obtain a conviction or acquittal.

Subsequently, I would suspect that the B.C. Attorney General, Wally Oppal, former justice of the Court of Appeal, is not enforcing its laws regarding criminal organization and marijuana grow operations because he has a serious conflict of interest, as evident with his brother Harry Oppal who was under investigation by a special prosecutor appointed by Wally Oppal. The investigation of course turned in favour of his brother Harry Oppal on the basis that the special prosecutor claimed that the witnesses against Harry were not credible.

Consider that Stephen Easton, an economics professor at SFU was quoted to say in the recent Macleans magazine that, ""There's been no indication Canadian police have been compromised or that politicians or judges have been bought, but it's hard to imagine these kinds of flows of money without that happening".

I know from my own family such as uncles, that organized crime is cemented from within. --- The story of my own family will eventually be told in due course when I am ready to put all the pieces together first.

Kevin Annett is doing a wonderful job and we need more people to expose the corruption that is damaging all of us.

And thanks a million for writing about our own corruption coming right from Canada, where people believe that Canada is honest and clean.

"A Peek into the Life of a Bachelorette" (Thanks Tina)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

May 15, 2008

bachelorette.jpg


In love with herself. Yes. But attractive to men...I think not.






"Now, it's not that I don't engage in compromise, but I stick to a particular methodology and without apology. I like sleeping alone in my lovely queen-sized bed. When I'm drinking beer on my couch and watching football, it's a pain to have to do my hair and makeup for a boyfriend. I enjoy my loud, laughter-filled, sometimes vulgar, five-hour telephone conversations with girlfriends. And although I'm not obsessed with cleanliness, I like dishes taken to the kitchen sink and pre-rinsed. Conversely, I don't like being criticized for having a messy kitchen. Just some insight into what I find endearing about bachelorettehood."


For the whole pathetic rationalization for being unlovable and alone.. see this link


"How to Treat a Woman" by "Emma"----(Male Response below)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

May 11, 2008



I am a submissive woman.  I long to be with a man who has strong leadership skills, someone who is not hesitant to exert his power in a relationship with me.  Someone I can take care of and look after and be a helpmate to but also depend on to take charge when needed.  Someone I can complement, not someone I can dominate.   

But today's men need to learn the difference between responsible leadership and abuse.  In the upside down world of feminism we live in today, I generally come across two types of men:  

The first type is the kind who have been brainwashed by the feminist movement and think that what women want is for their men to worship and idolize them.  Nothing turns me off faster than a man who worships me, puts my needs and desires before his own and bends over backward to fulfill my every whim.  I run from men like that.   

The other type of men I come across are the ones who call themselves 'dominant,' but are actually just emotionally abusive (and sometimes physically) and don't have a clue that they are.  They are the ones who will go all the way to China or Russia looking for a 'submissive' wife, because they say there are no submissive women in the United States.  There is such a complete disconnect in the brains of these men, it is beyond me how they function in any relationship.  What they don't realize is that women (yes, even here in the US) are inherently submissive, to one degree or another.  It's in our DNA.  It is hard-wired into us (in the same way your masculinity is hard-wired into you), in spite of the fact that feminism has done its level best to squash it.   

To the men in the first category:  Go home.  There is no hope for you.   

To the men in the second category:  Any woman who truly loves you will go to the ends of the earth for you.  She will feed you and take care of you until death.  She will bear and raise your children and take care of your home.  She will put her feet to the fire for you.  She'll stand by you and support you through the worst life has to dish out.  She'll put her life on the line for you and she will do it all without reservation - as long as you are treating her well.   

Start NOT treating her well, start being disrespectful and criticizing everything she does, and all you'll do is piss her off.  All of a sudden you have this furious woman in front of you, and you have no idea what she's angry about.  Inevitably, because you cannot see where you are doing anything wrong, you'll then shift the blame and accuse her of being an angry feminist, thereby sabotaging the relationship and dooming it to fail.     

Newsflash:  She doesn't have an anger problem.  She has an abusive husband problem.  Most women with an IQ above 40 will not stay with an abusive husband.   

Let me say it again:  If you treat your woman well, you won't have to ask for her submission.  She will give it willingly, freely, happily and without reservation until the day you die.

Most of the men in this category do not know what the word 'marriage' or 'partnership' truly means.  They carry a deep-seated contempt for women in general that is apparent in almost everything they do.  They don't view their women as partners or helpmates; they view them as property and treat them as less than human, with barely a shred of simple common decency or respect.   

So what does it mean to treat a woman well?  What do women really want?   

Well, of course we want your leadership and direction.  We like our men to be men.  We want you to be strong and decisive in the ways we aren't.  We love that you can get the lid off the flipping pickle jar for us, or move a cement step to free a trapped kitten.  We LOVE that mysterious masculine side of you.  But we also want and need your respect, approval and appreciation.  That's not feminism talking, it's simple human nature.   

I once had a conversation with a man who had just been through a devastating divorce after a 27-year marriage to a woman he obviously loved very much.  He said to me, "She was so beautiful and I was always so proud to have her for my wife."   

I asked (gently), "Did you ever tell her that?"  

"NO!!!"  He said, as if it was beneath his macho dignity to actually compliment his wife.  It made me want to cry for her.   

H - E - L - L - O !?!     

Guys, come on.  Get a grip.   

Just because you expect a meal to be on the table at a certain time (and we are fine with the fact that you expect it) would it kill you to give the courtesy of a simple thank you when it is?

There's a huge difference between saying, with a twinkle in your eye:

"I'd like you to wear this today."

and

"Take that thing off, it makes your ass look fat."   

There's a huge difference between:

"I realize you have a different opinion, but I'm going to do it this way instead."

and

"Your opinion means nothing."  

There's a huge difference between:

"I appreciate all that you do."

and

"It's your JOB, woman!"   

There's a huge difference between:

"I like that you don't expect me to take you out to expensive restaurants every weekend."

and

"Hey, you're a cheap date!"   

and

"I like your hair better down."

As opposed to:

"Your hair looks like hell up."   

See the difference?  I am constantly amazed by the number of men who don't.  The first statements are relationship builders and the second statements are relationship destroyers.  To a man, it's a subtle distinction.  To a woman, it's a sledgehammer.  The first statements are what women thrive on.  They are what create and sustain that undying lifelong devotion for her partner.  The second statements are emotionally hurtful and abusive and make her feel disrespected, unappreciated and unloved.  They slowly tear down her self-worth and self-esteem.  Do that long enough and she will eventually go away, whether you are a good provider or not.   

You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar:  Show your appreciation and she will do more of whatever it is you appreciate.  Constantly criticize everything she does, and she will do less, if any at all.  Simple common courtesy like saying thank you for a meal or showing your appreciation to your partner doesn't make you any less of a man; quite the opposite.  It assures her that she is important to you and it goes a long way toward building the kind of trust and loyalty that lasts forever.  It's the key to creating that submissive woman you all claim to want.   

It's not rocket science, guys.  It takes very little effort on your part, with lifelong rewards.   

Feminism has been both bad and good for society.  On the good side, it empowered women to get out of truly abusive relationships, something that was very much needed back in the day. But one of the many ways in which it has been bad is that it has taught men to use 'feminism' as a scapegoat for their own lack of communication and relationship skills.    

Where are the REAL men, the ones who can dance on the edge of dominance without falling off the cliff into abusiveness?
-----

Male Response:

Dear Henry

I could write a long reply to this. What many don't realize (and some
do) is that while roles and identities for women have changed over
the last 40 years due to "feminism," nothing similar has happened for
men.

Emma's letter shows just how confused us men actually are today and
have been in the past. The MSM has done nuthing to give us a clear
role models either!

Singing "Girl you gotta love your man, take him by the hand, make him
understand" Jim Morrison

-Freddie

Letter from Poland

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

May 10, 2008

polish.gif
Dear Dr Makow,

My name is Krzysztof (Chris) and I live in south-western part of Poland. Currently I prepare for a Ph.D. in history while performing my duties as an assistant at the university. I would like to share some views about the reality of changing Polish society and especially the impact of that change for the male-female relationships.

I have been following Your online publications on feminism for about a year and it really helped me to define issues which I managed to observe only in part before.

First let me state that in the West the general view of Polish society
and women as traditional and conservative is based on outdated and
somehow misperceived data. The fact is (as I can see it almost every
day) that Polish women increasingly adopt the models of behavior
imported from Western societies. The pattern of male role for young
females usually comes from mass media and movies such as highly popular
American "Friends" mini-series and its many Polish copies.

Students of both sexes also watch our own movie productions which at first glance
seem to endorse traditional values but usually vindicate dysfunctional
family relations, divorces, single career model and inability for
healthy engagement between man and woman. The form of the message
remains familiar (in order to attract more conservative viewers) but the
content is undoubtedly poisonous.

Some people might argue that the alternative reality of television or
internet is not affecting anyone at all. Unfortunately the impact is
quite destructive.

I am now 25 years old and have been in several relationships with young
women. Although every one of them was different in character, they also
had some common feature - almost from the start they expected a
competition from my part. In one case a girl started to treat me as a
kind of purely physical satisfaction to her sexual eagerness. I just
could not imagine something like this adopted by woman! That limited
kind of relation could not last for long and finally broke down.

 Now I am single but basing on my experience I am looking for serious
relationship with a woman who will be ready to participate in my life.
Honestly, I am not without guilt when valuing wrong directions and my
priorities in estimating female qualities changed too. Actually, the male
attitude toward women has also been greatly distorted and I could name
many examples of such behavior among my friends. It seems obvious and
natural for them to treat women as sexual toys made only for temporary
exploitation. Their focus remains mainly physical - the greater breast,
the more  attractive girl. On the other hand almost none of them manages
to stay in a relationship for more than few months.

As I see men are increasingly disoriented as well as women. When it comes to the
relationship crisis among women I can recall one case of my female
friend with whom I failed to form a permanent understanding. Her
boyfriend left her and she asked for my advice on why that happened and
what to do next. When I tried to influence her by carefully explaining
that her readiness for sexual contacts comes too early and forms the
source of her loneliness, she was surprised. According to her opinion it
was necessary for a girl to be physically attractive first and seduce a
man so that he could not leave her. "Did it work?" - I asked. "No" was
her reply, nevertheless she felt insulted for some time by our
conversation.

In general the trends among young women and students at all are turning
to complicate relations of young generation. It manifests in their daily
activities - spending more time in front of PCs, watching irrational
entertainment shows, concentrating on their temporary feelings with
movies, games, porn, music in earphones. Much of the time of young
people's day is spent on completely unproductive and usually
brainwashing activities perceived by them as "freedom". Their own
"space" prevents them from conducting proper human relations and exchange
of ideas. In many cases they are unable to find words expressing their
opinions or form correct sentence.

To be optimistic, there are still people who try to define their purpose
in healthy way and I hope they are prepared to bring positive change to
our societies.

I believe Your website is adding to the benefit of those who want to
maintain their human identity.

Thank You,

Sincerely,

Chris
-----------------

Polish Women        (an idealistic from a Marriage website)
       
Polish women are unlike Western women due to the historical, cultural, and political situation of Poland. The woman in Poland has always been put on the pedestal. She has been cherished as a homemaker, a mother to her children and a great wife. She has always been a pillar of a family, many times working outside of the home and taking care of her husband and her children on top of that.        Since Polish society gives a high priority of raising children, the women are given the responsibility of raising children and caring for their family. They are the ones that get up early in the morning, prepare breakfast and get the kids ready to school. Many Polish women are stay-at-home mothers. They have enough time and energy to take care of the children, play with them, and make sure that they have everything they need. There are some Polish women, however, who work professionally outside of home. In such situations, small children are either in a day care during they day or spend the day at one of the relatives. Since extended family is very important in Poland, the more popular arrangement is that either a grandma or aunt will care for the children while the mother is at work.


Polish women take care of their husbands just as much as they take care of their children.

As a matter of fact, the women work double jobs while their husbands usually work at only one job. The majority of women work professionally outside of their homes. The jobs they hold are usually in the areas of health care and education. Demanding as those jobs may be, the Polish women are expected to give the 100% of their efforts to caring for their husband and the household. Right after they come back home from work they begin their homely duties such as cleaning, cooking, washing dishes and doing laundry. The women work hard so that when their husbands come home they can enjoy the atmosphere of a clean home. Polish women take pride in being able to offer freshly cooked meal to their husbands and allow them to relax in the atmosphere of their home.

Apart from extensive knowledge on how to take care of their families' appetites and leisure time, women born in Poland know a lot about being economical and diligent. They won't waste anything that can still be of use unless the family decides otherwise. Moreover, some of them can even fix broken things, like scratches on walls, broken windows or... leaking faucets, but they do appreciate if a man can do it for them. Polish females marry on average at age 23 and men at age 26. Once they get married, they hardly ever divorce. Divorce is not as prevalent in Poland as it is in many of the other former communist countries such as Russia. This difference is associated with Poland being a traditionally Catholic country, where over 90% are Catholic. Catholicism forbids married couples to divorce. Even if they do divorce, Polish females are unwilling to remarry. Typically, in a divorce women receive custody of the children. In 1991, women were granted sole custody of the children in over 70% of the divorce cases involving children under age 18. As wives, Polish women are very faithful and devoted. Once their trust is broken, however, they are not likely to trust somebody else. Due to their upbringing, they are taught to be faithful to one man and one man only.       


Polish women have always had equal access to education and today they have higher levels of educational attainment than young Polish men. Poland, like the rest of the Soviet alliance in Eastern Europe, offered women more opportunities for higher education and employment, than did most West European countries. Many professions, such as architecture, engineering, and university teaching, employed a considerably higher percentage of women in Poland than in the West, and over 60 percent of medical students in 1980 were women. In many households in the 1980s, women earned more than their husbands. Yet the socialist system that yielded those statistics also uniformly excluded women from the highest positions of economic and political power. The end of communist government brought a new debate about women's role in Polish society. A significant part of society saw the political transformation as an appropriate time for women to return full-time to the home after communism had forced them into the workplace and weakened the Polish family.
       

Letters from Ronald and Duane in Thailand

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

May 5, 2008

thai.jpg
Ronald: Since 2003 I have been an enthusiastic reader of your columns on www.rense.com and on your website. I am a half German, half Thai male who is currently living in Thailand. I have had the great opportunity to live in an environment with traditional values. My father, a retired surgeon was 32 years older than my mother and he had to wait until 55 years of age to get to know my mother in Thailand. It turned out that my mother was the best woman to him who took care of him until he passed away 3 years ago.

It was my luck to grow up in a warm family, where my father had the leadership and there were hardly any quarrels. Despite the fact that my father bought land and houses through my mother, she always was faithful. I am certain that a large portion of women would have taken advantage of this situation, but my mother did not.

The reason I am writing this email is to convey that I am beginning to understand the damages done by feminism which is becoming more dangerous in countries like Thailand as well. Having lived 12 years in Germany I have witnessed female hate against men. Women like to make fun of men being "ATM machines on 2 legs". Apart from that German girls do not want to commit or have families. Only casual sex.

After having returned to Thailand in 2004, I was seeking after the traditional and innocent Thai flower however to my astonishment they are hard to find nowadays. Statistically seen, out of ten girls only one would suit to be a lovely and trustworthy wife. The other nine are selfish. Here too times have changed when you compare the Thai women in 1973 with those today. It is almost like a different species.  Thai women have fallen so low, imagine that 40% of student girls are willing the sell their bodies just to have the latest mobile phones or go to trendy pubs. A large portion of the women want rich and foreign guys, as the Thai males does not make enough salary. Where should this lead too?

However I am aware what has caused this change in Thai society. A big factor is definitely the elitist controlled media, which is successfully transforming the Thais into consumer robots and especially spreading the banner of feminism and greed. Thaksin Shinwatra a CFR man had been ruling this country for 6 years. Now his stooges are back in power. This is very sad for a once moral and beautiful country.

There is still some hope though as a small percentage has not succumbed to brain washing. Times are over where most of the South East Asian girls were beautiful flowers. However even in the US and Europe there are still these traditional thinking girls and those whose eyes have opened and are distancing themselves from feminist and media dogma.  Yes these good girls are still out there, so why should we settle with less!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Duane: I am so glad to be back in Thailand, sorry to say, but true. I got married 18 months ago and am very happy with just the kind of wife you mentioned. Love between a man and a good woman can be so fulfilling. My wife always wears a dress and that never excited me before like it does now. The point I am trying to make is, nature comes back once the brainwashing wears off.

   We live in a big house in Chiang Rai, northern most Thailand, cooler than the scorching hot, other parts of the country. we are starting a garden to grow our own foods and are thinking of buying a couple of goats for fresh Raw milk. Life is good here and very free, Ron Paul would love the laws and the way they are enforced here. The Thai government is honest as far as I have experienced and holds people accountable for their actions but there is not a preemptive blanket enforcement of laws such as speeding and seat belts. Although these laws are on the books they are not widely enforced. There are no pushers here, no crack cocaine and no drive by shootings.

   I highly recommend this lifestyle to all retired single Americans, especially those combat Veterans like myself. Come here and find a nice Thai girl (don't look in the bars) settle down and be happy. Thailand and its people are the best therapy I know, and soon you will forget all that bothers you. Take the advise of a very wise man ( not myself) and come here and get a good old fashioned woman. There are going to be a lot of messed up minds coming home from Iraq and that's the way it is. Men are going to come home with confusion in there very souls and the first thing that comes to mind is a bullet in the head. No matter how bad you feel, I guarantee you it doesn't have to be that way. Life and love and even gentleness with come back with time, and the man never goes away. I never thought gentleness would ever return but it did and life is good.

   I feel sad about the direction my country has been steered. I have been living in Thailand for eight years now, except for the five months I went back to vote against George Bush and hoped the country would return to its prior greatness. That didn't happen and so here I returned. I don't see anything to be encouraged about by the three candidates on the block now. Everything in the media sound bites about  Rev, Wright were designed to shape the debate. What he said I think are true statements and I don't have to be black to know where AIDS comes from or what our foreign policy has brought us. Yet Obama distanced himself from his long time friend for what? This is a good example of how the media shapes debate and forms opinions. Media is losing its grip on the public but I am afraid it will be too late before my fellow Americans just turn off the TV and vote for no incumbents. Read articles on newspaper subscriptions and viewership of news networks, they are losing their credibility and folks are turning to the internet. This is the only hope I see.

   In closing I would like to thank you Dr Makow, for sharing your views and helping me understand why I was so angry. I have lost that anger now and read every day, every article I can with an open mind. Some of the stuff on the internet is really out of touch with reality, and some is just mis and disinformation but reading on, that stuff is easy to spot after a while. Please feel free to share this with your readers if you can tolerate my lack of writing skills. I leave you with an open invitation to you and your wife to visit us here anytime, I am sure we could find something to talk about, good golf here and real fresh air. Be well don't let the things you can't control occupy your peace of mind.

THE RELENTLESS MARCH OF DANISH COMMUNISM/FEMINISM BY PHILIP JONES

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

This morning, a highly politicized and thinly disguised Feminist `Action` paper (PDF File attached) was delivered in the mail along with the rest of the day's post.  
The paper is entitled `Support Us` and it calls for strike action on behalf of those who work in the Danish Social Welfare Industry.
 
Even though men also work in these occupations, the overwhelming message is stated boldly and clearly on the front page; `Give women the salary they deserve`. But this `strike` is not about women claiming equal pay, they have had that for decades. It is nothing more than a demand for a pay rise and should be presented to the public as being just that.  But the text of the eight page paper reads like yet another `Crusade` for women's rights, in order to gain support and sympathy from a population which for decades has been drenched in feminist propaganda and therefore sees society purely in those terms. The photographs on the front page of the paper are more or less a `who's who` of Danish `Power Women`.  

 danfem.jpg
The almost total and absolute takeover of all the public institutions by feminists here is on a level perhaps equaled only in the other Scandinavian countries. Even though the same route is being followed by most if not all other western nations, here, it's success is unparalleled.
 
In Denmark, this `long march` through the institutions began back in the sixties during what is generally referred to as `The Second Wave Of Feminism`. The Social `Democratic`government at the time were quick to adopt absolute `equality of the sexes` as party policy. (It should be noted that women in Denmark had achieved political equality back in the 1920's) but we are talking now about the total leveling and corrupting of natural genetic truths.

This ideological stance was then placed onto the school curriculum, which helped to secure national acceptance of the idea. At an early age, conventional ideas of gender roles were reconstructed. Boys were taught to cook, girls to saw wood. `Equality` (actually identically) was taken to it's logical conclusion. Children were indoctrinated with this notion, and told that both males and females must work.

This was in great part intended to destroy the customary belief that a woman's duty was to be a wife and mother, and substitute the idea that her place was beside her man in office and factory. The State controlled media played it's part in this too, and what was dubbed `sex role discrimination` was officially banned from children's programmes initially and throughout programming shortly after.
 
The effect of this social engineering can clearly be seen here in Denmark today, more so I believe, than anywhere else. Of course, it has happened throughout the west, but everything seems so exacerbated, extreme and highlighted here.
 
During the 1960's women began entering the Danish labour market `en masse` and at this time , a radical group calling itself the `Red Stockings` movement, came to the fore of gender conflict in Denmark. They were clearly  inspired by the works of Gloria Steinem and Betty Frieden along with home grown ideologues like Lisa Norgaard, who had harshly criticized `pro family` associations attempting to raise the profile and official status of `housekeeping` as a profession, in line with other trades. Ms Norgaard saw this only as a ` devious male strategy` to keep women `enslaved` in the home.
 
The Red Stocking's movement peaked in the 1970's and it's virulent anti male, anti family ideology became incorporated into an `Official` Equality Policy in which State, local authorities and political parties and trade union organizations took over the role from `women's organizations`. This led to what is today openly declared as being `State Sponsored Institutionalized Feminism`.
 
The `Red Stocking` activists of the 1960's and 1970's, are now in positions of extreme authority throughout Danish public life, and continue to exert their malevolent influence on the whole of society. The extent of this influence cannot be overstated or exaggerated. It has been a gender `coup d'etat` of the most fantastic proportions.
 
So why has this unnatural creed been able to insinuate itself so completely here, in comparison with other societies? I believe the answer lies in the fact that until quite recently, Denmark like Sweden has been relatively isolated from the mainstream of European life.

Therefore, the State has been able to exercise a disproportionate amount of intellectual control over a population starved of any real outside influences. The relationship between the media and the education system for example is quite unique in so much as that back in the sixties and seventies, both were controlled by the Education ministry, and unofficially likely still are to a lesser degree today.

Together, these vital channels of information, under official direction have been able to `guide` the population in increments, into accepting an ideology of extreme gender interchangeability, whilst at the same time ensuring that any `outside` influences were censored to ensure no unwanted contradictions or ideas were allowed to hinder or detract from their agenda. By the time that Satellite TV and the Internet came along, these ideas were so firmly entrenched, that only minimal `damage limitation` was necessary, and anyway, by that time, the rest of the industrialized world was also firmly in the `velvet grip` of the Femi Brigades and their sponsors.
 
A walk along any Danish street will quickly reveal that there is something quite odd about the place. Initially, it is difficult to pinpoint. But it doesn't take too long to work out that women here do not look as they do elsewhere. They make little or no effort, dress appallingly even by western standards and have an attitude bereft of any `feminine` whiles whatsoever.
 
Yes indeed Henry, we have a long way to go before the injury caused to humanity by the `false gods` of Feminism in particular and the `Great Work of Ages` in general can begin to be addressed and then reversed. When it does begin, It won't start here and that's for sure.
 
"Philip Jones" <true_brit58@hotmail.co.uk>