Direct Link to Latest News

 

At Easter, the Old Testament is Crucifying the New

April 1, 2018

ultimate-question-source-of-significance-672x372.jpg
"The Human Rights advocate Alfred de Zayas rejects the teachings of the Old Testament outright and compares it with what Jesus Christ preached: The command of "love thy neighbour" is put against what drives the adherents of the warlord Jehova. Unfortunately we have to realize that this life-destroying ideology has not left our world by any means. Just the opposite, it has taken possession of the so-called Western World and is planning the next war. We should concern ourselves with this." -- Christian Juergen Klein



Disclaimer-  I am not a Christian but I do believe in Jesus' teaching that God is Love and Love is the blueprint for human salvation, personally and collectively. I post this as a reminder that Christ tried to turn Judaism into a genuine religion, from a satanic cult, and paid the price.  Not all my Christian readers will agree with Alfred de Zayas. (see First Comment by Michael Hoffman below.)  De Zayas, a Cuban-born American lawyer, is hard to classify. He seems to be a globalist with some very politcally incorrect views. 





(abridged by henrymakow.com) 

Does our ostensibly Christian society understand the message of Jesus Christ, or do we just pay lip service to it? Let us imagine, just for a moment, that we were to take the Sermon on the Mount seriously. Would we still consider ourselves Christians?

220px-Alfred_de_Zayas_2010.jpg
(Alfred de Zayas, left)

Quite frankly, we do not practice Christianity, which is based on love, forgiveness and humility. That's what the New Testament is all about. What we practice is a modified form of the Old Testament, flattering ourselves with the illusion that we are, after all, the "good guys", the chosen people of God, that we shall be saved and that all others are doomed (and probably deserve to be doomed) -- the Muslims, the Bahais, the Hindus, the Buddhists, the agnostics, the atheists. We pay lip service to human brotherhood, but in practice we are predators.

Every time we read the Old Testament and accept with self-righteous contentment the idea that our God sent ten plagues to the Egyptians, ordered the Israelites to smite the women and children of Canaan, to kill everything living in Jericho, to slaughter the city of Hai ... every time we read such stories without reflecting on their implications and obvious injustice, we are not behaving as New Testament Christians.

Who could possibly see any legitimacy in the claim that the Old Testament granted divine justification to the patriarchs to take the promised Lebensraum by force? (Exodus, Chapters 8 to15, Deuteronomy Chapter VII, verses 1-6, Chapter XX, verses 16-18, and Joshua Chapter VI, verse 21, Chapter VIII, verses 18-29).  There is not only xenophobia in these verses, but misanthropy.  Who would, in good conscience, repeat the words of Psalm 58 about others with whom we have discord:  « These men are born sinners, lying from their earliest words ! They are poisonous as deadly snakes, cobras that close their ears to the most expert of charmers. O God, break off their fangs. Tear out the teeth of these young lions, Lord. Let them disappear like water into thirsty ground. Let them be as snails that dissolve into slime and as those who die at birth, who never see the sun. God will sweep away both old and young. He will destroy them more quickly than a cooking pot can feel the blazing fire of thorns beneath it. The godly shall rejoice in the triumph of the right. They shall walk the bloodstained fields of slaughtered, wicked men."?  

In the same vein we read Psalm 63:  "But those plotting to destroy me shall go down to the depths of hell. They are doomed to die by the sword, to become the food of jackals." Is this not paranoid? 

Is it not misanthropy, a combination of petulance, solipsism, narcissism and arrogance?  With very good reason the first of the seven capital sins (for Catholics) is the sin of arrogance, the source of so many other dysfunctions and abuses.  Yet, arrogance does not feature prominently among the sins proscribed in the Ten Commandments. It has been said that a person can observe the ten commandments and still be unjust. The new Alliance in love demands much more than peremptory obedience of the ten commandments. 

A conscious Christian knows that the world is not black and white, that we are all imperfect, that there is good in the bad and that there is also bad in the good.  Every single one of us has good and bad traits.  Religion should help us marshal this complexity...

Religion is not and cannot be misanthropic.  Religion is philanthropic and optimistic, it recognizes that we are all the children of the same Creator.  As St. Paul tells us in the Epistle to the Romans, Chapter 8, verses14-15: "Those who are led by the Spirit of God are the sons of God. Now you have not received a spirit of bondage so as to be again in fear, but you have received a spirit of adoption as sons, by virtue of which we cry "Father"!"

angry_god.jpg
In the Old Testament  Yaweh is defined as the Lord of Armies, Lord of Sebaoth (from Hebrew s??ba'ôt, pl. of s?aba', army, from s?aba', to wage war). This concept of a warrior God is common to many other religions -- but does it satisfy our sense of religion, our sense of goodness, our sense of morality, our sense of justice for all creatures of the Earth? Is our idea of the glory of God that of a heap of corpses?

For some apparently it does. And many evangelical churches project this image of divinity. Somehow it seems that the majority of Christians do not even try to understand the message, much less live according to the Sermon on the Mount, because they think it is an allegory, a metaphor, too tough, because we reject the fundamental premise of the equality of human beings. We want to be the privileged class, the chosen people, even if we would not admit it to ourselves. It is not equality that we want, but privilege!  We want the extra Wurst!

We know the Beatitudes only in name -- not in practice -- for in essence we still live according to Old Testament rules, considering ourselves the rightfully chosen people and judging all others as heathen and worthy of destruction. We adhere to the myth of the "clash of civilizations" instead of looking for an alliance of civilizations, for a rehabilitation and reconciliation of cultures. 

When I go to Catholic Mass on Holy Thursday to celebrate the founding of the New Alliance and the con-celebration of the Eucharist feast, when I go with my wife to the reformed Protestant Good Friday service to meditate on the overwhelming symbolism of the crucifixion, when we go to the ecumenical Easter Sunday service, I like to focus on the mystery of our existence.

How ineffable the very fact that we exist, that one day we all shall die, and that above all we believe in Life and have faith in the Resurrection.

As Rilke said: "Das Leben ist eine Herrlichkeit" (life is splendour).

And, again, Hiersein ist herrlich (7. Duino Elegy) -- it is good to be here and now.

I like to reflect on the overwhelming mystery that a GOD CREATOR would so love his Creation that he would send his SON to die on the Cross to redeem us.

220px-Noel-coypel-the-resurrection-of-christ-1700.jpg
If you emotionally and physically experience faith, if you instinctively feel it, if you believe, you would agree that we can be saved only by GRACE, i.e. by the same transcendental force, by the same incomprehensible generoristy -- that gratuitous act of creation. We ought to endeavour to to the right thing, to be good to our families, to our neighbours, to our colleagues, to be just, but our good works can hardly be enough to deserve eternal salvation. We are only the vessels into which Divinie Grace is poured, like wine is poured into a chalice, and yet, it is the wine that matters, the wine that still states of its grapes (Elizabeth Barrett Browning, Sonnets from the Portuguese, 6).

If we practiced Christianity, we would at least make an effort not to hate other people, not to lie to and double-cross our acquaintances and even our friends. Maybe we could even persuade ourselves to love some more of them, in principle, not just our spouses and buddies, but also the people who work with us, our colleagues in the office, our secretaries, even our bosses!

We should endeavour to hate only evil, but not the persons who deliberately or by error do evil. Maybe they are thoroughly confused and subjectively think that they are doing the "right" thing. Maybe they, too, think they are Christians and acting honourably.  Why not give the golden rule a try?   "Therefore all that you wish men to do to you, even so do you also to them" (Matthew VII, 12).

Instead of creating an atmosphere of confidence around us, we project a sense of being threatened, the suspicion that we consider our neighbour to be a competitor, a potential enemy instead of a potential friend. Thus we provoke the dislike of our neighbours, committing that first and gravest of the seven capital sins - the sin of arrogance.

Christ tried to teach us humility, not arrogance....

The New Testament is a "plan of action" for peace and reconciliation, but in AD 312 Roman Emperor Constantine made Christianity his personal religion and in AD 380 Emperor Theodosius declared Christianity to be the only State religion. This transformed the New/Old Testament into a programme of war and conquest, instrumentalizing it into a weapon of mass destruction, an instrument of asserting power -- and keeping it.

It is appropriate in Holy Week to be reminded of the core of Christian faith, of the mode d'emploi -- the Beatitudes

:"Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for justice, for they shall be satisfied.
"Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God.
"Blessed are they who suffer persecution for justice' sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven"

(Matthew, Chapter V, verses 1-10)

And I would turn to that passage of the Sermon of the Mount

"If thou art offering thy gift at the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother has anything against thee, leave thy gift before the altar and go first to be reconciled with your brother, and then come and offer thy gift." Matthew V, 23-24. This is a cardinal principle of the Beatitudes -- charity, forgiveness, reconciliation ahead of ritual. For what is the use of the ritual, if we persist in doing injustice to others? 

The Sermon on the Mount is the New Law, replacing the Old Law of the Old Testament.

 -----
First Comment by Michael Hoffman- (Thanks to Michael for this tip) 

The  preceding statement is reflective of the ancient heresy of Marcion; it is reborn in modern habiliments. 
This heresy serves rabbinic Judaism since it is a sneak attack on Jesus Christ: by attacking the Old Testament, Jesus Himself is delegitimated. Why? Because Jesus Christ quoted the Old Testament and advocated it, along with His disciples, hundreds of times.
Hence, the purveyors of this anti-Old Testament material are either so ignorant they have near zero familiarity with the New Testament, and are therefore profoundly confused, or they are putting forth their attack on the Old Testament with full knowledge, as a way to eventually nullify the New Testament and create a false Jesus of their own making.
This heresy is popular among neo-Nazis and racist pagans.
Michael Hoffman
Christian revisionist historian
www.RevisionistHistory.org
The rabbis despise and falsify the Old Testament. 
The evidence is here:
http://talmudical.blogspot.com
and here:
https://truthfulhistory.blogspot.com/2016/02/judaica-books-and-resources.html




Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "At Easter, the Old Testament is Crucifying the New"

Rudy said (April 2, 2018):

It is important to know what happened in Genesis 6 when the Bene Elohim came to earth and mated with the daughters of men. This was a ploy by Satan to destroy humanity on a genetic level. Then the flood, but somehow this non human seed survived ala Nimrod and the Tower of Babel incident. If you read Psalm 82 you realize that Yahweh divided the nations and appointed created divine council members to govern these. Of course they strayed and became other Gods and denied Yahweh his due. Abraham became the select nation....his portion among the nations. Please consider Michael Heiser's book The Unseen Realm.....which will explode your understanding of the Old Testament and make you appreciate the fact that The pre-incarnate Christ is all over the Old Testament as The Angel of the Lord (Joshua 5:13)😊


Pedro said (April 1, 2018):

If Jesus was so far removed from the OT, he would have been a heretic and crucified at 12, before he went walkabout (possibly West to Egypt, possibly East to BrahmaLand). Like in today's world, you have to stay meek and grovelling or, to progress, to sign a contract with "the invisible one" (Bob Dylan said this of his career) and then at best, if maverick, corral the opposition (Lenin's Perestroika) and teach the rulers how to better use it for their own success and survival, wittingly or not (like Nazism).

Love your neighbor doesn't mean bringing vipers into your home as one European couple said they would this week after their billeted refugee from Africa raped their own child and they still kept the animal at home - "we need to understand them" (on Rense). Sick. Fulford's interview with D. Rockefeller comes to mind too. What self-hating kind of person seeks to understand the insanity that DID Fukushima and to love the perpetrators and cover-uppers?

The Synagogue of Satan is the modern day Caananites (Rick Adams at RBN). There are lessons in the bible, as I am sure there were lessons in all those Gnostic texts and Pagan practices which were burned and obliterated by the monotheistic Holy Roman Empire. The Egyptians, at least the Ptolemies, are of the same bloodline that we have seen dominate and subjugate byways of deception (if bribery or slave chains don't work) right through to the Rothchilds today (Leuren Moret).

The Wiki says Ahkenaton (preceding the Ptomelies though) established a quasi-monotheistic religion... sounds Judaic as a quasi-religion which is really about power, like the Holy Roman Empire (Christianity was good for them) and the International Syndicate of Magic Money (The Roman Empire was good for them) and now the Info and (un)Reality wars (Money power was good for it).

As David McGownan's (RIP) Weird Scenes Inside the Laurel Canyon shows, the Haight-Ashbury that started out with good intentions (perhaps) was not the same as the CIA LSD Satanist MKULTRA riddled one a couple of years later. Seals in Francisco Bay are now trying to eat people as they are starving, courtesy of Fukushima. "Love" and a lying media will show that 2 of 150 Pilot Whales 'beached' in Australia were saved, not mentioning they all floated to the beach dead already.

Lies and the veneer of good intentions by the evil doers. And Evil intenders as their only justification is a twisted scripture (Talmud) that says evil is good. Beware (and love and protect) the baby in the bathwaters though, evil needs good to corrupt and parasites need their hosts (Holy or not so Holy but still human).

****


Doug said (April 1, 2018):

“This heresy is popular among neo-Nazis and racist pagans.” This is the type of conclusion and name-calling that results from confining understanding of the Old Testament within the paradigm of that book itself. Much of the Old Testament was written by the Pharaoh Ahkenaton, except for the illuminating parts which he simply lifted from other cultures. Ahenaton believed he was a God and was indeed worshipped as God. He was a megalomaniac and a very deeply disturbed homosexual who wrote himself into the story as Yahweh, the murdering, war-making, deceptive God who was going to return in a spectacular grand finale in which the entire world would be completely destroyed. Psychopaths always want to blow up the world.

Fundamental to the doctrine was the idea that when doing wrong or even evil deeds, ‘it was the Devil who made me do it.’ Psychopaths always externalise. Europeans have a better understanding of human nature and realised that we have the potential for good and bad with each of us and that we should oppress bad motives and perfect ourselves.

European people were tortured and murdered by the millions as heretics while this wicked African God was being violently imposed. The story has brought endless wars and suffering. Thanks to Yahweh, Europeans are approaching extinction because they were tricked into committing suicide in unnecessary wars that were Biblical in scale and insanity.

The teachings of Jesus are completely opposite to the Old Testament. Hollywood and TV movies mockingly ask ‘what would Jesus do’. As we approach the time when this story will have a very, very bad ending simply because a small number of powerful people and the financial elite are true believers, isn’t it better to ask, what would Yahweh do? This story needs some urgent open discussion before it is too late and the whole world is destroyed.


Doug said (April 1, 2018):

“This heresy is popular among neo-Nazis and racist pagans.” This is the type of conclusion and name-calling that results from confining understanding of the Old Testament within the paradigm of that book itself. Much of the Old Testament was written by the Pharaoh Ahkenaton, except for the illuminating parts which he simply lifted from other cultures. Ahenaton believed he was a God and was indeed worshipped as God. He was a megalomaniac and a very deeply disturbed homosexual who wrote himself into the story as Yahweh, the murdering, war-making, deceptive God who was going to return in a spectacular grand finale in which the entire world would be completely destroyed. Psychopaths always want to blow up the world.

Fundamental to the doctrine was the idea that when doing wrong or even evil deeds, ‘it was the Devil who made me do it.’ Psychopaths always externalise. Europeans have a better understanding of human nature and realised that we have the potential for good and bad with each of us and that we should oppress bad motives and perfect ourselves.

European people were tortured and murdered by the millions as heretics while this wicked African God was being violently imposed. The story has brought endless wars and suffering. Thanks to Yahweh, Europeans are approaching extinction because they were tricked into committing suicide in unnecessary wars that were Biblical in scale and insanity.

The teaching of Jesus is completely opposite to the Old Testament. Hollywood and TV movies mockingly ask ‘what would Jesus do’. As we approach the time when this story will have a very, very bad ending simply because a small number of powerful people and the financial elite are true believers, isn’t it better to ask, what would Yahweh do? This story needs some urgent open discussion before it is too late and the whole world is destroyed.


Al Thompson said (April 1, 2018):

After studying the Bible for over 25 years, I can say that I do not think it is the Word of God. There is too much evil, violence, contradictions, sexual perversion, and outright lies for me to accept it as God's Word.

Does anyone have any facts that prove that the Bible is true? If so, which version? Which church is the real "Christian" church? Any information on the reality of God comes from the creation and not from any writing. One verse out of the Book of Enoch states in effect that: For it was not God's intention for man to confirm his faith with paper and ink. Writings are not reliable unless they are founded on the truth. And that's the dilemma. How do we know when a writing is true or false?
If the writing doesn't line up with known facts, then it is highly suspect.

Reading and writing seem to be a way for the evil ones to distort the truth as most people put too much trust in a writing. When I was in the various Christian churches, most of the people were taught that the commandments are not important. I went to Church to learn how to upgrade my moral standards and not to drag them down into the Satanic sewer.

While I still believe in the God who created me, I reject the religions because they are false and misleading. I don't read the Bible any longer because I really don't know what I am getting. Whether it is Judaism, Islam, Christianity, or any other religion, I think they are all full of shit and completely dishonest. I find it much easier to reason out right and wrong knowing that there is only one correct answer; the truth. The truth rules the roost. Whether or not I completely understand it or not isn't the issue. It is up to me to understand it and if I make a mistake then I need to correct it. I can do that quite nicely without a book. All I have to do is take more time with any issue and decide whether it is right or wrong.

Anyone can effectively work with the truth, but we will get into trouble when attempting to discern truth with a lying writing. In my opinion, people should be doing more thinking than reading.

http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2012/03/reality-of-god-fallacy-of-religion.html


James C said (April 1, 2018):

Critics of the Old Testament tend to interpret it in a historical and cultural vacuum, for it is only by doing so that they can portray Jehovah, the God of the Old Testament, as an irrational, bloodthirsty, warmongering psychopath, a cruel and vindictive monster. They select which parts of the Old Testament they want to emphasize and ignore the greater context which delegitimizes their argument.

If you listen to these critics, the Canaanites had done absolutely nothing worthy of the death penalty. Never mind the fact that their worship of Baal included child sacrifice by fire, temple prostitution of both sexes, and every form of demonic occultism known to man (see Deut. 18:10-12). Also, given their incredible sexual immorality, venereal disease was probably so prevalent among them that they had become a threat to themselves and everyone else. They had also been warned well in advance to leave the area (see Joshua 2:9).

The same critics portray Christ as someone who would never enforce capital punishment on anyone, no matter the extent of their guilt. I suggest such "critics" get a red-letter Bible and read the following words of Christ in red: "But those mine enemies, who would not that I should reign over them, bring here, and slay before me" (Luke 19:27).

The bottom line is: people and even entire nations can become worthy of death by their actions. No sane person would argue against this fact.


Marco said (April 1, 2018):

De Zeyas seems to have a genuine concern for human welfare and hopes to find some divine justification for his sentiments. Hey, who can blame him?
You can find quotes from early Christians who didn't even justify the sword and who expressed their disapproval with even the death penalty for criminals.

But he didn't need to dig through the Old Testament to find an argument against Christian Phariseeism. The entire history of Christianity has been rife with examples. I could go to my traditional Catholic parish and find tons probably, and I don't think many of them are even familiar with the Old Testament, they just want the good old ultramontanism back, hahaha.

I don't get involved with theological or historical concerns anymore, they do nothing for the little faith I have left. I'm a nobody and no better than anyone else. Unless you believe that in your heart and know it to be true, I don't think God will have anything to do with you.


James T said (April 1, 2018):

This is an old tactic, as cited by Mr. Hoffmann, made famous by Marcion. Also, a curiosity, why does he use what appears to be a jargon term, that is, "new alliance"? The "conspiracy" he asserts with regard to Constantine, et al, is familiar as a recruitment tactic employed by neo-gnostics these days, utilized to undermine Christianity in general (and not just the Catholic church, itself appearing to be a gnostic sect, just a very territorial & domineering version) and subsequently present gnostic nonsense to compromise the believer. One wonders, is this what he is aiming for? As someone Christian, I do appreciate speaking of Christ's words, but given this fellows presentation, I suspect that he is employing a familiar tactic; a way to exploit believer's naivete to undermine their faith, and get them on the gnostic bandwagon, a bandwagon which is going full steam ahead these days, through multiple denominations, sects, and faiths, yet little addressed by the churches at large, regardless of denomination. I note that Gnosticism always seems to be pushed, and is always found within such items as Freemasonry, Satanism, the occult in general, new age movements, pagan and neo-pagan movements, the "new apostolic reformation", and even the secular science cult of atheism ties back into it, along with the Judaic cults, making it extremely virulent, and shall we say a "weaponized religion" that functions to debilitate the natural defenses of those it infects, and shuts down critical areas, making way for other problems.

Not to de-emphasize the message of Love here, but there is also a question, what does one do when one Loves someone, how is Love exercised, does a parent allow a child predator access to their child "out of love for their enemy" for example? The answer is obviously not, the predator must be driven off and corrected in their ways, not only for the child's safety but for the sake of the predator, if they have anything worth saving left, that is. We must be careful to avoid being conditioned to become a victim, and/or an apathetic believer that permits everything, from corrupt arguments like these, Love must be understood, not jammed into a stereotype... after all Christ didn't say to devils "please if you want to come out, get out of that poor man.", He commanded them out, with authority. Also sometimes removal of evil requires force to be applied.


JG said (April 1, 2018):

There seems to be a new wave of pagan beliefs going around these days.

Is God no longer a God of judgment?

Is God now a personalized God that we simply create in our minds and hearts?

How many people even talk about the Ten Commandments anymore? Have they become obsolete?
Have you noticed that when people describe a good person today rarely do they describe him as a "God fearing" person.

Do preachers talk about "saving souls" in their sermons anymore or is that theology also outdated.

Easter Sunday as we call it is supposed to be the celebration of a resurrected life in Jesus Christ for those who believe in him. Yes, we're still sinners that fall short of the mark but are we even conscious anymore or care to know the real meaning of the Cross and the Resurrection?

In case you haven't noticed all Churches are now wrong. The Catholics are wrong, the Protestants are wrong, and everybody else who follows the traditional Christianity of their religion. If this is the case then is their Holy Bible wrong also? Is it better to have no religion at all because all the Churches aren't perfect? If so what better religion have we replaced it with?

We're falling away fast from the Christian world that we once new because we are no longer practicing Christians.


Marcos said (April 1, 2018):

his Zayas person makes the same mistake new agers and universalists do: he thinks he knows better than God and wants to create his own religion, carving out the parts he didn't like and keeping the ones that makes him feel good. It is the Zayanity religion.

Over and over we see the same basic problem. People don't understand that God is Loving, but also is Just. Neither they understand that believing that God applies justice doesn't make you evil. I'm not cheering for violence neither am I glad because of judgment. Neither is God, because He is not pleased with the destruction of his creation. If He does it, there must be a reason that I, an imperfect and limited being, can not fathom completely. Does Zayas understand perfectly what was like in the Old Testament? The spiritual implications? Of course not.

It is a simple question of logic. We are indeed supposed to be loving and offer the other cheek, because our judgement is marred with selfishness and hatred. Revenge is of the Lord's, because He is the one with the responsibility for keeping the order in the universe, judging fairly. I'm glad God does his job, otherwise we would have been destroyed a long time ago.

Zayas also forgets that man's situation is not a light joke, it is a condition of total depravity and evil brought by the fall and sin. It's serious stuff, man, made worse by the presence of extremely cruel demons. Satan tried to wipe out mankind from Earth in the Old Testament. Wake up. Don't be a Shirley MacLaine or Oprah who thinks good wishes will solve it all. I wonder if you ever have studied the Bible in a serious way.

People like Zayas are used by Satan and the elite to transform Christianity into a fashion, an ineffective philosophy devoid of any real transcendent meaning or spiritual power. Not a metaphysical religion that explains how the Universe works, but just another amulet to make people relaxed and comfortable with themselves and their sins.


Connie said (April 1, 2018):

DeZayas forgets that God is God -- and a just God at that. He gives and takes away in perfect love and mercy. So in the inerrant eye of the Creator, the enemies of the Jews did fully deserve their fate. "My ways are not your ways," says the Lord.

DeZayas also forgets the sad truth about mankind, which is "all fall short of the glory of God." That means that each of us, who were given free will, were once destined for hell. This is why Jesus, the Redeemer, was needed in the first place, to save us from it. It is why saints often begin as horrific sinners.

DeZayas wants none other than for God to be human, and humans to be God, and even puts himself as the judge over God, in yet another Satanic inversion.


Tony N said (April 1, 2018):

I hope you are blessed this Easter Henry and that one of these years you are blessed fully with Jesus.

I grew up catholic, became agnostic and college and discovered Christ when I finally grew up enough to examine all sides critically thanks to family, friends, teachers of the word, and truth seekers like you.

The ugly and brutal stories of the old testament made it easy for the deceivers to lead me to agnosticism in college.
The beauty of Jesus love for us in the new testament Gospels brought me back with faith and critical thinking to support it.

Due to excellent teachers like Dr Vernon McGee and his teachers, the old testament has become more and more important to my faith.
The old testament cries out over and over again "The Saviour is coming !" (Isaiah 53 is not even allowed in synagogues today !!)
The new testament responds with "Jesus Christ the Saviour is here !"
The old testament is ugly because if focuses on man's natural state and the material world.
The new testament is beautiful because it gives a glimpse of paradise in the spiritual world.

We are still in the material world and the sermon on the mount is not possible until Jesus comes again....the lies/deceptions of communism promising utopia should more than enough warning on what happens when man tries to create paradise and removing God.

God bless and use your work for His glory and wishing you God, Truth, Liberty, Peace and continued health and a joyful Easter.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at