Sex - We Have Put the Cart Before the Horse
June 29, 2022
(Horse = love. Cart = sex.) Traditional sexual assumptions turned out to be right. In the 1950-60s, a young woman would only have sex in the context of love and marriage. "Making love" (sex) was literally an expression of a spiritual union i.e. love. In this state, your partner becomes part of you.
Today we have put the carriage before the horse. People seek sexual titillation rather than to celebrate a spiritual union (which they really seek.) Sex creates and strengthens a spiritual bond. The enemy of love, Satanism destroys everything.
The decline of traditional assumptions is a measure of our cultural subversion. The Illuminati are destroying society by destroying young women. Career-driven switch-hitters, coarsened by promiscuity and porn, cannot morph into loyal and loving wives and mothers. I reprise this description of the 2006 campus hookup scene which, surprise surprise, mirrors the homosexual cruising scene. The situation is even worse now thanks to dating apps and smartphones. (See Dating Apps: Crack to Sex Addicts)
Young women are now valued almost totally in terms of their sex appeal because they have been stripped of their time-honored role of wife and mother. They are taught to cultivate the behavior of porn queens rather than heart of a family. Needless to say, this is dehumanizing and self-destructive but again, Satanism is all about death and destruction.
Sexual intercourse is an act of female possession by a male. If the man has sex and then discards her, she is humiliated and degraded. Physical intimacy must correspond with emotional intimacy. To regain dignity and sanity, young women need to demand courtship and marriage before putting out.
Men have also lost the script. They think women don't need sex and must be manipulated or bribed into having intercourse. Many prominent men have ruined their careers as a result. Women love and need sex more than men! They need their reproductive canal dredged at least once a week. But, naturally, they also require a loving relationship. A man need only find the right woman and take a permanent interest, and the gates will swing open!
(Originally, "Feminism Killed Courtship on Campus" - Updated from Sept 9, 2006 & Jan 26, 2019)
By Henry Makow PhD
Thanks to Feminism, co-eds today do not endure the daily humiliation of courtship. They don't worry about young men proffering flowers or asking them out for dinners, dances or movies.
The dreary days of dating when young men sought them as friends, and potential future wives and mothers are gone.
This is the picture of college sexual mores in the article "Sex and Scandal at Duke [University]" by Janet Reitman. It typifies the scene at most universities.
"Whatever sex goes on, the girls say, is done in the context of the ''hook up,'' which describes anything from making out to full-on intercourse. Much to the disappointment of many students, female and male, there's no real dating scene at Duke -- true for a lot of colleges.
''I've never been asked out on a date in my entire life -- not once,'' says one stunning brunette. Nor has a guy ever bought her a drink. ''I think that if anybody ever did that, I would ask him if he were on drugs,'' she says.
Rather, there's the casual one-night stand, usually bolstered by heavy drinking and followed the next morning by -- well, nothing, usually. ''You'll hook up with a guy, and you know that nothing will come out of it,'' says Anna. The best thing you can hope for, she says, ''is that you'll get to hook up with him again.'' Some girls they know have managed to score a regular hook up -- meaning consistent sex -- but others play the field, bouncing from one guy to the next."
The phrase "whatever sex goes on" is an understatement.
"Traditional intercourse is common, and oral sex nearly ubiquitous, regarded as a form of elaborate kissing that doesn't really mean very much. ''Everybody gives blow jobs now,'' says Naomi. ''Before,'' she adds -- meaning a pre-Monica/pre-Britney ''before'' -- ''it used to be you'd have sex and then give one.'' But now, girls give them freely -- on their own initiative, she says. (They also tend to get as much as they give, at least according to Duke men.)"
If this article is any indication, feminism has done nothing for young women's self-esteem. Before, they competed on the basis of their human qualities -- talent, intelligence, personality. Now, let's face it, they all have the same equipment.
Even though these girls get A's and are beautiful, they vie to give their body to high-status males, (athletes and fraternity men.) The reason? Other women are so sexually available; this is the only way they can get status and attention.
''I found myself falling into this thing,'' says Allison. ''It made me very uncomfortable and unhappy because it's not a way to live. But if I didn't do these things and he broke up with me for some reason, two days from now he'd have somebody else. That's just how it works...If my mother knew, she would smack me across the face. I was not brought up in that kind of environment.''In the past, the requirement of courtship and love for sex actually empowered women. Marriage was like a trade union. Now all young women are like scabs. They must perform for nothing and even less.
Young men treat them with contempt as illustrated by one male Duke blogger. (Please excuse the language.)
"These delightful young ladies deal with their massive insecurity by getting fucked by frat boys. Lucky for us guys, frat boys treat sorority girls like shit. As soon as Sally Pi Phi thinks she has secured Johnny Soccer Player, Johnny is off boning Chrissy Tri Delta . . .. All of this leads to unhappy, insecure girls all fighting to get rammed by someone of status.''
This is the fruit of "equality." Young women express their independence by being as aggressive and promiscuous as males. ''Sometimes, girls will be like, 'I'm just horny and I want to have sex,' '' one says...."It's our decision if we're going to allow ourselves to be subjected to negative treatment. It's all framed by the way [other] girls behave.''
But a man who does not love a woman will not care to satisfy her sexually. Men are actually programmed to get pleasure from a woman's pleasure but this only applies to a woman he loves.
(Why do women try to be slutty when it is innocence that is most attractive to men?)In the Heterosexual Contract ( love/ marriage) women surrender power (symbolized by sex) in exchange for male power expressed as love, which a man must first demonstrate through patient courtship. Take away that contract, and women get less than nothing in return for their power.
Needless to say, young women who prostitute themselves for "status" are less likely to have successful marriages. This trend is part of a gradual process of imposing the male homosexual model on society. Studies indicate that less than 10% of male gays form permanent relationships, mostly childless and that the vast majority are promiscuous with 43% of them having more than 500 sex partners in their lifetime.
Using Feminism as a lever, elite social engineers are foisting this model on society as a whole. Aldous Huxley warned us about this model in Brave New World (1932) where promiscuity was encouraged, marriage and family proscribed and children born in state-sponsored hatcheries. This is where sexual behaviour at elite universities like Duke is leading. These are the "women's rights" our decadent society is fighting to impose on Muslims.
It makes perfect sense that Feminism would kill a heterosexual institution like courtship. Behind the facade of "women's rights," post-war Feminism is lesbian in character. It teaches that heterosexual roles (wife, mother) are "socially constructed" and "oppressive" to women. It encourages women to abandon them and imitate men instead. It was instigated by the Rockefeller Foundation which continues to finance it today as part of their plutocratic occult New World Order. All those idealistic feminists who wanted to "change the world" are getting their wish.
----------
------ Note: Before feminists protest the "womyn's movement" is about "equality in the workplace" and "choice" let me say, don't be so naive, that was a ruse! Educate yourselves about the origins and hidden agenda of Feminism before it is too late.
----------------------------
Related: Want to Get Laid? Get Married (but don't have kids!)
Gays and Jews https://www.henrymakow.com/_by_jeff_jefferson.html
Henry Blodgett - Why Do People Hate Jews : Sex as Panacea
Also see: "Sex on Campus" Chicago Sun Times
Tony B said (June 29, 2022):
Henry, you're too young or I'm too old. In my teen years "making love" meant holding hands and maybe a goodnight kiss. Sex was beyond "making love." Before WW1 screwed things up (part of the purpose of wars), ALL courtship was under close observation and control of a third party adult monitor keeping proper order. There was no hanky-panky at all. The purpose of courtship was for the couple to get to know one another - an excellent idea which would prevent millions of divorces.