Direct Link to Latest News


Sandy Hook Was a Drill

January 27, 2013

(President Obama, wiping a non-existent tear, over Sandy Hoax massacre.)


(Obama at a campaign rally. "You love me. You really love me.") 

Latest! (Dec. 8, 2013) - Unraveling Sandy Hook
911 calls cast more doubt

(April 18) -What is Known about Sandy Hook

Inconsistencies, upbeat demeanour and bad acting suggest Sandy Hook was sold to participants as a "training exercise." The ensuing controversy over whether a massacre actually took place may be intended to create confusion and division.

Latest- Important interview with James Tracy on anomalies -

 Child survivor says it was a drill   (March 5)
Newtown refuses Access to Death Certificates
-- Blurring the Lines between "Drill" and Attack

By Melanie Lamport
("R you Sandy or R you Hooked?", abridged& edited by 

James Tracy, a tenured professor from Florida Atlantic University, is suggesting the deaths at Sandy Hook may have resulted from a training exercise. Tracy says that "crisis actors" may have been employed in a conspiracy to shape public opinion in favor of gun control. [NO these mass shootings are not about taking away your AK-47 hunting rifle]

Tracy probably got the idea from the "leaked" Pottawattamie County, Iowa Emergency Management Agency document, Operation Closed Campus Exercise Plan (ExPlan). This describes a DHS-approved drill such as Sandy Hook.

Click here or here to download your own copy of the ExPlan before the Internet police remove it for security reasons.

Where are the bodies or photos of bodies or crime scene photos? What about a surveillance video or still images from the scene or a timeline that makes some sense? [2]

Look at this screen-shot showing a blog post from the charity website for Dec. 10 (now removed).

You can find more images with the Google time-stamp archived at Photos: Sandy Hook smoking guns emerge or click here if the article was "removed" to protect National Security.

(This is a drill,children. If 20 children & 6 teachers had actually been slaughtered, they would be running away in terror.)

The United Way victim's fundraising website page was created and titled specifically for the Sandy Hook shootings. All the dates are either around a month or a couple days prior to the actual shooting in the once-tranquil suburban Newtown on December 14, 2012.

My question is why CNN (one of the six companies that control the media) would let Anderson Cooper or Ben Swann question whether "the Sandy Hook shooting ever took place -- at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation's news media have described."  Fox News broadcast journalist Ben Swann, is calling for the release of the outside video to the school where Lanza entered the building.

These rampage-killings are either full scale Department of Homeland Security planned drills with "crisis actors," staged MK-Ultra "false-flag" events, or the latest episode of Assassination TV for aliens living on the planet Mars. Operation Rampage Killing


Do you really believe all that free bandwidth exists in the world so that you can watch Robbie Parker get into his acting mode before he gives his "B" performance as a grieving parent? Click here to watch the video. Do you hear him saying [around the sixth second] ".... do you want me to read the cards?"

Or what about the Associated Press/Newsday and the New York Daily News articles with conflicting accounts on whatreallyhappend at Sandy Hook. [7]

December 15 AP reports: "Only the rifle was used on the victims." A statement supported by Dr. H. Wayne Carver II, Connecticut State's chief medical examiner. Carver's examination found that of the "seven autopsies he personally performed on Sandy Hook victims," all of them had "three to 11 wounds apiece." 

Carver says that the gunman was able to reload so quickly because he used a "military-style rifle rigged with two "taped magazines."  [8]

However, later the New York Daily News reports that of the "three guns Adam Lanza is supposed to have brought to the school, "the rifle was left in the trunk."

I am not interested in whether the deaths resulted from hundreds of rounds of .233 caliber bullets which were fired with deadly accuracy, in minutes by a "scrawny" 20-year-old with "a rifle" ... that was still in the trunk of his car in the parking lot.

I want to know why the Wayne Carver and Robbie Parker videos haven't been removed for "National Security or Privacy Reasons?" Leaving them on the Web serves only one purpose: to lead many to believe that this was some sort of black ops type false flag initiated and carried out with the long-term goal of disarming the American people.

(What happened to dead principal and teachers? Some may have been killed or relocated. It's for a good cause- gun control.)

Put another way, I am suggesting that the public reaction/controversy over the 2nd Amendment was not only anticipated but was the cornerstone and goal of the plan from the beginning.

Look, if the plan were to disarm American citizens by carrying out massacres like Sandy Hook, then why do they need so many of these Jokers?

What's going on here? Do you really believe Adam Lanza or James Holmes woke up one morning believing they were in a Batman movie, painted their hair red, and then went on a rampage killing of innocent children?

(What happened to the dead children? Some were crisis actors; some may have been killed; some may have been invented.)   

What am I saying here? Sandy Hook, Aurora, Columbine and Tucson were never about gun control or mental health; they were about instilling fear, anxiety, apprehension and foster feelings of resentment and rage in order to create negative energy.

Fear that another lone gunman will wake up one day and kill a bunch of innocent kids. Sandy Hook and the other mass shootings are about the negative energy that was the inevitable outcome of the debate over gun control.

Coming soon, why would anyone want to create fear and negative energy.

Want more proof? Obama quoted the following biblical passage in his speech at the Sandy Hook Interfaith Prayer Vigil in Newtown:

"So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal." ~ 2 Corinthians 4:18


Melanie Lamport is a retired Kindergarten and First Grade teacher living in Southern California. Ms. Lamport graduated from Indiana University with a B.S. in Elementary Education.  She received her Master's Degree in Curriculum Studies from DePaul University.

(left, caterer on hand for drill.) 

Related - Lamport - Operation Rampage Killing 

------------  Helicopter Footage shows first responders and fire trucks were there in advance for the drill. If this was after a massacre, they would not be standing around, would they? 

------------ The impostor Veronique Pozner, "Noah's mother." Noah is not in her family pic. 
------------ Many Hoax Links 


[2] Sandy Hook School Massacre Timeline at Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG)

[7] This Associated Press/Newsday article [now removed but archived at

[8] Sandy Hook Massacre: Official Story Spins Out of Control (Dec. 18, 2012)

Most of the initial mainstream media reports have since been rewritten to fit 'new' facts proclaimed by 'law enforcement officials'. Here's an example from Business Insider. The following excerpts are the opening paragraphs from the 'same' article, one earlier original version, followed by the later revised version: The massacre [...] was reportedly perpetrated with a .233 caliber rifle, a Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol.

(Below, Killer on the loose inside, and they are waiting in neat lines outside.) 


The Bushmaster rifle was found in the trunk of the shooter's car. The Sig Sauer and Glock pistols were the only weapons used in the shooting, according to CBS. Now the question is what kind of magazine would allow a shooter to fire "100" rounds in such a short period. Indeed, I was wondering the same thing. How could two pistols do so much damage? The report was updated as follows: The massacre in Connecticut that's taken the lives of at least 26 people was reportedly perpetrated with a .223 caliber rifle, a Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol, according to NBC:

The shooter was using one Sig Sauer and one Glock pistol, according to CNN. Later details emerged that the primary weapon was the Bushmaster "assault-style" rifle.

Altogether, though, it doesn't matter what type of weapon the shooter used. The bottom line is that it was likely a magazine fed, semi-automatic, with enough rounds to shoot "100 shots" in a matter of minutes, as quoted in USA Today


First Comment from Brian

Lately I have been thinking that they left behind all these anomalies and loose ends just to screw with our minds. Or maybe they really did actually screw up the operation. Who knows?


Check out the incredible similarity in appearance between an unidentified woman in the much speculated about Greenberg online photo album and the school psychologist named Mary Sherlach who is said to have been one of the first killed in the rampage -

Same eyes, lips, nose, etc. You can even see the same vertical indentation on the nose in both photos.


There appear to be several other lookalikes in this online photo album such as a girl named Riley Harmon, who looks remarkably similar to teacher Kaitlin Roig who gave a somewhat over the top, hammy account of her experience during the alleged shooting.


For readers not up to speed on this particular subject, the Greenberg album I am refering to is an online Picassa photo album containing numerous pictures of an extended family, and their various friends and associates, of a one Greenberg family based out of Florida. Allegations that several figures from this album posed as, or were used as simulated victims in the Gabrielle Giffords shooting were made well over a year before the Sandy Hook incident.


And how about the mother of little Ella Seaver, student of Sandy Hook Elemetary School who looks just like B- grade horror movie actress Debbie Rochon who starred in, of all things, "The Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre" from the year 2000? - side by side image here -

Note the name of the studio she currently works for "Bloodbath Productions" Isn't that cute?


I also find it interesting that the brother of the mother of six year old Noah Pozner, Alexis Haller, is a Vatican lawyer representing the Holy See in court cases involving child sexual abuse cases against the church -

He also wrote, or co-wrote a bill, presented to a committee run by Joe Biden, that would make it possible for authorities to prosecute anyone failing to report a gun owner who later commits a crime with a gun.


Take a look at his sister, Veronique Pozner, whose son Noah was allegedly slain at Sandy Hook, being interviewed by CNN's Anderson Cooper Notice there is no visible breath coming from their mouths even though the temperature is near freezing, and to top it off, Cooper's disappearing nose, which would seem to indicate the interview took place in front of a green screen on a set. Debunkers have tried to claim this anomalie is due to "compression" that occured when the video was uploaded to YouTube, but as the video above shows, the same "disappearing nose" can be seen in the original CNN clip taken right from their own website. Perhaps they will clean it up and re-post it back to the CNN site now that the cat is out of the bag. Then they can say the conspiracy theorists got it wrong again.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Sandy Hook Was a Drill "

Dave said (May 15, 2013):

In Russia, during the cold war, whole towns were constructed and filled with trainees and actors to prepare Russian moles for integration into American society. When I look at the Newtown "massacre" it kind of reminds me of those Russian towns. How hard would it be for the US government to integrate their own people over 20 to 50 years and fill an existing town with their own "actors?" You have to remember that the scale of time that we normal people look at is our lives and can something be done "in our lives?" Governments controlled by their luciferian masters, their "handlers" (IMF/BIS/World Bank), think in terms of centuries and generations in order to accomplish long term goals. That is why it is so easy for their handlers to control politicians, as they are easily lead with materialistic concepts and benefits in the short term of one generation or the time-span of one life. Personally I hope the whole thing is a government ruse using actors, because the thought of that many children being executed for real by a government sponsored patsy or Manchurian candidate is quite hard to bear.

Kristine said (January 29, 2013):

What did Sun Tzu say about the art of war? One thing he said was that the perpetrator should “feign confusion”. This is exactly what the Sandy Hook misery represents. The elite scum knows exactly what it is doing and the people just continue to eat it up.

You see the confusion in the minds of your readers and what and how they write about the total sandy hook experience: their minds are completely absorbed in the whys the wherefores, in the details and in the many contradictions. People who let themselves get sucked into this madness are confounded – and spell-bound, literally.

What people should do is REJECT this Hollywood production, as it is part and parcel of our further induction into the cult, into their dominion over us, over our very thoughts. They should say to themselves – this thing is whacked and move on.

Where your treasure is there your heart shall also be. Why funnel your precious energy into trying to make sense of deception? You cannot do it, you will only be further confused and weakened for the true reality, which they are doing their damndest to conceal, and that quite successfully. It is a spiritual war, not a material one. They know that, but the sheep need yet to figure it out.

JC said (January 28, 2013):

I was involved in a real world situation, that involved hundreds of individuals and vast Government resources. It was covered by all the newspapers and magazines. One of the things that struck me was that not a single newspaper or magazine got the story right. Even when their information was coming from high officials. As I talked with others, I began to notice that no one really could explain definitively exactly what had happened and we were there
How much of this mind set is happening in Sandy Hook and 9-11 and any other catastrophe perpetrated around the world as a whole?

Do the people on the scene really know what happened? All they have are individual facts lying on a table as pieces of a puzzle creating a picture.

Is some sort of unspoken form of intimidation being imposed on the town, creating the narrative?

Something happened there and the tragedy is that those children and adults who died there (I'm not ready to say that no one died) were simply a blood sacrifice on the alter of the agenda of the N.W.O.

Humanity loses if the agenda is advanced.

Joe said (January 28, 2013):

I think all Americans should know that Obama was involved with running guns/weaponry into the US to arm criminal gangs across the country.

Obama/Holder ran guns/weaponry into the States in tandem with the Mexican mafia/drug gangs.
Google : " Operation Fast and Furious + Obama "
The operation hardly made the mainstream news. In the few reports that surfaced, it was reported in passing, then swept down the memory hole. Many may not know about Operation Fast and Furious.
Obama, the gun supplier to criminal gangs across the US, now wants to take guns away from law-abiding Americans.

The more Americans who know about Operation Fast and Furious, the better.

Not one authority figure, on any level of government, ever mentions the huge underground, black-market for weaponry in the US. The authorities never even talk about the black-market in weapons, let alone make any attempts to end the underground trade, or even try to put a dent into the illegal trade.

The "crisis actors" seem like characters in some awful Hollywood movie. They remind me of the characters in the movie, " The Stepford Wives ".

Doug said (January 28, 2013):

I've always believed that not only was 9/11 an inside job, but that this was made to be obvious to even the most casual observer. (Buildings just do not collapse straight down through their path of max resistance, particularly when they are built like those towers). There are many reasons to question Sandy Hook although it is not so obvious as 9/11, nor the OKC bombings which killed many children. I wonder what the motivation is. Perhaps they wanted a civil war and too few people had woken up during times of OKC and 9/11. Perhaps these things just instill fear of government which maybe a more powerful fear than anything else. Jaques Ellul, sociologist and author of "Propaganda: The Shaping Of Mens Attitudes" (which is much better than Bernays much earlier book) explains that fear makes one more susceptible to propaganda.

Would it be more efficient to fake Sandy Hook or to actually carry it out ?

I just don't understand the motive for this yet and can only speculate. Is it having the desired affect on attitudes toward guns - maybe - time will tell.Certainly gun control must be a critical component of Agenda 21.

Dan said (January 28, 2013):

Back in the early 1960's there was a theme park in rural Florida called "Six Gun Territory". It was a replica of a old Western cowboy town. The main attraction for boys was stunt men dressed like gunslingers that put on mock gunfights without warning. Even though the tourists knew it was acting and stage guns shooting blanks, it was still scary because it looked so real and was so close. The actors knew how to pull stunts to fake out the tourists to get girls to scream or dads to duck for cover. For instance, one stunt I saw every time we went there was a gunslinger would pretend to be shot, and dive backwards into a horse water trough. The water splash always showered on the tourists on the part of the boardwalk near the trough, guaranteed to cause screams.
For a moment, bystander's disbelief was suspended.

"Six Gun Territory" closed sometime during the 80's.

Now Houston had an alleged 'campus shooting' last week which looked faker than on of the shows at "Six Gun". How many other such unannounced drills taken place around the USA to amp up local suspension of disbelief?

O said (January 28, 2013):

There are items that are in a state of confusion:

1) who owned the shooter's car; not to be confused with the plate that appears be registered with a known criminal with a family that had lots of felonies. 2) why did the shooter have Ryan's ID, and the press reported Ryan and then said it was Adam. 3) what was this ID exactly, and if such was significant why did Ryan not know such was missing. 4) all witnesses talking about Nancy was hearsay comments made by her, so why does she tell one thing to some and a different story to others.

I believe that Nancy had a problem of conscience about something that she wanted to hide concerning Adam, as maybe he was not living there during the past 3 years; too many witnesses said he disappeared off the face of the earth, so where was Adam? I also see that she told some people that she was in the process of having Adam placed into a mental institution, and with others she and Adam were traveling all over the world to find a smaller home, and a college for him.

O said (January 27, 2013):

Adam was considered a computer genius, and read that he could take apart a tower and put it all back together again. This has to be the 'Smoking Gun' because he would know that smashing a hard drive with a hammer on both his and his mother's hard drive would be futile. I say this is the red flag, and it was not him in the family home who shot his mother, but someone who had no clue about a computer hard drive, as he would know better. So why did he not remove the hard drives and toss them in a river or bury them in the woods? I know because it was not him who murdered Nancy, and suspect Adam has not been in that home for about 3 years.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at