Hamid said (November 30, 2008):

Thanks a lot Henry this is a master work, mostly because it explain many issues in a easy and understandable way, even the links are very informative.

Along Side with This Huge Mind Control Campaign of adopting The Homosexuality that you perfectly explain in this article, there is a systemically interfering with our body functional, specifically on our hormone system, more specific on the men testosterone production both on men and women, creating the men become feminine behaviour and looks, and the women become more feminine or more horny!

Here in Denmark one of the word’s best specialists in reproduction is the professor Niels Erik Skakkebæk from Rigshospital (Copenhagen’s university Hospital). Is trying unsuccessfully to convince politicians to act and quickly regulate and impose new laws to force corporations not to use the destructive chemicals in their products which have been identified in details by so many famous experts around the world that are just undeniable. Prof. Niles compares the problem with that of Global warming. “I want to have a “National advise committee” that could clarify, where we lacks the knowledge to stop this development. However I lately got a refusal from Health ministry, « says he.

The lead scientist of the Growth and Reproduction Klink of Righshospital Anna Maria Anderson in a research gave a mixed of hormones destructive stuffs to pregnant rats, thereafter so many rats were born with breast organs, while %60 of them had defective penice. The stuff has with a great possibility the same effect on mankind, the results can be a very likely explanation of those tendencies, we have seen on dropping men seed quality, damage in boys sex organ, and testicle cancer «explains she.

These hormone destructive stuff each one alone are not too effective that is why they are approved by the authority. But these stuff are every where, all over our food, cosmetic, cloth, plastics and so much more, so we are bombarded by them.

Senior scientist of Denmark Teknisk University Ulla Hass under an EU project is conducting a research to see which 10 hormone destructive stuff we are getting each day. And how dangerous they are when we take them all together called “Cocktail effect”.

Mary said (November 30, 2008):

Henry: I agree with your article totally. I've seen this in the school system and have experienced it first hand while in college. In one class that I had a few years ago on Diversity, while completing my Master's Degree in Family Life Education (Future Educators for--Families), the group being discussed was Alternate Family Styles (Homosexuality). When I asked, "What is it called when you are Not Homophobic, which is an unrealistic fear of Homosexuality, but that because you do not see Homosexuality in the Natural World--Nature, the Animal kingdom, etc., and for That reason (because even plants are male and female) you question whether Homosexuality is simply a 'Sexual Orientation,' and therefore is natural and not abnormal?" The professor's response: "That's Xynophobia." I didn't know what 'Xynophobia' was and had to go home and look it up: Racist, a fear of Everything. As Family Life Educators, many of us will be teaching the teachers (whether in schools or the community).

Anon said (November 29, 2008):

In response to your article, "Now, Heterosexuals are in the Closet", I'd like to bring to your attention an event that happened at SUNY New
Paltz in circa 2000 that seems eerily similar to some of the stories
you recount:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C06EFD71730F93AA1575BC0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1

"Meanwhile, two lesbian instructors who showed lesbian porn to high school girls at summer school and told them to use zucchini to satisfy
their sexual needs are still teaching." At SUNY New Paltz, members of the Women's Studies department held a 'seminar' called 'Revolting
Behavior' which included workshops on "Sex Toys for Women" and "Safe, Sane & Consensual S/M: An Alternative Way of Loving.". Although our
society has learned to tolerate this sort of thing in their backyard, supporting it with tax payer money proved to be pushing the limit.

http://www.city-journal.org/html/8_2_sndgs04.html

One could even speculate that these kinds of productions are part of a bigger plan to break down the judgment mechanisms of young students.
Why are such fringe, for lack of a better term: 'deviant' forms of behavior getting not only attention, but financial support?

Carpetbagger said (November 29, 2008):

The University of Manitoba's women's studies program is way over the top, and before enrolling I was unaware that there was even such a
program there. Listening to part of a lecture it was immediately apparent that even a non english speaker would consider the prof a biased shrieking harpy.

People should have the right to form groups and discuss whatever they want of course, I'm just tired of paying for it. The womyn's centre on
campus is a fine example. Why is everybody forced to pay for a 'sex toys party' - there was one advertised a couple of weeks ago - and
free condoms and tampons? And how is the field of women's studies actually considered a legitimate field of study? And how is it not considered discriminatory?

The closest I can figure is that if enough people believe something, it is effectively and unfortunately true. And maybe it's on this point
where the recurring theme of occult crossover occurs. But what's the answer? Does a Taliban West franchise open it's doors and smash TV's,
radios and computers?

I'm in a position where it's impossible to openly fight. Unfortunately a side effect of your publications is that you are considered a fringe
lunatic by most people which in my humble opinion compromises your effectiveness to directly fight these programs. And I don't see any angry mob revolution happening due to your, or anybody's, writings either.

In fact, nobody is effectively fighting and the inmates are running the asylum. I say let it burn, and maybe roast some marshmellows while
it does. Please don't take offense either as your writings are not worthless. You are mostly preaching to the choir though, and by openly
associating conspiracies considered fringy with opposition to feminism, I think you are losing more hearts and minds than are gained.

And I can't decide if what you are doing is bravely noble, or an operation designed to further marginalize resistance.

---

Dear CB,

They always marginalize and smear opponents. It's part of the mind control they exercise on their dupes. If the goyim would only read the Protocols they would see that universities are used deliberately to inculcate their young with mistake beliefs.

No one likes to be told they have been deceived. But how much worse to be shown, and refuse to see.

henry

Pat said (November 29, 2008):

can certainly relate to your story of lesbians showing porno movies to high school girls. My story takes place in a university but was corrupt just the same.

I will try to make this short but I am glad to tell someone of my bitter disappointment upon deciding to return to school at the age of fifty-five.

Went to the state university of New York and our professor had the class write out situation where people would be discrimminated against. Our professor was I am sure a lesbian and I was told be a few students that in order to get a good grade they felt that creating a situation in which lesbians were being discrimminated against was their best bet in getting that good grade.

Anwyway what I want to say is that as some of them got in front of the class and read their stories, I was appalled! One of the stories used profane language and mentioned two girls having sex in the bathroom and other situations as well which I have forgotten, it was six or so years ago. In any case I dropped out of school because of personality problems I had in getting along with the teacher. I still to this day feel sad that I was not able to get my ph.d in ancient greek history. That was my dream.

I could go on and on in telling you the problems I encountered with that teacher and in fact the whole department. She would grade my papers with large red marks all over it and when I would ask her to explain she could not explain why they were there. I even had a conference with the chairlady of the department with no results. So I decided to drop out, I was so stressed.
Thanks for listening,

Patricia Oh yes I am being harrassed by the loan department for a loan I originally had for 3,000 but with collection fees it is now 5,500. Sad since I never was able to use the money for school.

Peter said (November 29, 2008):

f you Google 'Christian Family', you'll get 21,200,000 hits. If you Google 'Gay Family' you'll get 3,450,000 hits. Sometimes we read too much into Google results. I heartily agree with your main points and you can (and do) support them very well without treating Google like the Oracle at Delphi - or God. ;) Better to stick with the 'Divine Order' or even 'Natural Order' explanation.

--

Peter,

Considering that Christian families probably outnumber gay families by 1000 to one, the google results (15 to one) are significant. They show what's getting disproportionate attention in mass consciousness.

Henry

Dan said (November 29, 2008):

Last night I was looking through YouTube pages listings for 'demon possession'. Everyone's notice how on YouTube you'll click a link which throws you into a different though related category. I think it's called 'breadcrumbs', a tricky way to lead traffic into a topic they didn't start out looking for. Here's how it went.
'Demon possession' led to 'Witchcraft', led to 'Wicca' - in the Wicca layer were tons of videos glamorizing 'the power of goddess' and 'you are goddess', etc,
and then it led into a section devoted to homemade videos by teenage girls telling why they've 'chosen' to become lesbians. Listening to a few of those in a row I'll just say the main reason given was pretty shallow. Basically saying boys aren't as good in bed as girls.

Now wait a second, before anyone jumps to debate 'pro or con' on that matter, keep in mind I'm talking about girls who looked not older than sixteen, who've already decided that they're lesbians because they're having better sex with girls than boys their age.

Most people have forgotten that it used to be considered normal that no one had sex with anyone before their wedding night, for the most common people marriage didn't occur before a courtship process which involved the suitors meeting the girls Father and Mother to make his 'intentions' known to be honorable. Girls usually didn't accept marriage proposals unless the Father and family approved. Some 'eloped', but most girls cared about their family first and trusted their judgment, even if they were at first disappointed. Most often later the girl would realized her Father and family were right. And ALL the family members were involved in this process - the grandmother, mother, father, to less extent the grandfather. Sex was the LAST consideration of founding a good marriage - it wasn't even to be considered until the marriage actually began.

Teen lesbians may be throwing temper tantrums in HORROR hearing this, but I say they wouldn't be here at all if their great grandmothers or grandmothers or mothers had been teenage lesbians. They might think about that if their own mother protests them going gay because the mother says she wants grandchildren someday.

As for what these girls think about teen boys being bad at sex basket cases -- they're right about that. The solution isn't for the boys and girls to go gay based on the teen fallacy that they should each stick to their own familiar 'equipment'. Boys need a few years to mature into men, and girls have always been in the best position to make sure they do by telling them 'NO' to begin with.

Tony said (November 29, 2008):

Henry,

Two most important points.

1. The family is the basis of civilization. Period. Civilization declines into nonexistence, i.e. chaos, crime, mayhem, lawlessness, etc., without strong families. Strong families force government to govern fairly and justly. Weakened families breed corrupted government wherein the worst criminals are those who govern who then protect their rapine by enacting their criminality into law.

2. Tolerance of unnatural acts is itself an unnatural act, i.e. tolerance of evil is evil. Acts in opposition to nature are evil. Flaunting unnatural acts is flaunting evil. Promoting them is evil. Tolerating such acts, let alone condoning them, is evil. Neutrality of such acts is out of the question as it is also an evil to be neutral of evil. That is just another toleration of it.

Omar said (November 29, 2008):

Throughout my life I have noticed something about homosexual men: they worship masculine power, though themselves feel unworthy or incapable of possessing it.

Similarly, as you always write, women like powerful men. I have an example that illustrates the point succinctly. Years ago I was a TA for a course in computer literacy. It was a course which many non-engineering and non-computer science students, particularly women, took to fill some basic requirements. So there was a good mix of people from different departments. In particular, departments where you will find the more attractive women on campus: art-history, psychology, etc.

So as I’m taking the elevator to the lab where the class session is, 2 geeky undergraduate boys are talking: “Did you see [name omitted] she is soooooooo hot” (a gal in the class)

“Dude, she asked me to help her with her homework “

I laughed to myself, this idiot is clueless. By immediately submitting to her wish, this boy exhibits his weakness. I have a problem in general with women trying to use their sexual appeal to garner favors of this sort, but this was just pure pathetic.

So I give the lecture, and I am at the front of class individually helping out students with questions. This girl then calls out from her desk, as if she can bypass the line of students waiting, as I’m helping others. Omar,… Omar… Omar…. She is so used to weak men just catering to her every wish she is incredibly boorish.

She keeps trying to interrupt as I’m helping another student, and finally I lay down my notebook, look at her, and sternly say and somewhat loud [name omitted], EXCUSE ME. People are trying to work. QUIET DOWN. NOW!

Her face turns red, and she quietly looks down and continues, as do I.

The student I was helping was the same pathetic boy in the elevator. I look at him and whisper,

“I’ll bet you 100 bucks she’ll ask me out by the end of the week”

I got an email that same day asking if I’d like to go out for coffee.

I refused ;) of course.