NewYorker Cover is Illuminati Taunt
July 1, 2017
Direct Link to Latest News
July 1, 2017
David said (July 2, 2017):
we should be encouraged that corporate owned "news" organizations like the New Yorker, CNN, the New York Slimes and the Washington Compost are losing subscribers and viewers at an alarming (for their CEO's, editors and boards of directors) rate. They are being displaced by 1000's of independent media source (like your site, for instance).
To me this cover screams "Pay attention to us! We are still relevant, damnit!" much like the network hosts have meltdowns on-air, plunging necklines or D-cup bra sizes. They are a dying institution.
Chad said (July 1, 2017):
Seems to me the commenter [below] is a little closer to the truth. Not all black people follow the Caucasian body lines and yes, they do look like that. Blacks on average tend to be more lean and with narrower hips. Insect? That's a stretch. Some may think of it as offensive. I thought it was irrelevant and distracting from the story.
The part about the reflection in the glasses tells volumes. Yes, black people are interwoven deeply into the fabric of America and who cares the ethnicity of a person wearing the red, white and blue with white stars. But yes, the classic view is that "all American" would constitute a white person. Blond no less. And coming from the New Yorker, you know they've got some underhanded intention of punching America in the gut, with every expression of theirs.
Putting a black person on the cover, as the article suggests, is not in any way to promote or uplift black people. It's to displace whites or at least usher them to the back of the line.
Corine said (July 1, 2017):
Once more you are right! This is nothing about diversity but definitely about white dispossession.
The reflection in the sunglasses shows some some kind of pyramid with stairs up front. Besides, the gal looks way too masculine! So they are like saying
" thank you negroes and LBGTQ for your willful collaboration, we have succeeded! America is no longer christian and white!!"
Al Thompson said (July 1, 2017):
This photo of this lady in the Jew Yorker is an example of an attempt to twist the minds of the people who "read" it.
The black woman has a "fro" but look at the right arm. It is almost masculine. Then she has the five-pointed stars on her bathing suit and the expression on her face looks like the bitch from hell. This is why black men go out with white women. In addition, the flat boobs may suggest that she is a tranny.
The whole photo is grotesque.
JJ said (July 1, 2017):
The New Yorker has been my parents Bible and devotional for as long as I can remember. Ever since the 1970s, they've had a subscription. To me, it represents everything soulless, narcissistic and just plain wrong about the baby boomer generation, even though they were war babies. Close enough.
You don't have to read what's inside when a casual look at their covers say everything. No need to go over them in detail, as that would take too long and besides, you and your audience are familiar with them already. Great writing and cartoons my ass. Liberal smarminess at its finest. Just look at the advertisements if you think the average reader is in a lower tax bracket than those nasty, rich Republicans.
Charles said (July 1, 2017):
I like to make a point about the July 1, 2017, New Yorker magazine cover depicted in your article, "Illuminati Speak Through Magazine Cover."
The teen's hairstyle is very unusual. She has a straightened hairstyle over much of her head and an Afro hairstyle on the back of her head. But the Afro style looks too large for her head, it also looks pasted on the back of the head.
My ethnicity is African American, and I know groups of African Americans have hotly contested (often politicized) certain hairstyles. To see a black person, particularly a black woman, simultaneously wear a combined straightened and Afro hairstyle, let alone a straightened style with a huge Afro, is extremely rare, if not fanciful.
I want to add to your insightful critique of the image my observation that the New Yorker magazine editors are subtly using anti-black humor. I agree with you that the editors weaponized multicultural diversity with the aim, among a number of things, to rip America and Americans into pieces, into nonexistence.
Henry, I look forward to reading the material on your website. I have learned much from you and your contributors since I discovered your website around 2009.
You (and similar like-minded folks) guided me in reeducating or to liberating myself from the various manifestations of Marxism that I fell into in the late 1960s and 1970s and held onto in diminishing ways for social analysis until 9/11. Your website has given me hope and a purpose to help make America great again and to get to know God, specifically through Christianity.
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at
Ann said (July 2, 2017):
The "white man" in the background grilling. Saying "White men now serve us." My question is aren't the Jews or whomever is controlling things....aren't they white? That's like shooting themselves in the foot. Or they are so secure in their palaces that none of this "kill the white man" will touch them? Or it's not a white man heading up things here on earth, but rather Satan himself. It's all so awful. But then again, how could it be otherwise? We are here to learn, not to sit in comfort and paradise. Thank you for your contribution to the truth.