I think your "Sandy hook" article has few HUGE mistakes
First: One seen running from building, chased by police. Seen on this aerial video starting at 7.30 min -- More Confirmation from news report."
I think this is actually wrong. I think all people seen running on the aerial-footage into the woods are cops! Here's a better video of the same footage:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UgEl0G7dx4
You can see "yellow" police patches one the sleeves of the people running, and one cop appears to be running out of the building without a jacket on. They are all cops aren't they?
..no "shooters" running out of the building on the footage, if you ask me.
"Perpetrator number two ..perpetrator number three" ..says the video "analyzer"
But the boy being interviewed does not talk about "another shooter", he only mentions seeing a guy in hand cuffs ..two very different things.
The boy also tells that they were running, and that a car was blocking some of the view, and so they didn't get a good look at him.
..so it is abit questionable by the "analyzer" to claim this guy in hand cuffs was another shooter
And one of the persons handcuffed by the cops was actually a father of a student, maybe it was the same guy the boy saw:
This father of a student was also at first reported to be the actual shooter, so maybe this is why the confusion about "other shooters" besides Adam Lanza
Gunman kills 20 kids, 6 adults at Connecticut elementary school
A man shoots and kills 20 children and 6 adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.
December 14, 2012
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/dec/14/nation/la-na-1215-newtown-school-shooting-20121215
Chris Manfredonia, whose 6-year-old daughter attends the school, was heading there Friday morning to help make gingerbread houses with first-graders when he heard popping sounds and smelled sulfur.
He ran around the school trying to reach his daughter and was briefly handcuffed by police. He later found his child, who had been locked in a small room with a teacher.
"The whole reason we moved here a year ago is because when you drive down the subdivision, it's a happy place," said his wife, Georgeann Manfredonia. "There's a ton of children here and the families are very kind and supportive."
The guy arrested in the woods: What if he just happened to be on a walk in the woods when the shooting started? Here's a video of an interview, where the guy tells that the "guy from the woods" is..
"...sitting in the front of a police car over there now".
It appears the guy is right in front of them, and if it would be a FACT that he was another shooter, you would i imagine they would have taken him away from the scene alot faster.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apwTd-B_MP8
"The local police dispatch tape carries a report that a teacher saw two shooters running from the scene. (3.25)"
I think the radio message talks about "teacher seeing two SHADOWS running past the building" ..SHADOWS not SHOOTERS
Those "shadows" could have been anybody ..maybe some of the people living near by who came to rescue children.
One more thing:
Adam Lanza apparently was a person suffering from the 'Asperger syndrome', and i actually have been an school-assistant to a 4-5 grader boy with Asperger's, so i know quite well that they can behave in very peculiar ways, and can have huge anger/rage fits.
Autistic/Asperger's people can, and many times do, "pre-model" certain events and if things don't fit that model, they can either "shut down" or go into huge rage/anger fits. These people also can be very, very sensitive about some things.
What i have read about Adam Lanza, and i have read quite a bit, his behaviour fits my experience with the boy who i was helping.
Although the Aurora shooting might have involved other persons, i think Adam Lanza really could have acted alone.
--
Makow reply: Thanks for bringing this video to my attention. The police radio indicates a cop confronted a perpetrator. There was panic in his voice. The cops ran into the forest and then stood around a man in handcuffs. They stopped running because they apprehended someone running away. The man in police car was wearing camouflage pants.
You can always explain away facts. It makes sense that the officials would come up with cover stories. Shooters would be portrayed as parents. Ginger bread cookies? Why aren't these incidents mentioned in mainstream media?
Most police are Freemasons. The culprits would be arrested and protected. Then, how do we explain why there were no injured? Everyone was shot many times to prevent witnesses. Not the way Lanza would think.
Did you read Carolyn Hamlett on my site today? She says they planned these events years ago. Do you really think this rash of shootings is random? Do you really think the coordinated call for gun control from Zionist media and politicians is accidental? Have you forgotten 9-11 when the same traitor establishment murdered and hoodwinked Americans?
-
Peter said (December 18, 2012):
One thing that all these shocking false flag events share is that they were all made for television.
It is a sign of your immaturity and an indicator of your ongoing
programmability that even when you know that you are being lied to you carry on watching the television relentlessly sucking on the tit of the Whore of Babylon.
I am quite proud of the fact that i didnt know what on earth people were banging on about when they kept mentioning "sandy hills" until it niggled me enough to look it up thats how tuned my bs sensors are these days.
People BREAK THE SPELL stop watching the box.
Re-Acquire your discernment in all things - Namaste