Trump Won Because Americans are Sick of Immigration
January 30, 2017
We all know that agencies like Mossad and the CIA orchestrate most "Muslim" or "white supremacist" terror. Trump must know this too.
But it doesn't matter because most Americans are sick of immigration regardless of whom instigates terror.
Trump won because Stephen Bannon convinced him to stake everything on this fact.
While the Democrats were rigging polls to fit the globalist agenda, Trump was looking at the true data. He vowed to stop the dispossession of the white working class by curtailing immigration.
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
One of the disadvantages of living in a reality bubble (i.e. Cabalist solipsism) is that the Clinton Democrats lost touch with reality.
Democrats skewed polls and then believed the results themselves. They said Americans were pro-immigration by a 60-30 margin. (See the
Luckily the Trump Campaign was in touch with reality. A Breitbart article by Julia Hahn published on July 31, 2016, set the tone for the remaining ten weeks of the campaign: "New polling data shows that it would be virtually impossible for Hillary Clinton to win the general election if the Republican nominee were able to frame the immigration issue in populist terms that emphasize reducing the overall amount of immigration into the country and protecting jobs, incomes, and benefits for the domestic population."
The poll surveyed a random selection of 2,010 registered voters throughout the nation.
"The poll shows that instead of dividing Americans, immigration is an issue where Americans have reached the consensus that it is a problem, maybe the problem," said pollster Doug Kaplan.
"The polling data suggests that the Republican Party could see overwhelming electoral success if it were able to portray Clinton's immigration policy as a corporatist attempt to flood the labor supply with foreign workers in order to drive down wages and incomes for American workers.
"As the polling data confirms, the most potent framing of the immigration issue is to focus on the numbers and scale of total immigration into the country, and to present the American people with the choice between more immigration and less immigration.
(Left, the Democrats were looking at the wrong data.)
..."The media and Democrat politicians uses the term "pro-immigrant" in a completely alien way- i.e. in a way which focuses on trying to help foreign nationals who do not live in America. The new polling information underscores the importance for Republicans to reclaim the historically correct understanding of "pro-immigrant"- as meaning defending U.S. residents who have already immigrated to the country against competition for jobs and resources from foreign nationals residing outside of the country.
"Below are some of the poll's findings:
- By a nearly 6 to 1 margin, U.S. voters believe immigration should be decreased rather than increased.
"Every three years, the U.S. admits a population of new immigrants the size of Los Angeles. Sixty three percent of voters said that this figure is too high, whereas only a minuscule 11 percent of voters said that number is not high enough. Only 13 percent of Democrats and Independents-- and only 7 percent of Republicans-- said immigration should be increased.
- "By a 25-to-1 margin, voters believe that unemployed American workers should get preference for a U.S. job rather than a foreign worker brought in from another country.
"Seventy five percent of voters believe American workers should get U.S. jobs, whereas only 3 percent of voters believe foreign workers should be imported to fill U.S. jobs.
"Democrats agreed with this sentiment by a margin of roughly 30-to-1 (69.8 percent who think jobs should go to unemployed Americans whereas only 2.3 percent think foreign labor should be imported). African Americans agree with this sentiment by a margin of 65-to-1 (78.5 percent who think unemployed Americans should get the jobs versus 1.2 percent who think foreign workers should be brought in). Hispanics agree with this sentiment by a margin of 30-to-1 (59.1 percent versus 2.0 percent).
"There are roughly 94 million Americans operating outside the labor market today. Yet every year the U.S. admits one million plus foreign nationals on green cards, one million guest workers, dependents, and refugees, and half a million foreign students.
"Sixty one percent of voters believe that any politician, "who would rather import foreign workers to take jobs rather than give them to current U.S. residents, is unfit to hold office." (This article is continued in a Note below First Comment.)
STEVE BANNON WAS LISTENING
Steve Bannon recognized that white working class frustration held the key to victory, and even permanent political domination.
'I'm not a white nationalist. I'm a nationalist. I'm an economic nationalist,' Bannon told The Hollywood Reporter. 'The globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia. The issue now is about Americans looking to not get f***ed over.'
Bannon believed that the Democratic Party ditched Trump's potent voter pool after Bill Clinton, who won his presidential election in 1992 whispering to the working man. The Republican Party gained and lost that same group under Reagan. Now, Bannon suggested, parties were catering to the 'donor class,' while everyday Americans were left out.
'If we deliver,' he said, with the 'we' likely meaning the Trump administration, 'we'll get 60 percent of the white vote, and 40 percent of the black and Hispanic vote and we'll govern for 50 years.'
'That's what Democrats missed, they were talking to these people with companies with a $9 billion market cap employing nine people. It's not reality. They lost sight of what the world is about,' Bannon said.
'The media bubble is the ultimate symbol of what's wrong with this country,' Bannon said. 'It's a closed circle of information from which Hillary Clinton got all her information - and her confidence.'
CONCLUSION
Trump's so-called "Muslim Ban" is ham-handed, especially considering intelligence agencies are behind ISIS and most "terror." But regardless, Americans want to see immigration curtailed.
"Immigration," legal and otherwise, is an Illuminati Jewish banker program to change the racial and cultural character of the West. Trump won the election by appealing to the growing resentment of an endangered species, the European Christian majority in the US.
Immigration wouldn't be an issue if the majority of immigrants came from this background but apparently very few do.
At the same time, Trump was careful to stand up for people of all ethnic backgrounds who had immigrated legally. Quite simply, the Soros-owned Democrats were looking to dispossess the American people, but, in their arrogance, they carelessly neglected to rig the vote.
We're waiting to see if the price Trump must pay to save Americans is to serve Israeli interests, or whether this "America First" strategy is the price he paid to serve Israel. Who comes first? Certainly, maintaining the myth of Islamic terror is serving the Zionist agenda.
We're waiting to see if Trump represents a reprieve from globalism and the NWO, or just another route (world war?) to the same destination.
---
Related- Hillary Still Delusional
----------------- Breitbart writer Julia Hahn Hired by Trump
First Comment by Ken Adachi-
Glad to read your commentary, an astute and cogent observation that needed an exposition. A couple of points to make:
1) As Trump stated after signing the Executive Order, it's not a "Muslim ban" as the Left would prefer us to call it, but rather a 90 day moratorium on entry into the US of refugees from seven Middle Eastern countries - Iraq, Iran, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Syria, and Sudan in order to set up and install the extreme vetting process to do a thorough background check on all who attempt to enter from those countries. The other 46 Muslim nations have no restrictions imposed on them.
2) There certainly was an all out attempt to steal the election through election machine rigging - by changing the vote from Trump to Clinton, AND 3-4 million fraudulent votes made by dead people, about 675K illegal aliens, and multiple votes by no-ID cheaters going from precinct to precinct, and even crossing state lines. The only reason it didn't succeed was due to the rigorous state election laws in place in enough states to thwart election theft, honest poll workers who caught the machine cheating attempt, AND the unprecedented HIGH number of voters who came out and voted for Trump. If we didn't have the huge plurality of pro Trump voters, we would not have saved the election from a Hillary theft. Soros and the DNC jackals were planning on stealing it, but they didn't anticipate the landslide of Trump votes would swamp out their effort. Even for 2.5 months after the election, the Left continues to crow that Hillary won the popular vote when the voter count facts prove just the opposite.
I find most of the anti-Trump comments posted here and especially the know-it-all cynicism penned by "Z" to be of zero value and only strokes the ego of accomplish-nothing naysayers; the same sort of knuckleheads who tell people to not bother voting because "it's all rigged anyway." Had we listened to that crowd, we would be bemoaning, today, the ascension of President Hillary.
Note: The Breitbart article continued.
"Yet politicians on both sides of the aisle, such as Hillary Clinton and House Speaker Paul Ryan, have pushed policies that would do just that. Clinton supported a 2013 immigration expansion bill, which would have doubled the number of foreign workers admitted to the country at a time when millions of Americans are not working. Speaker Ryan has a two decade long history of pushing for open borders. Ryan has called for enacting an immigration system that would allow foreign nationals from all over the globe to freely and legally enter the country and take any U.S. job. Speaker Ryan has explained that he believes foreign labor is necessary to help corporations keep wages low.
- Three out of four voters believe the nation needs "an immigration system that puts American workers first, not an immigration system that serves the demands of donors seeking to reduce labor costs.
More than seven out of ten African Americans agreed with the sentiment that the nation's immigration system should prioritize needs of American workers above donors who want to reduce labor costs.
- A majority of U.S. voters (53%) believe "record amounts of immigration into the U.S. have strained school resources and disadvantaged U.S. children."
- A majority of voters (55%) disagree with Hillary Clinton's call to release illegal immigrants arriving at the border into the United States and give them a chance to apply for asylum.
A majority of women (51.6 percent) opposed Clinton's proposal to release illegal immigrants into the interior and allow them to apply for asylum.
- Roughly three out of four voters-- including nearly three out of four Democrat voters-- believe that "instead of giving jobs and healthcare to millions of refugees from around the world, we should rebuild our inner cities and put Americans back to work."
African Americans agreed with this sentiment by a 10 to 1 margin (86.3 percent agree versus 8.5 percent disagree). Hispanics agreed by a margin of 5 to 1 (68.9 percent agreed versus 12.6 percent disagreed).
The number of immigrants in the U.S. is currently at a record high of 42.4 million. In 1970, fewer than one in 21 Americans were foreign-born. Today, as a result of the federal government's four-decade-long green card gusher championed by Ted Kennedy, nearly one in seven U.S. residents was born in a foreign country. If immigration levels remain at the same rapid pace-- without any expansions-- within seven years, the foreign-born share of the U.S. population will reach an all-time high.
In the 1920s, the last time the foreign-born share of the population reached a record high, then-President Calvin Coolidge hit the pause button for roughly fifty years, producing an era of explosive wage growth and allowing immigrants already in the country to assimilate.
As the polling data suggests, a majority of U.S. voters would be supportive of similar measures to reduce immigration and improve jobs, wages and benefits for the domestic population."
Tina said (February 1, 2017):
Thanks for your latest article on "Trump Won Because Americans are Sick of Immigration" The end of your article especially where you say, "We're waiting to see if the price Trump must pay to save Americans is to serve Israeli interests, or whether this "America First" strategy is the price he paid to serve Israel. Who comes first? Certainly, maintaining the myth of Islamic terror is serving the Zionist agenda."
It seems to me that the answer to your question may be that he is paying a price to serve Israel and he has been paying it for a while. While I do not particularly like CNN, I do watch it from time to time because there is always some truth in the mix of their lies.... In 2016, one of CNN’s report, they claimed that Trump owed "4 billion to his debtors including almost a billion for which he was personally responsible". He also owed money to 72 banks. At the end the banks decided to forgive the debt by saying that “Trump should not be allowed to go bust because he was the best salesman to sell off his own properties and hammered out a five-year plan to allow him to repay his personal debts.†I know of no banks that would forgive billions of dollars worth of debts.... I believe the deal was the US Presidency and serving Israel. Here is the article http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/05/politics/donald-trump-atlantic-city-finances/