Direct Link to Latest News


Is Mind Control the Motive for Legal Pot ?

April 15, 2018

justin weed (1) (1).jpg
Justin Trudeau is a mind-controlled Illuminati errand boy. 
Next July, Canada becomes only the second country
in the world to legalize marijuana. (Uruguay was first.)

In January, California becomes the 8th state to legalize cannabis.
Obviously, the Illuminati think legal pot serves the NWO cause,
satanism, and enslavement. 

But for many, weed is actually "mind-expanding," an antidote to mind control. 
Is the Illuminati making a huge mistake? 

Update - Marijuana Legalization is funded by George Soros

From Nov 28, 2017
by Henry Makow Ph.D. 

If you belonged to the one percent that own 50% of the wealth, controlling billions of useless eaters would be a top priority. Naturally, you would use the education system and mass media, but you'd want something more permanent and reliable. 

In Aldous Huxley's dystopia, Brave New World (1932) a drug called SOMA   taught the people to "love their slavery." Is this the purpose of pot legalization?  

There are many signs that LSD and marijuana are the Illuminati's SOMA. Timothy Leary said the CIA created the LSD movement.  The CIA is an instrument of the Illuminati central banking cartel. George Soros has spent at least $80 million on the legalization effort since 1994, according to tax filings.


Jon Rappoport cites a 1955 CIA document which lists their goals for mass drugging the population:

"The CIA wanted to discover chemicals that would "lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men." Sounds like a general description of the devolution of society. 

* Substances which will produce "pure" euphoria with no subsequent let-down.

* Substances which alter personality structure in such a way that the tendency of the recipient to become dependent upon another person is enhanced. 

* A material which will cause mental confusion of such a type that the individual under its influence will find it difficult to maintain a fabrication under questioning. 

* Substances which will lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men when administered in undetectable amounts.

Although Rappoport links these goals to the opioid crisis, clearly these symptoms could also apply to marijuana. 

The problem is that many people who use LSD and marijuana credit it for liberating them from the ego and from mind control.  In this
video, Cathy O'Brien said cannabis was never used for mind control because it had the opposite effect. 

Indeed my generation credited LSD and to a lesser extent, marijuana with revealing God to them. Marijuana allows many people to shed the shackles of their socialization and see life authentically, from a spiritual perspective. It is turning on the headlights after driving down a highway in the dark. Suddenly, you can see the white line. 

We believed that we could "save the world" by getting everyone high. Unfortunately, the premise was wrong. Everyone makes little difference. The people in power --the satanist Jewish bankers and their Freemasonic fart catchers --- are the ones that needed to be turned on, and they obviously were not. 

In any case, the Illuminati seem to think that the people will not be enlightened by exposure to marijuana. I beg to differ, and I look forward to its legalization next summer.  In the meantime, I welcome reports from jurisdictions like Oregon and Colorado as to how the spread of this wonder drug has impacted society. Is it more alive and true?

RELATED - The CIA Created the Drug Culture 
---Monsanto and the Push for Corporate Cannabis 

First Comment from Lynda- 

    I think we are in the transitional phase of this.  The ultimate goal is to control and eradicate the supply of natural cannabis and substitute a GMO.  Legalisation is the first step to round-up of all the suppliers, businesses etc.
At this point, the Overlords have lost control of the cannabis narrative because there is too much independent, scientific research.  And there is too much clinical data on its benefits.  Too many people know someone who knows someone who manages their Parkinson's Disease with cannabis or someone who cured their cancer with cannabis.  In short, the horse has bolted.  What to do.  The Overlords would not be the Overlords if they did not have a plan.  And right now, I would say we are in the transitional phase of it.
Cannabis is one of the earth's sacred plants.  Anyone except a modern Westerner would be able to tell this just by looking.  And there is a long history of use in Europe and I suppose all over the world as a fiber (hemp) for clothing, rope, and soft furnishing.  It is warm in winter and cool in summer.  Properly worked it feels like silk but has the tensile strength and wearability of the heavier fibers.  Buy a hemp shirt and feel the difference.  In work socks, it wears as well as wool but without the itchiness.  Just like linen is a water fiber, cotton an air fiber, wool a fire fiber,  hemp is a spirit of earth fiber.
Then there is the medicinal properties.  Cannabis acts on the neurological system.  This is substantiated in thousands of independent studies.  For the pain of terminal bone cancer there is no substitute for it.  it has a long use in the relief of the pain of the dying - but especially cancer that has metastasized to the bone.  And it prevents and successfully treats the cancer itself.  Too many people know this.  Then there is its power over the neurological diseases: Motor Neurone, Parkinson's, uncontrollable seizures - all controllable with cannabis and many times curable with cannabis.
And yes, for those with no pathology, especially neurological pathology or pain, cannabis is a great stress buster if taken in a ritual / sacred manner.  Stress is one of the great killers of our time.
If it could be studied in independent (NO Big Pharma $$) laboratories and hospitals we would know the THC percentage that is needed for a range of diseases.  But we don't. Therein lies the difficulty in treatment.
However, the ersatz preparations with Big Pharma trademark are now being trialed my city at a major hospital.  How they got their experimental subjects was like this.
Parents whose children had uncontrolled epilepsy were simply rounded up through suppliers  (who were allowed to operate as bait).  Once they were rounded up, they were made to participate (or else - social services takes the child).   Almost all of these children were vaxxed.  A healthy baby. Triple Antigen. Then on the same day - constant crying.  We are not talking a fussy baby here.  We are talking about the scream that the old clinicians called: 'crie encephalique'  intracranial pressure and what today would be called 'cyotokine storm' of systemic inflammation followed by seizures.  The parents are told by the medical profession that of course it is their fault, shaken baby or whatever.  From that time they are a marked population.  And for so many of these children nothing the medical profession has to offer is going to cure or alleviate those seizures.  Sooo.. The parents get into the independent research.  They find suppliers.  They try to drop out of the system.  And on cannabis, those children are going to start improving.
Too many people have successfully negotiated this path for there not to be a groundswell of demand for legalization.  So how to do this in a way that doesn't interfere with Big Pharma racketeering and the lucrative drug maintenance programmes for a host of diseases that cannabis successfully treats or cures outright.
In my city, the medical community that is on the watch for good is following the cannabis trial at a major hospital by insiders who are watching it all unfold - with horror.  The threats from the social services.  Children who were brought in, their parents under police guard, with their seizures controlled (and we can't have that), children who were getting better on cannabis etc - now going backwards and getting their seizures back.  Arrests and drug busts on parents if the blood tests reveal the real THC in the blood as opposed to the synthetic THC.  This trial and I am sure others like it is the kind of medical Bolshevism currently being rolled out in the transitional phase of the Cannabis plan.

Mike Writes:

The recent trend to legalize marijuana does not represent a threat to the Illuminati and certainly not a change of heart. Purchasing a legally limited and overpriced substance from a government-owned or monitored facility does not exactly represent freedom. 

People seem to forget that the original intent of our laws was not to control and dominate us, but to represent us. This suggests that we Are the law. Yet who feels that way when they go begging at a government-controlled office?
A lot of things can deal effectively with cancer and other diseases, but it is important to recognize that there is a monopoly in control which essentially owns the communications industry and the political parties.

It makes billions of dollars in profit each year and will never be swayed by what is best for the people. Not only that, but poor nutrition, harmful drug remedies and dubious vaccinations are required to ensure a steady stream of customers to support the industry.

Do you think a naturalistic hospital could survive within a country dominated by the Rock-feller allopathic system? It would conveniently explode, like the Texas fertilizer plant that intended to challenge Monsanto in court.

Now the advent of genetically modified seeds, and the insane go-along acceptance by the public. We already know all about the Illuminati, but maybe we should start studying the public, ourselves. It is a fact that the Illuminati power rests on the ignorance, greed, apathy, and proneness to delusion of the general public, ourselves. Maybe a discussion of 'Fairy Tales' would be in order.

The writer of this piece seems to think that RICO was set up to deal with organized crime. But I would suggest that our whole system consists of interlinked organized crime, and therefore the RICCO Act was designed to protect organized crime.  The legal system, medical system and political system are all rackets, and to think that any of them represent you is an unfortunate delusion which just may come around to bite you in the backside.
There is no question about the medicinal value of marijuana, but to suggest that it is a necessity to gain a higher awareness or to compensate for the dullness in your life is to hold a materialist perspective like the Illuminati and their useful idiots.

More important is to realize that you are being weakened and off-balanced in the longer run by poor nutrition and prescription medications. It is not enough that a few websites mention the dangers of a few bad food additives in passing. Unconsciously the public is being influenced by the full weight of commercial marketing. What is being done to the public through its consumption of essentially poisonous foods, poisonous entertainment, and poisonous social engineering are all components of a full court press.

What I am suggesting is that good health is primary, so that medicinal substances shouldn't be needed at all. Dentists and pharmacies and hospitals and Medicare or Obamacare should not be needed. Knowledge is power, and neither the schools nor the mainstream media can be depended upon for this. We take back our power by taking on the responsibility ourselves and not relying on any designated authorities.
Some useful information on YouTube;


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Is Mind Control the Motive for Legal Pot ? "

Jeremy C said (December 1, 2017):

It’s an interesting question. Here are some of my thoughts. First of all, I will declare that I have used marijuana on and off. I didn’t really start using it regularly until my mid 30’s.

I worked in a hard labour job where almost everybody smoked it. It relieved tension in the mind and body and also brought some joy to a drudgerous and difficult, physically demanding job. I felt like more of a person than a labour slave. There was an effect on productivity in a sense because it led to some conflict between labour (who smoked) and management (who didn’t want us to smoke but only wanted production without concern for labour).

I felt more content with a very humble life using marijuana. It had an appeal in making my life fairly simple. I got up every morning, put in my gear, got out the door, worked in the field every day 7 days per week, -35 or + 35 degree didn’t matter, I earned money everyday that I had no place or time to spend any of it, I had zero responsibilities other than that, and I used marijuana. I did this for two years of my life and I lost 59 lbs and had no physical issues.

I felt freed from city life and complications and drudgery. Occasionally we would get new workers with serious addiction problems to alcohol (wouldn’t last very long) cocaine (hard workers for a brief period but would self-destruct after short time) opioids (generally hated by regulars, full of drama and always at risk of sudden death on the job, almost uncontrollable powerful addiction and created too much trouble, usually we used to get rid of them at the first opportunity by being very unfriendly towards them to let them know they were not wanted here.

Then they started coming in big numbers from Maritimes and Eastern Canada usually to escape warrants for their arrests - this is when I eventually left the job).

So what my experience tells me is that although marijuana certainly threatens the sacred cow pharma industries more dangerous and toxic drugs like opioids - they are inclined to let us have our weed because people use weed anyway and because it seems to pacify the population and keep us from feeling like slaves. That’s what I think. The opioid epidemic is a devastating blight on society and is ruining a lot of lives and will take a long time to die down. How many dependent zombies do they need to create anyway?

Creating opiod addictions are great weapons for immediate and devastating impact on communities...but since they tend to make such an impact it is more likely to motivate communities to reject big pharma/government and whoever is deemed a pusher of such drugs relatively quickly before it spreads. Legalize and promote weed and it is a much more subtle vehicle to influence the masses.

Once it is legalized..who is to say that there isn’t some synthetic additive that they can infused into the legal weed that changes the game?

I’m currently fasting from weed for the next month or so. I do this frequently. Each time I do it it has an effect. I find that when I am using weed I am cut off spiritually in a sense. It protects me from depressing stuff or at least allows me to function socially much better but something is missing. After I stop using, I go through a period where emotions and things that I suppressed with weed come out and I tighten up socially...but I feel that when I pray sober that I connect with God better? That I can be reached. If that makes sense.

Doug P said (December 1, 2017):

They need to legalize all formerly illegal activity because the need (their need to put it into the population) for now illegal activity makes electronic money impossible. So everything that is illegal must be made legal so people can buy it with the chip, else they must lose the drug trade.

Marijuanna just dulls the higher thinking faculties to make this all happen - make people passive.

LSD must not do this, else it would be made the popular drug. LSD is mind enhancing - you think better, clearer and deeper on it. They don't want that. I ate 3 grams of mushrooms a few times and at all times (same effect as LSD basically) got a magnificent amount of intellectual work done that I could not have done otherwise.

I think its all about getting us to take the chip. Once this happens all is lost.

Ken Adachi said (November 29, 2017):

Wow, great commentary from Lynda and Mike (Lynda's comment that "shaking baby syndrome" is routinely used by law enforcement to FALSELY accuse the parents or the baby sitter for a baby's death when Ischemia (STROKE induction in the brain) caused by the body's hyper immune reaction to the toxins found in VACCINES, is the real reason, is right on target). I would also consider moving up Roman's comments to follow Mike's with the larger 'first' comments font size. Smoking cannabis has many psychological and motivational drawbacks, and is not necessarily the wisest way to get the beneficial properties of the plant into the body. Cannabis oil, which can cure cancer and a bunch of other health problems, is consumed orally, without getting high in any way. Abraham Christie, the boyfriend of the mother (Elena) whose two children's Youtube testimony ("Papa Kills Babies") broke open the London Hampstead school Satanic cult pedophilia and baby murder/cannibalism story in Feb. of 2015, had also affirmed that juicing and consuming the flowers of cannabis plants will break mind control programming.

Children's Revelations Prove Satanists Control UK (March 21, 2015)

Dr. Andrew Moulden: All Vaccines Cause Ischemia (Impaired Blood Flow) Which Blocks Oxygen Delivery Leading to Chronic Disease (July 22, 2015)

Glen said (November 29, 2017):

When in doubt I always try to listen to the experts on the subject. "According to Cathy O'Brien, a former mind-controlled sex slave for the gov, they would let slaves take all the drugs they wanted, except marijuana. Why? Because marijuana usage made it impossible to mind control them. It doesn't allow for the compartmentalization of the mind to take place. Since I heard her say that on a video a few years ago, I have understood the "war" on drugs in a little different way. I think you might find this of interest! [source: ] "
Cathy in her own words -

Roman said (November 29, 2017):

A large enough dose of THC is harmful to mental health and intellect of some people, especially the exceptional white Christian males such as Washington, Newton, Tesla, Einstein (nonpsychopathic Jews are super whites that question social nonsense). Give them some potent weed and they'll end up in a mental hospital. Weaker cannabinoids might be beneficial for some things.
THC is estrogenic. THC creates an anti-man mentality, to them there is no right/wrong, good/evil, yes/no . Only what feels good is good for them. I know I have been around potheads.

The elites don't care controlling the masses. They already have them under mass hypnosis. What they fear is the few who can see, a few who can change the world. Right now you have 7 or 8 billion who are blind ignoramuses. It wasn't like that even a hundred years ago.

Alan C said (November 28, 2017):

Regardless of the product and its pleasure or harm, the governments always have the same tactic.
First make it illegal then buy up the competition quietly and then create a monopoly for themselves by only reintroducing the product under strict licensing rules.
Works every time, look at alcohol, cigarets, drugs, guns etc.

Dan A said (November 28, 2017):

Mass drugging of the population. Psychotropic drugs are being used for that purpose. Such drugs create apathy, among other things. People who take such drugs lose their will to fight.

Ezra said (November 28, 2017):

One hypothesis is the cabalists & freemasons (e.g Soros) will monoploise the market then get laws introduced where organic or natural cannabis is gradually outlawed, in a similar way to homeopathic medicines, and only synthetic licensed genetically modified patentable versions, dangerous to health...will be sold...maybe in conjunction with re-legalized highy dangerous "zombie" synthetic cannabis drugs e.g spice (produced in Israel) and flakka

The other point worth making is that many cannabis variants now are extremely psychoactive e.g skunk and they are a major cause of increasing admissions to psychiatric untis for drug-induced psychosis...this is just a fact and I have seen it firsthand.

...zog UK - spice synthetic cannabis drug epidemic for the goyim (spice etc produced by "Dr Zee" in Tel Aviv

David said (January 30, 2014):

Henry, I am the last person to dictate what others should do with their bodies as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else, which I also realize makes it very difficult to measure a selfish act that doesn't have ANY impact on loved ones (like the crack-addicted single mom who indulges her personal taste for cocaine and serial boyfriends).

But for me, when I experimented as a youth with pot I found in my case it accentuated not only the positive but also negative moods: if I was in a great frame of mind (who is as a teenager?) the euphoria was intense; but if I was despondent, pot made me extremely depressed and almost suicidal. Luckily, I realized that early on and stopped doing it forever before I was out of high school. But I know others who were adversely impacted by drug use and wouldn't stop, because it was a peer pressure thing. "If I stop getting high, my 'friends' will all desert me". A lot of kids like in that in my generation didn't survive. David

Stephen Coleman said (January 29, 2014):

Marijuana may have some medical benefits when used properly. But as a teen and young adult, I saw siblings and friends start doing weed and the notable characteristic in each case was a total change in personality within a week of starting marijuana usage. The change, I felt was not positive. My active and popular brother suddenly became a couch zombie. Another brother was a top student and within the week was flunking out of college. Dito for my friends.

Another common denominator was that each one of them "thought" it was good and enjoyed using marijuana. I sure didn't enjoy seeing the effects and to this day have never used any sort of drug. I swore that I will not allow it to ruin my life.

Stephen Coleman

Doug said (January 29, 2014):

As a semi regular user of marijuana, about two grams per month, I can honestly say that I use it for inspiration and its use in the short term does help that. Regular usage has the opposite affect on everything that it is good for.

But I think it was made illegal partly or perhaps mostly because of its incredibly diverse industrial usage and the fact that anyone can grow it quite easily. It could never really be a 'controlled substance' because its so easy to grow. The stuff you get from gov sources isn't very potent.

I think its a bad thing for young people to use and that it possibly has some medical or psychological effects that are not in the mainstream press. It is habit forming if you use more than even a liberal amount.

John said (January 28, 2014):

The comment [below] 'vehemently forbidden by God in the Bible and it is equated with sorcery' is why I never took the Bible seriously even before I knew they left the Gospel of Mary Magdalen out of it.

It is pure Luciferian propaganda, as even the Sutras say Perfection (a spiritual book of well repute, unlike the Bible) can be attained through 'light containing herbs'

as anyone who has experienced drugs such as the psychedelics will tell you

drugs can be used by good sorcerers and bad ones

if legalising hemp is a ploy to destroy society, as it leads to the bad drugs etc, then it isn't a very smart plot and the fact it is the exact opposite of the most controlling OVERT fascist states around the world suggests it isn't an Illuminati plot unless they actually think it might, and maybe open more people up to possession.

the real problem is alcohol and if every alcohol user moved to weed or to using weed the world would be a better place. I find coffee addiction to be more of a problem.

and there isn't any evidence that I have seen that convinces me dope leads to crack and smack

crack and smack addicts are not emotionally healthy people. Time we actually looked at the source of the problem, which is the Illuminati controlled mental health industry, which has suppressed the non toxic, smack addiction and alcohol addiction cure for decades plus depression etc by TIR therapy.

and as medical marijuana would destroy the medical industry I find it a strange sort of plot, and a few other industries with hemp, and hemp oil

maybe the spirit is alive in more people in those states, and the death cult can't keep it suppressed any more

lets hope so, and having a few kids over the years and observed their drug habits, I'm not concerned they will develop a dope habit. The one who did but not that u would notice has now given it up

many many people drink alcohol but don't become alcoholics, so why dope smokers would automatically become dope addicts is laughable. But Dope excess can damage your aura like alcohol addiction can open you up to possession

and weed also can lift you into thinking, which is above the matrix, out the cage.

Rich said (January 28, 2014):

As a Colorado resident with a job, I was subject to urinalysis to get hired(many years ago), and live under the constant threat of these tests in the event of any accident, or rule infraction, and I am subject to random tests that can happen at any time for no reason.

About the only jobs left that don't require a pee test involve washing lots of dishes, or to start your own business(and try to slog through the government red tape).

I fail to see the use in legal marijuana at this point, at least for anyone who aspires to more than living in their parents basement. I have no axe to grind against marijuana use or production(especially the hemp products industry), but really, what use is it except for the masses of jobless and keeping them content with their extended unemployment and welfare checks, and in fact coming to love it.

Its obvious to me that after a few years of legalization, laws will be passed, small timers will be put out of business, corporate will take over, Marlboro Greens, $10 a pack taxes, public health crises, bad weed full of chemicals, and say goodbye to your medicinal and spiritual little herb.

Carl said (January 28, 2014):

I noticed a lot of your readers and writers have a very black and white approach to just about everything. I know a woman who used to be in good shape and she decided to eat frosted flakes all day and now she had gained a pile of weight. Is refined sugar a drug? Should we ban this so that she cannot eat herself into obesity? According to one of your tweets sugar makes up a massive amount of visits to the hospital. Do we protect people from themselves because they need to be treated like children?

Marijuana and its close relative hemp are both an excellent food source (Manitoba harvest hemp hearts, read the nutritional ingredients) and method by which the finest garments can be manufactured.

Marijuana can help people suffering from disease related pain which was pointed out already. Like everything else, it can be abused, so should be protect a few people from themselves? Probably not, we have enough laws preventing people from lucrative lives and imprisoning the innocent.

There are so many laws that wood burning fireplaces in Montreal cannot be lit anymore so that the carbon tards don't get upset. Lets just keep weed away from developing brains and let adults decide for themselves. Otherwise people will just use cake and cola as their drug, and I'm told that's why many countries are full sick, obese people, who occupy the hospitals.

Tony B said (January 28, 2014):

What seems to be forgotten here is that, once upon a time, not all that far in the past, drugs of most any kind were not government controlled in any way. They were not in demand by many. Even the infamous Chinese opium dens had to be forced on China by that long-time seat of evil called Britain.

The outlaw and control of drugs was used to create an artificial demand along with artificially high prices for them. Everyone in the U.S. who cares has known for decades that the reason drugs are in every hamlet in the country, often dealt and protected by the poorly paid local cops, is because their importation and distribution in the U.S. is largely an industry of the CIA. Now often imported directly into air force bases in the country. Individuals trying to deal for themselves have been routinely murdered, usually in assassination style to make the point to others who might try their luck.

It needs to be mentioned here too that the football star turned patriotic army special forces, who was shot three times in the forehead when he shouted to those Americans shooting at him, "I'm Pat Tillman, for God's sake," or something close to that, had vowed to go home and tell Americans that the job of U.S. troops in Afghanistan was to protect the once again thriving poppy fields which the Taliban had almost eliminated.

The m.o. follows the identical path of real vanilla flavoring, a very cheap import from Mexico monopolized and grossly overpriced by systematic murder and threat of murder of independent distributors.

Also ignored is the fact that whole industries could be created in the U.S. for the many positive uses of hemp without even considering pot.

Ray said (January 28, 2014):

In the past 12 years, hundreds of laboratory studies have shown that cannabis-based preparations have the potential to treat -- and prevent -- cancer, arthritis, epilepsy, Alzheimers, Parkinsons and a host of other illnesses. Meanwhile, the DEA has not allowed human trials of cannabis medicines since 1976.

If prohibitionists think that the DEA has not allowed human trials of cannabis because the DEA is trying to protect us, they need to think again.

Those who support pot prohibition need to be aware of two things:

1) By supporting prohibition, they are advocating the mass incarceration of otherwise law-abiding citizens who choose to use cannabis. In other words, if I choose to use cannabis, prohibitionists want to incarcerate me, fine me and seize my assets. Needless to say, those are fightin' words.

2) If it turns out -- as the overwhelming body of evidence suggests -- that cannabis prohibition is causing people to suffer and die from cancer and other illnesses, then prohibitionists are personally responsible for all those deaths and suffering. Ignorance of the facts is no excuse. Virtually all the relevant laboratory evidence is available online. Google cannabis and cancer, cannabis and epilepsy, cannabis and arthritis, cannabis and Alzheimers, etc.

Thanks to the tireless work of a relatively small number of dedicated activists and researchers, we have turned the corner on cannabis prohibition. Those who have supported and continue to support the DEA in its disastrous policy of pot prohibition are directly responsible for all the suffering and death this policy has caused, and the day of reckoning is at hand.

A said (January 28, 2014):

Honestly, how shameless of US to dare call this a "free country" and then take peoples freedom and property away for possessing a plant. Absolutely ridiculous! How can one profess the creation and then say God didn't intend for this plant to be used for anything?

I do not use this plant but know of some very decent people who have and I find it unconscionable to criminalize it.

While synthetics, both illicit and doctor prescribed are questionable at best, all natural plants (GMO being the unnatural plant) were put here for our use when needed. Men will abuse/misuse just about anything but a sane society doesn't punish everyone for this.

Lamar said (January 28, 2014):

I was thirteen years old, when I smoked that first joint and delighted in that psychotic effect of being in another dimension....those experts said it had no addictive nature to it, so I felt safe.

Soon, whatever activity I planned on doing, smoke a joint first and it will increase the enjoyment of the activity. I remember smoking those beautiful joints while performing algebra and astonished at how easy it was to solve those equations, only to receive grade “F” on my papers.

Or those first days when smoking pot enhanced my social life – what a good reason to hang out with friends, but then after while, I could care less about the friends.

Pot became my best friend...I just wanted to hang out with my joints. and then, why doesn’t anybody talk about the intensity of the paranoia? or what about the bad mood after the high wears off? or the foggy mind even days after the last joint was smoked?

We smoke it because of the high, and looking back on those 5 years of being high, I regret the waste of valuable time.

I love your website and learn much it. In my opinion, even though the Illuminati have their tentacles of control in every area of society, they are not omnipotent.

Man’s determination to smoke marijuana regardless of the illegal status has won him the same outcome as the ‘end of prohibition’. And now, since it is becoming legal they’ll just make their money/power from it in a legal way....and we will smoke it even more because the government says it’s okay.

By the way, I just want you to know from experience, that it is a real pain in the ass when a fellow driver stoned on marijuana totals your car, after having paid it off.


Thanks Lamar

Anything in excess is harmful.


JG said (January 28, 2014):

As far as Marijuana goes lets call it what it is, a tranquilizer.

It's mostly smoked in dark places where there is little light.

In this state of "euphoria" the imagination runs rapid. Your sense of space and timing is also impaired. True, you won't become violent or arrogant on this drug because you are sedated.
It's also quite a "stress reliever" and is cheaper and less harmful than psychotropic drugs.

It also is effective in combating alcoholism. It has been proven that alcohol consumption used with marijuana decreases in most cases.

However, the marijuana "fairy tale" does have a downside.

Your perception of reality is altered while under the sedation of marijuana.

You imagine things such as relationships to be stronger and better than they really are. John Lennon's album "Imagine" has a picture of smoke surrounding him on the cover. The lyrics to this song are Marxist at it's core but under sedation it's real message is disguised,"no Heaven above us and no Hell below us", therefore no
reward for righteousness and no punishment for sin. But, on marijuana, it's a song of love, peace, and joy.

Drugs are a " Magical Mystery Tour" of deceptions that, in the end, the "big lie" wins.

If you're seeking salvation and trying to find a life through Jesus Christ I really wouldn't recommend drugs as the avenue to get there.

ZZ (Poland) said (January 28, 2014):

[pun intended]

The only, but very important factor against the pot legalization is the fact, that the Banana prompt-reader-in-chief, health insurance Obamination, kenyan Barry, lately admitted publicly to smoking the weed.

It is not exactly a recommendation source to be followed in health and insurance matters, to speak frankly. Rather a huge RED FLAG, perfectly fitting in the landscape, as the prompter reader is a bolshevista guy.

and have a smoke :-)

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at