SB says: "The NWO looked the other way as Bush and the oil cabal violated international law and compromised domestic constitutional precepts to launch an invasion of Iraq, and unknown to the global public, on the anticipated use of WMD (or discovery thereof in Iraq), planned to expand the campaign into Syria and Iran to secure control of Middle Eastern oil (...)".

This doesn`t seem real since we know the "NWO" faction -mainly through the american "neo-con" zionists and the so-called "jewish" lobby- have not only "looked the other way as..." but indeed did everything possible to convince Bush to attack Irak. For the same reason the right wing zionists in Israel would now like the USA to attack Iran too. Or aren`t these zionists -the American "neo-cons" and the Israelian right wing zionists- part of the faction called here "NWO"? If they aren`t, what else could the "NWO" be?

SB is trying to convince us that if Kerry is the next president his puppet masters -the "NWO" faction- will stop the attacks against the Arab countries and use a more peaceful way to fulfill the "world government" plan.

SenderBerl even says : "The big loser here will be Israel who had an understandable interest in the regime change aspect of the NWO agenda for Iraq, Syria and Iran. Now, Kerry will have to bend over big time to appease these same countries and it will be at the expense of Israel. "

But, if the "NWO" faction is dominated by those pharisean international bankers who have created Israel and are now using it for their purposes, how could the "NWO" be in disaccord with the "wishes" of the present Israel government to pursue the war against the Arab world and against Iran?

Anyway, it cannot be denied that Kerry is the candidate of the right wing zionists and that he doesn`t make a secret about his will to do the very best for these people.

SB tells: "The loss for Israel will also be consistent with its failings in that SenderBerl consistently assessed that Israel's role was to protect the Arab/Islamic nations against the NWO onslaught to effectuate culture change in the Arab/Islamic nations (...)". This is a very peculiar assertion. As if saying the role of the cat is to protect mouses against being devoured by some mysterious predator... Once again, how to imagine that the right wing sionists are not part (and even heart) of the so-called "NWO" faction?

SB says: "(...) the NWO agenda was self defeating in that ultimately China and the Asian nations would prevail in the NWO design for global capitalism/control, something now assured if China's influence now becomes greater than the NWO's regarding oil. " Indeed, this agenda does involve the end of the sovereign nations and thus the fusion of China and the Asian nations into a planetary transnational system. Inside this logic, the "NWO agenda" isn`t self defeating.

SB says: "China may carry dominant influence over global oil and the NWO will move to develop alternative energy sources, or else what they aimed to do to the Middle East and China will boomerang back against their own interests." How could China gain a "dominant influence over global oil" under the present geo-political circumstances? And, anyway, how could the development of alternative energy -what is mainly a question of scientific research abilities- insure the domination of any entity over a China who has an immense and well known scientific potential?

Could it be that SenderBerg`s analysis is oriented to Kerry`s election against Bush? Anyway, it is suggesting something like "Kerry is a globalizator just like Bush BUT the difference is he is going to use peaceful means to fulfill the New World Order agenda." I may be wrong but this doesn`t sound real to me. Unless of course if the "NWO" faction has nothing to see with the pharisean billionaires whose conspiracy against the rest of the humanity has already produced so many wars and misery since so many years. But then what the hell could the "NWO" faction be?...