John said (February 13, 2012):

I've noticed that Rense censors a LOT of NEWS, and especially
real important and timely news, and as much as 50% of what is
important.

I surf about 2 hours a day and can see very clearly what Rense
omits/censors !

Remember, sins of omission are as grave as sins of commission.
Rense readers beware and be fully informed.

The Fukushima earthquake appears very clearly to have never reached a point 9 magnitude.

I downloaded almost every Tsunami video posted. When I reviewed them I could not find any earthquake damage. The people, (being well educated on earthquakes and Tsunamis)
appeared to be actively engaged in their normal business routines as the Tsunami struck. A 7 or 8 magnitude would have caused a mass exodus to higher ground by the authorities. There was no mass exodus visible in the Tsunami videos ! !

Gary said (January 31, 2012):

This seems very plausible to me, and it is unfortunate that this
information has not been picked up by more alternative media.

During 9/11, the company providing security to the World Trade Center, 'Kroll Associates', had Zionist ties. In this article it is noted that: "...an Israeli firm by the name of Magna BSP secured a contract to run security at the Fukushima Daiichi plant."

Consider the dates: 9/11/2001 and 3/11/2011. Numerology and astrology are not ignored by the ruling elites, and these numbers (and the astrology associated with them) may be significant - and should not be ignored.

Can there be a peaceful solution to the escalation of tension between Israel and Iran? It seems to me that the Illuminati would prefer that there was not.

JB said (January 30, 2012):

just noting here - so Rense ends a 10 year relationship with someone who tries to suggest that a nuke was behind Fukushima - but he will continue to promote the dribble of obvious frauds such as Ben Fulford.

could this have anything to do with the emphasis/investment Rense has put into the Fukushima stories? Is it perhaps problematic when people try to turn the quest to bring truth to the masses into a business model?

David said (January 30, 2012):

I didn't know Rense was playing censor. He did have a row with Mark Glenn over pushing Muslim bashing material around a year ago. In that case it was Glenn who objected to Rense unfairly putting anti-Muslim info on Rense's web site.

Peter said (January 29, 2012):

If jr wont link to this highly informative and thoughtfully believable
report then it can mean only one thing

ITS TRUE

Well done Henry Integrity like a laser beam as always

Oh and Jeff "Take that silly wig off"

Matt said (January 29, 2012):

The Fukushima reactors collapsed due to moderate earthquakes. 'Spent" fuel that still has 90% of its energy was stored in tanks above ground just like in the US. The reality is, nuclear power is extremely unsafe, as was once again proven at Fukushima. There are miles of plumbing and pumps that have to work correctly. GE, designer of the reactors, should be held liable. If Japan offered to enrich uranium fuel for Iran, it was so Iran would not have a reason/need to enrich fuel, for which I am sure Israel was thankful. The Japanese government lied to their people throughout this incident, which is entirely unacceptable.

Doug said (January 29, 2012):

Jeff Rense is an egotistical ass clown, just like Alex Jones. I am continually amused by the animosity between the "big names" in the "alternative media", calling one another CIA operatives and so-on. It's childish an very counter-productive; it actually makes them appear much less credible, as if they wouldn't already appear silly to a skeptical newcomer to the community. As far as I am concerned, you are the only legitimate one out there because you're the only one willing to give others opinions consideration instead of immediately jumping to slandering them, etc. Useful idiots like Rense dont see the harm that they do. The odds are already stacked against us, you know?

Fight the good fight my friend.

Irish Dan said (January 29, 2012):

Jeff's attitude is inexcusable, as Sinn Fein person who was banned from Irish Radio and TV for almost 25 years, I totally disagree with censorship or the curtailment of free exchange of information, irrespective of how bizzar or unlikely the concepts proposed may seem.

For a large part of my life I I had a close working association here
in Ireland as a paralegal with the late Billy Flynn PI, a man who
exposed dozens of Irish State scandals and one who regularly exposed police wrongdoing for decades.

On one occasion while working with him on what became known as The Donegal Garda Scandal (Garda Siochana.... Guardians Of The Peace....Irish Police) I became aware that some of the local police had their own bomb making factory and they were mixing and making viable explosives. These explosives were then planted with faulty detonators in the British Occupied Six Counties, in another jurisdiction.

This and other matters afterwards became the subject of a Judicial Enquiry and is now a matter of public record. It was done to enhance overtime and promotion of corrupt police in both jurisdictions but what was a local cross border operation could have jeopardized the Peace Process at a sensitive time.

In this covert world of the spooks and the NWO, often one and the same, nothing, no matter how apparently bizzar or abnormal can be ruled out. Jeff Reece is doing the whole exposure cause a grave disservice and he is working against his own stated objectives.

You were right Henry to carry that article and allow thinking people to come to their own conclusions. Jeff may have disagreed with you and the conclusions but he could have mounted a counter argument and opened up the debate as to what really happened. Instead he has de facto curtailed the debate and discussion.

Quo Bono ? Not you Henry, not Jeff or not those who are opposed to this kind of covert International skulduggery!

Kassandra said (January 29, 2012):

First let me thank you for your website! It's one of my favorites. I love the fact that your site focuses on morals and critical issues in the most intelligent manner. I have learned so much here. And I owe you a debt of gratitude, which I should have already expressed. Sorry, I was remiss! ( This is my first time writing you.)

I felt compelled to write, in seeing what occurred regarding Rense. I am dropping him immediately. He shall never again grace my TOP SITES page. It appears he doesn't value free exchange of ideas. Neither does he embody the mindset that we readers are intelligent enough to decide for ourselves what to believe.

Personally, I am glad to see others besides myself that question events such as these. Since 911, I question EVERY event that occurs anywhere. They have the technology. It is quite possible.

TPTB are also without a shred of conscience. Such creatures will pollute even their own bed to grasp more money and power. Evil has long term cunning, but has a huge blind spot regarding consequence. Megalomania destroys the destroyer.Inevitably. I look at these mass polluting events and remember the UN Agenda 21, and the Georgia Guidestones. And think of all prophecies, from all traditions. And above all recall what was written about Chief Seattle. ( It is not relevant to me whether he is the source of that wisdom or not. Truth is truth, regardless of who speaks it!) Indeed, we are all downwind, we are all downstream. What man does to the web of life he also does to himself. Nature doesn't lose a chemical.

And Thank You Henry for sublime articles such as "Philo: "Every Good Man is Free"

With all the tragedy that befalls the world. We need some inspiration too!

Farganne Reply to David said (January 29, 2012):

My reply to this:

Unfortunately, I have nothing good to smoke, so if I'm wrong about something, it's just that I am misguided or ill-informed. I am no engineer or scientist, and I'm learning a lot as I go. What's important to me is to examine the evidence, and I feel that the alternative media has not given this report the attention it deserves.

You make a good point about the ocean water absorbing energy from the quake. I looked into it and found a precedent in the Indian Ocean quake/tsunami of 2004. It occurred 50 miles or so off the West Coast of Sumatra. On Google Maps:

http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=3.316,95.854&spn=50,50&t=m&q=3.316,95.854

Now here's a picture of the tsunami hitting the mainland:

http://extinctionrising.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/tsunami-wave.jpg

That picture seems to justify your claim. I have sent Stone an email asking what he has to say about this.

Now, what do you have to say about the blasts that destroyed the reactors? And what about Reactor 4?

Addendum: According to Stone's presentation, the purported epicenter was 24 miles from the coast, not 43: http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/smokingun1.jpg

PMJ said (January 29, 2012):

Many of your readers will find you without Jeff Rense. We are not all dumb asses and realize the individual need to discern. Just like you, I always tell people { just because I read something and pass it on for a look/see, doesn't mean I am endorsing all the info} DISCERNMENT IS REQUIRED!!!!!!

Fred said (January 29, 2012):

So much for free dissemination of information and the exchange of ideas. This proves the axiom that there is no such thing as a free press! I expect this type of behavior out of the New York Times and other controlled newspapers engage in; not from a site that bills itself as a champion of free speech! Rense allows many writers to opine about their passions and some are really out there but que sera, sera!

I will place Rense.com in the same category as WND and will treat it accordingly.

Just a suggestion. Email your readers and tell them to add your site to their Favorites Bar.

Horst said (January 29, 2012):

Yes, you are absolutely right, there is no need to be censored by somebody whom we thought to be on the same wave-length
and being able to accept freedom of speech and expression. - Not to flatter your mishandled mind and excellence in what
you are giving us, you are indeed a shining light in this sombre world,

You know what we say in French: un de perdu, dix de retrouves.....

This being said, please continue with what you are offering us, there certainly are many more subscribers of yours who will
encourage you and stay the line, and share my stance, Nobody is perfect and we only learn from our mistakes, if we dare to look up to GOD.

David said (January 29, 2012):

A 9.0-magnitude earthquake is more than 100 times stronger than a 6.8. A 9.0 should have devastated everything within a 1,000-km radius. There should have been widespread urban carnage, even worse than what Kobe suffered?????

It's 43 miles off the coast!!!!!

The energy was absorbed by the water.

Kobe was only 12 miles off the coast!!!!!

Lot's of sea floor / sand and water to absorb the initial shock.

This guy is smoking some good shit.

Farganne (reply to PB) said (January 29, 2012):

First, these are not my claims. They are Jim Stone's. Stone established that there was no 9.0-magnitude earthquake anywhere, inland or offshore.

Second, you claim that offshore quakes weaken as they reach land. I am unable to find support for this claim. Can you support this claim scientifically?

Third, videos of the tsunami show commercial parking lots full of parked cars. The people were not warned of the tsunami. There was no "high ground" being sought.

Fourth, your link to a "photo analysis" of the tsunami yielded no photos.

Fifth, and this is something I couldn't get to in the article, but Mr. Arnie "prompt criticality" Gunderson is not a real expert. Stone proved that the peak of Gunderson's resume was toying with a 100-watt reactor in a college class. Yet he's the resident "expert" on the "prompt criticality" theory of how those massive structures exploded.

Sixth, information from Daiichi is still coming in via sensors, and that information is distorted -- by Stuxnet.

Seventh, you can see the damage in clear detail by looking at the classified drone photos of the disaster site as retrieved by the website Pink Tentacle and as analyzed in Stone's report.

Have you even read Stone's report?

Your blog seems quite serious, and I would like to believe that you are of good intentions. But something tells me that at the very least, you haven't bothered to read Stone's report.

Doug said (January 29, 2012):

Censorship has the purpose of covering truth, lies (hopefully) become self evident as more information is exposed. The scientific method explains that we form a hypothesis then disprove that hypothesis and form another until the hypothesis explains the truth.

The idea of Fukashima being an "inside job" is a valid hypothesis for testing, based only on history of other cataclysms being inside job. One should check this possibility given past experience. An attempt to censor this kind of investigation is an attempt to censor truth. I will never listen to Rense again.

Censorship has done far more damage in real terms than any one disaster. Censorship shapes propaganda and allows wars, warps the mind into a false world view and allows "inside jobs" to be carried out in the first place. Physical damage and loss of life has occured in these wars lasting 100 years, its only been possible with propaganda and censorship.

Censorship is the acid test for truth movement media.

David said (January 29, 2012):

On Rense... strange he would ditch his best columnist.

I just looked at the others on the site, I was surprised how bad many of them are. Have you seen these horrific Dead Dog Poet Transmitting articles? I don't understand a word this guy says. Here's a quote from his latest piece:

'Word has it that they are erecting a statue in the West Village, of Harris Milstead snacking on poodle shit. That's what the American wet dream is all about. When your mind is a Petri dish, this is the kind of thing modern art aficionados lose their lunch over. Harris will probably be snacking on that too, if it happens and the whole thing will be art; managed and ministered by the usual suspects who handle art the way they handle dead gerbils in the aftermath and possibly in the afterlife as well. I suspect in that latter case the gerbils are no longer dead and have been reverse Bonzaied.'

You couldn't make that up.

Don said (January 29, 2012):

How insane, great argument, I posted it as did Icke and I'm sure many others….let the perceived truth fly and people will decide for themselves should be the MO, which has always been my beef with Rense and some others.

Let people decide, stop the filtering. What's to fear of the Truth?

Anyway, we're all a bunch of fluid serious heartfelt searchers and re-searchers and this needs to be dealt with on a much more loving and understanding level.

You're the real deal Henry…anyone who shunts you is suspect in my book.

PB said (January 29, 2012):

A few of Farganne's claims are far-fetched. Regarding the damage radius of an offshore quake, whether man-made or natural: by the time it reached the island, the quake would be weaker. On 3/11, the ground accelerations at Daiichi NPS were within design criteria, so certainly it wasn't a calamity. Tokyo newsroom staff continued work during the quake, because its magnitude was reduced by the time it reached Tokyo.

Without a warning of the approaching tsunami, there would have been order of magnitude more victims. Most of the population at risk has sought high ground.

The height of tsunami at the Daiichi NPS was not 15 m. There are no believable proofs. Damage recorded at Daiichi NPS is not consistent with such a wave -- see photo analysis here:
http://piotrbein.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/join-a-grassroots-investigation-of-311-nuclear-catastrophe-%e2%80%93-stuxnet-in-fukushima-daiichi/

Farganne believes that planted nukes have destroyed the reactors, since a hydrogen explosion could not damage a reactor's containment. A meltdown will destroy a reactor. Nuclear expert Tedd Weyman (Canada) wrote to my blog: "We know from the ballsitic features of #1 reactor’s first explosion that it was NOT a hydrogen explosion, it was a super criticality — prompt critical –event, indicating core melt and inner containment breach." http://piotrbein.wordpress.com/2011/05/13/alert-reactor-1-meltdown-unstoppable-extremely-dangerousstopienie-w-reaktorze-1-niemozliwe-do-pokonania-niezwykle-grozne/

Likely, hydrogen released by the overheated nuclear fuel rods (exposed due to loss of cooling water), made its way to the outer building envelope and exploded, stripping the relatively light upper structures in units 1, 3 and 4. Unit 2 was vented through louvers in the upper part of the reactor building. Tedd Weyman writes about hydrogen produced by fuel rods in reactors and SFP: "Several metals and ceramics in nuclear reactors, when exposed to water, experience chemical interactions called hydrolysis and radiolysis. One of the most dangerous non-nuclear kinetic energy products of these reactions the formation of hydrides and the explosive gas, hydrogen. The raw or new fuel rods (MOX fuel made of plutonium and urnaium) as well as the spent fuel rods both produce hydrogen." http://piotrbein.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/a-state-of-lies-not-emergency-is-declared/

Farganne is right that reactor 4 meltdown/explosion would be impossible since its fuel was removed before 3/11. Information from Daiichi is scant -- do we know the damage to the reactor itself? It was the contents of its SFP that caused an explosion, due to a "slow" chain reaction, according to nuclear reactor expert Arnie Gundersen (USA): the fuel pool likely had "a self-sustaining chain reaction" rather than receiving nuclear fission products in the fallout from the other units. http://fairewinds.com/content/gundersen-discusses-current-condition-reactors-tepco-claim-no-fission-fuel-pool-and-lack-rad

Farganne said (January 28, 2012):

Author reply to Ken Adachi below:

You posted your opinions on Fukushima, which were accurate, and which you backed up with some seismogram analysis and testimony of psychics.

Jim Stone was 10 weeks later than you because he spent more than 500 hours compiling hard evidence to back up his claims.

As for your assertion that he never published anything before his Fukushima report, simply search "Tainted Nightmare" at Google:

https://www.google.com/search?q=tainted+nightmare&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

He is not an ex-NASA analyst. He claims to have been an analyst for the NSA. You insinuate that his work history makes him untrustworthy. That is ad hominem and naive. There are good and bad people in every agency. Evil is not monolithic, but highly compartmentalized. TPTB are very good at harnessing intelligence. If they get hold of a brainiac with principles, they will employ that person to perform specific tasks while keeping them in the dark about the more nefarious things that go on.

Jim Stone produced a massive report based on lots of research and real, hard evidence. You gave opinions, with almost no evidence. There's a big difference.

Ken Adachi said (January 28, 2012):

Hello Henry,

Jim Stone did not break the Japan nuke story when he published his article for the first time on May 28, 2011 claiming that the March 11 Japan Tsunami was caused by undersea nuclear explosions. Nor did he break the story on May 28, 2011 that the Fukushima, Daaiichi reactor containment building explosions were caused by planted nuclear devices (rather than an
explosion of hydrogen gas).

I broke both of those stories fully TEN WEEKS earlier, BEFORE we ever read a word from Mr. Jim Stone, ex-NASA analyst.

I published an article on March 12, 2011, ONE day after the Japan event, Japan's 3/11/11 Mega 9.1 Earthquake: Another Illuminati Production? (Mar. 12, 2011)

From Ken Adachi, Editor
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/japanquakemanufactured12mar11.shtml
March 12, 2011

in which I said:

1. The tsunami was not a genuine, earthquake-provoked tsunami, but rather was a sea SURGE that resulted from planted undersea nuclear devices.

2. The Daiichi explosions were due to mini nukes that were planted inside the Fukushima facility in order to CREATE the APPEARANCE of a massive nuclear leak (as in Chernobyl) in order to perpetrate a Radiation psyops HOAX upon the world. The purpose was to turn public opinion against nuclear power plants in favor of the "safer" gas turbine plants that Merkle's Germany announced a few months ago would now become the norm in Germany as they phase out nuclear plants (does this sound like a setup to you? Think there's any connection to that natural gas pipeline that Russia wants to run from the Caspian sea across Afghanistan, etc?)

3. i reported on March 12, 2011 that the March 11, 2011 Japan seismographs were NOT showing a natural earthquake release, but rather the sudden vertical spike that can ONLY be seen with underground nuclear explosions, not natural earthquake activity.

4. I also reported that the radiation being detected in the sea water was not coming from Daiichi, but rather was due to the undersea nuclear explosion that created the sea surge that was erroneously reported to be a tsunami caused my a Richter 9 earthquake.

All these claims were made on March 12, 2011 at educate-yoursef.org.
I re-posted Jim Stone's May 28 article on my web site on June 1, 2011 . I was somewhat miffed that he did not mention my web site or my March 12 article in his piece, but I felt the story was too important to ignore as he CORROBORATED and affirmed what I had already stated 2.5 months earlier.

No one ever heard of (or read anything by) "freelance reporter" Jim Stone before he "broke" the Japan nuke/faux earthquake story with his May 28, 2011 article. Now that I know of his NASA affiliation, I have greater suspicions as to WHY he didn't mention my web site or my March 12 article in his write up.

Richard said (January 27, 2012):

Also, Kudos to you on the current Fukashima article on your site. I have long felt that there is something extremely fishy about that event.

The article you posted is the first I have read of the
"exploded-by-design" theory. Of course, I am sure the criminals that did this will get away with it, just as they did on 9/11.

Thank-you for the work that you do!