Mario C said (January 16, 2020):

I dont think that the claw has a satanic meaning. If so many people in different times, some of them even consider saints use it, is an indication that is not satanic. Illuminati and Mason symbolism are not satanic in themselves but are just are satanically , that is egoistic evil, used .

Paul S said (January 15, 2020):

Although I can't prove it in a brief comment, my feeling for a long time has been that the Catholic Church in Rome has been the invention of Ladino-speaking Sephardim from Spain from Day One of its existence -- you can see this by studying the breakup of the Roman Empire into eastern and western halves, and the role that Roman generals and emperors from "Ladino-speaking" Spain played in break-up and subsequent control of the western half of the empire. Likewise, the Protestant churches of the north have been the invention of Yiddish-speaking Ashkenazi from Germany. This alone goes a long way towards explaining the Roman-German axis that persisted throughout all the Middle Ages and down into WWII, and why the Catholic Church was so friendly towards upper-level Nazis. I think most of what we call "Western Culture" is a Jewish (Medici?) invention that was created around the time of the Renaissance, so it's not surprising that the West has been ruled by Jews since its inception.

Essel said (January 15, 2020):

Attention, this enumeration can contain, and even in my opinion contains, deliberate errors intended to dirty certain characters, particularly dangerous for the sect. It is not because the painter depicted the fingers in the way described that the real character was a follower of the thing.

There is a very simple criterion for knowing what is really going on, and that is to study the actions taken by the suspect during his life. Now, if we take the case of Pius IX, for example, we see that he waged a merciless war on the religious and political subversion operated by masonry (syllabus, etc.). It was also made known that he was a freemason, initiated in America, etc.

I also contest the membership of Ignatius of Loyola, a complex character who admirably converted after leading a bad life, an act particularly worthy of a Masonic Nemesis (goddess of vengeance). He played a great role in the Counter-Reformation, which earned him a tenacious hatred from the Americans, who are of anti-Catholic culture. Just because the Jesuit Order is totally corrupt today, does not mean that St. Ignatius was, at least in the second part of his life.

This technique is especially applied with regard to the sect's repentant who have divulged certain secrets, such as Diana Vaughan and others.

Sam P said (January 2, 2018):

There is no question the "claw" is an intentional element in the sampled portraits, but I have my doubts about the attribution of a Luciferian, Kabbalistic or crypto-Jewish meaning. It doesn´t seem plausible to have Roger Bacon, Our Lady and Adolph Hitler as members of the same secret society.

A hypothesis I haven´t seen anyone entertain so far is that the "claw" could be a sign of recognition among painters who in the past would have belonged to corporations of craftsmen. It could also be a sign of nobility or elegance added by the painter in accordance with the rules of his trade, just as there are very specific rules to be followed in iconography. If so, the "claw" would belong to the painter, not to the person shown in the portrait (who might not even be aware of the addition, or may have been long deceased when the painting was produced).

The sign seems to have become popular in the late 15th century (the "babylonmatrix" site linked to shows Roger Bacon flashing the "claw" sign in the 13th century, but that particular drawing was made in the 19th century). I think it would be worth looking into what happened in the art and science of portraiture in the Renaissance and how craftsmen’s guilds and corporations across Europe were networked.

The above is not a refutation of the Luciferian, Kabbalistic or crypto-Jewish currents that took hold of European society in and after the Renaissance, but an independent hypothesis pending research.

--

Thanks Sam

None are so blind as those who will not see.

henry

Mark H said (January 2, 2018):

Happy New Year to you and family.

A very good blog from the start: however, this section reiterates your latest posting.

https://thenarrowgateweb.com/2016/07/27/templars-cross-square-and-compass-and-the-night-owl/

Gordon said (January 2, 2018):

your top article today is most interesting. It adds weight to the theory of a friend of mine, which he told me when the internet first came about = that the 'www' at the beginning of internet addresses, is exactly what you describe ;
: a Marrano gesture which signals the letters M & W, symbolizing 666 from the three V's. The letter V is "waw" in Hebrew and "vav" in Gematria and is the 6th letter in both.

just the meerest of co-incidences? I think not.

BW said (January 2, 2018):

I think a lot of your readers are not completely aware of the immensity of this “planet Earth” conspiracy, and will only go halfway into the “rabbit hole” as they say...The link sent to you by David Livingstone is a treasure trove for all-round information (or shall I say “re-information”) about the “Conspiracy”, and I think all of your regular followers should read it and see the Big Picture?....I mean there are lots of sites out there regarding these matters, but this one is really good I think. Although I’m a bit suspicious of the fact that it has posted links to Alex Jones & Infowars etc...Which have been recognized as Zionist shills. But who knows Hey? In any case, thanks for posting this, and keep up the good work!
Happy New Year!
https://web.archive.org/web/20140423184901/http://www.pseudoreality.org/

Jarle J said (January 2, 2018):

Wow.. your latest Henry..

Triad Claw Hand Sign Suggests Massive Satanic Conspiracy

I believe David Livingstone is right on target, I have investigated it, and came to the same conclusion, the UK (Germanic) Royals is from the same tribe of Esau.. Remember that Herod was Edomite, from Esau... he who killed all those children... to keep his power...

http://www.riksavisen.no/european-royals-are-all-from-edomesau/

Jesus told us we should know them by their fruits, Wow, how right he was:

"Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel." - Matthew 10:6, he ordered his diciples.

Tribes of Israel had been in captivity for 500 years with the Assyrians in Caucasus at Jesus' time.. Where did the Caucasians go from there, as they went out of Egypt, never happy to be in bondage? That is another story..... but it will set Jacobs Trouble in a completely new perspective if we investigate this... it might be opposite than mainstream (satanic) perception of it.

Christians of the tribe of Israel is not wearing that skullcap as the norwegian king and his son is having in attached image, we Christian are in the New Covenant, have been for 1000 years,

"For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: AND THE GOVERNMENT SHALL BE ON HIS SHOULDER: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace". - Isaiah 9:6

http://www.riksavisen.no/norway-one-thousand-year-under-christs-reign/

Christ has been the King of kings.. evidenced.. last 50 years this changed....

Just to let you know..

Sandeep said (November 2, 2015):

I found the Triad hand sign article very interesting. I saw that some people were somewhat revolted by some of the people depicted making this sign. Now, putting aside whether these people were part of the Satanic conspiracy, it is hard to believe that these people did not do this sign without intention.

Firstly, the sign does take an effort to make, and secondly it has been performed over many centuries. As to the painters, I think they were most likely initiated as well, meaning they knew the meaning of that sign. It was purposely drawn this way. You could equate the paintings from back then to our modern magazines, where you constantly see photographers taking one-eye, pyramid and other symbolic pictures.

Also, I don't believe in the notion that signs purvey some kind of lovely virtue. I agree with you that this is the deception to conceal its true meaning, like we see in so many signs and symbols.

Pedro said (November 1, 2015):

One thing that occurs to me studying up on the Illuminati (the Bavarian kind) is that they are nothing if not unoriginal. Anything can be sequestered and perverted, in the Talmudic fashion. So it is just as possible that most of these hand signs are innocent, but they would have us believe that everyone who was anyone was part of their scheme. Any publicity is good publicity. Also making a hazard for 'conspiracy theorists' who see a Red under every bed.

That said, particularly over the last several centuries, they do seem to have all the angles and people covered and there is the possibility that the Devil is really making them do it, such seems the power that they have acquired over almost everything and everyone. Suspect them by their weird hand signs, but know them by their fruits. I doubt that the true God cares for such frivolities and conspiracies amongst men. His sign shall make them tremble, not smirk.

cw said (November 1, 2015):

How many photos/videos have we seen of someone famous signaling their allegiance to whatever? In high school we had secret code words spoken openly in front of other students. When Ron Paul first ran for president, his campaign would call me once a month. The last time they called......I asked the worker if she was familiar with the YouTube videos that very clearly showed Ron Paul signaling his allegiance using the very common Illuminati hand sign. No reply, she hung up. I just checked a few minutes ago - it's still there at YouTube. After reading your most recent post.......it reminded me that I have never heard of any mention of this from anyone and I wonder why that is

Ken said (November 1, 2015):

Probably the most recognized name of our time in this dilemma, is Evangelist Billy Graham. Many claim he is a Mason, but nobody seems to get close enough to both ask him directly or show a lodge of membership. My own research has shown he was SURROUNDED by opportunist Freemasons during his entire career. This enabled him to access media like large stadiums and major network TV time. Media which otherwise would never allow any respect for Jesus Christ to be preached. But his over-diplomacy to Zionists allowed one false doctrine to creep into his own beliefs. I cannot fault anything he ever preached from the pulpit, BUT in his private life,

Tex Marrs uncovered a quote he said to Golda Meir. Billy said he would never do a crusade in Israel because "Jews have their own covenant." What covenant is that Billy? Sacrificing animals, instead of the blood of Christ is the only other "covenant" I see mentioned in the authorized version of scriptures. And THAT is the same garbage Talmudic Jews want to return to by rejecting Christ.

Tim P said (November 1, 2015):

Come on Henry. Don't claim credit for everything. All of these people were Jews? Christopher Columbus? Martin Luther (LOL), and all the rest. Give the other nationalities some credit at least. Isaac Newton was a Jew? Based on no evidence at all, we are supposed to believe that? This is the old Jewish mentality that the Jews are everything and the Goyim just animals. Try to overcome that, and admit that other nationalities can produce men of distinction.

Luther, by the way, certainly no Jew of any kind, is an interesting case. Early on, he trusted the Rabbis, and leaned on them for his learning of Hebrew, and his translation of the Old Testament. In the passage of time, he came to realize that the Rabbis had deliberately misled him in his learning of Hebrew, and mistranslated the bible. This provoked Luther to deeper study, and he looked at the Talmud, which by then, he could read in the original tongue. He became a RAGING anti-semite, when he realized what the Rabbis were really teaching about Christ and Christians. Luther was what they call a Type A personality now. A little excitable, a little extreme. If the proposals in his book had been carried out, I don't think there would be any organized Judaism at all left. But more moderate heads prevailed. The rulers were loathe to lose their funding, which would result in the destruction of their country by the Catholics in the ongoing religious wars.

Most likely, few or none of the people pictured in the article were actually Marranos. Our problem as Christians lies elsewhere. The Cannibal religion of the Catholics and Lutherans is certainly despicable in God's eyes. They imagine they are eating the actual body and blood of Jesus, the real veins, vessels, cartilage, brain tissue, all of it. It is disgusting and has no place in any religion. It did provoke one dyspeptic Rabbi to pronounce that Jesus is literally shit, since the Christians eat him, then they shit him out. I don't believe this. But the ritual is Satanic. And if the Cannibal Christians were really right, the Rabbi would have a good point.

A few years ago, you posted that Putin was a Jew. (or was probably a Jew). I am wondering, do you still believe this? Even after he annexed the Krimea in order to counter the plan to make Krimea the 2nd Jewish state? If he is a Jew, would he have done that? Really? Then you were wrong about Putin. And the one posted this weekend is far more wrong.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. No evidence. Repudiate it.

--

Thanks Tim

I'm not "claiming credit, "just exploring a possibility. I have a lot of respect for David Livingstone.

henry

Mike P said (November 1, 2015):

It surprised me that Martin Luther would be on the list you published of so called crypto Jews based upon supposed hand signs. It's hard to imagine that the author of "On The Jews and Their Lies" would fit in very well with that group. John Wesley too. These are mostly portraits, so maybe the painter was responsible, thinking that was a classic pose or something. Joseph Smith, on the other hand was definitely a Freemason before inventing his religion. This whole "hand sign" thing seems to me to be a very questionable way of determining anything.

Alberta said (November 1, 2015):

Shame on you Henry. If there is anything at that speaks of a Cabal on that list, it is the Satanic music that was playing throughout the gallery presentation.

Your list of 'crypto-Jews' is pathetic.

Francis Xavier, Catherine of Aragon, Ignatius Loyola, Christopher Columbus, Charles Borromeo...? just because of the way their hands were positioned during a sitting of a portrait?

Maybe you should take a vacation and actually read the lives of these people on this 'gallery', their writings and what ever else is out their in the publishing world and figure out who carried the rebels and who were those who fought against Satan.

It is only with in the Holy Roman Apostolic Church that Satan has any true enemies. The rest of the world already belongs to him and therefore, everyone else who does not adhere to the teachings of his Church and all her Traditions are just his play things. That includes you, Henry.

----

Alberta

I'm sure the devil does NOT want us to expose his agents. I do not apologize for opening a debate on this subject. It does seem unlikely that all these people are cryptos. But it's worth examining.

henry

Bonnie said (November 1, 2015):

Posing hands is an important challenge for portrait artists. Awkward hands can easily distract from the face and other more important aspects of a portrait. Across time, certain hand positions have become classic. For example, females, whether standing or seated, are often asked to pose using "ballerina hands"; they lift up their pointer finger while curving those remaining. Women may also be asked to place the slimmest fingers, the pinkies, in the foreground. As for men, Napoleon was not by any means the only subject portrayed with a hand hidden inside the suit jacket. This technique adds intrigue to the portrait, while eliminating the need to portray the hand at all. So I am a skeptic about the so-called "satanic hands."

Jennifer said (November 1, 2015):

This Satanic Hand Sign off the mark.

I am a professional ballerina, modern dancer and teacher of archetypal gesture. I have taught at the New York Academy of Art to figurative artists.

My studies of gesture are based on ancient, religious and historical universal archetypal gesture. Noted teachers in this field have been Francois Delsarte http://www.contemporary-dance.org/francois-delsarte.html, of which I studied from many of his disciples and Marcel Marceau, of whom I studied with one of his direct proteges.

The so called Triad Hand Sign, joining third and fourth fingers is know in the art world of archetypal gesture as being symbolic of a person having their body, mind and soul in harmony. All paintings and sculptures of angels from ancient times to present also model this triad hand as it is considered a symbol of a good and holy spiritual hand. I doubt Christopher Columbus et. al., ever held their fingers in such a delicate, aesthetic and elegant manner -naturally. They may have been taught to do so as a wolf in sheep's clothing. Because this is the understood archetypal gesture of a godly hand, the painter simply depicted their subject's hands in the Triad position so they appeared godly. The archetypal gesture for evil is the opposite when the third and fourth fingers are split as in the photo of Winston Churchill. All ballerinas learn and use the Triad hand in dances depicting pure, good and angelic dances. When I am expressing an angel in dance, I always use the triad hand.

---

Thanks Jennifer,

They always have a cover story. Like the sign of Baphomet is "love" in universal sign language.

henry

James Perloff said (November 1, 2015):

I had seen this online before (the full gallery), and had mixed thoughts about it. Some of the hand gestures were less pronounced than others, and my feeling was that, in at least some of the portraits, too much might have been read into them. (Incidentally, I read the journals of John Wesley many years ago, and he certainly struck me as an entirely sincere Christian.)

On the other hand, when I slap my own hand on my torso, it doesn't go into that position naturally. Holding the 3rd and 4th fingers together, and apart from the neighboring fingers, takes effort. This makes me think that the interpretation is, in general, probably correct.

Also, I have to wonder about the possibility that perhaps, in cases, the arrangement of fingers was a trademark of the artist rather than his subject. It took a long time to pose for these portraits, and speaking for myself, it would be hard to sustain that finger position for long. I suppose a clever artist could have drawn the fingers that way without the subject even realizing it.

I don't mean that this WAS an invention of the artists, but the possibility that this might have occurred in certain instances is perhaps something we could keep "on the table."

Glen said (November 1, 2015):

Wow, who knew? Just when I thought I knew it all about how long this "conspiracy" has been going on and all who were involved, BAM, Henry smacks me upside the head with new evidence.

Al Thompson said (October 31, 2015):

This information is actually more useful than most of the other facts that are observed. And the reason is that once these idiots are identified, then we know who they are because the idiots disclosed it to us. Now, if we then get ourselves entangled with them, it's our own fault. So we do get warnings. Think of these finger flashes as your heads-up and then just stay separated from them to the extent it is possible.

http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2011/11/two-fingered-finger.html

BB said (October 31, 2015):

They know their own.

I had my first 33 degree grip handshake the other day. Or at least the first one that i know about. Just they way they talk and the words they use to feel people out feels wrong. Inhuman. I found it best just to lie. Thank you more information. On what to keep my eyes open for. If a person has to become a member of Freemasons to get ahead. I'm fine as I am.