RS said (June 5, 2024):

The so-called Hitler's "Mein Kampf" was Ghostwritten by a Jesuit priest Bernard Staemphle, according to Edmond Paris' book "The Secret History of the Jesuits".

Paris was mysteriously killed for his books.

Jim C said (May 5, 2019):

Once again you have provided your readers with insights that have either been unrealized or never considered to be true about Adolph Hitler.

Similar to the creation of the publics’ impression and belief of the real "monster of Germany” during the 1st half of the 20th Century, here in America the masses have been fed the same type of bullshit about Ronny Reagan, the Bushes, Obama, and Trump.

They’re all useful idiots put on the stage to con the American people into believing the “Big Lie”. Like Hitler, none of them had or have the intellect to lead
A parade down main street. Actors all, being told by their directors what and when to say their lines.

Thank you once again.

Keep up the good work!!!!!!

David A said (May 5, 2019):

WELL HENRY- THANKS FOR PLAYING YOUR CARD AS A JEWISH MISINFORMATION AGENT. YOUR ACTUALLY QUITE EASY TO FIGURE OUT. UNTILL THE JEWISH
PROBLEM IS TAKEN CARE OF ONCE AND FOR ALL, THIS WORLD WILL NEVER FUNCTION PROPERLY. YOUR A TYPICAL CONTROLLED OP PIECE OF SHIT JEW.

--
David,

You are so stupid you can't recognize who your friends or enemies are. I show that Zionists/bankers and not Germans are ultimately responsible for the Holocaust. But somehow I am a Jewish agent. Go figure.

henry

Pedro said (May 5, 2019):

"Sometimes when unexpected questions were put to him, he just walked away, or started his senseless political ranting."

Same as today heh in what passes as a political debate? Do we ever see 'unexpected questions' these days?

What is someone had gotten to ask Trump at election time if he was going to investigate 'America's Reichstag' and the use of explosives in 911,
seeing as he says here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt-ldMj9y9w&feature=youtu.be

ON 911 that
planes could not have taken those buildings down, and adding did he know about the third building WTC7? Did he think some Arabs would be capable of that destruction and why did they stop at that, given the agitation we have given their world in the Middle East since? Probably he would reply he has bigger fish to fry and is trying to make America great again (/"senseless political ranting"). How about brave again?

(I have not made up my mind about Hitler though).

Charlie E said (May 4, 2019):

Why didn’t Hitler bomb rothchilds palaces and “the city” in London - the magic mile (literally) of the banking houses.
It would have ended the war instantly with Germany the undisputed victor by cutting off the head of the opposition.
So he really was a puppet and this explains why he did not invade England at the beginning and why he let them escape at Dunkirk the greatest treachery in human history - in a bunch of fishing boats

Ron said (June 2, 2008):

Concerning /Was Hitler Just a Pawn/, I have no doubt that he was a pawn of the satanic power brokers. However, I see a lot of conflicting information on him. In WWI he rose from private to corporal and won two Iron Crosses did he not? When he was infiltrating groups for army intelligence, did he not arise in one instance to give a rousing speech that impressed everyone? Albert Speer seemed quite impressed by Hitler early on, and Hitler seemed to hold a certain knowledge of architecture and art that he often discussed with Speer. Goebbels literally worshiped Hitler and his genius in Goebbels personal diary. And Hitler was able to control some of the most outstanding generals in history such as Rommel and Guderian. He also hobnobbed with the elite, and was even chosen as /Time/'s man of the year. He seems to have been unpopular early on, but became more popular than most leaders later. And I doubt any coaching by anyone could have produced Hitler's dynamic and spellbinding speeches. Frankly, I wonder if Hitler can be explained. He would seem to a prototype for the anti-Christ, and both may share a satanic intelligence, charisma, and leadership ability, as well the power to deceive and persuade that exceed human keen. Both also seem self-destructive, irrational, vindictive and destined for a bad end. Just as man cannot fully perceive God or even angels, he cannot fully comprehend the depths of a fully depraved soul, especially when Satan himself is that soul. We can analyze and debate evil, but fully comprehend it? I hope not.

Jean said (June 2, 2008):

Very interesting article, Dr. Makow.

The sentence...

"
"Before every important speech Hitler was, sometimes for days, closeted with Hess who in some unknown way, got Hitler into that frenetic state in which he came forth to address the public."

led me to look into the occultism / satanism of Rudolph Hess.

Maybe Hess was able to use some kind of mind control or hynotism technique oroccultic / satanic spell (?) on Hitler to get him to perform the way he did.

I remember that "Colonel" William Mandel House, Woodrow Wilson's "alter ego", was supposedly able to sort of "ooze" his ideas into people in a room when Wilson was president. House was an occultic type, I understand.

Anyway, I see a strong connection between our USA MKUltra mind control history to NAZIism's brutality and occultism and satanism.

The techniques used to control people, including setting up and triggering or activating "altars" (altar personalities) may have originated from German Thule Society folk like Hess and Hitler.

Just an observation.

Ben said (June 1, 2008):

Once again, let me say that i thoroughly enjoy all your articles, just great.

As a student of that period of German history, i much enjoyed your article speculating as to Hitler's true position, and to what extent he was manipulated.

I always did think that he was a pawn of the Reichwehr and the old Prussian elite - these prussians are of course responsible for the standardisation of education, and the Prussian state is the model upon which our modern system has been crafted. Indeed the Prussian aristocracy in charge of the Reichwehr did indeed recruit Hitler as an asset during his days as a slob in Munich, and indeed, his radicalisation with regards to the Jewish question was not entirely organic, but fermented and guided. He was indeed manouvered into position with regards to the early days of the German Workers Party , later to become the NSDAP.

The current historical debate centers mainly around the argument over whether Hitler was fully in charge, omnipotent (the fundementalist school) , or whether he was simply largely reactive to those around him, notably Goring (the structuralist school) Though it is at this point at which debate ceases, and within these parameters in which the debate is held. Interestingly this fits quite well with Chomskys notion of setting parameters and allowing vigourous debate within them, giving the desired impression of free debate.

As i previously stated, the Prussian elements of the German power system , certainly manouvered Hitler into power, indeed Von Schleicher and Von Papen (notice all the Von's?? lol) were notably influential in manouvering HItler into the position of chancellor. Von Papen was in all probability the Gay lover of Von Hindeburg ( he was known as "mein kleine Franzchen") - it seems they were involved while lonely on the battle field.

It is of course highly likely , that , considering the esteem with which the Illuminati power structures hold the old guard of Prussia, and their social institutions - that all of these members of the Prussian elite manouvering Hitler were influenced by Masonic / Illuminati objectives. Indeed Skull and Bones is i beleive German in origin, and of course the current regime in the USA has been crafted by the smae methods of using a bafoon to take the rap - while his handlers set up a perfectly legal presidential dictatorship.

I could go on, but i just wanted to point you toward what i think is the right direction with this - Von Papen, he manouvered Hitler into power, though the History books would have us beleve Hitler shifted Von Papen out of the way through his own might - it is infinitely more likely that Von Papen was an unwitting Illuminati agent (the man appears to have been rather stupid), and took orders from his older gentleman bed-freind in charge of the Army - who was in turn controlled by the German Industrialists, and ordered to make way for Hitler.

In fact it is these Industrialists, who had their own Jekyl Island event, which fortunately produced a rather interesting document- a letter petitioning Hindenburg to make HItler chnacellor, signed by over 50 of the top men form I G Farbern and the like , all friends of Prescott Bush of course!

yes henry - Von Papen is your man , he got Hitler into power , as a Jesuit agent secured the support of the Vatican, and secured HItlers position through his Marburg SPeech - which, on behalf of the Industrialists - ensured the destruction of HItler's competition - the SA -- he was of course aquitted at Nuremburg.

Interestingly - if you're looking for the connection to the Jewish Bankers Hjalmar Schacht is the man - i am sure of that 110% - Danish Aristocracy , and in charge of the German economy for 30 odd years, even during the Weimar period when the Jewish banking houses were allowing inflation, and the decadent 1920's in Berlin - yes schacht is the man who understood the money - and Von Papen was the agent of the Illuminati.

Colin said (June 1, 2008):

I thought you might like to share this video with your readers as it in some ways confirms your observations in your article The "Jewish" Conspiracy is British Imperialism, The video is in 2 parts on youtube (links follow)

The Planned Destruction of Germany Pt-1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M79HuEW3YEE

Part 1 of a 2 Part excerpt from Lyndon LaRouche's political action committee Documentary "Firewall : In defense of the Nation State" detailing the pre & post WWI British Plan to systematically Plunder & Destroy the German Nation through War & Credit Manipulation.
The Planned Destruction of Germany Pt-2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyvDtZQhSH8

S said (June 1, 2008):

Regarding your article, "Was Hitler just a Pawn?"

This is a question which people have been struggling for a long time. I think its clear that he was supported by the Rothschild syndicate in the beginning. But was he a pawn throughout, right till the end? That's not such an easy question to answer.

We can ask, was there anything that Hitler did that was fundamentally contrary to the interests of the Rothschild syndicate? I think the answer may be yes. In your article "Rothschilds Conduct Red Symphony" you write:

"Unfortunately for the bankers, Hitler also proved intractable. He started to print his own money!

"He took over for himself the privilege of manufacturing money and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones; he took over the untouched machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the state... Are you capable of imagining what would have come ...if it had infected a number of other states and brought about the creation of a period of autarchy [absolute rule, replacing that of the bankers]. If you can, then imagine its counterrevolutionary functions..." (263)

Hitler had become a bigger threat than Stalin, who had not meddled with money. Rakovsky's present mission was to convince Stalin to make a pact with Hitler and turn Hitler's aggression against the West. The purpose was for Germany and the Western nations to exhaust each other before another front was opened in the East."

This suggests that Hitler may have had a complex relationship with the syndicate.

We see this phenomenon in modern times too - for example Putin was selected on behalf of the syndicates by the oligarchs, but they have had a troubled relationship with him. Rothschild's man Khodorovsky has been rotting in a Siberian prison, where he has been subjected to attacks by fellow inmates, including having his face cut up in one attack.

--

S- You make an excellent point. It is possible that Hitler rebelled at a later stage. But that would only reconfirm the bankers' original plan: to set Germany up for destruction, and redrawn the map of Europe. -Henry

Dan said (June 1, 2008):

Have you read "My Friend Hitler", a biography of school friend of Hitler as a teenager? I found it in the library when I was in college, a 1950's hardcover, then titled "Adolph Hitler Mein Jungen Freund".
A new edition is here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Young-Hitler-I-Knew/dp/1853676942

It's a quick, simple read. It seems the honest writing of an ordinary man remembering a high school buddy he looked to as someone more worldly and quicker on the uptake than himself.
One instance I recall was Kubizek recounting an encounter with a well known neighborhood man in a park while walking with Hitler. A man in his 50's struck up a conversation with them, spoke kindly to Kubizek, and invited him to come visit him at his house sometime. After the man had gone, Hitler told August, "Don't go there. He is a homosexual". Kubizek barely knew what a homosexual was. The book is full of episodes Kubizek's boyhood fascination with Hitler's knowledge of things that in those days adolescents didn't know about.

Kubizek's admiration was evidently unique, the image of Hitler he evokes is of a youth with the kind of quirky intelligence that didn't make him instantly popular either with classmates, or adults. My impression from his description is that young Hitler was an acutely keen observer who didn't try to stand out but neither was withdrawn or shy. He said Hitler told him that anything that happened in high school was unimportant. He was planning for bigger things in the future. Kubizek wrote that Hitler told him of a plan he had to bring culture to the most remote parts of not only Austria but all of the German nations of that time. Hitler already loved Wagner's operas. No phonographs back then, they heard the music at a nearby opera house. Hitler had a plan to put opera sets on flatbed railroad cars and have troups perform Wagner in places that had no opera houses. Kubizek described other such plans Hitler had for improving German life, and recalled he asked Hitler, 'but how are you going to do such things?"

The value of Kubizek's account, which has never been disputed, is that it settles a few questions whether Hitler was a complete cypher that accepted an entirely scripted role later on. Not entirely, it would seem. His drawing always showed aspirations for ordering German culture according to the trademark Hitlerian 'vision', which consisted of his perception of a German culture as he imagined it had been during the reign of his idyll Frederich the Great, backed by a spritual ethos of Wagner's music. Though this implies a form of simple idealism verging on nostalgia for a Germany that never was, Hitler was cynical in his view of politics and human nature.

There's no evidence that Hitler was a genius, or original in any field. His strengths seem to have been persistence, 'street' cunning, and persuasion, both by charm or coercian. It's a recipe for an opportunist. And opportunists are ideal front men.

There's been much debate over a plethora of theories to explain the 'phenomenon' or 'mystery' of Hitler. Such hypotheses as whether he was a secretly sired Rothschield, bred for the role. Or whether he was just some brainwashed cypher secretly under mind control by MI6.

I'm inclined to see him as simply the opportunist who fit the profile that the Luciferian elite needed to fill the bill at the right place and right time. Had it not been him, it would have been somebody else.

Jim said (August 19, 2007):

Dear Henry, your recent articles on Hitler are groundbreaking and most excellent, as usual for your all your investigative journalism. You have truly cracked the code of the "feigned opposition" or voluntary splits enacted
by the secret ruling oligarchical "old black Guelph nobility" and their cutouts,
the superior elite freemasons. It is this planned, false flag stuff that really hides their presence while they steal us all blind and institute their global credit system based
on oil, weapons, illicit drugs, etc. Their trademark is perversity, pedophilia,black arts, and use of crypto-intelligence agencies. It's essentially the same system used to finance the roman emperors, and the same behind the
british east india company (revealed in the opium wars escapades where the brits sold opium to china to get back their silver and gold used to
buy chinese tea and silk and gunpowder). Since that time drugs have continued to be used as a weapon of war and tool to disenfranchise the
masses. The ruling elites believe it is much easier to rule a country where the
people have been dirtied up by drugs, porno, promiscuity, alcoholism. They know that if you take away the peoples self respect they will not have the character to defend their freedom and their families from oppression....

Lynda (General Comment) said (August 19, 2007):

Check out the new video clip "Angry Mob" by Kaiser Chiefs now appearing on Countdown here in Oz. More demoralisation for the gender war - the prostitution of women as a class featuring prominently. Also, be alert to the 'splatter' visual now ubiquitous in cinema, the graphic arts, tv, video. Usually red splatter but now featuring rainbow splatter. Definitely a Kryptocracy signature for universal war - in the credits of the highly occult "Smallville" series and The 300 - a film about the Spartan (a Dorian people) defense of Thermopylae and Greek victory over Persia ( i.e. Poros ) led by the Spartans. Thank God for DVD, you can pause the opening credits to see signatures, signs, watchwords etc, fast forward the brainwashing to the end credits so it can be quickly seen where the production is coming from - literally.

Bill said (August 18, 2007):

Not up to the standard one has come to expect of STMales, IMHO. This is why : it's absurd.

I've worked for approaching 18 years in state prisons. During this time I've gotten to know a fair number of (nominally) "low functioning" individuals who started businesses from scratch and ran them very capably indeed, and under very difficult circumstances. That these were "criminal enterprises" changes nothing essential. Some of these same men, by reading and practice, write legal filings that would -- in thorough research, tightly reasoned logic and polished eloquence -- embarrass many practicing attorneys.

Joseph "Stalin" was similarly (if I mistake not) probably of unexceptional formal intelligence as conventionally measured, but exceptionally capable in the real world, to say the least. (The parallel is almost too self-evident : Djugushvilli, in Georgian, is ""Jew's Son" ; Hitler was, by some accounts, a casual offspring of one of the Vienna Rothschilds. But now we've gotten sidetracked into the Judaic supremacy analogue of the Arian supremacy business).

On this basis, the implied assumption embedded in your (latest) "Hitler was a moron" sop to orthodox righteousness (which must be morally right even when it is objectively absurd) -- i.e., that testing well in mathematical / symbolic intelligence correlates with real-world competence -- is at spectacular variance -- not only with everyday experience (the highly educated generally work for the business-savy. Not vice versa) but with the man's inarguable rhetorical genius. Borderline retarded people do not hold multiple thousands of their fellows spellbound for an hour at a time. Nor do recordings of their orations exercise this same effect today -- sans special effects lighting, music and pagentry.

------

Bill,

No one said he was retarded.

Henry

Donna said (August 18, 2007):

This has always been about bloodline, and those people who believe they should rule the world
because they in fact have divine blood running through their veins. Take a look at the secret
societies and you will see this is the main theme in all of them. To have divine blood running
through their veins. This is the secret (sod) of the blood (dom), and this is the greatest sin
and must be destroyed from off the earth. The idea of monarchy is not dead, because it
is the culmination of a group of people connected by blood being ruled by one person, who
epitomizes the culture and history of that people. The Aryan bloodline is not dead, and there are those in these secret societies that know that that bloodline is the bloodline of the nephilim,those fallen angels who took on the flesh to lord it over mankind. Sodomy is a sin, and there are men in this world who still rule by Sodomy. To do this it means to control the womb, and control what comes from the womb. It is why women must free themselves from the control of men. There can be no redemption as long as one half of humanity holds the other half
down.

Bailey said (August 18, 2007):

Regarding your article "Which Hidden Power Created Hitler" on Rense.com, I just wanted to relay that I appreciated the article and have thought of these ideas many times, myself. In fact, I presented similar ideas to my law school class a few years ago and nearly got booed out of the lecture room. Seems to me that people today, especially young people under 30, think alike. No room for alternative ideas. Talk about "think outside the box"!

I had also mentioned that Hitler is still admired by German's today, albeit they admit that he eventually went crazy. They state that he advanced their country out of a great depression. The students in my class wouldn't buy what I was saying and insisted I was a Hitler lover or a communist. They wouldn't even THINK about my presentation. (Needless to say, I eventually dropped out of law school.)

I agree with your conclusion and find it interesting and most probably true. I think of George W. Bush in the same fashion. Thanks for the article. Good one!

John said (August 18, 2007):

I applaud you on your book "Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order."

It's about time that someone put fish back on bicycles! (gloria steinem reference!)

I haven't always agreed with your opinion, some call it 'paranoid', but after teaching in a prison, and very specifically talking with a former 'one of them' in length about Freemasons, Illuminati, Bildenbergers and then in great length
about my own grandfather being a member of Knights Templar (Scottish Rite) and a 33rd degree FreeMason, well a LOT of things came into focus quite clearly! I was raised by my dad and mother (mom was catholic), dad was sick and tired of religion (his father) to think for myself, once the rituals of Freemasonry were clearly explained to me in a non-biased fashion, I formed the opinion that these people are/were/will be satan worshippers.

I also talked at great length with a man formerly involved in the Klan, the Oklahoma City bombing and a lot of 'hate crimes' - and then, well, the mother of my son was a Mormon, This 'culture' of programming is all around us, I'm not paranoid - just 'woke up' and can now see ever so subtle 'hints' everywhere! - and quite frankly with the recent stock market 'faulter' - and
GW Bush's war on common sense - it really scares me! - our country scares me, doing business with a bank scares me, watching TV is something I don't do anymore.

Most of the 'new' articles about JP Morgan aren't new to me, I live in a town that he created - Anaconda, MT JP Morgan, Ben Ali Haggin, Phoebe Hearst - all founders of the Anaconda company, standard oil, hearst empire,these articles read like a history of my hometown - he caused WWI and more than likely funded Hitler,there is still an apartment building in Butte with 'Albeit Macht Frei' painted on the door to the boiler room,
it's been there a long, long time.

Rense.com and Henry Makow, good combination.
sorry for the ramblings!

John -Anaconda Mt