Luke said (October 12, 2015):

Thank you, Henry. The articles you've published about sexuality and feminism have changed my life in such a positive and empowering way. I'm 31 years old and truly feel wise compared to the majority of people around me. I wish I lived in a country where universities taught information like this.

Peter D said (October 10, 2015):

First and foremost, I must state that your observations have been spot on, in regards to this sexual revolution that overwhelmed the post war baby boomers. Social engineers have thrown monkey wrenches into the youth's development for millennia.(Part of being enveloped within an intensely competitive social milieu) Sigmund Freud wrote in his landmark study, Civilization and It's Discontents, ***psychological repression of the awareness of our natural being was a necessary step in building civilization. Only people motivated by abstraction rather then spontaneous perception and need, could build the cities and staff the factories, serve in the armies, and otherwise discipline themselves into taking part in the vast and self-abdicating social projects.***

Class delineation plays a significant role in this arena. The discipline and self-abdication are the marks of the middle class and lower class. The upper class live lives of luxury disconnected from the mundane day to day rat races consuming the middle and lower classes.

Manhattan, in the 1970's was a case in point. It was a huge playground for the wealthy. It was a completely different world from the outer boroughs, home to the self abdicating and disciplined. All through the 1970's and 1980's I was a nudist. Nude beaches were almost totally the playground of the upper classes. In fact, it was through a book on nudism that I encountered Freud's Civilization and It's Discontents.

Strangely, today, the nude beaches are frequented by an increasing number of middle and lower classes. (Far more then during the preceding decades). It is an ugly scene today,unsophisticated, sin drenched oafs, acting like infants.

I am unsure what has transpired in the last 20 years but I am convinced we are all specimens in some vast petrie dish. Nudism was a privilege, a privilege enjoyed by the educated. Higher education is for the privileged. The lower classes and middle classes are somewhat aware of their significant class underprivileged. This was clear to me when I returned to the nude beaches and saw how markedly they had changed. Nudism was only for the privileged, now ,the lowly can partake of the luxury of nudism.

My conclusion Henry is, the current raging sexual depravity is a way to pander to the lowly. A type of bread and circus' to keep the lowly distracted and out of the way of the high and mighty.

Dan H said (October 9, 2015):

IMO, the reason that God deliberately placed the excretory and sexual functions in such close proximity is because it means something and that something is the Cross of Christ.

Notice that the sexual function in both genders is between the urinary and defecation systems. If urination stands for the cleansing of evil from humanity by the flood (by water), then defecation would stand for the same cleansing of evil from humanity by the tribulation of Revelation (by death, since what comes out is dead). In between those two events which served to eliminate 'waste' from the individual body human stands the Cross of Christ which represents 'new life' for the corporate body human.

This is why sexual sins are so serious to God. They are a corruption of the 'new life' provided by God through the Cross of Christ and represented by the human reproductive system.

H said (December 10, 2012):

Hi Henry. After reading your article 'Sex Obsession as Occult Possession', what immediately came to mind was a scene from the film 'Altered States', written by Paddy Chaefsky.

After having a rather steamy sex scene, Emily Jessup (Blair Brown) said to her husband Eddie Jessup (William Hurt), and I paraphrase, "Why do you think that after we have sex, you have to see God?"

The film skillfully shows a blend of sex, drugs, and technology and how they all fit together in the humanistic pursuit of making man God.

So a more appropriate response to her husband would be Emily Jessup asking why her husband thinks he has to be God, which would be the final cap on the film making in totally in line with what you article says.

Richard said (December 10, 2012):

Our priest recently explained how he made the decision to become a priest and quit dating. Plied by wine perhaps, he confided that in college he reviewed his diary, and noticed that every ten months he'd written ecstatically about meeting a girl.

Each one was a different girl - but the feelings he put down were identical. He realized that he was projecting feeling, needs and expectations onto a string of girls just because they were female. The feelings for the individual girls wore off.
He said he's run into a few of them in later years, and wondered how he ever thought they were so unique.

There was a time when Western society didn't consider sex and orgasm a 'need'. After Kinsey (and his Rockefeller foundation backers) set in motion legal and social changes that would result in boys taking up masturbation as a human right, and orgasm as a need, sex became a surrogate religion in the West.

Sex worship is really worship of a Self that's not really there. It's a very important component of the New Age religions. Historically, civilizations that fell into debauchery have been rare, and the 'golden age' of sexual license didn't last long due to proliferation of venereal diseases, or conquest by more stoic cultures who saw they had their guard down.

In most cultures sex obsessed people are relegated to barely tolerated subcultures, or banished entirely. The evidence of history does not bode well for the "queering" of Global "civilization".

Dan said (December 9, 2012):

Sorry to say that for many years I quoted Maslow at parties to impress "chicks" I picked up with my 'liberalness'. I know know only someone emotionally arrested at puberty could confuse an orgasm with a 'religious experience', but I did, thanks to pornography-driven masturbation.

I was introduced to Maslow in Psych 101 in which his Kabbalah inspired 'hierarchy of needs' pyramid was presented as scripture for the Self.
(notice that 'morality' is the last thing on Maslow's list. First ya gotta have food, sex, money, status, and strokes from mom... http://www.techinasia.com/techinasia/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/main-qimg-af9d1d5e525186d5257563f9b112249c.png )

I learned from experience in life that Maslow's pyramid isn't universal. It's exactly what they called it, Maslow's heirarchy of needs, nobody else's.

Sex in the occult is used as a form of sorcery, because sex alters consciousness. I know of only two occult uses for it. Only one is used on the public - that's the induction of suggestive state and submission of the targets by media sorcerers.

TV dramas crank out the same themes in lockstep from season to season, that has nothing to do with reality. Several years ago there were a disproportionate number of CSI and 'House' scripts involving father-daughter incest. (in one 'House' the father had actually turned his son into a transsexual...talk about a double-header...)

I threw out my TV in early 2008, but what little I glean seems TV programming and production has been turned over to homosexuals to promote their own fantasies.

John said (December 9, 2012):

I feel sorry for you. You seemed to have completely missed the point of sex. Your must be insecure in you own masculinity to be so afraid of loving a woman. You must come to terms with the notion that women do not exist to serve men - they exist to propagate the race, with great difficulty and danger to themselves. By the way, was your steak corn fed or free range? Maybe you should try hunting down your next steak yourself, perhaps wild elk, that would be even better. Likely you have even scratched the surface on how good a steak can be.

Asim said (December 9, 2012):

Your latest article is brilliant and ever more relevant. Here in the UK, the Zionist- controlled BBC always show Jews as one homogeneous group all hellbent on destroying the Palestinians. Jews are depicted as hate mongering settlers or cold blooded IDF soldiers-but what about the Jewish Israelis who defend and stand up for the Palestinians?

The Zionist- controlled media are at pains to never show this light of the Jewish people, otherwise, how else can they foment religious hatred between Jews and Muslims in particular?

I recently went to an inter-faith dialogue between jews, christians and muslims. I was shocked but so pleasantly surprised to see jewish rabbis from neutri karta stand an speak in defense of the oppressed. Tragically, we do not see this more often-instead we see orchestrated movements of pro-israelis swarming to trafalger square draped in israeli flags arrogantly defending their crimes. I approached one lady who was completely draped in the israeli flag. I asked her why she defended israel's actions, and the first thing she said to me was..'I have lots of arab and palestinian friends, I like them very much....!!!!!! Clearly, Henry, Jewish people have been grotesquely manipulated into acting as willing sacrificial dupes as you have so eloquently put it.