Tina said (August 6, 2008):

Stephen Harper is a very good example of a Zionist Christian. He professes to be an evangelist Christian and subsequently a follower of Christ and yet his government is telling children that it’s okay to have sex as early as nine years old, by allocated $300 million to vaccinate thousands of girls.

It is my considered opinion that between the Zionist Christians and Zionist Jews, this world is completely falling a part, as both sects are using same method to promote more sex between same sex and sex with juveniles.

Isn’t Miley Cyrus another evangelist Christian?

I don’t know Henry but what Zionist Evangelist Christians are promoting is trash and only trash!

Andrew said (August 4, 2008):

I would like to respond to a comment left by Doc W, who said, "Parents must be made aware of the fact that they will NOT be present when their children have a first sexual encounter, and it will most likely be forced...Flaws in the production, or marketing of Gardasil may be worthy of critique..."

W, you also wrote about a girl being left alone with the handyman. It occurs to me that defenseless children should NOT be injected with toxic cultures, so that they can be left unsupervised by their custodians, who were too overburdened to raise their young charges in person. More responsible caretakers could play a helpful role, by protecting innocent girls from liberated, moral reprobates, and by defeating every possible opportunity for illicit encounters.

Information I read at vaclib.org leads me to believe that any vaccine is unsafe, regardless of it's questionable quality or emotionally-intimidating, hardsale marketing, which refuses to acknowledge that this patent medicine has killed, and will kill again.

Also, if the globalist benefactors of the medical industry preach the doctrine of population control, and if their victims have become contagious after taking other vaccines, what commercialized public service announcement can guarantee me that sex will be 100% safe for the monogamous man, who marries an inoculated woman?

Mrs U said (October 8, 2007):

Just read the article about Gardasil!
We are raising our granddaughter who is now 13. After learning she may have been sexually active we took her to the Health Dept here is Michigan and we were talked into letting her receive the series of Gardasil shots. She got one shot and was scheduled for two more but we started hearing disturbing reports about the shots so we discussed it and decided to NOT get any more of the shots.

Time passed and came around to the date set up for the next shot and we received a call of reminder from the Health Dept. and we informed them of our decision. They were P'O'd...big time. Try as they might we stood our ground.
The next day yet another 'nurse' called from the Health Dept trying to put further pressure on us to come in for the shot, again we refused. The next day yet another even more heavy handed call came trying to put even firmer pressure on us. We refused.

They totally denied there has been any deaths linked to the so-called vaccine.
We figure there must be some sinister plot involved with this stuff for them to be so adament when we plainly refused it. MMMMMM....

Doc W said (September 16, 2007):

As an addendum to my note of Sept 9th, a comment about sexual exposure seems appropriate.

I was the only male in a female health clinic when the subject of losing one's virginity came up between nurses, and medical assistants. Every woman in the room described being sexually abused by a relative, or an acquaintance between the ages of 5-9. In one case, it was a handyman her mother had hired for kitchen repairs. The terrified young girl had the daily task of unlocking the door for her rapist while mother was at work. None of these women told their parents except for one whose mother walked in and caught 'uncle' in the act.

Parents must be made aware of the fact that they will NOT be present when their children have a first sexual encounter, and it will most likely be forced. Pedophiles are skilled in the use of fear & guilt to assure a child's silence. They bind child victims in an unholy alliance of which they dare not tell. Those who try are labeled as liars.

Flaws in the production, or marketing of Gardasil may be worthy of critique, but burying young female patients due to cervical cancer is equally distasteful.

--

Dear Doc,

I think we have to stop pedophiles, not make the world safe for them,.

Henry

John said (September 14, 2007):

I just going to complain (vent) here a little and you certainly don't need to take the time to respond.

I belong to more than a few conservative and prepper doomer forums....and I spend a lot of time posting current events that I believe are symptoms of the hidden hand of the NWO/Iluminati.....in the last 6 months I think I can count on one hand the number of favorable responses.

All other responses are either flames or suggestions that I buy some Tin Foil....

I have spent hundreds of hours trying to paint the big picture via email to relatives and friends....and all I get are glassy stares.

The dark side has done well, they have mastered the art of smoke and mirrors and the "sheeple" haven't a clue.

Now its not because of what I have read at your site or the works of people like Fritz Springmeier, and Svali, but because of people I know who are victims of Satanic Ritual Abuse....and their stories......horrific tales that make me weep when I see and feel their pain and fear that come from memories that seep through their skins like sap from an old tree....

I know that I know that the NWO/Illuminati is real and that it is the most evil construct yet devised by man....and it weighs upon my heart that so many just don't see it.

And it feels here lately like "they" have ramped up their efforts and the control of the media and political bodies seems even more energized.

Maybe I need a break and just chill.

Thanks for listening Henry

----
John,

Take a break and chill. They can't stop you from being happy. Only you can do that.

"Surviving the New World Order"
http://www.savethemales.ca/001374.html

henry

Carter said (September 13, 2007):

'He wearies them by keeping them constantly occupied, and makes them rush about by offering them ostensible advantages.'--Sun Tzu, The Art of War Our overlords have taken old Sunny Tzu's words to heart: a generation of weary, confused whores awaits. I'd write more, but I have to fill out forms whilst watching football...

Ed (Lucifer Queen of the World) said (September 13, 2007):

Yours is the only website I've found that takes an anti New York (Babylon) media-whore view of society and its homogenization through feminism. You are to be congratulated. Lucifer, the
victimologist, is primarily a victimizer. The article on vaccinations is a perfect example.
PBS had a show yesterday, in fact, about, an Afghan woman's valiant struggles to become a member of Parliament blah, blah
blah...

Paul said (September 13, 2007):

I am happy to hear another sane voice speaking up against Gardasil

I have received your article as a forward from Connie Fogal, leader of the Canada Action Party, an individual who 'tells-it-like-it-is'. (How long will we continue to have acces to an uncensored internet?!) I expect it won't be too long before Gardasil is marketed to politicians in China, if indeed that is not already underway. In China it would serve two purposes: support the one-child family policy and make politicians (as well as Merck-Frosst) rich!

Dr. Mercola (www.mercola.com) has spoken up against the imposition of Gardasil repeatedly. See also http://search.mercola.com/Results.aspx?q=gardasil for a list of his articles on the subject

Croft said (September 10, 2007):

As early as May 23 there were 1,637 adverse reactions to Merck's vaccine Gardasil for human papillomavirus (HPV) reported to the United States Food & Drug Administration (US FDA) via the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Among the adverse events reported there were 371 serious reactions. Three deaths were related to the vaccine. As of August 2007 five deaths have been reported that are related to the vaccine.

Government regulators need to explain why they allowed Merck to use a potentially reactive aluminum containing placebo as a control for most trial participants, rather than a non-reactive saline solution placebo.[1] A reactive placebo can artificially increase the appearance of safety of an experimental drug or vaccine in a clinical trial. Gardasil contains 225 mcg of aluminum and, although aluminum adjuvants have been used in vaccines for decades, they were never tested for safety in clinical trials. Merck and the FDA did not disclose how much aluminum was in the placebo.[2]

Animal and human studies have shown that aluminum can cause nerve cell death [3] and that vaccine aluminum adjuvants can allow aluminum to enter the brain, [4 5] as well as cause inflammation at the injection site leading to chronic joint and muscle pain and fatigue. [6 7] Nearly 90 percent of Gardasil recipients and 85 percent of aluminum placebo recipients followed-up for safety reported one or more adverse events within 15 days of vaccination, particularly at the injection site.[8] Pain and swelling at injection site occurred in approximately 83 percent of Gardasil and 73 percent of aluminum placebo recipients. About 60 percent of those who got Gardasil or the aluminum placebo had systemic adverse events including headache, fever, nausea, dizziness, vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia. [9 10] Gardasil recipients had more serious adverse events such as headache, gastroenteritis, appendicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, asthma, bronchospasm and arthritis.

The precautionary principle dictates that good science should precede Health Canada vaccine policy recommendations. Parents have a right to expect proof of safety and not assumption of safety before new vaccines, like Gardasil, are given simultaneously with other vaccines to their children.

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) is a disorder in which the body's immune system attacks part of the peripheral nervous system, and can cause total paralysis. Analysis of Gardasil reports to VAERS indicates there was a two to 12 times greater likelihood that serious adverse events, such as GBS, were reported when Gardasil was given in combination with Menactra rather than given alone. Accepted scientific standards indicate that these findings are statistically significant and cannot be dismissed as coincidence. In particular, the available VAERS data show there was a more than 1,000 percent increased risk of GBS reports following Gardasil administration when Menactra was given at the same time.

Who should be held accountable when tax payer salaried health officials mislead the media concerning HPV vaccine safety issues?
Why should Health Canada be relying on the vaccine manufacturer for safety tests?

In the United States their Congress has immunized the vaccine manufacturers from any liability concerning their products. With the exception of the province of Quebec there is no adverse event reporting system in place nor any compensation program available for vaccine caused injury or death in Canada. Parents of children who are victims of vaccine induced injury or death will need deep pockets to take legal action. since Canadian courts tend to side with the drug manufacturer most victims can forget any kind of redress or compensation.

As of May 31, there have been 2,227 Gardasil adverse events filed with the NIH Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), including 13 suspected or confirmed cases of GBS (two more GBS reports were made in June for a total of 15) and 239 cases of syncope (fainting with temporary loss of consciousness), many of which resulted in head injuries and fractures. Seven deaths have been reported after receipt of Gardasil. Nearly 10 percent of all Gardasil adverse event reports to VAERS involved avoidable medical errors.

A total of 1,930 reported Gardasil adverse events involved administration of Gardasil alone, and 135 adverse events involved co-administration of Gardasil with Menactra (A Meningococcal vaccine) . A comparative analysis of those two categories of VAERS reports indicates that when Gardasil was given simultaneously with Menactra rather than alone, there was a statistically significant increased risk of reported adverse events:

* respiratory problem reports increased by 114 percent;
* cardiac problems reports increased by 118 percent;
* neuromuscular and coordination problem reports increased by 234 percent;
* convulsions and central nervous system problem reports increased by 301 percent;
* reports of injuries from falls after unconsciousness increased by 674 percent; and
* GBS reports increased by 1,130 percent.

The British Medical Journal, June 9, 2007;334:1182-1183, reported Gardasil related adverse events that occurred in Australia: 25 girls who had just received their first injection of the vaccine experienced headache, nausea, and dizziness. In some cases, the problems were so severe that they were hospitalized. Shares of the vaccine's Australian licensed developer, CSL, fell after the incident was reported in the Australian news media,

Please remember: The risk is 100 percent when it is your own child that is adversely affected.

Maien said (September 10, 2007):

thank-you for another wonderful article.

I would question your comment that Canadian socialism is the reason for this
whole debacle taking place. Rather, I would suggest that the continued influence of American corporations/foreign policy and many Canadians in
power (gov't or corporate) whos' personal greed is currently running rampant... are responsible for the very new phenomena (in Canada) of
lobbyists running gov't for business interests.

Christine said (September 10, 2007):

The title of this piece was unnecessarily crude. It seems to me that the underlying agenda of this monstrous project is the mass sterilization of Canadian girls. Years ago, Big Pharma did testing on a vaccine whose "side effect" was sterilization.

So maybe the Canadian government has gone even farther than the Chinese government: instead of 1 child policy, there is now a no child policy?

Bob said (September 10, 2007):

Thanks for another timely and accurate article. I assume you already know about this website but am forwarding it just in case you don't.
Some other salient points that are seldom made:
1.) There is ZERO statistical evidence that ANY vaccine works. Why? Because the proponents of this swill have successfully argued that it would be "unethical" to apply Koch's Postulates to vaccines, since doing so would "unduly endanger" those test subjects who did not receive the vaccine. How's THAT for begging the question of whether they work at all?
2.) There is a growing body of evidence that there is, in fact, NO SUCH THING AS A VIRUS! How does that grab you? See Doug Kaufman's books and website .
3.) Vaccinations should NEVER be allowed to be called "immunizations", simply because they NEVER confer "immunity" (which is, by definition, TOTAL protection from a "disease").

Stephen said (September 10, 2007):

On the HPV vaccine, you might like to add to your file on the subject that the state of New South Wales in Australia (and probably the other states too) has been rolling out a vaccination program among girls in the early teen bracket. As a teacher in a high school on the NSW South Coast, it is my impression that most of the girls are getting the vaccine.

Bob said (September 10, 2007):

Thanks for another timely and accurate article. I assume you already know about this website but am forwarding it just in case you don't.
Some other salient points that are seldom made:
1.) There is ZERO statistical evidence that ANY vaccine works. Why? Because the proponents of this swill have successfully argued that it would be "unethical" to apply Koch's Postulates to vaccines, since doing so would "unduly endanger" those test subjects who did not receive the vaccine. How's THAT for begging the question of whether they work at all?
2.) There is a growing body of evidence that there is, in fact, NO SUCH THING AS A VIRUS! How does that grab you? See Doug Kaufman's books and website .
3.) Vaccinations should NEVER be allowed to be called "immunizations", simply because they NEVER confer "immunity" (which is, by definition, TOTAL protection from a "disease").

Clare said (September 10, 2007):

Canada Pimps Its Girls to Big Pharma i'd like to give you another perspective as someone who has contracted HPV and had the ensuing hospitalisation and operation to ensure that the cancerous cells were removed, i take offence to your assertion that it is the domain of promiscuous girls. no one could ever claim that i am promiscuous - in fact it was a promiscuous (prior to our relationship) long term partner that brought it to my life. my partner and i thought we were safe, we had taken precautions and had all the STD testing known to man to ensure that we were healthy. the problem being that there is no testing for HPV in men, you just see the resultant cell abnormalities in women which then lead to cancer. I think that your, and many of your readers, assertion that it is the responsibility of females to abstain leaves a massive missing link in the chain of responsibility. men must be taught not to sleep around also - they pass HPV on. the case could be made that without them, it would not be.

Tony said (September 10, 2007):

Protocols of Zion (Second last par. Protocol 10]

"...it is indispensable to trouble in all countries the people's relations with their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculations of diseases, by want, so that the Goyim see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else."

Last paragraph: "But if we give the nations of the world a breathing space the moment we long for is hardly likely ever to arrive."

Dr. Wagner said (September 9, 2007):

As an GYN doc, I see the issue differently. In our specialty, we must assume that EVERYONE is having sex...voluntarily, or otherwise. There are over 50 known STD's, and half of them can be fatal. Protection against just one disease is hardly a license for promiscuity, IMHO.

Vast numbers of young girls are exposed to such things as Herpes & HPV before puberty. Rapists, and incestuous perverts use no condoms, and they're always infected with something.

My spouse was regularly raped by a teenage brother from age 5-15. At age 23, she was being treated for cervical cancer. She later discovered he had molested most of her young cousins as well, and ALL of them developed cervical cancer.

In an era where our children risk sexual molestation at home, school, and church, I say immunize. My granddaughters will be immunized before puberty.

"BandAidOne" Wagner, MD
---

Thanks for this alternative view. I think individuals who are not being molested and are in control of their lives will not want to subject themselves to the risks entailed by this vaccine.

Henry

Annette said (September 9, 2007):

It is pure insanity to vaccinate children. Besides nobody knows for sure the long range effect of these vaccines. As a matter of fact I am against ALL vaccinations of children, as they all contain mercury and enough vaccinations and you have a contaminated child.

I also believe that vaccinations are the cause of many ailments, that children suffer from, such as learning disabilities, autism, hyperactivity and the weakening of the immune system, thus render them suceptible to may other illnesses during their lifespan.

Cristina said (September 8, 2007):

As I was reading your article about vaccination It became to my mind something that happened here in my country Argentina last october. The goverment made a mass vacination against Rubeola to all the girls all over the country.

Thank God, some doctors made aware the people on TV and some radios of a compound inside some of the vaccines cepas: PROSTAGLANDINE. It´s a total- for-ever sterilizing factor. And I know for certainly that these doctors have no idea about any conspiracy theory. You are able to say NO to the goverment Henry. We did it. Regards Cristina

Alan said (September 8, 2007):

Where did the evidence that Gardasil works only on girls with no sexual experience come from? Merck, I suspect. This is the sole justification
for the Canadian government to attempt to vaccinate every schoolgirl.

The implication that Gardasil does not work on girls with sexual experience is wrong. Gardasil does not work on any girls. Vaccines do
not work. Vaccines are an NWO scam. I recommend anyone with an open mind to watch the video "Vaccination - The Hidden Truth" (1998).

The video is available online:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8610554679207090010

Adam said (September 8, 2007):

Great article on Gardasil. I'm not one to buy into conspiracy theories, but as a Microbiologist I see a major potential disaster looming in the near future.

It is a well documented fact that certain vaccinations will caused a person to have a false-positive result on an HIV test. With mandatory HIV testing looming in the near future, we could have a generation of women who took the Gardasil vaccine almost all test positive for HIV.

The vaccine implies the women will be engaging in sexual practices, so tracing the false-positive to the vaccine will be difficult. While the implications of such are catastrophic, massive profits will be generated for these drug companies. Flu, Hepatitis B, and tetanus vaccines can give a false positive as well.

What is more frightening about this are the implications of eugenics. Killing the men in a society has only a temporary effect on slowing population growth. However targeting women dramatically reduces the population growth, one of the elite's stated goals.

Judith Reisman Ph.D. said (September 8, 2007):

Now, do remember that Gardasil is the SECOND STD vaccine our little tykes have been getting.

Since 1992 as neonates they were shot up with HEP B and then they moved it to a few months old so this is STD number TWO!!!

www.drjudithreisman.com

Mike said (September 8, 2007):

I am a biochemist who works with big drug companies on a daily basis ....This deal with Merck-Frosst Canada and the Canadian government absolutely stinks to the high heavens. Teach you daughters abstinence, and if they want to engage in promiscuous behaviors, there will always be mental, spiritual and potential physical harm as a result. If they choose to become vaccinated, just like the vaccine for Varicella Zoster (chicken pox) its something that may protect you for a while. But realize that passive immunity from being exposed to a virus is always more potent. The B cells that carry a memory of the epitopic regions of the virus, to produce T cell mediated antibodies in the future have a limited memory , and thats why you usually require "booster shots" every so often. Who knows how effective Gardisil will be. One can't look at the entire population in clinical trials or guestimate a decade out its long term effective range. What one CAN guestimate is the total revnue produced by continual vaccinations, whether or not they actually produce results.

That to me should be a person's choice. Trust that most scientists like myself, go into the profession wanting to cure diseases. The bottom line is the guys on the corporate jets, are concerned with share prices, not your daughter's cervix. Thats reality. One I have had to stomach and accept , in order to continue working with the industry. They do save some lives. But Lord knows that some of these people get filthy rich, while they paid the scientists like myself beans to do the research.

Dan said (September 8, 2007):

Don't get me started on that vaccine. The governor tried to ram rod that through here in Texas. He tried to simply pull a Bush and give a 'mandate' to require mandatory vaccination of pubescent girls. The State House legislature wasn't expected to pass it, so the governor, Perry, jumped in.

He didn't get away with it only because the reps took it as a personal sleight. They don't like it when the governor tells them what to do.
This played in every state in the Union this year. The big pharma corp pushing this poison is Mercke. They spent millions in every state with propaganda commercials, and bribes.

The public was too much against it here, even though the television stations and newspapers did their best to spin it as a good thing, like they always do.

As for me, I researched it. Did you know it's essentially not an 'HIV' vaccine (nobody knows what HIV is) -- it's a vaccine for a certain strain of venerial warts. I wrote in to the Houston Chronicle and got that information out.

Puts a different slant on it when people understand that this isn't 'HIV' prevention. It boils down to making little girls get vaccinated for a venerial disease only whores and junkies acquire.

And what's the psychological effect on a little girl? You have to get this shot because the government thinks you're going to become a slut? Great for a kid's self esteem. And I suppose it also gives them the notion later that they are immunized agains STDS so why the hell not screw the football team?

So to people I talked to around here I started terming it, the "slut shot". It's an insult and abomination, a slap in the face to parents.

The latter was one good argument that got the public concensus against the governor. The notion that it would cause problems from girls assuming they were immune. And that's the way it was being sold! All lies, any way you cut it.

They'll be around next year. Mercke stands to make - I think - 3 billion annumally off of their venerial wart vaccine once the get it required in all states.

See, down here in the States that figure was given, but only based on US sales. Our news doesn't tell us that this same drug is being pushed in Canada, Ireland, The UK, Australia, the EU....it's world wide . That adds up to many tens of billions.

Globalist corporatism served and enforced by fascist government stooges. Nice work if ya can get it.

Ali said (September 8, 2007):

Hi Henry, I'm french, so excuse me if i make some errors. I discovered your website by coincidence and from then, i read all your articles, and you opened my mind about the feminist conspiracy.

About the vaccination of little girls, i agree with you, it's again mind control, against the children, whose the hidden message is : Just fornicate, it's natural and we protect you. But i think there is a lot more in game with these vaccinations : The depopulation. Imagine if 80% of the girls who take this vaccination have problem to be pregnant, or more become sterile.

This would be good for the depopulation agenda. In france too the newspapers, the tv, are in campaign to inoculate this s**t, into the girls blood. It's so supect.

Christena said (September 7, 2007):

While I normally agree one hundred percent with your articles, this particular one about the vaccine is not quite accurate. The government isn't trying to encourage promiscuity by offering this vaccine - they are offering this vaccine because our girls ARE promiscuous.

Society has allowed them to become so, through movies, music videos, etc. These girls by age nine are on the cusp of becoming sexually active. I do agree that the drug is being pushed a little prematurely, and needs further testing before being offered, and the fact that this was not done does worry me and make me suspicious.

As for the drug sending the message that sex is fine for young girls, it is the media that is doing that, not the vaccine itself. If the vaccine had never hit the media as such a hot topic, then doctors could have offered the option to parents discreetly. Young girls would never have to be told WHY they need it so young. They would never have to be told about the association between the vaccine and sexual activity. But thanks to the absurd coverage in the news about it, it is too late for that now. Shame on the media for this.

If, after several years of study and testing, the drug proved to be both safe and effective, I would possibly consider allowing my daughter to have it. By the tim she is nine it may well be a good option. I will not, however, even hint to my daughter that it has anything to do with sex. It is simply another shot to help keep her healthy.

And that is assuming it is a safe product, but as you said, it is very suspicious for the government to be pushing it so much. Where I live, the past few months have been full of articles in the local papers about how to get all young adults in the province vaccinated against the mumps. How to do it, how to make them want it, how to approach as many as possible. Apparently the mumps must be a very deadly disease indeed with the amount of coverage it has been getting. They even wanted to set up vaccine booths in local bars to make sure that they got everyone. Does that not sound a bit strange to you??? I wonder what the urgency is for everyone to suddenly start getting extra vaccines.....