Retired Nurse-2 said (January 24, 2011):

i got out my box of diaries going way back to when i was nursing, and i can remember something that may be important, with insiders like this man who know things they should not, when in hospital they always have a 'relative' sit with them 24/7 so that if they speak they can shut them up,

a conversation i had at the time with other staff members in the canteen, and one woman now long dead said, the doctors would 'let people die' if they were a threat to national security, i gather this man was a potential whistle blower and from that article he must have talked about things he shouldn't have, so i am surprised he left hospital if you get my drift, we had several people in there like him, and they always had a 'relative' with them as a minder

Retired Nurse said (January 21, 2011):

i was a nurse in a well known London teaching hospital which had a secret ward for military casualties in the early seventies. I remember this man stokes coming on this secret ward, the talk among the staff was that he was sent to Moscow to collect documents from a would be defector and was betrayed. He was captured and badly beaten by soviets. He was sentenced for anti soviet activities to svetmagorsk camp on the siberian border, where he very foolishly kept trying to escape, each time the punishment was more severe, being buried alive, mock firing squads and being hung up for daily beatings with canes was part of what occurred.

It was said that the British government denied knowledge of him until he threatened to talk, the embassy then got him back to Britain where he weighed under 5 stone and had been set alight with petrol, he had experienced a total mental and physical breakdown, the plastic surgeon who worked on him was a good friend, who said he would never be right.

retired nurse of 40 years experience.

This article is relevant

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=4202

Alexandra said (January 21, 2011):

Greetings from Scotland. I always find your articles of great interest. I offer you some thoughts about Kitchener. I have visited the Orkneys. These islands are some distance from the North of the Scottish mainland. Now, I had already heard that Kitchener's ship had been put in the way of danger completely deliberately. What happened after his ship was attacked was that orders were given, on the Orkneys, that no help should be given to any survivors from the shipwreck. Consequently, there was hardly any help. However, a few local people did help some of the survivors, who somehow got ashore. I asked about this on my visit to the Orkneys, and the story that I had heard was confirmed. There is a memorial, as I recall, for the victims. The people that I spoke to seemed to think that Kitchener was disposed of, quite deliberately, because his direction of the War was considered unsatisfactory. I must say that I was shocked to have this story confirmed by Orkney people, who had no reason to lie about this matter

Charles said (January 20, 2011):

There is a subtext to the line of thought distinguishing "Gentile" from "Moorish" or "Jewish" or "Hindu" banking. The most honest sub-text seems to be presented that a dedicated "Mithraic" cult emerged in Judaism (and we are not talking Christianity here by the way despite all evidence) and that cult, the Frankist cult, controls international banking.

One difficulty with this thought is the Bank of England existed before Jacob Frank. The other difficulty is the Vatican Bank existed prior to either one. So it seems to me that all roads lead to Rome. I think a bright light on banking needs must also concentrate on Mother Church and not solely on families like Medici or Fugger.

K said (January 20, 2011):

Great article,

I knew this man Stokes in the late sixties. He was attached to the anti soviet desk; then seconded to a particularly secret section, and all i can say is that he was an amazing crack shot who could live rough in holes in the ground for days on end.

He must be a great age now. I had a photo of him with peter wright and the Cypriot rep outside the Cyprus station taken in 1969. he was in a position to know a lot of stuff and i did not know he was still alive.

Bob said (January 20, 2011):

That's a pretty disastrous chronological error that Stokes makes. He also calls Lord Alfred Douglas ("Bosie") Alfred Bruce. It would certainly help his credibility if he mentioned sources.

--

Bob

I agree that Stokes is a sloppy writer who makes some serious errors. In this business we learn to separate the wheat from the chaff. Stokes is basically on the right track. What is novel is that he presents Churchill as quite literally a "Soviet" agent and names some possible sources.

Obama could be a "Soviet" agent as well. Frightening isn't it?

Henry

PS- Stokes may be referring to this (from wikipedia)

In the most noted case, brought by Winston Churchill in 1923, Douglas was found guilty of libeling Churchill and was sentenced to six months in prison. Douglas had claimed that Churchill had been part of a Jewish conspiracy to kill Lord Kitchener, the British Secretary of State for War. Kitchener had died on 5 June 1916, while on a diplomatic mission to Russia: the ship in which he was traveling, the armoured cruiser HMS Hampshire, struck a German naval mine and sank west of the Orkney Islands.

In 1924, while in prison, Douglas, in an ironic echo of Wilde's composition of De Profundis (Latin for "From the Depths") during his incarceration, wrote his last major poetic work, In Excelsis (literally, "In the highest"), which contains 17 cantos. Since the prison authorities would not allow Douglas to take the manuscript with him when he was released, he had to rewrite the entire work from memory.

Douglas maintained that his health never recovered from his harsh prison ordeal, which included sleeping on a plank bed without a mattress.