Reader said (November 2, 2015):

If Arthur Topham's words are 'hate speech', isn't the Talmud 'hate literature'? Just saying. And since when is an emotion 'hate' a crime? Actions, yes, but feelings?

Michael said (October 31, 2015):

Your site is one of two I visit for real, serious, no b.s. news/commentary. Jim Stone is the other.

In reference to the piece above, I offer an excerpt of it, and then validation.

"First Comment by Glen" "Since birth we have been taught in our houses of worship that the Jews are Gods chosen people."

This is all very true. Recently, in an effort to appease my wife (raised R.C. but non practicing at all until 'Catholic Guilt' licks in an after a martini or two.). We decided to do a 'tour' of different denominations, with an eye toward selecting one for attendance. I was opposed, but love allows for many things, so we went.

First was R.C. Even she acknowledged the cultist aspect and that was that.
Next, a church called "Elm Street Christian Church", and the to the point of this note.

Out of forty-five minute service, no less than 20 minutes were spent lauding the Jews, exhorting us to love and help them, praising them for their for standing before God and exhorting us to do everything but worship them as deities.

I couldn't take any more and had to excuse myself from the balance of his talk. (potty break). When it was over, my wife, thinking (before) that my speeches to her on the way of the Jew were wrong, after that service, 'saw the light', and now knows another slice of the pie.

Thanks for the article and good work Henry. Please keep it up.

Al Thompson said (October 30, 2015):

I read this and it is going to be hard grind doing the trial this way. His attorney is going to the merits of the case without challenging jurisdiction. That is done by asking the simple question: "What facts do you have that the 'hate crime' codes apply to me?" This immediately goes to discredit the prosecution's witness. If they try to answer it, then ask: "Is that a fact or an opinion?" They will never provide any facts that the codes apply to anyone. I had a govtard state: "The codes apply because the codes apply." Usually, the judge will ignore this and continue with the case, at which point the defendant should object to every answer the witness gives. This will make any witness look like they are not competent as a witness and their testimony should be disregarded. The problem with quoting the Talmud is that his attorney has already accepted the "court's" jurisdiction and he is getting to the merits of the case without establishing the court's authority. Of course, you would expect an attorney to do that as they wouldn't have a job.

I think this works because no man's law can interfere with the natural law that God created. Since the court is Satanic, there is really no remedy. And that's why the court's authority should always be challenged. An attorney won't do that, unfortunately. While Arthur may do okay with the jury by showing the hypocrisy of the Jews and the Talmud, the main problem is that his attorney accepted jurisdiction without a challenge.

There's a lot more that can be done in a courtroom, but jurisdiction is the big issue and should be established before the trial. I hope this works out well for him, but it is up to his attorney to shift the burden of proof and make them prove everything they are accusing Arthur of doing. Most attorneys do not do a good job with this. Applicability of the codes should be the first place to start.

The big question if one is caught in a courtroom should be directed to the judge at arraignment: "What facts do you have that the codes apply to me?"

In my opinion, the only authority that means anything is God's authority under his natural law. The rest of it is just nonsense and it is unusable.
http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2014/10/the-god-defense.html

Robert K said (October 30, 2015):

You can see why the MSM are not covering this important trial. But you may be sure they will be crowing loudly if Topham is convicted. It would be the obverse of the recent case in the UK, where the trial of Ben Fellowes, who reported that a Minister of the Crown had sexually assaulted him in his youth, was reported on until the jury exonerated Fellowes, at which point the Establishment media abruptly fell silent.

The external discipline of the media is now so blatantly pervasive that it is surprising that anyone pays attention to it at all, except perhaps as an exercise in studying methods of deception. It has become just a section in the orchestra playing to manipulate and neutralize the thinking of the population.

It's probably too much to hope that the judge might utter some obiter dicta about the laughable research standards of the hate speech squad, which clearly is beyond its depth in a matter such as this.

MS said (October 30, 2015):

The second and longest chapter in the Quran, al-Baqarah ("The Cow" - referring to the golden calf,) is among other things an epic overview of the Jews and their eventual betrayal of God's covenant. In it, God tells us that during Prophet Solomon's reign, the Jews "began following that which was recited by the devils (Talmud)," and "they threw their revealed book (Torah) behind their backs." We also learn that the exiled Jews in Babylon were instructed in sorcery by two angels, Haroot and Maroot, who were sent to the Jews as a test from God.

The Quran further exonerates Prophet Solomon (Suleiman), blessings be upon him, from allegations of sorcery, and affirms his role in uprooting the occultist Jewish leadership, and the Jinn (demons) with whom they were in league. It is said that he buried their magical knowledge beneath his temple, which has lied beneath the sanctuaries of the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa mosques for many centuries now.

This site has a pretty good summary:

http://www.missionislam.com/nwo/secretworld.htm The author does, however, make an error in identifying Prophet Muhammad as the expected messiah of Abrahamic revelations. This is incorrect. The Muslim view is clear, and has always been that Prophet Jesus is the prophesied messiah, and that he will return to complete his mission and establish a rule of peace, justice and abundance. The Quran calls Jesus the messiah at least nine times, and Muhammad affirmed repeatedly that Jesus is the messiah, blessings be on them both.

For the sake of mutual understanding, I'm also obliged to note that the article, in the opening, when it identifies those who have gone astray as Christians, does so due to the deification of Christ, the sonship, and for the Pauline doctrine of a triune godhead (trinity), all of which the Quran considers deviations from the monotheism of father Abraham. Aside from thus doctrinal point, the Quran speaks affectionately and approvingly about Christian virtue and piety, and Prophet Muhammad has prophesied that Muslims will ally with Orthodox Christians to confront the antichrist, Dajjal.

Paul said (October 30, 2015):

One of the hardest things about being God's Chosen People (something I do believe the Jews are at the moment) is learning how to accept such an identity with humility and realize that as a leader of the groups of people that make up our world, this one group of people has to always be above reproach. If they sin in any way, they will be judged by God Himself, in more severe ways than any other group of people. This identity is not for the weak or the timid but for the boldest and bravest of men. The Talmud twists this identity into a monstrosity.

--
Paul

The notion that God would choose one people over another is a con job and perversion of the meaning of God, which in part is universal love.

henry

Bob said (October 30, 2015):

I'd love to have a transcript of this trial!