Direct Link to Latest News


Putin and Zionism: A Complex Relationship

December 23, 2015


When I read that Putin and Netanyahu had agreed to cooperate in fighting terror, I thought

WTF? Doesn't he know that Israel is the #1 source of terror (along with the CIA and MI-6)? In a long article published today, "The Saker" explains that Putin has to play stupid. There is a balance of power in Russia, and to a certain extent Putin's hands are tied. Jewish globalist financial interests are still powerful.

This excerpt helps explain apparent contradictions in Putin's behavior. As the Saker says, "Putin is a very good man in charge of a very bad system."

Putin and Israel: A Complex and Multi-Layered Relationship

by The Saker 

(Excerpt by

Just as between 1917 and 1939, between 1991 and 1999 [under Boris Yeltsin] the reigns of power in Russia were firmly in Jewish hands, and in both cases, with truly catastrophic consequences. The big difference is that if in the early 20th century the Jews in power were ideological opponents of the Anglo Empire, [for public consumption-Makow] in the late 20th century, the Jews in Russia were practically an extension of the AngloZionist Empire.

Speaking of extensions of the AngloZionist Empire.

I have already explained many times in the past that the candidature of Putin to succeed Eltsin was a compromise reached between the Russian security services and Russian "big money" who pushed Medvedev as a counter-weight to Putin. I usually refer to the forces backing Putin as "Eurasian Sovereignists" and the forces backing Medvedev as "Atlantic Integrationists". The goal of the former is to fully sovereignize Russia and make her a key element in a multi-polar but unified Eurasian continent while the goal of the latter is to be accepted by the AngloZionist Empire as an equal partner and to integrate Russia into the western power structures. Next is something so important that I will single it out on a separate parapgraph:


(Last December. That's a Masonic handshake.)

The Atlantic Sovereignists are still in full control of the Russian financial and banking sector, of all the key economic ministries and government positions, they control the Russian Central Bank and they are, by far, the single biggest threat to the rule of Putin and those supporting him. Considering that roughly 90% of Russians now support Putin, that means that these Atlantic Sovereignists are the single biggest threat to the Russian people and Russia as a whole.

How is that all linked to Israel? Simple!

Putin inherited a system created by and for the AngloZionist Empire. He was a compromise candidate between two radically opposed parties and it took him years to first get rid of most of the the Russian (Jewish) oligarchs and then, very gradually, begin cleanup process in which slowly, step by step, the Zionists were booted out of their positions of power. 

 According to Mikhail Khazin, the balance between these two groups has only recently reached a 50/50 point of (unstable) equilibrium. That also means that the "Putin people" need to watch their back every day the Good Lord makes because they know that their so-called "colleagues" are willing to stab them in a blink of an eye as soon as they get an opportunity.

I happen to think that the rumors of a coup in Russia are greatly exaggerated. Not only because Putin does [have] the support of the "power ministries" (Defense, State Security, Internal Affairs, etc.) but, much more importantly, because of the 90% support he has with the Russian people. To overthrow a man with such a cult-like following, a man truly loved by the vast majority of people, would be too dangerous. But that does not mean that the 5th column is not willing to sabotage every effort of Putin and his supporters.

The truth is that Putin has been forced to compromise many, many times. Here are just a few examples:

The oligarchs: when Putin ridded Russia of the semibankirshchina [Jewish oligarchs, bankers] he did not really crack down on all the oligarchs as such. He only only got rid of those oligarchs who, like Khodorkovsky, had tried to basically stage a coup against Putin by buying the entire Duma. The oligarchs were told "stay out of politics and I will leave you alone". The deal is still on today.

The economy: even in his last speech Putin had to declare that he fully supports the Central Bank and the economic Ministers of the Medvedev government. Considering that literally ALL Putin allies openly and vocally are screaming bloody murder about the way the Russian economy is mismanaged, this is clearly a coerced statement and not something he believes in. 

 By the way, I am observing a systematic vilification campaign on the central Russian TV channels against the Central Bank and the economic Ministers and this cannot be a coincidence. I predict that Putin is preparing a purge of these circles, but that he needs to line up all his ducks in a row before taking action, especially by inflaming the public opinion against them. 

 Right now the Russian economy is still run by IMF-stooges, by "Washington consensus" types, hence their crazy policy on interest rates, on buying US obligations, on keeping inflation low, etc. etc. etc. Putin, by conviction, is not what I would call a "socialist" but he is most definitely a proponent of "social markets" and somebody who is trying hard to decouple Russia from the western financial system, and not play by the rules of the Empire.

Foreign policy: right up until Putin's latest re-election when finally Russia began to have a fairly consistent foreign policy, the policy of Russia has been one of zigs followed by zags. This was especially true during the times when Medvedev was in charge of the Presidency and when Iran and Libya were betrayed by Russia at the UNSC (something Putin openly called "stupid").

Personalities: remember the hyper-corrupt Minister of Defense Serdiukov? Guess what? He has still not been formally charged with anything. Even the woman he did most of his dirty dealing with still lives in her luxurious apparent in Moscow. What does this tell us? That even when Putin got the hard proof of Serdiukov's malfeasance he had enough power to replace him by Shoigu, but not enough to power to stick such high-profile "Atlantic Sovereignists" into jail.

Nazi occupied Ukraine: Putin had enough control over the government to provide the vital Voentorg and to even send some special forces and artillery strikes across the border to help the Novorussians, but he could not force the economic Ministries to use the Russian economic might to strangle the Ukrainian economy. This resulted in Russia sending artillery shells across the border in Saur Mogila and (basically free) energy across the border to Kiev.

Russophobic propaganda: ... Bottom line: while Putin did immensely improve the overall quality of the Russian media, the russophobes are still very influential and can spew their hateful venom in total impunity.

I could continue to list example after example, but I think you get the idea: Putin is a very good man in charge of a very bad system.


First Comment by Tony Blizzard, who sent this. (Thanks Tony)

This is the most logical article I have seen on Putin, his actions and his lack of actions. Russia will NEVER win against the Rothschild cabal until they toss the phony debt as money lie that almost all nations now live with as the cabal grabs ever more wealth through it.  As well as having stolen over 90% of all wealth, world wide, they also own the best part of EVERY national debt, so-called, on these totally phony loans of nothing at usury instead of an honest real monetary medium of exchange.  The world's worst crime in all history.  It causes more grief than mass murders because it is that as well as every other economic crime combined with it.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Putin and Zionism: A Complex Relationship"

Carl said (December 24, 2015):

While it may be true that Putin has to conform to a certain degree I think he shows his true colors in the following ways:

1) Remember when Obama was caught on tape talking to Medvedev (intended to be transmitted to Putin) about "having more flexibility?"

To play proxy army in Syria?

2)Meetings with Kissinger, international criminal. What good could come from that?

3)Maintaining the status quo on 9/11, despite it being obvious a building freefell etc. Complicit are Silverstein and the dancing Israeli's, with the Neocons that sniff their ass.

4)Honoring Mason, Vlad Lenin a Moloch worshipping*, genocidal madman instead of burning his body or just bury it?!
*Georges Solomon. Among the Red Rulers

5) There is some evidence to suggest Putin is a cryptic Royal Arch Mason.

The fact is most humans can't handle the Hegelian nature of Putin's role with the west. This is the team red versus team blue NFL style thinking pattern. Russia has been compromised since the Bolsheviks rushed the Winter palace and the Tzar's daughters blood flowed soon after. The actors have changed, this is the only difference.

JG said (December 24, 2015):

I had to chuckle at that aged whale in the picture who yields so much power and evil. Kissinger is still a major figure in the plotting and background for the "world chessboard" of horrors to come. There is no compromise with this monster and Putin can only tolerate him best he can.

Like all great leaders of the past such as Kennedy, Lincoln, and Ghandi, Putin knows that you can't totally ignore the devil in the room and survive as a politician at the same time. This is a cold reality.
Contrary to all the western MSM's lies about him, Putin DOESN'T want war and is NOT out to conquer the world. His great desire for peace and a Christian Russia has made him the target of the NWO and their hammer, the once Christian but now Marxist led NATO.
They have done everything to provoke this man and his nation including the plummet of the ruble but Putin still has remained steadfast and patient.
This man is to be praised.

Dan said (December 23, 2015):

When Putin put the Russian air force into action in Syria I think we expected a confrontation with Israel, who had been getting bolder with hit and run air strikes in Syria. But apparently Putin is letting them save face by playing along that the US and Israel's interest is only ISIS and not Assad. Of course that means he's tactfully stopped them from attacking the Syrian Army as they were before the Russian presence went public.

When that's considered, it's clear that it doesn't necessarily mean some sneaky 'back room deals' are going on.

Sandeep said (December 23, 2015):

Finally an article relating to Putin that takes a very common-sense approach. This is what I have been saying for a long time. Putin inherited a lot of mess left from the Jewish ideology called Communism. He is clearly a Christian who does not hide it and even makes strong appearances to promote it, while in the West everything is done to destroy it. We got famous Russians like Solzhenitsyn who clearly identified the cause of Russia's destruction (enabled by the Zionist cabal) and not coincidentally Putin was an admirer of him. I believe as well that Putin is sincere, but he cannot avoid the fact that he has to play along with some of the political realities that are engrained in the internal and external political world.

This is the reason why some of his statements are totally contradictory to his actual stances. People have to understand that politics is a dirty business, like I said, and you have to go very deep to understand certain decisions/statements being made.

Speaking of this, I actually wondered recently why Israel was able to bomb places in Syria when the Russians have moved in their S-400 systems that are covering almost the entire Syrian airspace (definitely the southern Syrian airspace).

The Saker has basically answered it. There are definitely back-door deals which must have included concessions on both sides. This must have also been agreed upon by Assad. And this again is a good example of how dirty politics is, and how people who are being attacked (in this case Assad) are sucked into it. This is also a good example of how the portrayed public reality doesn't mostly match the real reality, unless you understand that there are always deals behind the scenes.

It is the job of the citizenry to pay attention and to identify what the reality is. With regards to Putin, The Saker identified these contradictions correctly. To finalize, it will take some time for Putin to make even larger moves which will further reveal, hopefully, his true character.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at