Direct Link to Latest News

 

Winston Churchill, Illuminati

July 24, 2005

churchill By Henry Makow, Ph.D.


If the 1940-41 London Blitz is any indication, the recent terror bombings are contrived.

The first air raid on London by the Nazis took place Sept. 7, 1940 and killed 306 people.

After touring the ruins, Winston Churchill remarked, "They cheered me as if I'd given them victory, instead of getting their houses bombed to bits." (416)

Churchill is telling the truth.

Unknown to Londoners, he had rejected Hitler's proposal to spare civilian targets. Quite the opposite, he goaded Hitler into bombing London by hitting Berlin and other civilian targets first.

Churchill told his Air Marshall: "Never mistreat an enemy by halves" and instructed his cabinet, "bombing of military objectives, increasingly widely interpreted, seems our best road home at present." He blocked the Red Cross from monitoring civilian casualties. (440)

Before the end of Sept. 1940, 7,000 Londoners including 700 children lay dead. By the end of the war, more than 60,000 British civilians and 650,000 German civilians died from "strategic" bombing.

In 1940, Churchill had to divert attacks from RAF airfields but he also wanted to start the bloodletting. A year had passed with little action. It was being called the "phoney war." Hitler was making generous peace offers that many Englishmen wanted to accept.

If Britain had made peace, there would not have been a Jewish holocaust.

Churchill described the Second World War as the "most unnecessary war in history." But he served bankers in the City who had made good his stock market losses and saved his beloved Chartwell from foreclosure. A manic-depressive, he thrived on the rush of war and cared little for ordinary people.

I realize this is not the saccharine history we are spoon-fed. What we term "history" is mostly propaganda, i.e. a cover-up.

My source for the above is David Irving's Churchill's War (Avon Books, 1987), which cuts through the sycophancy that characterizes most accounts of World War Two.

What light does it shed on the recent bombings in London? The Second World War was a big step in a long-term program to enslave humanity in a world dictatorship run by the Illuminati (London-based monopoly capital.)

The Illuminati start wars to increase their wealth and power and to control, reshape and brutalize society. The "War on Terror" is intended to make us forfeit civil rights and engage in yet another unnecessary war, this time against Islam.

Most politicians (Churchill, Bush, Blair etc.,) are flunkies, con men, traitors and criminals, packaged and sold by (banker-owned) mass media and universities.


WHO WAS WINSTON CHURCHILL?


The essential fact about Winston Churchill is that his mother's father was Leonard Jerome (formerly Jacobson, 1818-1891) a speculator and business partner of August Belmont (nee Shoenberg 1813-1890), who was Rothschild's main American representative.

Jennie Jerome's marriage to Randolph Churchill, the second son of the Duke of Marlborough appears to have been a marriage of convenience, typical of many unions between spendthrift English aristocrats and daughters of Jewish financiers.

Apparently the Marlborough's objections were overcome by a dowry of 50,000 pounds, about five million dollars today. Nevertheless they did not attend the wedding in April 1874 and the Duchess referred to young Winston, born seven months later, as an "upstart."

Biographers tend to describe Churchill as not quite "English" and use Jewish stereotypes. Of Churchill's "premature" birth, William Manchester says: "He never could wait his turn." ("The Last Lion," p. 108)

Beatrice Webb recorded sitting beside him at dinner: "First impression: restless, almost intolerably so...egotistical, bumptious, shallow minded and reactionary but with a certain personal magnetism...More of the American speculator than the English aristocrat. Talked exclusively about himself and his electioneering plans..." (John Pearson, "The Private Lives of Winston Churchill," 114)

Churchill's "driven" quality is attributed to the fact his parents neglected him and taught him that love has to be earned in terms of worldly recognition. (He also wanted to avenge his father whose political career/life was cut short by syphilis.) Winston became a successful author at age 24 and a cabinet minister at 33. His rise was assisted by his mother's connections with the Rothschild circle including the powerful banker Ernest Cassell.

In the 1930's Churchill's banker friends made him the leading light in their lobby, "The Focus Group," led by the Zionist chairman of British Shell, Sir Robert Waley-Cohen. Churchill became the main opponent of "appeasement" and eventually the main barrier to making peace with Hitler.

In 1936, the Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin told a delegation led by Churchill, "If there is any fighting in Europe to be done, I'd rather see the Bolshies and Nazis doing it." But this policy was not what the Illuminati had in mind. (61)

I have already described the Illuminati as a clique/cult consisting of Jewish finance and British/America/European aristocracy joined by marriage, money and belief in the occult (Freemasonry). Churchill, a Freemason, fits this description.

They own vast interlocking cartels (banking, oil, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, minerals, media etc.) and control society and government through corporate and professional groups, the media, secret societies, think tanks, foundations and intelligence agencies. Their goal is "to absorb the world's wealth" (in the words of Cecil Rhodes.)

Nations (Britain, US, Israel) movements (Zionism, Socialism, Communism) and people (Americans, Germans, Jews) are their pawns, to be sacrificed as pawns usually are, to their demented megalomaniacal scheme.

According to the "Red Symphony" document, the Illuminati created Hitler to control Stalin and start a war. But it appears that Hitler alienated the bankers by printing his own money. This was a major threat to the "Revolution" (i.e. Illuminati world control.)

"Germany's unforgivable crime before the second world war," Churchill said," was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit." (Churchill to Lord Robert Boothby, quoted in the Foreword, 2nd Ed. Sydney Rogerson, Propaganda in the Next War
2001, orig. 1938.


UNANSWERED QUESTIONS


Hitler had no desire to fight Britain. He regarded the British as racial brothers and feared a two-front war. He made many peace overtures, promising to uphold the British Empire in return for a free hand in Europe where he promised considerable national autonomy (e.g. Vichy France).

He sent his Deputy Rudolph Hess to Britain to sue for peace in May 1941. Churchill had Hess locked away. I don't understand how Hitler didn't know that Illuminati Jewish bankers exercised decisive power in Britain. This was common knowledge in Britain. It makes me wonder if he was somehow duped by the Illuminati, or even working for them.

After Hitler's invasion of Russia in June 1941, his policy toward Jews shifted from expulsion to extermination. He regarded Russian Communism as a Jewish phenomenon. Increasingly, with the bombing of civilian centres, and stiffening resistance in Russia, Germany was engaged in a genocidal death struggle. (My intention here is not to condone any Nazi or Allied atrocities or aggression, but to unveil the larger more insidious plan, which applies to a WWIII.)

This would not have been the case had Britain made peace, or allowed for conditional surrender. But abandoning Russia was never in the cards. Communism, like Fascism, was created by monopoly capital (the Illuminati.) But they may have lost control of Hitler and could not permit him to build an empire in Europe.

FDR famously said that nothing in history happens by accident. The Illuminati's purpose in World War Two was economic, political and occult: to enrich themselves while destroying the nation states of Europe (including Britain) and sacrificing millions of lives to their god Satan.

"You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism," Churchill is quoted as saying, "but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest." (Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill, His Career in War and Peace p. 145)

The Jewish holocaust was also part of the plan, to justify the creation of the Masonic "Jewish" state. Bernard Wasserstein writes, "During the first two years of the war, when the German authorities bent their efforts to securing the exodus of the Jews from the Reich and from Nazi occupied territory, it was the British Government which took the lead in barring the escape routes from Europe against Jewish refugees." ("Britain and the Jews of Europe," 1939-1945, p.345)

We are entering an era like Orwell's "1984," characterized by fear and turmoil, viruses and bombs, propaganda and surveillance. The war of terror, like all wars, is against humanity. The security measures are designed for use against us after they crash the stock market or hit us with pestilence or nuclear weapons. Rarely is wealth associated with powerlessness. Our power is based on individual freedom, a real press and genuine democracy and these have been eroded.

The value of history is to remember that nothing is as it seems. It's all being orchestrated according to a plan that is centuries old. Mankind appears to be edging toward an abyss.

See also: Michael Walsh Real History of the Blitz

----------------------

churchillHello Henry,

I thought that you and your readers might find this photo of Winston Churchill interesting. I bought a book on druids and low and behold there he was. I believe those are some Freemasons standing behind him? He looks a bit glum, must be a touch of the "black dog". Keep up the excellent work!

People are waking up...peace, and power to the resistance!

Tom

More on Churchill the Druid



Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Winston Churchill, Illuminati"

Walter said (July 31, 2005):

Great Article. You're work in this area closely parallels mine.

If we can get enough people to grasp the obvious, the Crown will have a problem.

As much as I dislike Gandhi, I do believe that he grasped the true weakness of the Crown, and its mercantilist methods.

He was educated in England, and he understood how they operate.

The mercantilists great advantage is the school system. Once programmed, very few escape as long as no action that creates too much cognitive dissonance occurs.

The mercantilists will do anything to avoid exposing their totalitarian agenda. This fact Gandhi grasped.

Passive resistance is beyond their ability to control.

Hence all the ruses and financing of apparently diametrically opposites. How Marxist of them.

Always control the premise!

Keep up the great writing


Elaine said (July 26, 2005):

You are, oh so right -- but people cannot believe that this "conspiracy" could be ongoing for centuries as you have so rightly stated.

Knowing real history as opposed to the drivel that is taught in public schools, might have helped at one time, but there are just too many brainwashed people who haven't a clue and don't care, as long as they can watch their
mindless programs, "Hysterical" Housewives,
Reality TV, and submit to the dizzying amounts of addictive porn and gambling
that is being pushed by the government along with sodomy, same sex marriage and whatever other deviant demoralizing sex acts they can perpetrate upon our nation to destroy our
children and people.

All I can say is, if I didn't know and believe in a good God who has his own plan for humanity and is in charge of the universe and all it contains, I would probably be demoralized too.


Doug said (July 25, 2005):

Hi

On CBC-AM-Ideas (below) I heard Martin Gilbert tell that:

On the eve of WW-2, one of Churchill's friend's (from childhood) visited Churchill late one night. He was distressed and told Chuchill not to become involved, as the war was a Jewish Contrivance .

Gilbert said that Churchill's response was to the effect of ... 'raising that issue now is not helpful'. No denial and no disbelief.



http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/calendar/2004/09_september.html
Monday, September 27
CONTINUE TO PESTER
Sir Martin Gilbert looks at Winston Churchill’s leadership during the Second World War in the 2004 Barbara Frum Lecture.


Tony said (July 24, 2005):

Henry,

Interesting facts about Churchill's lineage I had neglected to trace years ago - partly because I grew up in WW2 and was very early sick of
even thinking about it. Didn't take much to make me see that the propaganda I was fed as a child (and continued on into adulthood without
end) was just that.

However, I am aware that Hitler's actual statement to the Brits was that he would defend with German troops the British empire and the Roman Catholic Church as he understood that these two entities were necessary to retain world order. When I was first made aware of this offer it shocked me so that I will never forget it, as I was still believing the
propaganda to a large degree. But I did, by then, understand that Hitler never had the remotest "world conquest" dreams. He wanted to get back Germany's ceded lands so the nation could once again be self-supporting. Stalin, however, was a different ball game. Gee,
interesting, whose side the "west" went on.

Of course, Hitler had no idea just how much the real powers wanted the world destabilized, not kept in order. And they certainly have managed
to destabilize it, destroying right order as well as any other order so they can, by destruction, restructure (not rebuild) the world to suit
themselves.
----
Thanks Tony,

I have a problem with Hitler's ideas about Lebenstraum and aryan racial supremacy especially the subjugation, slave labor and extermination of Jews and Slavs.--Henry
--------------

Don't get me wrong, I was never a Hitler lover. But I do admire him for seeing through and then correcting the issuance of Germany's money - for which you rightly state that this had much to do with his falling out with the big boys. How I dream of the American congress taking back its number one priority of issuing America's money, sans the criminal usury. --Tony


Glenn said (July 24, 2005):

agree with you about Churchill. Why was it necessary to lock up Rudolph Hess? Was he the architect of the "Holocaust"? Hardly, he was taking Hitler's peace proposal to the Brit's, and, as you say, the power elite did not want peace. I anger some people when I say that Hitler can be forgiven his sins, as I do not believe he ever committed Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. I wonder if Churchill and others who foisted war on the innocent civilian population will be forgiven though. It is they who were ultimately responsible for the millions of dead in the ETO. And with the massive
British intelligence network that was operating inside Germany, plus the capture of the enigma code machine, how did the holocaust escape the allies notice? Good on 'ya for bringing this to light.


Jerrell said (July 24, 2005):

Henry I wish more people could understand that Hitler went to Russia not so much to secure "living room" for the German people but to save the Germans who were living in Russia from the communists murdering of them and the robbery of their property and culture. Catherine-the great had invited thousands of Germans to settle and farm the wild lands of the stepps over a hundred years before communistism. They grew wheat, just as they do here in the midwest,and became successful. Read Mein Knampf to find the truth behind his motives: return of stolen lands, especially Prussia, and rescue of the Volga and Black Sea Germans. Keep up the good work. We are becoming informed. Jerrel


Andrew said (July 24, 2005):

While the U.S. Military is being intentionally demoralized and destroyed in a needless war in Iraq and the rest of the world is learning to HATE AMERICAN ARROGANCE -- Americans are actually being sold the virtues of WORLD WAR III.

Do you think I'm kidding? Google "World War III" and the click NEWS. I got 277 hits this morning which signal a media blitz. e.g. "Poll: Americans Say World War III Likely" And many more such stories http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&lr=&tab=wn&ie=UTF-8&q=%22world+war+III%22&btnG=Search+News

Anyone who does not realize that we are sold on the virtues of World War III has his head in the sand.

The media is selling World War III today just as they sold the virtues of the War In Iraq in 2002 in the lead up to the invasion.

But many Americans are brainwashed to the point that they cannot see or believe this, because it involves a massive corporate media conspiracy.

THIS IS HOW AMERICA IS BEING DESTROYED...intentionally.


Luther said (July 24, 2005):

The article about Winston Churchill and his service to the Illuminati destroys the sanitized, patriotic, almost regal treatment of W.C. as a Prime Minister who took nothing off the Nazis. He is truly responsible for more British deaths than Hitler himself! It is fascinating that he willingly served the banking and financial masters more than the people of the nation hands down.

Another good source about who Churchill really was is in THE BIGGEST SECRET and or THE TRUTH WILL MAKE YOU FREE from British author David Icke. Icke has outlined the passage of masonry from the old world to freemoasonry in the new. RULE BY SECRECY from Jim Marrs gives some information about the intent purposes of the illuminati in creating wars through the ages. For example, every war finds the banking industry (the Rothchilds have kept this a reality) financing both sides and coming out the real winner.

Once again we need to ask ourselves who profits from the London bombs. Yesterday a man was killed by police that had nothing to do with either of the bombing incidents, instead on his way to catch a train. The BBC report said he was followed by plain clothes officers from outside the station! Somewhere he was thrown down on the walkway or floor and apparently shot five times! This leads me to believe this man's murder was meant to send a message to the public.

Blair is most likely the new Churchill since he and Bush feel most secure in office when the people in their respective countries are terrified, and lashing out at a supposed enemy (Islam). The trouble is the way people are being killed in Iraq and prisoners mistreated in Guantanmo


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at