that conspiracy theorists have been warning about for years
packaged into a single Orwellian entity, complete
with dramatic piano music and a mask of humanitarian benevolence.
"Free markets are already fair. Corporate elites interfere with that fairness when they join with governments to rig the system in their favor and gain undue advantages. The inequities that people like Rothschild describe as an excuse for centralization were in fact created by those very elites. Even the stagflation crisis we are facing today is a direct result of governments and central banks stepping in with trillions in fiat money to save the "too big to fail" corporations from their own disastrous practices. Why should we trust them with AI, or the climate, or social welfare, or anything else for that matter?"
Makow- The Jewish central bankers and their Freemason flunkies are literally stealing our Divine Birthright and that of our children. They want total control of our lives, a monopoly over money, power, thought ...everything. This is the meaning of Communism. This is the meaning of "woke." We own nothing and are their slaves.
by Brandon Smith
(henrymakow.com)
The basic root function of this council is to centralize most or all major corporations (corporations with global influence) and join them with governments into a network that places ideology over profit motive. The CIC is the physical body representing the ESG concept, which creates incentives and punishments for the business world based on their compliance with the values of globalism and woke socialism, as well as their submission to the climate agenda.
The idea is simple: Bring the majority of corporations into line with the far-left political order. Once this is done, force those companies to use their platforms and public exposure to indoctrinate the masses. We have seen this strategy in action over the past several years, with many companies producing a steady stream of products, media content and marketing rife with Diversity, Equity and Inclusion propaganda, not to mention anti-west and anti-conservative propaganda.
These corporations have been so ingrained into the DEI and ESG format that many of them are willing to alienate the majority of their customers and lose vast profits. The last vestiges of free market economics are thus destroyed.
Why would companies choose to join with such an organization if they are going to be constantly micromanaged in their operations? It may not be presented to them as a choice, but rather an inevitable requirement. Those who get in on the ground floor get the best seats at the cabal's table; those who join late might be crushed under the weight of an oppressive socialist bureaucracy.
Then again, the choice could also be voluntary with the promise that corporate leaders will be given extensive governance roles after the "Great Reset" of capitalism which the World Economic Forum discusses so often.
The meeting of corporate power with government power under a shared ideological cultism is the original definition of fascism. The Council for Inclusive Capitalism is the living breathing expression of that authoritarian seed.
The group is headed by Lady Lynn de Rothschild, left, of the notorious Rothschild dynasty and has expanded to include an army of corporate partners, government partners, UN partners and even the Vatican. A key component to the globalist agenda that is mentioned frequently is Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its supposed ability to upend everything in our society and economy forever. While the abilities of AI are highly overrated, the elites seem to see it as some kind of godlike apparatus that will remake the world. Rothschild engaged with the media recently to promote an interesting and revealing argument.
Surprisingly, Rothschild meets some resistance from her interviewers which forces her to make an indirect admission: AI will require a root and branch reform of the economy," meaning, free markets have to go and government/corporate partners will have to step in to control everything, for the sake of the populace and the "greater good", of course.
AI, much like climate change, is quickly becoming yet another false excuse for global centralization. The CIC along with institutions like the WEF and the UN have been asserting for the past few years that "someone" needs to step in to moderate AI so that no single government abuses its apparently unlimited power. In other words: Problem, Reaction, Solution.
The globalists create a problem out of thin air (AI), then suggest it is a much greater boon (or threat) to humanity than it actually is, then they offer their services as fair and empathetic arbiters of the technology and its effects. Rothschild suggests it herself in the interview when she claims that "capitalists" will have to adjust their priorities over to social causes in the wake of AI. It's just ESG in another form.
I would point out the tone of disdain in Rothschild's reaction when free markets are brought into the debate. These people HATE any notion of free markets. Adam Smith's system was drafted in direct response to the trespasses of mercantilist control. The two constructs are mutually exclusive. You cannot have free markets (or freedom) within a centralized mercantilist empire. You cannot have free markets and socialism within the same economy. And to be clear, the system we have in the U.S. today is NOT a free market system.
Free markets are already fair. Corporate elites interfere with that fairness when they join with governments to rig the system in their favor and gain undue advantages. The inequities that people like Rothschild describe as an excuse for centralization were in fact created by those very elites. Even the stagflation crisis we are facing today is a direct result of governments and central banks stepping in with trillions in fiat money to save the "too big to fail" corporations from their own disastrous practices. Why should we trust them with AI, or the climate, or social welfare, or anything else for that matter?
RK said (December 8, 2023):
The naivety Brandon Smith displays in stating that "Free markets are already fair" is mind-boggling. How could anyone believe this without challenging the existence of a monopoly that is arbitrarily controlling the creation and attribution of financial credit? It is misleading to talk about a future centralization of power when centralization has existed for centuries.