Jason W said (December 26, 2020):

The reason why the Moneychangers and Pharisees hate Christmas is that the story of Jesus and thus Christianity is ALL: about God being your only master. People have forgotten the purpose of Jesus was to set the "Jews" free from the Pharisees and Moneychangers, the traditions of men.

As long as you have God alone above you, you are free and no man can be above you. This is the worst thing possible for the slavers, which is what the Moneychangers and Pharisees are.

You Jews and Freemasons and everyone else who follows them are SLAVES. They will throw you under the bus whenever it's convenient.They will offer you power and make you sick and you will never escape their grasp. When your usefulness is gone, so are you. Remember the devil has no friends, only useful idiots.

Only Jesus can set you free, and this is done by making God your only master. Christianity and freedom are one and the same.

with men, freedom is impossible. With God, anything is possible.

Chris R said (December 25, 2020):

For some time I have been wondering why Christianity is singled out for attack by the establishment. Considering that Islam also recognizes Jesus as the messiah and a large proportion of Muslims are prepared for war and martyrdom, it never really made sense to me until now with all this talk about vaccine passports becoming a requirement to access basic services and even work. It sounds too similar to the mark of the beast as described in the book of Revelation to be a simple coincidence, and Christianity is the only religion that includes Revelation among its scriptures.

The fewer people who take this seriously, the more who will be willing to take experimental vaccines in exchange for easing of restrictions on out basic freedom.

Christine said (December 22, 2019):

Yes, the hatred is intense.

But they won't win, because Jesus Christ is Lord of Lords and King of Kings.

And as the Old Testament repeatedly shows, God always choses to fight with a tiny, seemingly completely overwhelmed human army because it demonstrates His divine glory.

How utterly foolish it is for mortal man to strive against his maker.

Rob said (December 22, 2019):

Have to say that your site is the best on the net! You give factual information as well as philosophical truths.

Keep it up brother!

Jean said (January 4, 2006):

If the purposee of eliminating Christmas is, as you say, "To degrade humanity, the elite has
to dynamite the four pillars of human identity: race, religion, nation and
family. Just as it promotes homosexuality and fe-manism to undermine family,
it uses Jewish holidays to destroy Christianity." This could be but how to
explain that the Jewish traditions are not targeted, in contrast with the
Christian and the Muslim traditions? Not only are the Jewish traditions left
intact but the Jewish collective identity is even reinforced by a never
ending and self-insulationnist commemoration of the Jewish "Holocaust". It
looks like everything is done to destroy the cultural, national, ethnic and
religious specificities... except in the Jewish people. So, what is going on?

Jean

Dear Jean,

Apparently the banksters do not fear Jewish holidays because presumably they celebrate historical events rather than uphold universal standards.

Henry

Carol said (January 4, 2006):

Luckily for me, I live deep within the folds of Quebec society, in Montreal which not too long ago was referred to as ‘la ville de 300 clochers’. A city of 300 church bells chiming every Sunday, at a time when the city was contained within a smaller space. No Anglo-Saxon/Jewish authority would dare jeopardize the fragile adherence which exists between Quebec and the Canadian confederation. As a result, the Christmas spirit explodes into action from the last week of November, where radio stations play progressively principally Christmas songs and where even today one talk radio station continues to play them in the evening. And the ensuing effects on pluralism is that everyone, Jews and Muslims included are showered with the religious impulse from Christianity. How could this be a problem? Everyone is ennobled with the esthetic and passion of love inherent within Christianity. And this is just another day in Montreal.

Michelle said (January 2, 2006):

Liked your latest column on Christmas. I took great pleasure in singing it out to customers, store clerks, etc this year. My Christmas cards are always totally religious, but I made sure all gift tags, etc were also. Oh, how offensive Jesus is. The Gospels show it over and over. But I adore Him; more and more I'm learning to REJOICE when I am condemned and persecuted for my love and loyalty to Him. There will come a day when all is over, and how sorry they will be then. In the meantime, the outrageous lengths of Christ-haters are often pure comedy. Love has no fear. Love cannot be taken away, destroyed, removed from our hearts. They just can't get it.

John said (January 2, 2006):

Good lord Henry how in the world could you have gotten it so wrong?

The G between the skull and crossbones as you describe stands for God. Thats a square and compass too by the way. I have many jewish friends that wear that ring proudly. Shame on you for presenting such lies for what ever your reasons are!

You blaspheme on the Rense site an organization which it is clear you know nothing at all about. Do you think that phd after your name gives you the right to spew such utter senseless lies about the masons?

I'll agree with you about the war on Christmas but this other stuff about the masons sounds like it comes from a high school dropout, or someone who tried to get into the masonic lodge and was maybe blackballed and not allowed in for some dire reason.

The founding fathers of this nation were all dreaded "masons". The boston tea party, a nice guy on horse back with the first name of Paul. Even the declaration of independence was written by masons.

Its really sad to come across such an article as your's. Hopefully all who read it will realize even though you have a phd you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

I hate to be so blunt but it just needed to be said that way.

Happy New Year
-----------

Dear John,

Have you ever been deceived or proven wrong in your life? You certainly have the confidence (or arrogance) of someone who hasn't or doesn't know it.

The role of the Masons in founding the US may not be as benign as you think. G stands for Gnossis or Generation for the top ranks of Masonry. Do you think the Church of Satan would be successful if it advertised itself as such? It's much more effective pretending to represent God, which in a weird way it does. Its God is Lucifer. Keep digging! I used to be a Socialist and Zionist myself. I gain no benefit from my current views and would gladly retract if convinced I am wrong again.

Henry

Leo said (January 2, 2006):

Enjoyed reading your article and think that you are probably right on all points that there is a conspiracy to eradicate Christmas from our culture. But there is a fundamental problem with defending the custom...it's origin has nothing whatsoever to do with the birth of Christ. Surely you must know that Christmas celebration has it's origin in pagan roots (as is Easter) and is never mentioned in the Bible, as a event that Christians should celebrate. Are we being hoodwinked into defending something which is fundamentally false from the very beginning?
---------------

Leo,

Christmas is a celebration of the birth of Christ. Nothing else matters. Henry

Harry said (January 1, 2006):

Julius Streicher had a jew in his employ on his newspaper who was a talmudist.
He would take out of context any commentaries that might exacerbate jew and non jew relations.Streicher never would shake hands with his jew employee.
Ghettoized jews like the rothchilds needed guts,intelligence and discipline as well as good fortune to reach the pinnacles of their success.
The conditions to ghettoize the jews by the nobility and church of the time should be condemned for allowing an intelligent and essentially literate people to suffer the humiliation indignities and pain because of christian dogma.
If you are a converted jew that is your business.
To read your diatribes against your ancestral heritage is another matter.
When the greek invader antiochus captured jerusalem a couple centuries before yeshua,he besmirched the temple by slaughtering pigs on its holy alter.To stick it to the jews of his time.
I relate all this to you in order for you to have a more balanced view of history.
---------

Harry,

I do not identify the Jewish people with Rothschilds' ambitions, as you seem to do. This got millions of Jews slaughtered once, and it could happen again.

henry

Tony said (December 31, 2005):

Christians don't need any lessons in tolerance unless they are being forced to tolerate evil, which is what the "war against Christmas" is really about. Patrick Henry wrote:

"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For that reason alone, people of other faiths have been afforded freedom of worship here."

It is the other religions which are not tolerant of Christianity. And a major one of those religions is atheism, which is a secular religion in a real sense. Like it's god, environmentalism, it is not in any sense a science; it is strictly a faith based belief sans any factual proof whatsoever of its tenets. When explored to its roots one finds satanism, as in all anti God beliefs. That is why gnostic masonry and atheism overlap and are often, but not always, identical.

As a separate thought, it should be mentioned that Christmas is actually Christ's mass. A mass held specifically to honor Jesus Christ, God incarnate. Today it is the rare nominal Christian who is aware of that true origin of Christmas. Even many modern nominal Catholics don't know it.

Dan said (December 31, 2005):

I don't watch a lot of television, though whenever Christ or the institution of churches are mentioned on it, it's nearly always derisive. I participated in the jokes trivializing religion ever since the 1970's, and all the way through 2001. The better educated the company, the more fashionable it is to deride anything sacred, including the concept of the sacred itself.
Christianity is clearly the target, in the US. And for four or five years many Christians are condemning and ridiculing Islam, not realizing how similar these faiths are in essence. They should return to this nation's long standing policy of tolerance, and defense of the rights of all faiths. For one faith to ridicule and persecute another is to undermine one's own position simultaneously.

Television is getting quite viscious toward anything sacred. Those who let the TV drone constantly are numbed to the ugliness of it.
Since I don't watch much, I can see underneath the clever humor, something hateful toward love, peace, and certaintly intolerant.

These are the same writers and personalites who extoll the 'tolerance' of homosexual 'marriage-which is itself just another clever insult against the sanctity of heterosexual union which after all, is the basis of family.

And I've seen people laughing at these shows even after just having returned from their churches.

There's much of what was once called "common sense" removed from people's knowlege about the sacred. I think that the reason Gay marriage can be taken 'seriously' now, is the result of a few decades of corrosion and distortion of what marriage was about to begin with. During the 60's, the first wave of attack was the old slogan that "marriage is just a piece of paper". So back then, the same proponents who now extoll Gay marriage, they were insisting on no marriage for heterosexuals or anyone else.
They attacked the institution, mocking the spiritual aspects, and reducing it to appear as only a 'property' contract through which a woman bartered her freedom away to a man.

Marriage is now considered by many to be an archaic and meaningless form, and it's uselessness is demonstrated easily enough by them by pointing to the high failure rate--which they've been working relentlessly for decades to manifest.

Odd that now they want Gay marriage, using the argument that the State and society are denying the poor homosexuals the right to 'find love' with 'someone special'. I want someone to ask them, the writers and promoters of these notions, which is it? Isn't it just "a piece of paper" for homosexuals too? Aren't they really trying to subject the happy homosexuals to the "hell" that they've been saying for so long that marriage is for heterosexuals?

Tom said (December 31, 2005):

Bravo for you. Israel Shamir, whom I much admire, has said it is up to the Jews to put the kibosh on the whole Israel-Zionist, apartheid,
racist, anti-Christian fog coming over the U.S. and emanating from Israel. So it enheartens me to see you writing from your position of
strength about the insulting sidelining of Christmas. You've said what I would not have "dared" to say: let the U.S. be a Christian
nation (the fact of a myriad of many sects can be counted on to keep a theocracy at bay). We'll be a tolerant land, whereas Israel is an
exceedingly intolerant one, and is never called to order on the point. Strengst verboten!

Garrett said (December 31, 2005):

Thank you for your service to males and humanity through your mental work and resulting articles provided via your web site. Reading your work and personal life experiences intensely has had and will likely continue to have a profound effect on my paradigms and actions as the memes your profess and articulate ring true in contrast to the popular cultural and ideological crap and evilness. Your tolerance and compassion for the small percentage of differing people such as homosexuals and manly women/womanly men without encouraging hate but rather nurturing and support if anything without loosing your judgmental position for what's generally right for most people goes a long ways towards increasing personal credibility with me. Again, thank you and I'll be returning regularly to continue my studies.