DS said (February 17, 2022):

Joachim Bartoll violates the basic principles of numerology over and over again. (yes, there are principles in numerology). Let me give a few glaring examples. He says that Freedom sums to 66 which it doesn't but even if he has a system in which it did, it could not then reduce to 33 which he claims. In numerology, reduction means reducing a number by adding its digits. 6 + 6 = 12 which could then be reduced again with 1 + 2 = 3. There is no route to 33. He then speaks to how the "number of the beast", i.e. 666 reduces to 66 which clearly it doesn't. 666 reduces very famously to 18 and this number 18 has been used many times to represent 666. I can give some high profile examples of this.

Later, he speaks to someone named Dave Steenberg and proposes that the ee in Steenberg is 33. It isn't. Again, even if it was, you have to use the entire name to calculate the number for the name. He is basically saying that any word with ee in it is freemason/satanic. That is obviously absurd. Earlier, he proposed that it was mm which was 33. Again, it is not and if you apply that to every instance of mm, you quickly get to absurd places.

The rest of his examples are, if anything, even more crazed. Like I said, I won't break all of them down. However, I will make the crucial point that when the powers-that-be do use numbers in their "work", they are not convoluted as he extremely is. The more obscure and convoluted you do your numbers, the weaker they are. They want to project power, so they do it clearly as in 9/11, 3/11, 11/22, 7/7, 11/11, endless 666s, and 33s, also things such as www (which is 666), etc.

I will grant you that the logo he presents is suspect but it is not enough by itself to condemn the effort. What does he propose people do, sit on their asses because some infiltrator MIGHT have compromised a logo?