Direct Link to Latest News

 

June 5, 2012

soros.jpegAnthony Migchels comments on George Soros Speech June 2, 2012







Well, the least we can say is that he offers a very candid appraisal of the way the EU was built: with piecemeal little steps, the contrivers knowing it would lead to new problems that would have to be solved with ever more EU.

I also like his analysis of what this means for Germany: it is going through a small boom because of teh capital influx from the periphery. This is indeed to some extent empire like. He's right on the money when he says the periphery is destined to remain permanently depressed without permanent capital transfers.

And the Germans like the goodies (capital influx), but they hate the price: chronic handouts.

he's also right that the piecemeal process that built the EU could easily go in reverse, creating a momentum seeing the EU going back to square one.

The first half of his speech is worthless. He's saying Economics is a philosophy, instead of a science. Rothbard certainly would agree. I don't. The management of volume and capital costs are quite measurable and scientifically manageable. this is the last thing Soros and his Rothschild bosses want us to realize, of course.

He also adroitly avoids the real issue: mounting costs of debt service. The Problem is not debt, it's Interest! This our master rapist will not tell us, for sure.
 
Why would he have taken down this speech? I don't know. Makes him look bad and does not stop, or even increase circulation. Who did it piss off?

The Germans? Perhaps, they are made responsible for a solution by Soros and he does explain why they are 'winning', although only the capitalists really win through empire, the people only very seldom, and at what price? Extorting their lesser brethren in the South?

His three-month window does sound a little alarmist, but it seems they, including the Bilderbergers, ARE getting worried about the euro's prospects, Greece in particular.



Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at