Direct Link to Latest News

 

Did the Romanovs Betray Christian Russia?

January 8, 2014

tsar-nicholas-ii-russia1.jpg



Far from defenders of tradition, the Romanovs 

were Illuminati traitors, according to Hamad Subani.  


(Editor's Note: I find this hard to believe and welcome feedback from more informed readers.) 







by Hamad Subani 

author of The World War Deception 

(henrymakow.com) 


The Romanovs are usually seen as a symbol of Christian Russia, as innocent victims of a banker-backed atheist Communist revolution.

About a decade ago, Fritz Springmeier released a book entitled Bloodlines of the Illuminati. Springmeier says the Romanovs are linked to the Illuminati. They are mentioned in conjunction with the Van Duyn bloodline, which is one of the thirteen. To quote,

 "The mystery of the Van Duyn family is also reflected in the mystery surrounding the Romanov family. The Romanov family had more than the Russian branch, there was for instance a Prussian branch. And some of their family like the Grand Prince Alexis Romanov came to America, where his granddaughter Mary Teissier (the cousin to Alexander Romanov) was one of J. Paul Getty's main lovers. J. Paul Getty if you have forgotten was at one time listed by Fortune Magazine as America's richest man. Not only does Romanov blood flow in some of the Illuminati, the Romanov name pops up among the friends of Frank Sinatra. Mike and Gloria Romanov were friends of Frank Sinatra. Frank Sinatra's social activities were like a Who's Who in the Mafia and Illuminati. Frank Sinatra would travel to France to spend time with Baron Guy de Rothschild, or could be found doing a charity ball for the World Mercy Fund with Laurance Rockefeller.

 And elsewhere

 "But the Romanov's were also an occult bloodline, and so the Illuminati secretly took children of the Imperial family to serve as breeders for the Illuminati so that the Illuminati could channel in the Romanov's occult blood into their bloodlines.

 Another conspiracy researcher (the late Sherman Skolnick) cited several newspaper reports that the Romanov royal family may not have been executed at Ekaterinburg. Two other writers reached similar conclusions, namely Shay McNeal, The Secret Plot to Save the Tsar: The Truth Behind the Romanov Mystery (William Morrow, 2002) & Robert K. Massie, The Romanovs - The Final Chapter (Random House, 1995)

In 2004, a research paper was published in the Annals of Human Biology. The authors managed to obtain a sample of real Romanov DNA from a finger of Grand Duchess Elisabeth (sister of Empress Alexandra), which had been preserved by a monk. They discovered that it did not genetically tally with the DNA obtained by the earlier researchers from the remains found in Ekaterinburg. (A. Knight, L.A Zhivotovsky, ,D.H. Kass, D.E. Litwin, L.D. Green, P.S. White, J.L Mountain, "Molecular, forensic and haplotypic inconsistencies regarding the Ekaterinburg remains," Annals of Human Biology 31.2 (2004) 130). 

In my book, The World War Deception, I have further explored these inconsistencies, and the picture of the Romanovs that emerges is rather sinister:

In the 14th century, the Illuminati were concluding the last phase of the Mongol destruction of the Islamic World through the barbarian Amir Timur (See my  The Secret History of Iran ) While  Amir Timur's focus was the Middle East, where he killed five percent of the world's population, a side-project was the destruction of the Mongol Golden Horde, which had become Islamized, and which held control over Russia. 

The Romanovs emerged after the destruction of the Mongol Golden Horde, and filled the power vacuum. This was not a coincidence. Had Amir Timur not destroyed the Golden Horde, Russia would have probably been more Asiatic, and this may have been better, because Westernized societies tend to be more conducive to the Illuminati agenda. 


ROMANOVS NO MORE RUSSIAN THAN THE WINDSORS ARE ENGLISH


The Romanovs derive from the same occult Germanic-Bohemian group as the royal families of Germany and Britain. The British royal family changed its name from the German Saxe-Coburg and Gotha to Windsor before World War I, as this would make them more presentable as "British."

 

romanov_arms.gif

(left. Romanov Coat of arms, compare below with emblem of Freemasonry) 

Intermarriage with their relations was so common that the Romanovs became the most famous case study for the genetic transmission of hemophilia. The early Romanovs were so Germanic that they looked down upon Russians as being too Asiatic.  Peter the Great even tried to forcibly implant German culture in Russia. 

Another interesting feature of the Romanovs is their involvement in the occult. Arthur Dee (the son the English magus, spy master, alchemist and Rosicrucian John Dee) may have helped the first Romanov to ascend the throne. Prominent occultist, Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, was among the elite of Russian nobility. She was a cousin of Tsarist Prime Minister Count Witte. 

In 1891, the future Tsar, Nicholas II visited Blavatsky at her Indian headquarters in Adyar, but Blavatsky was forced to leave India after a scandal involving "Russian spies." Blavatsky is credited with having laid the foundation of Nazi ideology, which would serve as a dialectical false opposition to Communism. 

Long before Lenin and the Bolsheviks, the Romanovs were busy laying the groundwork for a powerful Soviet Union, which was meant to preside over not just Russia, but all of Asia, Europe and the Middle East. This is evident from a testament attributed to Peter the Great. To quote, "The Russian nation must be constantly on a war footing to keep the soldiers warlike and in good condition....... We must progress as much as possible in the direction of Constantinople and India." 

Double_Eagle_freemasonry.gif

(Left. Double headed eagle emblem of Freemasonry) 


According to this testament, Britain was to be retained as a secret ally, until all of Europe was conquered. It is no coincidence that when the British Empire would later play the "Great Game" with the Russian Empire in Asia, it always worked to the advantage of Russia. 

A case point is the Crimean War, where the British inserted themselves as allies of the Ottomans versus the Russians (1854). In the end, British intrigues resulted in a big reversal for the Ottomans. In the one case where the British really had to fight the Russians, they were commanded to charge into Russian canons! 

COLLUSION

For most people, the idea that Tsar Nicholas II would somehow secretly collude with the revolutionaries, fake the death of himself and his family and secretly escape sounds implausible because they view the Tsar as a defacto ruler of Russia, answerable only to himself. 

In reality, the Romanovs owed their power to the Illuminati, and were merely playing their part in the program of making Russia a bastion of Communism. Losing power and private fortune means a lot to those of us who have nowhere else to look to, but that meant little to the Romanovs who weren't genuine rulers in the first place, and who always had guarantees of security from their extended family in other nations. 

Nicholas II quietly ceded power to the revolutionaries, and later abdicated to his brother Michael, who strangely enough surrendered all power to the Duma. 

Diplomat Nicholas De Basily recounts how Michael "[...] accepted fate without the least revolt, the least show of anger or ill humor." Nicholas II had already transferred a large quantity of his wealth to the Chase Bank of New York. It seems he was a bit of worried that he and his family might still be executed by accident, and towards the end of his reign, he gave favourable territorial concessions to the Japanese on the condition that they secretly acknowledge a debt of honour towards him and his family. 

We are told that on July 17th 1918, Bolsheviks shot the Tsar and his immediate family in the cellar of the Ipatiev House in Yekaterinburg, Russia. The problem is that this cellar could hardly accommodate 6 people, not the 34 people who were present. 

In 1977, Boris Yeltsin, then an important official in the Yekaterinburg district, ordered the complete demolition of the Ipatiev house. Researcher Sherman Skolnick managed to obtain a 1970 Chicago Tribune article claiming that Emperor William II of Germany (cousin of the Romanovs) had included a secret clause in the Brest-Litovsk treaty that no harm was to come to the Romanov family, and that they were taken to Odessa and put  aboard Allied ship. Out of the 10,000 inhabitants of Ekaterinburg, no one saw the murder or burial of the royal family. There were however sightings of Japanese agents, who had come to honour their debt of honour. 

CONCLUSION

Sadly, the betrayal of Christian Russia did not end with the Romanovs. The White Russians, whose leadership was hopelessly infiltrated by the Romanovs, served as a reactionary dialectical opposition to Communism, driving all remnants of the resistance into the ground, and later in World War II, aiding the Nazis in their war crimes. 

After that, many White Russian leaders were offered asylum in the United States. One of them, George de Mohrenschildt surfaced as a key suspect in the assassination of President Kennedy. 

The Romanovs are an important example of how a false opposition can be more dangerous than the enemy. And how some leaders are willing to abdicate their position to advance the New World Order agenda.


---

First Comment by Tony Blizzard:


Hamad Subani's rant has all the earmarks of an MI6 created "radical" Muslim spewing disinformation by clumsy attempts at nonexistent connections of individuals and events.

Paquita de Shismareff (L. Fry of "Waters Flowing Eastward" and other works) was married to one of the highest military men of Czarist Russia.  During frequent visits to the Czar's family home, their children played with the very children who were later murdered by Bolshevik order. 

She had absolute knowledge of the slaughter of the Czar and his family.

This was related to me by de Shismareff first hand, in our years working together.  More than once.  She had inside contacts to the Czarist hierarchy to the end.  In fact, her husband got her, their children and a good part of their money out of Russia before the bloodshed began, as he knew what was coming (he was killed fighting the Boshevics), allowing her to acquire a mansion in New York City by which she set up with jobs countless refugees from Russia who arrived in the U.S. via steerage or whatever other means they could find to flee the mass murders of all educated classes.  She was kept informed by them of events in Russia as many were previous acquaintances of the family.

Moreover, she could not even mention the name of Helena Blavatsky without literally spitting it out.  I never saw her show such disgust and hatred toward any other person.  Since she co-authored "Occult Theocrasy," still the encyclopedia of satanic occultism in all its manifestations, with her friend, Edith Starr Miller, (the Lady Queenborough, also an American, later murdered by her Jewish husband who was never charged or even accused), the book a ten-year product of their research together, there can be no doubt that she and her friends in Russia were not taken in by such blatant occultists.

Yes, the Romanovs were mostly, like much British royalty, of German descent.  So what?  Did not they send their navy to U.S. ports in defense of the U.S. against Britain?

The Russian double headed eagle coat of arms stands for the two main entities of the country, Imperial Russia and the Russian Orthodox religion.  The mounted figure on the shield is Saint George slaying the dragon - the devil.

Many Christian European nations used the double headed eagle similarly. My guess is that the masonic double headed eagles are a copy to intentionally steal from or discredit Christian symbolism.


Hamad Subani replies:


 I have two main questions for Tony Blizzard

1.      How can he explain Fritz Springmeier placing the Romanovs in the 13 bloodlines of the Illuminati?

2.      Does he have any counterpoint to the DNA analysis of Alec Knight et all?

I am aware of the Romanovs sending their navy to US ports against Britain, but I am sure this took place under Tsar Alexander II, who was an exception (Tsar Alexander II was killed after a record nine assassination attempts!). The double headed eagle is a symbol of the Baylonian God of Lagash, which only makes sense why many other so-called Christian nations would adopt it.

Dan writes:


This article seems to stampede to conclusions without adequate study of the genealogies and heraldry of the Royal families of Europe and Russia. 

The double headed eagle is not the Romanov coat of arms,  nor is it the emblem of Freemasonry.    The black double eagle with the orb and scepter was the coat of arms of RUSSIA.  The first Tsar to use is was Ivan III.   Here's the meaning: On the occasion of the fall of Constantinople to the Ottoman Empire in 1453, Ivan, of the Grand Duchy of Muscovy claimed the succession of Byzantium. Ivan III sealed this though marriage with the niece of the last Byzantine emperor, Constantine XI.  

What does this eagle symbolize?  Ivan III took the image directly from the emblem of the Byzantine Empire which had just fallen.  The symbolism goes back to the division of the Roman Empire, with Rome becoming the seat of the West Empire, and Constantinople as the seat of the East, or Byzantine Empire.  This is why Moscow in some circles has been called the Third Rome.  

Ivan III was of the Rurik dynasty.  The Tsarina, niece of Constantine XI was born Zoe, of the House of Palailogos - the double headed eagle was originally the family crest of THAT dynasty, the Byzantine dynasty.   As Tsarina her name was changed from Zoe to Sophia.  

It was Ivan III that defeated the Golden Horde, and became Ivan the Great (not to be confused with Ivan the Terrible).  So Ivan III and Sophia are a big deal in world history.  These were events that come along once in a millennium:  the forging of Russia as  kingdom, and the fall of the Byzantine Empire.  It's important to understand that the Tsars saw Russia as the successor of Byzantium - the Eastern Roman Empire.   

Pope Paul II offered to perform the marriage personally, in an attempt to reunite the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic Church, but that didn't happen. 

The first Romanov Tsar was Mikhail a century and a half later.  (ROMAN - ov) The House of Romanov coat of arms is a red lion rampant with a golden shield and sword. 

The 'Double Headed Eagle of Lagash' is the emblem of the 33° of the Scottish Rite.   The origin of it's appearance in Freemasonry isn't mysterious.  Manly Hall wrote that the double headed 'eagle' of the 33° is really a Phoenix.  

According to Mackey's Encyclopedia of Freemasonry,  it was suggested in  "Grand Constitution of the Thirty-third Degree," purportedly written by Frederick the Great of Prussia in 1786.  This document was the blueprint for setting up the Scottish Rite at the Charleston Supreme Council in 1801. 








Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Did the Romanovs Betray Christian Russia?"

Anonymous said (January 10, 2014):

I am not sure if the Romanovs were executed or not, but one thing is for sure. They were not Christians at all.

Most people know about their relationship with the infamous Rasputin, but forget about the much more dangerous occultist Papus.

Papus, aka Gérard Encausse, was a leading French occultist and gnostic who traveled to Russia in 1901, 1905 and 1906 to be the Romanovs' puppet witch. He was a member of the OTO (same as Aleister Crowley's in the future), the Satanic Order of the Golden Dawn and Grand Orient Masonry. He was also anti-semitic.



Vojko said (January 10, 2014):

The author, Hamad should read this book, "The Secret Plot to Save the Tsar: The Truth Behind the Romanov Mystery" by Robert Wilton. A well written and researched book that left no doubt in my mind that the immediate Romanov family was murdered.

Most of the "crowned-heads" of Europe before world war one were related to one another. See the book "Crowns in Conflict: The Triumph of the Tragedy of European Monarchy, 1910-1918" by Theo Aronson.

If you go to Springmeier's book "Bloodlines of the Illuminati" on pages 223 & 224 (chapter on Rockefeller) Springmeier says very little on the Romanov's. Two short paragraphs. The extended Romanov family must have been huge and I have no doubt that maybe a few members were not the best characters and maybe a few did partake in the occult back then but which royal houses didn't ?

Having said all that one day I would like to read this book "The Secret Plot to Save the Tsar: The Truth Behind the Romanov Mystery" by Shay McNeal and read an info that contradicts Robert Wilton's book "The Secret Plot to Save the Tsar: The Truth Behind the Romanov Mystery".


Peter said (January 9, 2014):

Whatever the truth is, regarding this ancient conspiracy of ancient so-called royalty, I detect, in your featuring these stories, a reoccurring pattern.

This pattern is absolutely fascinating and I want to thank you for revealing these theories on your web site. I enjoy reading your posts as much as anything anywhere.
The pattern is, that throughout western history and perhaps non western history as well, we see a re-occurrence by elites conspiring amongst themselves , to create wars , to reduce the population of their respective peasantries.

The very complex dialectical reasons for wars are bogus. These reasons are formulated by sophisticated social engineers who perhaps utilize occult knowledge.Only the elites know this. Each "side" creates a synthetic reality for their peasants to marinate in. It is a very separate reality from the oppositions reality. Divide and conquer the peasants; and the elites waltz away free and unburdened.


Anonymous said (January 9, 2014):

Two points-First, In strict confidence, on a need to know basis, I was introduced to a person (super mega wealthy) who is high up in International Government and banking circles and has a special international passport. This person is (supposedly) a direct descendant of the Royal Romanov family. This person was raised in America. I didn’t ask questions as it would not have been appropriate. But later I spoke with another person who was in the meeting and they said-- maybe Princess Anastasia actually did escape and this was her heir?


Second, I also met members of the other Royal Romanov family. The Tsar had a Jewish Mistress who he gave his last name. Members of this Romanov family stayed in Russia when it became communist and some of them ended up owning banks in USSR and still own them today and others ended up getting high up Governmental positions in Education. Today they use a name that is close to Romanov.


Jim Perloff said (January 8, 2014):

Count Arthur Cherep-Spiridovich, a major general in the Russian army, wrote a pioneering conspiracy book in 1926 entitled THE SECRET WORLD GOVERNMENT. He underscored the Christianity of the czars and made it very clear that the Illuminati and Rothschilds were sworn to destroy them. Lenin and Trotsky would probably be much amused to now be hearing that the czar was their secret ally. Perhaps next someone will be saying that Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette secretly plotted the French Revolution and didn’t die at the guillotine.

Reply from HS:

I don’t know about the French Revolution. But I do know that the last Ottoman Sultan (whose bloodline had been compromised) chose to quietly abdicate and drive off to Switzerland at the end of World War One, even though most Turks were willing to die fighting for him (See my book The World War Deception for details). When leaders are not standing up to the enemy, there is usually something going on.


Steven said (January 8, 2014):

I would not accuse the Romanovs of treason as that would require malice and fore thought for them to be guilty.

I would accuse Nicholas Romanov of being too much a gentleman and not enough of a war lord for the good of his country. What he should have done is purged his government and country of Jews and Freemasons right after getting crowned Czar of Russia and personally supervised and directed government policy.

Any one giving him any crap over it should have been shot or impaled as traitors. The Czar might have had some blood on his hands but it would have been insignificant compared to the results of allowing democracy, communism and the Jewish Masonic Bolsheviks to have their way with Russia. Some times being Mr. Nice guy does not pay.


Deadeye Dick said (January 8, 2014):

It is a fact that Czar Nicholas II was a first cousin of both King George V of Britain and Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/books/review/Seymour-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

I'm not sure one should jump to the conclusion that this makes him personally a traitor to Russia, but I think the indication of a
"great game" being played on both Russia and Germany, in part due to the shortcomings and conflicts of interest on the part of these
individuals, is quite warranted.



Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at