Direct Link to Latest News


Jewish Lobby Vetoes Candidate Over 9-11 Views

September 27, 2008

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear."

Cicero Marcus Tullius
106-43 BC

from Sept 27, 2008
by Henry Makow Ph.D.

You're an "anti-Semite"
if you remark that the "Jews" control the world. So please ignore the fact that the Canadian Jewish Congress had a candidate removed by her party Friday for a 2003 article suggesting Israel had foreknowledge of 9-11.

Liberal leader Stephane Dion dropped Leslie Hughes, a veteran journalist, as a candidate in Winnipeg. She referred to the fact that Israeli -government-owned Zim shipping lines broke its lease and moved 200 employees out of the World Trade Center just one week before Sept. 11. Please ignore that this timely move actually took place. (See 9-11 Time line link below.)

This is what democracy looks like under Zionist occupation.  Both Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Opposition Leader Stephane Dion pandered to Bernie Farber, CEO of the Canadian Jewish Congress.

When Hughes' article surfaced Friday, Liberal leader Stephane Dion went cap-in-hand to  Farber: "We have a process ongoing with the Jewish congress, to see what she has said exactly, if our apology will be accepted . . .. I have full confidence in the Jewish congress," Dion said.


Farber felt Hughes didn't strike the right note of contrition. Her apology read like she was sorry people misinterpreted the column, not that she was sorry for offending people.

Since offending Jews now is the measure of truth, Farber gave her a thumbs down. While canvassing, Hughes learned from reporters she was no longer a Liberal candidate. Is this how freedom works? No one who has ever expressed a qualm about Jews or Zionism can run for an established party? People who opposed the premeditated attack on Lebanon in 2006, or Israel's treatment of Palestinians, can kiss their democratic rights goodbye?  

"It's a major shock to my faith in the party and the whole system," said Hughes, who refuted the anti-Semite slur by citing her biography of a leading Jewish community figure and the holocaust education classes she taught.

"So it's the theater of the absurd," she said."I have no time for conspiracy theories about the Jewish population whatever," she said. "The article that I wrote -- for anyone who reads it carefully -- is very clearly innocent of any kind of anti-Semitic feeling. I am just absolutely stunned by this. I guess that's how soldiers die in the trenches. This is how it must feel."

Bernie Farber was triumphant: "Lesley Hughes crossed a line which just simply cannot be crossed under any circumstances. There is no room in Canada or anywhere for these modern-age twists on the age-old anti-Semitic calumnies with these odious and dangerous conspiracy theories."

(This writer has also crossed that line. Farber wants the Canadian "Human Rights" Commission to force me to remove all "anti-Semitic" articles from my website. Presumably this would be one.)

Prime Minister Stephen Harper applauded Dion's decision, adding it's a "very serious thing" that Hughes wasn't immediately disciplined after refusing to retract her comments. "Is this the kind of political discourse that is tolerated in the Liberal party?" he said.

A prominent Conservative candidate, Peter Kent, characterized her writings as "attempts to demonize the world's only Jewish state as complicit in the 9/11 terrorist attacks."

Obviously, Israel is not "the world's only Jewish state." Dion, Harper and Kent are agents of  Zionist occupation. So are Bush, Obama and McCain. We suffer from a kind of Stockholm Syndrome, where our "leaders" collaborate with our kidnappers hoping to be treated well. This is how "The Protocols of the Elders of  Zion" describe the situation:

The masses are "accustomed to listen to us only who pay it for obedience and attention. In this way, we shall create a blind mighty force which will never be in a position to move in any direction without the guidance of our agents...The people will submit to this regime because it will know that upon these leaders will depend its earnings, gratification and the receipt of all kinds of benefits." ("Protocols of Zion" 10)


Anyone who studies this carefully documented 9-11 Timeline can see that Neocons, Zionists and Mossad played a prominent role in the false-flag attack on the World Trade Centre. The Mossad motto literally is "By way of deception, we shall wage war." False flags are their modus operandi ever since the Levon Affair in 1954 and the 1967 attack on the USS Liberty. A Report of the German Intelligence Service (BND) says Israel's Mossad helped the "Arab terrorists." Germany has not disowned this report and no one has refuted it.

"These investigations disclosed in late May of 2001 that an attack was to be made against certain specified targets in the American cities of Washington and New York. But it was apparent that the Mossad was not only fully aware of these attacks well in advance but actually, though their own agents inside these Arab groups, assisted in the planning and the eventual execution of the attacks.

That the Israeli government was fully aware of these attack is absolutely certain and proven. Diplomatic traffic between the Israeli Embassy in the Federal Republic and the Israeli Foreign Office made it very clear that Minister President Sharon was fully aware of this pending attack and urgently wished that no attempt was made to prevent the attacks."

On August 6, 2001, the German ambassador Ischinger informed George W. Bush of the exact time and place of the attack. Bush thanked the ambassador and said he was aware of it. Later the US Government demanded that Germany keep this warning secret.


The Canadian Jewish Congress is a registered lobby group posing as a "human rights" organization. It has no democratic mandate from Canadian Jews yet it presumes to speak for them. Its function is to create anti-Semitism, its bread and butter. Polls in Winnipeg are running 2-1 against removing Hughes. Hughes' article is now linked in the mainstream media and thousands more are learning  her views.

In a free country, no issue is off the table. No lobby group defines the terms of discourse, especially not one linked to the real 9-11 perpetrators by virtue of a common agenda.  "Anti-Semitism" is a ruse to stop discussion of the New World Order program. Central bankers need to enslave us (under the pretext of the bogus terror war) in order to protect their credit monopoly and ensure "debts" are repaid. This hate-filled agenda naturally tries to characterize legitimate resistance as "racial prejudice."

The Jewish community should expose 9-11 because the secret actions of a few Jews (and non-Jews) has put all Jews in jeopardy. Instead, Jews stupidly implicate themselves by attacking truthseekers. All 9-11 conspiracy-deniers are accomplices in the cover-up.

The so-called "Jewish Conspiracy" is actually the central banker conspiracy for world government i.e. "globalization."  Zionism, in the words of banker Louis Marshall, "is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon."  Freemasonry is another powerful weapon, which is largely non-Jewish (by membership.) Every institution in our society has been corrupted and subverted to this cause.

We are simply not equipped to recognize that this conspiracy is very real, and is entering a critical stage with the planned financial meltdown. Jews had better act before the shit hits the fan and the bankers again make them their scapegoat.

Hughes Guilty of Quoting an Israeli Newspaper

Related- "The Hypocrisy of Anti-Hate Laws"

See also Arthur Topham "Canada's Media Bias"

Bernie Farber "The Willful Blindness of Leslie Hughes"

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Jewish Lobby Vetoes Candidate Over 9-11 Views"

Joseph said (September 30, 2008):

I'm compelled to take a few moments to jot down my congratulations on your splendid article. " 1984 " and " Brave New World " really are materializing before our very eyes into an actual world-wide reality. No man - or woman - will dare to think independently,or to develop personal ideas or independent opinions. Any attempt to analyse facts impartially and objectively will be classified as some kind of, " criminal offense " . Independent thinkers with unconventional viewpoints will be consigned to the nearest insane-asylum,as was the standard practice in Soviet Russia over many decades. " No man will dare to speak Truth. " .
Best Regards,

Brendon -Perth West Oz said (September 30, 2008):

The so-called "Jewish Conspiracy" is actually the central banker conspiracy for world government i.e. "globalization." Zionism, in the words of banker Louis Marshall, "is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon." Freemasonry is another powerful weapon, which is largely non-Jewish (by membership.) Every institution in our society has been corrupted and subverted to this cause.

We are simply not equipped to recognize that this conspiracy is very real, and is entering a critical stage with the planned financial meltdown. Jews had better act before the shit hits the fan and the bankers again make them their scapegoat.

Yes indeedy.

If members of the general jewish community would act quickly and deciseivley and expose the rot it would be over in the blink of an eye. It is NOW a matter of survival for jews and possibly the rest of us.

I have tried to broker this with local jews to no avail and I have given up. Whatever our disagreements i certainly wish you the best and thank you for being one of the first to wake me up to the deeper levels.


Perth, West Oz

Sandy said (September 30, 2008):

Henry ,Soon it seems we will not be able to make any judgments about any one because we will not be aloud to criticize any one even if they are thieves, crooks and murders .I see where it may soon be unacceptable to criticize Muslims and if you criticize Jews or Zionists then your antisemitic or your involved in a verbal hate crime .

How on earth will there be any justice in this?Wrong doing is wrong doing no mater what nationality the minis is from.But if we are not aloud to evaluate actions and then criticize them without breaking a law how will society survive ?

If I was in charge of evaluating some one for say a job, how on earth would i do it without pointing out his qualities and weighing them with his short comings? I would have no recourse for selection if the man or woman believes he is above criticism or reproach.This kind of self imposed self worship superiority of an ordinary person reeks of a severe psychological disorder and could be found to be totally uncontrollable.

A person like this could get away with all kinds of crimes and every time you point one of their crimes out to them they could have you busted for telling the truth if the truth is intimidating to him. Evil hates it when you show it its own ugly face. Maybe we should start carrying mirrors with us so with out saying anything we can just make a non verbal statement that imply s the offender needs to take a look at him self since no one else is allowed to.

anon said (September 29, 2008):

This has nothing to do with any of your current articles. But ever since my friend became a free mason, his viewpoints has changed.

He talks about how the world needs to get "Restarted". And how the people who are trying to change stuff are "doing it for good."

In fact I been invited to a open house for the free masons.

James said (September 29, 2008):

Dr. Makow

Besides Zim breaking their lease and moving out of the WTC one week before 9-11, did you know that Goldman Sachs moved their gold trading floor from the WTC to London in 2001 as well? I still to this day wonder if they also moved their stash of Gold from vaults beneath building 4 before the towers came crashing down upon it...All if not most of the bullion stored in building 4 vanished into thin air.

Goldman where have I heard that name recently?

Vojco said (September 29, 2008):

Great article Henry 'Jewish Lobby Vetoes Candidate for 9-11 View'.

Supposed 'Jewish' groups have used 'vehicles' to deflect attention to their illegal and immoral activities such as the birth of the ADL in 1913 to the Bolshevik revolution of 1917-18 which had a majority Jewish leadership.

At the top these organizations (B'nai B'rith, ADL) have been financed by international bankers especially through the City of London Corporation. A long list of Jewish groups can be found in Elizzabeth Dillings book 'The Octopus'.

Persons such as conspiracy researcher Lloyd Miller (A-albionics Research) believe that the Jewish element in banking & revolutions has been stealthy used by the British "crown" and "The City" to deflect attention from themselves as to their purpose, control of the worlds debt, resources and people. I believe that there has been much intermarriage between banking nobility (Venice/Genoa/London) and Jewish money in which
both parties are after the same goal (world domination) and what hurts one group, money wise will hurt the other.

Don't leave out the Vatican out in this one through there various organs (Jesuits).

It's very hard to see the trees through the forest but if you follow the clues and look hard enough the bigger picture emerges. Will we wake up in time. I seriously doubt it.

Vadim said (September 29, 2008):

"Hughes, who refuted the anti-Semite slur by citing her biography of a leading Jewish community figure and the holocaust education classes she taught."

It's remarkable that as pretty much everyone, she tries to defend herself not by the fact that the accusation itself is violation of freedoms and irrelevant, but by demonstration of her loyalty to Jews. What if she was not "leading Jewish community figure", then she wouldn't be allowed to say what she said? and how about discussing the raised issue of complicity of Jewish community? it appears far more important than who is anti-Semite and who is not, so maybe let's not switch the topic?

Until this attitude of intrinsic guilt towards Jews stays, we always will be on defensive.

STS said (September 28, 2008):

Hello Dr. Makow,
Just wanted to let you know that I appreciate your position on 911 being an inside job as indicated in your recent article on the Leslie Hughes fiasco.
The following is an interview I did with Dr. Bill Deagle on my research of the Rothchild syndicate being behind 911.
If you get a chance check out my website
It would be good to do a talk at your class one day.
Splitting the Sky

Tom said (September 27, 2008):

I haven't even read your article yet and will do so shortly, but trust you noted the slavish obeisance to Israel in last night's US debate between the US candidates. Isn't this thing getting to be a little too obvious? I think overdoing it must be a kind of Jewish "fatal trait." Talk about anti-semitic remarks—how's that for one! Of course all along we have been subject to God's will, and He is slow to wrath, as various good books say, so not to worry. I'm trying to convince myself to cut out reading and fussing about politics and do some real work. But I can't resist subjoining George Santayana's remarks about God in this connection:

“[The word “God”] was a symbol, vague, variable, mythical, anthropomorphic; the symbol for an overwhelming reality, a symbol that named and unified in human speech the incalculable powers on which our destiny depends. To observe, record, and measure the method by which these powers operate is not to banish the idea of God; it is what the Hebrews called meditating on his ways. The modern hatred of religion is not, like that of the Greek philosophers, a hatred of poetry, for which they wished to substitute cosmology, mathematics, or dialectic, still maintaining the reverence of man for what is superhuman. The modern hatred of religion is hatred of the truth, hatred of all sublimity, hatred of the laughter of the gods. It is puerile human vanity trying to justify itself by a lie." GS in PERSONS AND PLACES.

Bill said (September 27, 2008):

Dr. Makow:

I grew up in Revere, MA just north of Boston which, at the time, was about half Jewish and half Italian. In the 1940s-1950s, there was some racial strife in the Boston area but mostly between the Italians and the Irish.

I developed a deep respect for our Jewish neighbors for two major reasons: They focused intently on providing for their children in every respect and the worker in the family treated his/her employment with a great deal of respect. Certainly there are other positives but those two have always been key in my mind.

My problem is that I try to be both diplomatic and honest when discussing anything with friends. The honest part sometimes comes across as racist even though, to me, diplomatically expressed honesty is better than suppressing true feelings. I feel that, regarding our Jewish brethren, the USA is a lot like pre-Hitler Germany. While representing only 2% of our population, it seems that well over half of important corporate, political, etc., leadership positions are held by Jewish people. Because of the current economic crisis, we are learning more and more Jewish names of leaders who have plundered their corporations and are now looking for a bailout from American taxpayers. This just makes matters worse.

Anyway, I appreciate your diplomatic honesty when discussing these sensitive issues and thought that I'd e-mail to say so.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at