Direct Link to Latest News

 

Jahar Tsarnaev Is To Be Judicially Murdered

June 3, 2019


murder.jpg

(Jahar Tsarnaev - Does Boston Marathon bomber look like a terrorist or a patsy?)


Mary Maxwell- "I am certain of Jahar's innocence. I believe the event was a false flag in which Jahar and his late brother Tamerlan were classic patsies.

Much could be ironed out if we could talk to the prisoner but he is under SAM's - special administrative measures requested by the trial judge George A O'Toole, Jr and carried out by Attorney General Loretta Lynch and now, presumably William Barr.

Thus, if he does not want the team that is currently acting in his appeal to be his representatives he has no way of conveying that information to the world. He is totally incommunicado in Supermax Prison in Colorado."


Jahar Tsarnaev Is To Be Judicially Murdered in Indiana

by Mary W. Maxwell LLB

(henrymakow.com) 

Jahar [Dzhokhar] Tsarnaev was tried by a jury in the US District Court in Massachusetts in 2015, two years after the Marathon in which he did not commit the crimes he has been convicted of. He is currently appealing the verdict but the so-called Defense Lawyers are not defending him. After all, the US government wants Jahar to take the rap.

Please see my 2019 book, The Soul of Boston and the Marathon Bombing (Free Download) as to Jahar's innocence and the FBI's guilt.

The so-called Defense Team does not show any signs of calling the prosecutor's attention to the fact that there is exculpatory evidence in file. The judge keeps giving extensions of time to the parties to deal with trivial or irrelevant matters.

Thus it seems that the appellate court will not override the guilty verdict. (They could do so and I hope I am wrong in my prediction. The appeal judge, Judge Juan Torruella, appears to be the sanest of men and a good judge.)

maxwell.jpg

(left, Mary Maxwell)

When the Prisoner Is Handed Over to the US Marshal

A federal Death Row prisoner stays in custody of the US Attorney General - currently, William Barr - until all appeals are exhausted. At that point, he is to be executed and is handed over to the US Marshal. According to 18 USC 3596:

"The United States marshal... shall supervise the implementation of the sentence in the manner prescribed by the law of the State in which the sentence is imposed. [That was Massachusetts.] If the law of the State does not provide for implementation of a sentence of death, [Massachusetts has abolished the death penalty] the court shall designate another State, [Judge O'Toole designated Indiana]..., and the sentence shall be implemented in the latter State in the manner prescribed by such law."

So what does Indiana law say? The death penalty in that state can only be given for murder with aggravating circumstance. One of the listed circumstances is bombing. The penalty is lethal injection.

After the Guilty Verdict of April 8, 2013

The counts of federal crimes on which Jahar Tsarnaev was sentenced to death on May 15, 2015 are:

Count 4 - "Use of a weapon of mass destruction resulting in death," Count 9 -- "Bombing a place of public use resulting in death," and Count 14 - "Malicious destruction of property resulting in personal injury and death".

Plus three other counts (5, 10, and 15) of "Possession and Use of a Firearm During and in Relation to a Crime of Violence Resulting in Death."

I am not sure which of those death counts is associated with each of the following decedents: Martin Richard, Lingzi Lu, and Krystle Campbell, all on Boylston St during the April 15, 2013 Marathon, and Sgt Collier who was seated in his cruise car at MIT three nights later.

Two Groups of Amici

I am an amicus curiae - friend of the court - in Tsarnaev's appeal. I am in a group of 3 United States citizens whom Judge Torruella allowed to file a statement in November 2017. Subsequently, "eight distinguished citizens of Massachusetts," including a retired judge of the Massachusetts Supreme Court, were allowed to act as a group of amici curiae.

Minnesota attorney Jack Graham is the counsel for my group, the other two members of which are Prof James Fetzer and Dr Cesar Baruja. Our statement points put that the main evidence presented by the FBI as to the bomb allegedly exploded by Jahar Tsarnaev is a black backpack, but he was - in the photo that the FBI uses to identify him - carrying a grey-white backpack.

The prosecution does not have a leg to stand on. As I explain in my book, The Soul of Boston (which is a revised edition of my earlier effort entitled Marathon Bombing: Indicting the Players), both legal teams - prosecution and defence - engaged in extraordinarily unethical behavior.

That, however, does not form part of our amici statement. Rather we rely on the backpack color and on the fact that Jahar's parents were coerced into coercing their son to accept the Public Defenders Miriam Conrad and Judith Clarke as his attorneys.

413607736824a89daf4b28692b7231db--the-white-brother.jpg

(Jahar and brother Tamerlan, who was brutally murdered by police) 

I am certain of Jahar's innocence. I believe the event was a false flag in which Jahar and his late brother Tamerlan were classic patsies.

Much could be ironed out if we could talk to the prisoner but he is under SAM's - special administrative measures requested by the trial judge George A O'Toole, Jr and carried out by Attorney General Loretta Lynch and now, presumably William Barr.

Thus, if he does not want the team that is currently acting in his appeal to be his representatives he has no way of conveying that information to the world. He is totally incommunicado in Supermax Prison in Colorado.

Frankly, I have fears for the life of the appeals judge, Juan Torruella, who hails from Puerto Rico. He is 85 years old, will turn 86 this week.

Things are not being played by the book. The "reality testing" of the principals seems to me to be way off.

If anyone wants to get in touch with me, about standing together for justice, please email me via the contact page of my website MaxwellForSenate.com

----

Related - YouTube lecture by Mary Maxwell on Tsarnaev Trial

Paul Craig Roberts   Murdering the Innocent to Support the Lie 

Makow - How to Avoid Becoming a CIA Patsy 

-----                Jahar Tsarnaev - A Patsy's Progress 

First Comment from Glen-


Dave McGowan(rest his soul)gave the most in-depth analysis of this psyop I believe you will find. It is filled with high-resolution photos of the alleged crime scene, complete with explanations of obvious fakery.
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/bostonmarathon/





Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Jahar Tsarnaev Is To Be Judicially Murdered "

Anonymous said (June 5, 2019):

Whether witting or unwitting, Mary M. Maxwell's and Co.s crusade for justice for Jahar Tsarnaev could well be misdirection from the fact that the whole trial is fake in the first place. They don't mind you arguing that Jahar is a framed, innocent patsy (even one in a government false flag operation) caught up in a miscarriage of justice by a corrupt legal system. They just don't want it coming out that the whole trial is a fake, to begin with and that it might not even be Jahar in the dock or even in prison (as in the fake trial and incarceration of Manson and "his" Manson Family: milesmathis.com/tate.pdf) in the first place.

The same also applies to Them not minding people arguing whether it was real passenger jetliners or high-tech remote-controlled drones crashing into the towers on 9-11 or whether it was burning jet fuel and airliner impacts or conventional demolition charges or Thermite or Nano Thermite or Thermate or even micro-nukes which destroyed the World Trade Centre on 9-11. They just don't want you to know it was missiles fired into the towers, covered over, with direct media criminal involvement, by fake, computer-generated images of jet aircraft melting into the towers in the former and top-secret, directed energy weapons reducing the W.T.C. to dust in the latter. It's a case of the revealing of a lesser truth for the re-veiling of a greater, more disturbing and injurious truth.

Better Mary and her crew should not be dignifying the whole fake, theatrical performance with well-meaning protests to the court as though the whole charade were real. But better they should instead be challenging the reality of the trial and whether anyone in the "Boston Marathon Bombing" was actually killed or even seriously injured by the smoke bombs they set off. They should be shouting, "THAT'S BESIDE THE POINT!", on every score.


FS said (June 4, 2019):

Henry,

That's a great 16-part, in-depth Boston Marathon Bombing report by a contributor you posted. That will keep me busy for a while. Thanks.

The "bombing" is shaping up to be a total fake, and in its aftermath, at least the trial of the younger Tsarnaev brother appears to be a totally faked show trail. Like Miles Mathis says, 'That's just not the way a real trial is conducted. It just doesn't happen.' Everything about it stinks of a hoax.

That there are so many people actively taking part in this scam and few if any insider leaks, says it all about the level of control, the number of people willing to go along with evil and the public just not caring. How to make them start caring? That's the question. For starters, show them how these scams impact them personally.


Robert K said (June 3, 2019):

"...the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity.... It is for future scientists to...discover exactly how...to make children believe that snow is black...."--Bertrand Russell

Judicial authorities in the US apparently do the same regarding the colour of backpacks. In the UK the trick is played regarding the colour of baseball caps (in the conviction of Tommy Mair for the killing of M.P. Jo Cox).


FS said (June 3, 2019):

If there's anything to what Miles Mathis says (milesmathis.com/boston2.pdf), the brutal killing and mutilation of the elder of the 2 Tsarnaev brothers was faked and so was the shooting, arrest, jailing, trial and imprisonment of his kid brother in the Boston Marathon Bombing fiasco (milesmathis.com/boston.pdf). These guys were intelligence from start to finish, and are probably working deep cover with new faces and identities in a super witness protection program in some warn-torn hell hole. Now they've got'em for keeps with all their bridges burnt behind them. Why kill them when they can be born again into great usefulness for the Controllers? Why do you think they call'em "spooks"?

--

Thanks FS

I'll trust the pic of the corpse on the table with the gash in his side

h


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at