Direct Link to Latest News

 

America's Only Choices: Jewish Communism or Jewish Zionism

May 9, 2018


1super_zionist_trump_AntiZioni.jpg
Reminder - George Soros was Behind Iran Deal

American politics today are defined by two versions of the Jew World Order, 
Zionism (nationalism) on the Right and Communism (globalism) on the Left.

The article below is a reminder that when George Soros pushed through the Iran nuclear deal to the consternation of Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump rode to his rescue. Trump announced his candidacy in June 2015, just as the Iran deal was being finalized. The only reason Americans got an alternative to Clinton was due to this schism in World Jewry between Communists and Zionists.  The Communists, led by George Soros, and fronted by Obama and Clinton, represent the disintegration of the nation-state, including Israel. The nationalists led by Netanyahu and fronted by Trump represents a handful of powerful nation-states dominated by Israel. This is a disagreement between Masonic lodges. In Trump, Americans are getting the crumbs from Israel's table.

Related- Hatred of Trump Reflects Century Old Jewish Schism   ----------- (between Trotskyists and Stalinists) 
---------------  Soros furious with Trump for killing deal 
-----------------Communism is Rothschild Monopoly Over EVERYTHING 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Comment by IN

There is no Zionist faction.  There is only a continuity of agenda.  Soros's Iran deal was meant to fail.  The document "Which Path To Persia" is the smoking gun that proves it:


http://landdestroyer.blogspot.ca/2018/05/america-planned-to-break-iran-nuclear.html


[The best way to minimize international opprobrium and maximize support (however, grudging or covert) is to strike only when there is a widespread conviction that the Iranians were given but then rejected a superb offer--one so good that only a regime determined to acquire nuclear weapons and acquire them for the wrong reasons would turn it down. Under those circumstances, the United States (or Israel) could portray its operations as taken in sorrow, not anger, and at least some in the international community would conclude that the Iranians "brought it on themselves" by refusing a very good deal.]


Obama offers the deal of the lifetime.  Trump backs out of it after the Israeli revelations.  Time will tell if the Israelis are not faking the documents to something akin to Colin Powell's infamous speech at the UN.


It is obvious that Soros is kept in the dark by the other globalists or is acting "outraged" in public.


Finally past Presidents for the most part act pro-Israel in their first term.  But in the second term, they act against Israel's interests.  Bush Jr comes to mind.  For instance we see the USA moving their embassy and publicly supporting embassy moves from other nations to Jerusalem.  Well Jerusalem is meant to be an international city in the future with a world religion.  So far the embassies moving only proves that the plan is going forward.  After all a city state does need embassies from the world.


I honestly doubt there is a Zionist faction.  We will probably see war escalate...after the embassies from some of the nations move in May. Then there will be calls to internationalize Jerusalem.   





Soros-puppet-Obama.jpg
Iran Deal Shows Illuminati/Zionism not Identical from May 25, 2016

The Iran deal was supported by the NGO Ploughshares. "Ploughshares is in turn financed by Soros' Open Society Institute, the Buffett Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation."

We welcomed the US-Iran nuclear deal last July as a sign that Obama was defying the Zionist lobby.
However, he is always the Illuminati's puppet.  As much as Netanyahu and AIPAC protested, we discover the usual suspects (Soros, Rockefeller whom we normally associate with Zionism) actually wanted the Iran deal.  The question is why? 

Are they leading up to Albert Pike's World War Three that will pit Zionists against Islam and destroy both? 

Iran is also controlled by the Illuminati. Do they want to build it up for this final conflagration? 

The deal may have been a rain check for Bibi, who has been well compensated for his patience.

 Zionism is "but an incident of a far reaching plan," said leading American Zionist Louis Marshall, counsel for bankers Kuhn Loeb in 1917. 
"It is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon."  That weapon is a trauma brainwashed people - army, airforce, nuclear arsenal and secret service, not to mention electorate- at the service of the Illuminati's satanic world dictatorship i.e. Communism. 

This article shows how the Illuminati purchase "public opinion."  




The Soros-Backed Group that Helped Sell Iran Nuclear Deal 
Breitbart.com
(abridged by henrymakow.com) 

TEL AVIV - A group that advocates a nuclear-free world and that was identified earlier this month by the White House as central in helping to market the Iran nuclear deal to the news media has funded National Public Radio since 2005, an Associated Press investigation has revealed.
Think tanks funded by the Ploughshares Fund include the Arms Control Association, Brookings Institution, and the Atlantic Council, the AP reported.

Unmentioned by the AP is that the Ploughshares Fund is financed by billionaire George Soros' Open Society Institute.

rhodes.jpg
The involvement of Ploughshares in selling the Iran agreement to the public was revealed in an extensive New York Times Magazine profile of Obama's deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes, left, titled, "The Aspiring Novelist Who Became Obama's Foreign-Policy Guru." The article contains interviews with Rhodes and scores of top Obama administration officials...

In the spring of last year, legions of arms-control experts began popping up at think tanks and on social media, and then became key sources for hundreds of often-clueless reporters. "We created an echo chamber," he admitted, when I asked him to explain the onslaught of freshly minted experts cheerleading for the deal. "They were saying things that validated what we had given them to say."

Rhodes told Times reporter David Samuels that the marketing strategy took advantage of the "absence of rational discourse" and utilized outside groups, including Ploughshares.

When I suggested that all this dark metafictional play seemed a bit removed from rational debate over America's future role in the world, Rhodes nodded. "In the absence of rational discourse, we are going to discourse the [expletive] out of this," he said. "We had test drives to know who was going to be able to carry our message effectively, and how to use outside groups like Ploughshares, the Iran Project and whomever else. So we knew the tactics that worked." He is proud of the way he sold the Iran deal. "We drove them crazy," he said of the deal's opponents.

(CENTRAL BANKER) MONEY TALKS

Now the AP has revealed the extent of Ploughshares funding to NPR and to influential foreign policy U.S. think tanks.Besides $100,000 to NPR last year, the AP reports:

Ploughshares has funded NPR's coverage of national security since 2005, the radio network said. Ploughshares reports show at least $700,000 in funding over that time. All grant descriptions since 2010 specifically mention Iran.

"It's a valued partnership, without any conditions from Ploughshares on our specific reporting, beyond the broad issues of national and nuclear security, nuclear policy, and nonproliferation," NPR said in an emailed statement. "As with all support received, we have a rigorous editorial firewall process in place to ensure our coverage is independent and is not influenced by funders or special interests..."


The Arms Control Association got $282,500; the Brookings Institution, $225,000; and the Atlantic Council, $182,500. They received money for Iran-related analysis, briefings and media outreach, and non-Iran nuclear work.

Other groups, less directly defined by their independent nuclear expertise, also secured grants.

illuminati8.gif
J-Street, the liberal Jewish political action group, received $576,500 to advocate for the deal. More than $281,000 went to the National Iranian American Council.

Princeton University got $70,000 to support former Iranian ambassador and nuclear spokesman Seyed Hossein Mousavian's "analysis, publications and policymaker engagement on the range of elements involved with the negotiated settlement of Iran's nuclear program."

Ploughshares says it has awarded hundreds of grants "whose aggregate value exceeded $60 million."

A previous investigation by this reporter showed Ploughshares has partnered with a who's who of the radical left, including Code Pink, the pro-Palestinian J Street, United for Peace & Justice, the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation and Demo, a progressive economic advisory group where President Obama's controversial former green jobs czar, Van Jones, has served on the board.

The group says its mission is to support the "smartest minds and most effective organizations to reduce nuclear stockpiles, prevent new nuclear states, and increase global security."

Ploughshares is in turn financed by Soros' Open Society Institute, the Buffett Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Rockefeller Foundation.

Another Ploughshares donor is the Tides Foundation, which is one of the largest funders of the radical left. Tides is funded by Soros.

Ploughshares has donated to the Institute for Policy Studies, which calls for massive slashes in the U.S. defense budget.

It has also financed the International Crisis Group, a small organization that boasts Soros on its board.

---------
First Comment by Tony B

Going a little deeper into this change in tactic, which is all it is:

There have been signs lately that the rabid Israeli leadership has outlived its usefulness to the Rothschild cabal plus everyone who matters knows that it is a directly subservient subdivision of Rothschild, Inc. which makes it a liability to that cabal.

In today's world that City of London headquartered cabal has one objective above all others which is the conquest of Russia's vast, practically untouched, natural resources, perhaps the last big prize left in the world.  They thought they had already stolen it through the communist destruction but have been shocked at the rapid return of Christianity and its right order after they dropped the terrorist tyranny and began their systematic rape of its resources.  Not to mention that the cabal thought it had Russia's fuel in hand until Putin thwarted them by jailing their agent and returning that industry and its resources to the Russian government.

So long as Zionist Israhell exists Iran will remain "hard nosed" against it and the supporting "West."  But with Israhell reduced by the cabal to be no longer a power which can play the Middle East as it pleases, Iran will eventually mellow, let its guard down, allowing the multitude of Rothschild funded (that means Soros et al too) organizations to infiltrate it and establish themselves as a weapon pointed at the soft under belly of Russia, a necessity for the total surrounding of that vast nation.  

They know Putin will not live forever and they have every intention of getting their prostitute, Medvedev (or any number of others), back in the top spot in time to further weaken Russia's defenses against the Rothschild financial empire which can buy many to so help them, can order conquest by whatever owned proxy it chooses, and can then once again destroy that nation and steal its resources.



Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for " America's Only Choices: Jewish Communism or Jewish Zionism "

JG said (May 9, 2018):

Neither Netanyahu's speech nor President Trump's speech on Iran hasn't seemed to have changed world opinion on this matter especially with the EU. They have heard this kind of talk many times before. It's the same old villains versus the same old innocent aggressors.
Washington is fortunate that they have someone who wants the job of being President these days. American Foreign Policy is largely being influenced by foreign Communist and Zionist forces from within it's own government. And, America has lost it's sovereignty as a Constitutional Democracy because of this.
I still believe that President Trump is not a war President and that he will keep his other campaign promises and get us out of these foreign wars like the one in Syria which he is trying to do.


Brendon O'Connell said (May 9, 2018):

I dont quite buy it Henry.

The "key", for me, is Israels obvious relationship with China, Russia and the Belt and Road Initiative $1 trillion economic project to lock up Eurasia into Smart Cities - using Israeli technology.

Population reduction is the grand plan. Control of population - herded into small areas where they can be tracked, traced, compelled to submit to a technocratic, scientific socialist (Marxist) digital tyranny. Vaccinated into sterility and allowed to die alone.

In that the worlds managerial elite is in accord across the board. All else is "detail" I suggest. But what ever the detail from here till Smart Gulag internment in self driving gulag trucks...I guess it makes for the shaping of public perception and reality. As long as we think there is a fight I guess we have hope. Just a theory.


S said (May 28, 2016):

The Illuminati rarely, if ever, show their face when they are behind world events. However with regard to the Iran Deal, the upstart Zionists (who are a cog in the wheel of organized Freemasonic Illuminati, similar to the Mormons, Italian Mafia, Soviet Communists, NAZIs, or any other movement du jour) have also been equally successful in masking their infiltrations, involvements, and identities behind some of the world’s largest developments (911 for example).

However the Illuminati were forced to throw the Zionists under the bus even though they were so useful to them for centuries, and especially over the past 70 years as their “whipping post,” “scapegoat,” and “lightning rod.”

The reason the Freemasonic Illuminati preferred to use the Freemasonic Zionists to advance their cause, more than any other type of organization, is because Jews are by nature very clannish, close-knit, organized, well educated, money-oriented, easily corruptible and corrupting, and scared like hell to survive after thousands of years of persecution.

The Iran Deal was historic for many reasons, but most importantly, it was the seminal event (for those informed souls that would even notice) which openly called attention to the pronounced and deafening fracture/break between the Illuminati and their bastard rebellious child, Zionism.

And the Israeli leadership and intelligentsia (33rd Degree Freemasons Benjamin Netanyahu all the way to the founder, 33rd Degree Freemason David Ben Gurion) knows it. As a litmus test, the Iran Nuclear Deal also revealed the identities of their proponents and opponents - if you supported the Iran Nuclear Deal, you were a Servant of the Freemasonic Illuminati, and if you opposed it, you were a Servant of Freemasonic Zionism. And now, in the aftermath, it is all on the table for the world to see.


MG said (May 26, 2016):

I pretty much agree with George [below]; the world is controlled by a vast web of demonic people and demonic organizations (political, economic, religious etc.) that are going to the tune of their master the devil who from the moment he rebelled against God in heaven was determined to build a universe in opposition to God and his reign. In the Bible this web is called the Babylon System and at the right time from this system the devil's ultimate tool will arise, the Anti-Christ. I personally believe we are very close to that moment and people like Obama, Hillary, Angela Merkel, Pope Francis, etc... are all doing their little part in preparing the world for his arrival.


George said (May 25, 2016):

I think that the term Illuminati is to a certain extent an anachronism. Joe Valachi allegedly said that organized crime never used the term Mafia to describe themselves. Instead it was OUR THING, in Italian Cosa Nostra. I think that the reality is that there is an essentially nameless coalition of gangsters who cooperate with each other in a variety of formats, including Masonry and organized religion, to control the show.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at