Drew said (April 19, 2010):

According to the ADL and SPLC, you could just as easily substitute "anti-semite" for "fascist" and your ironic essay would still hold true. The connection between the two goes back to ancient Rome.

The fasci was the symbol used in ancient Rome to represent "The Law", a bundle of sticks bound together. A single stick could easily be broken, whereas a bundle of them, representing the people together, proved much stronger.

The Jews of ancient Rome resented the Roman Law because they wished to live only under their own laws--and they rebelled against the symbol of the fasci. Because of their economic power and influence, they were able to convince Julius Caesar to make them exempt from common Roman Law and only answerable to their own Halachic Law. Thus, the Jews were the original "anti-fascists".

In modern Europe, the fascist movement really didn't start until right after WWI and the coincident Jewish Bolshevik revolution in Russia. The Christian Catholics in both Spain and Italy were the original "fascists" because they fought against the "lawlessness" of Bolshevism. Ever since then, messianic Jewish supremacists have labeled anyone who opposes their agenda, their "law", as being "fascist", and thereby also an "anti-Semite".

Stephan said (April 19, 2010):

From my research, "fascism" was a word originally coined for use in communist propaganda. Avidly studying its usage from 1930 to date, it appears to be the favorite toy of that group of S.W.A.T. team propagandists known as "confusionists." They bandied that term about to distract North Americans from the real issues. As with Obama's New Deal, anyone who opposed Franklin D. Roosevelt's first New Deal was a "fascist."

With the New Deal then as now, oppose the parity of the Canadian and US dollar and you were a fascist. Quote George Washington's strong convictions of "No Foreign Entanglements" before World War II and you were a fascist. Publicize that shadow-government head Bernard Baruch's orchestrated profiteering in the "blood business" of the military/industrial complex should, rather, be denied all profits in war time and that the people who fought the wars should be given the profits, make this view known and you were a fascist. Proclaim "The poor people fight the wars and the poor people pay for the wars," and you were a fascist. The FBI Joint Terrorist Task Force distributes a pamphlet "defining" in essence that anyone extensively quoting the Constitution is a fascist and should be dealt with. The FBI pamphlet is available here: http://www.radioliberty.com/fbipam.htm

Fascism is also used by liberal propagandists to distract from their infiltrative missions. A dedicated Marxist internationalist liberal who has infiltrated, say, key Catholic positions, will shape article content to declare something "fascist" to draw attention away from socialism leading to communism in the New World Order. For example, "Today's fascist and draconian measures of the amoral globalists are..." or "As we become aware of the growing fascism of the New World Order, let us examine the history of fascism..." Fascism is a word to endlessly delight confusionists. This is known as "Thwarting the common man" and is addressed in one of my favorite rare books, Man the Puppet: The Art of Controlling MInds by Abram Lipsky. Perhaps there is no greater example of this than the book The Fascist: His State and His Mind by E.B. Ashton.

Words such as "Fascism" and "antisemitism" for decades afford professional propagandists the moral high ground. Political class (liberals and neo-conservatives who have cherished their plane trips to Javier Solana) confusionists maintain an aggressive offense while keeping true conservatives on the defensive and momentarily confusing while weakening them. Mikhail Gorbachev, with extreme and radical application of Lenin's doctrine of revolutionary flexibility, strove intensely to take the moral high ground. We live in an era where perhaps knowing your Constitution and Bill of Rights is not enough for effective confrontation. Add to this a pocket manual, soon to be worn out, on combating false guilt. You will need it....

Mark said (April 19, 2010):

have been following your website for the last couple of months and I'd like to say thank you for your common sense and not allowing others to bully your freedom of speech. However onto your article and more importantly point 3. I wholeheartedly agree with every word you have written here.

I live in the UK, or should I say Orwell's state where our government has used 1984 as its "how to run a country" instruction manual. It is sadly those like David (April 18, 2010) who create a sitation in the USA with their liberal views that cause the greatest of problems.

"You know full well there is no way for the U.S. to ever attain a homogeneous population."

This is incorrect as within possibly 150 years, you will see that a homogeneous population will be that of blacks/hispanics, or a conglomeration of both. Does David not realise that the population of whites in the world, due to low birthrate is around 8%? What does this tell us of our future?

"And you also know that blacks have a claim to this country."

Do they? All I ever see from blacks is their continuing attacks on the white people and how much they love and miss mother Africa, ironically had it not been for the slave trade, those slave's descendants, now living in the west would simply not be here. In fact the slave trade opened up Africans to the rest of the world and had the European slave trade never existed, Africans would still be living as they were before the European slavers moved in. There is no one keeping blacks from leaving and going to live in Africa, but instead they choose to live here? Why is the question that must be asked? They live here because the western civilisation is the greatest civilisation known to man. A society of law and order. A society of compassion and one where anyone, no matter from what background can rise to the top of their chosen career should they will it. The laughable situation that there is continued racism to whites to blacks, keeping them down is nothing but lies, well, especially here in the UK where blacks are put on a pedestal while the rest of the white population are treated as 2nd class citizens. I could write lists upon lists of preference towards blacks but Shai mentions the overall situation in his reply on April 19, 2010.

We are all racists in fact. The true definition of the word racist, that being one who chooses to live in their own cultural beliefs, chooses to associate with their own people and chooses to pass those beliefs onto their children. However, this does not mean that white people "hate" those of other races and cultures, far from it. Were that so there would be no non whites in the West period. This is of course always overlooked. Were we haters of non whites after the abolition of the slave trade (by a white man incidentally, not a black) then all blacks would have been shipped back to Africa and all ports closed. Look around next time at all those liberals and left wingers who attack their own people for racism and see their racial demographic of close associates. Count the number of whites to non white friends. Who are the racists now in their definition of the word?

I speak as I do, not just because I believe 100% in liberty and freedom of speech but because I, before many whites who attack their own for racism who choose to live with their own people, because I have spent 16 years of my life, dating black women and immersing myself in black culture in London, UK. I have spent many a time in the company of blacks, eaten the curried goat and salt fish and aki. I have spent many an evening discussing much on society. I realise more importantly above all that those blacks in the west who choose to embrace and bring their children up under white, european culture and traditions succeed in life and live happy fruitful lives. It is sad to see that those who choose to continue by their African, tribal culture in the west continue to remain in their own, created black ghettos.

I am proud to be white. I am proud to be the man who I am, to look back at our wonderful history of those greats who came before us and have given this world much. Our only error, which has led to the destruction of our civilisation, was to open the doors and explore the world. Had we closed them, not allowed other cultures in and peoples to ruin it, we would not be in the situation we are today.
Many Americans may not have heard of Enoch Powell, but he was a great man, assassinated politically by the Conserative party, who were making plans to destroy our country, under Heath, to take us into the EU. He warned us that immigration would destroy our land and that we must be mad letting in the 30,000 people at the time (1970). Little did he know that within 30 years, our country would be letting in nearly 20 times that number, from lands alien to our culture, seeking to impose their own failed culture and values upon us. The current immigration rate into the UK a year is around 600,000 people. That would be like the USA letting in 3 million each year.

Shai said (April 19, 2010):

Michael Richards, better known as Kramer from TVs Seinfeld does make a good point. This was his defense speech in court after making racial comments in his comedy act. He makes some very interesting points...

“There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc. And then there are just Americans.

You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. You call me 'White boy,' 'Cracker,' 'Honkey,' 'Whitey,' 'Caveman'... and that's OK..

But when I call you, Ni**er, Coon, Towel head, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink …. you call me a racist.

You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you... so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?

You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day.
You have Black History Month. You have Cesar Chavez Day. You have Yom Hashoah. You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi.
You have the NAACP. You have BET....


If we had WET (White Entertainment Television), we'd be racists. If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.
If we had White History Month, we'd be racists.
If we had any organization for only whites to 'advance' OUR lives, we'd be racists.

We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce. Wonder who pays for that??

A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.

If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships.. You know we'd be racists.
There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US .. Yet if there were 'White Colleges', that would be a racist college.

In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.

You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you're not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.

You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.

I am proud.... But you call me a racist.

Why is it that only whites can be racists??

There is nothing improper about this e-mail.. Let's see which of you are proud enough to send it on. I sadly don't think many will. That's why we have LOST most of OUR RIGHTS in this country. We won't stand up for ourselves!

BE PROUD TO BE WHITE!

David said (April 19, 2010):

I've been in the process of moving and rather out of the loop. In any case, I qualify on all counts to be an alleged fascist and I agree with all your criteria as per the denigrated world view that the real fascists are spewing on a daily basis. Obama is a poser of the highest order and I am sick of the level of subversion of western society, we have a so-called PM who has reversed his former stand on deficit spending (only of course for certain perverse causes like killing Canadians and wrecking our economy supporting illegal wars, nothing that would ever help a citizen on home soil) and now it's all good - I thought that clown was supposed to be an economist? He is bought and paid for just as his slick counterpart to the south. People like Moe Strong and the like are the ones calling the shots here, him and his ilk need to be locked away, and my view is that they will - eventually.

Troy said (April 18, 2010):

I live in Kitchener, Ontario and I really appreciate the information your site has provided.
It certainly helps to piece things together.
In your interview with Mary Ann (Illuminati defector) she mentions that "they" have the world divided up into 10 regions.

http://www.savethemales.ca/illuminati_defector_mary_anne.html

If so, then this aligns with Biblical scripture quite well

Daniel 2:41-45 KJV [i.e. The "ten toes" destroyed by Christs return]
41 And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters' clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.
42 And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
43 And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
45 Forasmuch as thou sawest that the stone was cut out of the mountain without hands, and that it brake in pieces the iron, the brass, the clay, the silver, and the gold; the great God hath made known to the king what shall come to pass hereafter: and the dream is certain, and the interpretation thereof sure.

Revelation 17:12-14 KJV [i.e. The "ten horns" destroyed by Christ's return]
12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
13 These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
14 These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.

John said (April 18, 2010):

It makes them Liberal Fascists, a great new book by Jonah Goldberg

David said (April 18, 2010):

#3. You believe your country should retain its racial character and not be inundated by immigrants so that it becomes unrecognizable. You
believe that if Israel can enact laws to protect its racial character,so can North America, Europe and Australia.

This is the only questionable assertion on your list. Certainly NO country can handle the amount of immigrants, legal and illegal, that have been allowed into the U.S. in particular. It's less a question of racial identity than stability and common sense. But, this opens you up to all sorts of criticism. You know full well there is no way for the U.S. to ever attain a homogeneous population. And you also know that blacks have a claim to this country. I would soften that
point a little bit. I know what you're saying, but it will probably come off wrong to people less familiar with your writing."

Thanks David,

The current racial character includes Blacks and Hispanics, many of whom oppose excessive immigration, both legal and illegal.

henry