April 12, 2013
How a Tranny Broke Up My Woman's Therapy Group
by Susan
(henrymakow.com)
About ten years ago, I faithfully attended a women-only N.A. (Narcotics Anonymous)-affiliated meeting. This meeting, not listed in any organization directories, initially met in a member's home, but later moved to a meeting room at a local church. There was a core group of about 15 women, though we often had visitors join us through word-of-mouth. It was an amazing meeting, focused on recovery and relating to each other as women without male interference. Many female addicts have trouble relating to others in a healthy manner and often sexualize their relationships; for this reason (and others) gender-specific meetings can play an important part of recovery.
Unfortunately, "Donna" caught wind of our meetings and joined us one evening. At 6'4" and easily 300 pounds, "Donna" looked like a lumberjack, and carried "herself" like one, too. "She" wore full makeup (that could not hide "her" beard) and women's clothing. "She" told us that "she" was glad to find a meeting where "she" could share openly and honestly about things that moved "her" as a "woman". When "she" shared that, you could hear a pin drop in that room; as might be imagined, it was an incredibly awkward moment.
It was obvious to everyone that "Donna's" appearance was a big "F**k you" to those of us who regularly attended, as clearly as if "she" had shouted it. How could it be anything more? "She" was exerting "her" rights at our expense, for no other reason than that "she" could. Since we used the N.A. name and approved literature, we were not allowed to discriminate against any addict that cared to join us (stag meetings were not, at least at that time, sanctioned by the organization though they were relatively common; until that night, there had not been a problem to my knowledge). It was not as though "she" had no other choice in meetings: in our area, there were mixed meetings available every night of the week, and often at multiple locations. I had seen "her" at mixed meetings before, and "her" attendance had not have been criticized or commented upon, at least in my hearing. In fact, "she" didn't complain to us that "she" was uncomfortable at mixed meetings, but that "she" chose our women's meeting because "she" "felt more comfortable" there, obviously not giving our collective comfort a second thought.
Unfortunately, the group broke up shortly after "Donna" made it clear to the group's leader that "she" would be attending regularly, regardless of our feelings. Aware that others were uncomfortable with "her" presence, "she" was willing to break up the meeting rather than acquiesce to the groups' preference. How many of us would insist on inclusion in a group that didn't want us in it or made the majority of members uncomfortable? In the end, we ALL ended up without a group to attend: the perfect lose-lose situation. It was the quintessential demonstration of the trans-gender/homosexual agenda: cutting off one's nose to spite the face.
