Pittsburgh Massacre- An Irish Catholic's Perspective
October 31, 2018
Direct Link to Latest News
October 31, 2018
Ryan V said (October 31, 2018):
Just digesting your story on the
Pittsburgh Synagogue Shootings.
I went over to Mile Mathis and looked at
his take on the event. He suggested it was a hoax.
Same patterns as other hoaxes ie, 911, Sandy Hook
etc..
They borrowed the identities of Jewish people
who had just recently passed away and had
them stored in the Morgue.
Nobody shot in the Synagogue.
Body bags stuffed with manikins
or sleeping bags as they wheeled out
the beds on wheels.
But who knows?
I'll research as much as I can.
Thanks for your take though.
Thanks, Ryan
I'd be more sceptical if the shooter had not been caught alive.
henry
Brabantian said (October 31, 2018):
Was very surprised at the content of Gearóid Ó Colmáin's essay you published, as I had not seen his work in a while, and in the major work I read of his in 2016 - his often-powerful 11-part series on 'Coercive Engineered Migration' - Gearóid Ó Colmáin was an unusal but eloquent Stalinist who upheld Stalin as the true beacon of authentic Marxism, versus the Trotskyite Khruschev etc.
In between, I saw that Gearóid Ó Colmáin seemed to have been black-balled from the leftist sites, because he had publicly argued for a traditional also somewhat Stalinist view, that homosexuality was a type of mental disturbance that could be cured. This was 'too far' for the leftists, whilst Ó Colmáin's Stalinism did not win him friends on the right or alt-right.
(Stalin on sexual relations, is an interesting story in itself. Stalin reacted to the social chaos brought about under Lenin's 'easy-divorce' experiment, by restoring the patriarchal family as part of the 'socialist model'.)
Ó Colmáin is often interesting. From him I learned about Pentagon advisor Kelly Greenhill's 2010 book on 'Weapons of Mass Migration' - how manipulated migration has long been historically a tool to destroy societies - and also that Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels themselves, talked about migration as an oligarch weapon to destroy workers' lives and de-moralise them - quite something in light of today's Leftists supporting 'open borders' alongside the oligarchs.
But I hadn't seen such a spirited defence of Stalin as done by Ó Colmáin. Stalin removed a lot of Jewish figures from Soviet power in the late 1930s (which is sometimes claimed as a reason why Stalin is demonised).
Ó Colmáin quite stunned me in writing that, re Khruschev's famous speech about the 'cult of personality' of Stalin, according to Ó Colmáin, in the "Long mendacious speech slandering Stalin - every claim against Stalin in Khrushchev’s speech has since been proven to have been a lie." An interesting offset to the usual picture of Stalin as the 'worst' of the Soviet leaders. Israel Shamir has recently mounted a somewhat similar defence of Stalin and the whole Soviet era - citing various sources as to the gulag numbers being much lower than claimed, etc.
Ó Colmáin assembled fascinating supporting material ... Albania's red leader Enver Hoxha who praised Stalin as the Soviet leader most helpful re other nations' self-sufficiency, and Ché Guevara also saying that a more authentic socialism had given way to 'Khruschevite hucksterism'.
Now however, Ó Colmáin seems to express an earnest, almost child-like-simple, Vatican faith, which I hadn't seen in his 2016 magnum opus. A drift back perhaps to his youthful roots - tho with keeping a radical edge, Ó Colmáin's critique extending to the Vatican church itself. Thanks for printing him.
Dagfinn Klausen said (October 31, 2018):
"There are no indications, however, that this attack was a false flag and we should not fall into the trap of assuming that every terrorist attack is necessarily a false flag. Just because Jewish terrorists were most likely behind 911, and many other major global terrorist operations do not mean Jewish terrorists are behind all attacks. This attack appears to be the work of a far-right 'white nationalist' terrorist and there is no lack of nutcases in the white nationalist milieu».
False Flag cannot be ruled out regarding The Norway Attack.
- There is a picture of a person shooting, taken from a helicopter, that is not Breivik
- There are several witnesses describing more than one shooter
- Analyzing sound recording during the shooting proves more than one shooter
Suggest researching this link for more information:
https://www.amfir.com/AmFirstInst/NonToolbarTopics/Black_Ops/2011-07-22_Oslo/Oslo-Utoya_7-22_False_Flag_Terror;_Part_2;_Miscellaneous_Explanations,_Questionable_Government_and_Establishment_Media_Behavior.html
JG said (October 31, 2018):
There's no need to discuss the "antisemitic syndrome", it's an endless argument that bears no fruit for intelligent debate. It's name-calling that rejects anyone that they choose to place that label on. You can call anybody that name that you want and no one can stop you. And you don't even have to be Jewish to do so.
There are no written criteria for what constitutes being an antisemite. It could apply to almost anyone. Even some Jewish leaders have been called antisemitic by other Jews themselves. Sounds pretty crazy to me.
I don't believe the globalist want an Isreali Nation State. Their world order agenda is to be rid of all the nation-states and to put them under their control, including Israel. It's no surprise that some globalist leaders wanted President Trump to denounce specifically '"white nationalists" after what happened in Pittsburgh. Donald Trump is a White American who believes in the Constitution and his nation. They wanted him to denounce himself all whites that believe likewise. Is nationalism now on a parody with antisemitism? If you put a flag now on your front porch does this make you an evil nationalist?
Sounds pretty crazy to me.
Unfortunately, all this chaotic insanity will probably get worse before it gets better.
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at
RL said (October 31, 2018):
After first browsing thru this article the first time second time actually reading some of his comments as a supposed Catholic which he is not since he is Norvus order catholic which is not at all Catholic, so e of his statements are true because they come from Christ himself, but he leaves out much about the Jews or what true Popes have stated and saints , I suggest he get back to true Roman Catholic Faith and learn it and practice it , for as the true church teaches very Few are saved because very Few believe right do and act right in all things, soon Our Lords hand will come down on this sinful world as Our Lady has warned time after time but when on deaf ears .