Bogus TV Report Casts Doubt on Ottawa Shooting
November 5, 2014
These so-called "bullet holes" were already in the wall 18 months ago when Google took this picture inside the Parliament Building.
Reporter Evan Solomon of the CBC said they occurred Oct. 22 when Michael Zehalf-Bibeau was shot. If Bibeau was indeed killed here, where are the real bullet holes?
by DD
(henrymakow/com)
There are many pieces of evidence that suggests the "Attack In Ottawa" Oct. 22 was staged. In particular, a CBC video that purportedly provided the details of the event caught my attention.
The video starts with anchor Wendy Mesley stating that, "Tonight we can tell you precisely..." She then hands off to Evan Solomon. He starts his segment by saying, "...dramatic details....of exactly..." There is no mincing of words. The smoking gun is when he shows the bullets in the alcove.
First watch the CBC Report (image below) where Evan Solomon shows where the shooter was hiding and finally shot dead. He is pointing to "bullet holes" that were already there! Moreover, there are no new ones! Were they shooting blanks? Was this another "drill?"
In my opinion, this event was staged and CBC lied to its viewers. It's a bold statement but I am very hard pressed to believe that the CBC allowed themselves to cover details that were SO wrong.
Then, they think that the following correction posted online Oct. 25 is adequate. It's NOT! From CBC:
Corrections
This story has been edited from a previous version that stated there were nine bullet holes in the wall near the Parliamentary library, based on information from multiple sources. In fact, upon further investigation, not all the marks were caused by the bullets. The exact number of bullets that hit the wall in the shooting is unclear‎. Also, the pistol used by the sergeant-at-arms is a semi-automatic, not an automatic as reported in an earlier version and in the TV piece attached.
Oct 25, 2014 5:15 PM ET
Ponder this for a second. If this shooting actually took place where they say it did, then how can these simple details get confused?
The bullet marks should be there. First, they said they were there and now they say "they are not all bullet marks. "
In fact there are no new marks. This tells me, they staged it. It's only difficult to provide accurate details if you lied and that is exactly what the CBC did. No "ifs" "ands" or "buts".
If you watch the Josh Wingrove video, you will hear a long series of bullets being fired when the shooter was killed. You would expect, after hearing that, that the bullets would have caused major damage to the wall behind the shooter but what we have are 9 discrete marks (in fact the picture shows 10) on the wall. None are new.
The CBC need to reveal their sources and explain how this happened. Canada, where is your outrage? This cannot be condoned and overlooked.
Phil said (November 7, 2014):
Clearly bullet holes 2,3,5,7,8,9 were originally screw holes used to fix a picture frame or plaque on the wall due
to their symmetry. That is abundantly clear! 2,3,and 5 are in complete alignment as are 7 8 and 9. Looks like it was removed to put the much smaller plaque in place.
6 is on the corner of a stone block that might have crumbled and 1 is also on the edge of another stone block.
What a hoot!