Hello Henry,

May I share some thoughts with you? If you find it useful, you may use this article or any part of it as you wish.

Thank you for the time and effort you have given in setting up and maintaining your website. Please keep going. I find your articles interesting and informative although I haven't yet read them all..

With respect, it seems to me that there are three main challenges that we face if we are to wrest control of the planet from the beast called globalism and put it into the hands of the people:

understanding the beast
identifying what keeps the beast alive
effecting change

Understanding the beast

Over the years I have learned that in order to fix a problem you first have to understand it intimately. I guess this is why police often hob-nob with crime bosses. The misinformation that is regularly presented to the people is responsible for nothing short of a crisis in understanding.

Some people say that the beast is America, some say George Bush, some say the Jews.

Here in Australia most people regard our PM as the top of the pecking order and any socio-political convergence with international entities is regarded as being because "we like to copy America" or because of some limp-wristed acquiescence.

Any initiatives that are taken that are clearly detrimental to the people are brushed of as stupidity "what do politicians know about the real world anyway?"

I have no doubt at all that this fog of confusion is carefully cultivated.

Sir, it is our challenge to lift the fog and expose the beast.

Only when we have a good grasp on the structure of the problem (the international pecking order and its purpose and functional components) will we have any hope of changing things.

understanding what keeps the beast alive

The most threatening person, the fiercest animal and the greatest force; all can be brought to their knees when denied sustenance. It reminds me of an American-Indian proverb published on David Icke's website a while ago and went something like this:

conversation between grandpa and grandson

gp: inside you are two wolves - one bad one and one good one engaged in a fight to the death

gs: which one will win grandpa?

gp: the one you feed!

It seems most don't even consider this or perhaps consider that power is derived from the voting booth. Again we are very wide of the mark.

After clearly identifying and knowing the beast, only when we understand what keeps the beast alive will we be in a position to deny it it's sustenance. We need to understand how its power is derived. A good start might be to read your articles on the financial system/money/debt creation.

effecting change

My limited knowledge tells me that Pres. Lincoln and Pres. JFK had similar desires to reform the financial system - in my opinion going straight to the throat of the beast and attempting to cut off its sustenance - and without food the beast would surely have perished..... very quickly! Owing to the substantial threat that they represented, sadly, both of these great men met a violent end. They were unable to effect much change in this regard despite the soundness of their ideas.

On local turf, PM Gough Whitlam and politician Pauline Hanson became a serious threat to the globalists. Despite the soundness of their ideas and their intensely patriotic motivation, they also met their fate, but in a less violent manner.

It seems the greatest and most visionary minds are unable to effect fundamental change if it deviates from the globalist doctrine. Why?

Assuming that the higher echelons of the international order are as I suspect a cesspit of deceit, corruption and Talmudic contempt for their fellow human beings it follows that change favourable to the people cannot be made top down. Favourable change can only be effected bottom up and that means information and education on a global scale. An enormous task, but it seems the only choice we have of effecting radical and permanent change.

With a good grasp on the nature of the beast plus what keeps the beast alive I am sure that the people themselves will be deadly-effective in carrying out change in their own way.

Kind regards,

Mal.