Montreal 1989--Young Men Cowered While Women Were Massacred
December 6, 2022
Possibly, the only mass shooting not organized by intelligence services.
33rd Anniversary -- Montreal Mass Shooting of Feminists
On Dec 6, 1989, Marc Lepine shot 28 people, killing 14 young women who he singled out as feminists who had "ruined his life."
Ironically, the emasculation produced by feminism probably contributed to the tragedy. Men used to protect women.
These women said they were not feminists but, like Lepine, they were studying to be engineers. Women have gone from being supports for men - wives and mothers - to being competitors. Feminism is really masculinism.
Men need a woman's love. Nothing can justify Lepine, but he was motivated by a sense of betrayal that all men are feeling to some degree. Both sexes have suffered dearly from the Illuminati banker plan to depopulate and enslave the world by destroying heterosexual marriage and family.
from March 10, 2009
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
A recent film about the massacre of 14 young women at L'Ecole Polytechnique in 1989 has reignited debate about a little-known aspect of this tragedy: the passive behavior of the 50 young men in the engineering class.
They meekly obeyed the gunman, Marc Lepine, 25, when he ordered them to leave. Lepine proceeded to fire about 30 shots at the women, from left to right, leaving behind 9 victims, 6 of whom died. Before killing himself, he killed another eight women and wounded ten women & four men in the hallways, cafeteria, and other classrooms. He reloaded a number of times but no one tackled him.
In the first classroom, he said to the girls: "Do you know why you are over there?"
One girl answered "No".
"I am fighting feminism."
The girl replied: "We are not feminists, I have never fought against men."
He aimed his hunting rifle and started firing.
(14 bright futures snuffed out. They said, "we're not feminists.")
A recent film about the massacre of 14 young women at L'Ecole Polytechnique in 1989 has reignited debate about a little-known aspect of this tragedy: the passive behavior of the 50 young men in the engineering class.
They meekly obeyed the gunman, Marc Lepine, 25, when he ordered them to leave. Lepine proceeded to fire about 30 shots at the women, from left to right, leaving behind 9 victims, 6 of whom died. Before killing himself, he killed another eight women and wounded ten women & four men in the hallways, cafeteria, and other classrooms. He reloaded a number of times but no one tackled him.In the first classroom, he said to the girls: "Do you know why you are over there?"
One girl answered "No".
"I am fighting feminism."
The girl replied: "We are not feminists, I have never fought against men."
He aimed his hunting rifle and started firing.
(14 bright futures snuffed out. They said, "we're not feminists.") In a suicide note, Lepine said: "I have decided to send the feminists, who have always ruined my life, to their Maker. For seven years life has brought me no joy and being totally blase, I have decided to put an end to those viragos."
Feminist and lesbian activists were quick to exploit this tragedy as a "National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women," as if mass murder were an appropriate way to characterize domestic violence. White ribbons remind young women that within all men lurks a serial killer. Thus, these activists destroy the trust which is at the heart of a woman's love for a man and cause men to abandon them.
But what if, in that first classroom, the young men wouldn't separate from the girls, and then refused to file out of the class? What if they rushed Lepine instead? Failing that, what if they had jumped him as he exited the class?
The irony is that the emasculation produced by feminism probably contributed to the tragedy. Men used to be protective of women. This point was raised recently by Mark Steyn in his review of the film ("Polytechnique") --
"The defining image of contemporary Canadian maleness is not M Lepine... but the professors and the men in that classroom, who, ordered to leave by the lone gunman, meekly did so, and abandoned their female classmates to their fate--an act of abdication that would have been unthinkable in almost any other culture throughout human history. The 'men' stood outside in the corridor and, even as they heard the first shots, they did nothing. And, when it was over and [Lepine] walked out of the room and past them, they still did nothing. Whatever its other defects, Canadian manhood does not suffer from an excess of testosterone."
CANADIAN MANHOOD: AN OXYMORON?
This touched off a spirited discussion in the Comments section. One man wrote:
"This is nothing compared to a Polish Visitor to Canada, who got tasered to death at Vancouver International Airport because four well trained (???) Mounties felt that he, an unarmed man, was a threat to them. The important question has to be: "just how many Mounties does it take to handle an "unarmed" person"? Perhaps they think, that the criminals will laugh themselves to death when they see this kind of utter incompetence. To add insult to injury, this atrocity is dragged through the courts, where it will receive "Canadian Justice".
On the RCMP, another man comments: "Reading this, I am reminded of what I read about the aftermath of the stabbing and beheading of Tim McLean: that the RCMP officers stood outside the bus for HOURS watching Vincent Li stab, defile and cannibalize his victim's body."
Another man relates how he wrestled a gun away from a mugger and killed him. "I pulled the trigger and shot my assailant. Minutes later, the police arrived and arrested me. My assailant dies some three hours later in a hospital. This being Canada, it cost me in excess of $15K in legal fees."
But he vows he would do it again: "But rest assured, should anyone pose a risk of death to me, my wife, my children or anyone with whom I enjoy an effective connection, I would not hesitate for a second. I would kill again. I have since learned that my three siblings (two sisters, one brother) are similarly wired. Neuro-psychologists - including several in military positions - have assured me this is not genetic, just the "luck of the draw".
"All that having been said, I find it INCREDIBLE that not a single male who meekly left the Ecole Polytechnique classroom that day took any action. I am also fluently bilingual/bicultural, and more than a few good Quebecois men have confided in me their disgust at the prevalence of "les hommes rose" ("pink men") among the generations processed by public education systems since my own high school days. Heroes aren't born that way, but cowards do seem to have been conditioned for cowardice. Welcome to the post-modern feminized, touchy-feely world of bullshit called "public education". You're paying for it, after all."
Finally, another man summed it up: "Perhaps in guilting men for being men, in all the accusations of being rapist wannabe 's, they become so meek and pliable that they are no longer capable of acting as the men on the Titanic acted..."
CONCLUSION
Lepine (his real name was Gabil Rodrique Ghabi; he took his mother's name at age 13) was a psycho who couldn't get a date. If he had demonstrated this much spunk in a positive non-violent way, he wouldn't have had a problem. Men these days are underthe impression that women aren't interested in them. The opposite is true. Men just need to act confidently and with self respect.
Are we judging the young men in the class too harshly? After all, they were only 19-21. The Coroner's Report suggests some thought it was a prank.
Nonetheless, the incident illustrates the unraveling of the social fabric caused by feminism. As I have said, heterosexual marriage and family build and perpetuate society. Men want power; women want love. Marriage is based on the exchange of women's power for male power expressed as love. Both female and male sacrifice in different ways. Women empower men to be their protectors and providers (while they tend to children.) In the name of "equality," Communist-inspired feminism challenges male power which neuters and emasculates men.
Men and women need to re-establish their bond as partners rather than competitors. The days ahead may require sacrifice. This story suggests that men who have no one to protect won't make sacrifices.
---
Feminist and lesbian activists were quick to exploit this tragedy as a "National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women," as if mass murder were an appropriate way to characterize domestic violence. White ribbons remind young women that within all men lurks a serial killer. Thus, these activists destroy the trust which is at the heart of a woman's love for a man and cause men to abandon them.
But what if, in that first classroom, the young men wouldn't separate from the girls, and then refused to file out of the class? What if they rushed Lepine instead? Failing that, what if they had jumped him as he exited the class?
The irony is that the emasculation produced by feminism probably contributed to the tragedy. Men used to be protective of women. This point was raised recently by Mark Steyn in his review of the film ("Polytechnique") --
"The defining image of contemporary Canadian maleness is not M Lepine... but the professors and the men in that classroom, who, ordered to leave by the lone gunman, meekly did so, and abandoned their female classmates to their fate--an act of abdication that would have been unthinkable in almost any other culture throughout human history. The 'men' stood outside in the corridor and, even as they heard the first shots, they did nothing. And, when it was over and [Lepine] walked out of the room and past them, they still did nothing. Whatever its other defects, Canadian manhood does not suffer from an excess of testosterone."
CANADIAN MANHOOD: AN OXYMORON?
This touched off a spirited discussion in the Comments section. One man wrote:
"This is nothing compared to a Polish Visitor to Canada, who got tasered to death at Vancouver International Airport because four well trained (???) Mounties felt that he, an unarmed man, was a threat to them. The important question has to be: "just how many Mounties does it take to handle an "unarmed" person"? Perhaps they think, that the criminals will laugh themselves to death when they see this kind of utter incompetence. To add insult to injury, this atrocity is dragged through the courts, where it will receive "Canadian Justice".
On the RCMP, another man comments: "Reading this, I am reminded of what I read about the aftermath of the stabbing and beheading of Tim McLean: that the RCMP officers stood outside the bus for HOURS watching Vincent Li stab, defile and cannibalize his victim's body."
Another man relates how he wrestled a gun away from a mugger and killed him. "I pulled the trigger and shot my assailant. Minutes later, the police arrived and arrested me. My assailant dies some three hours later in a hospital. This being Canada, it cost me in excess of $15K in legal fees."
But he vows he would do it again: "But rest assured, should anyone pose a risk of death to me, my wife, my children or anyone with whom I enjoy an effective connection, I would not hesitate for a second. I would kill again. I have since learned that my three siblings (two sisters, one brother) are similarly wired. Neuro-psychologists - including several in military positions - have assured me this is not genetic, just the "luck of the draw".
"All that having been said, I find it INCREDIBLE that not a single male who meekly left the Ecole Polytechnique classroom that day took any action. I am also fluently bilingual/bicultural, and more than a few good Quebecois men have confided in me their disgust at the prevalence of "les hommes rose" ("pink men") among the generations processed by public education systems since my own high school days. Heroes aren't born that way, but cowards do seem to have been conditioned for cowardice. Welcome to the post-modern feminized, touchy-feely world of bullshit called "public education". You're paying for it, after all."
Finally, another man summed it up: "Perhaps in guilting men for being men, in all the accusations of being rapist wannabe 's, they become so meek and pliable that they are no longer capable of acting as the men on the Titanic acted..."
CONCLUSION
Lepine (his real name was Gabil Rodrique Ghabi; he took his mother's name at age 13) was a psycho who couldn't get a date. If he had demonstrated this much spunk in a positive non-violent way, he wouldn't have had a problem. Men these days are underthe impression that women aren't interested in them. The opposite is true. Men just need to act confidently and with self respect.
Are we judging the young men in the class too harshly? After all, they were only 19-21. The Coroner's Report suggests some thought it was a prank.
Nonetheless, the incident illustrates the unraveling of the social fabric caused by feminism. As I have said, heterosexual marriage and family build and perpetuate society. Men want power; women want love. Marriage is based on the exchange of women's power for male power expressed as love. Both female and male sacrifice in different ways. Women empower men to be their protectors and providers (while they tend to children.) In the name of "equality," Communist-inspired feminism challenges male power which neuters and emasculates men.
Men and women need to re-establish their bond as partners rather than competitors. The days ahead may require sacrifice. This story suggests that men who have no one to protect won't make sacrifices.
---
First Comment from FA-
One tidbit that is always left out is that at the time Poly had an ongoing effort to increase the percentage of female students. It was 15% at the time despite several years of a policy where men needed higher grades than women to get in. The murderer had been close to the acceptance line and deemed that his rejection was because women with lower grades than he stole his place and his future. If you find his full letter online you should see reference to this.
I was cutting school that day so was absent but my classmates recounted to me. One girl in my computer lab (where I should have been too) was walking out of the lab and came face to face with the gunman, he pointed the weapon at her and... click. She immediately closed the door and locked it. After reloading he shot at the door handle a few times and when it failed to open (unlike in movies) he didn't insist and continued his rampage elsewhere. One of my close friends hid under a table in a digital circuits lab for many hours with the the lights off not knowing when it was safe to leave. Eventually he went to our shared locker to get his coat and there were puddles of blood all along our locker's hallway.
You have to realize that mass shootings (false flag or otherwise) weren't a thing back then as they are today. Some of the students thought it was some sort of prank. Some thought the gunman was selecting the guys and leaving the girls safely behind. Most thought remaining calm and cooperating would end/diffuse the situation without incident. The overwhelming feeling when we went back to school in early 1990 to write our postponed fall 1989 final exams was not that the cowardly men were to blame. I also can't stand all the soy boys today but back then the guys still drank beer, drove motorcycles, played&watched contact sports, did hard sciences not gender studies...
I like the fact that you publish all sorts of opinions and let readers decide what to think.
I was cutting school that day so was absent but my classmates recounted to me. One girl in my computer lab (where I should have been too) was walking out of the lab and came face to face with the gunman, he pointed the weapon at her and... click. She immediately closed the door and locked it. After reloading he shot at the door handle a few times and when it failed to open (unlike in movies) he didn't insist and continued his rampage elsewhere. One of my close friends hid under a table in a digital circuits lab for many hours with the the lights off not knowing when it was safe to leave. Eventually he went to our shared locker to get his coat and there were puddles of blood all along our locker's hallway.
You have to realize that mass shootings (false flag or otherwise) weren't a thing back then as they are today. Some of the students thought it was some sort of prank. Some thought the gunman was selecting the guys and leaving the girls safely behind. Most thought remaining calm and cooperating would end/diffuse the situation without incident. The overwhelming feeling when we went back to school in early 1990 to write our postponed fall 1989 final exams was not that the cowardly men were to blame. I also can't stand all the soy boys today but back then the guys still drank beer, drove motorcycles, played&watched contact sports, did hard sciences not gender studies...
I like the fact that you publish all sorts of opinions and let readers decide what to think.
Ken Adachi
I didn't know about this shooting until reading about it today for the first time. It may be a completely legit story, but some things described here don't make sense and it makes the account look suspicious. When the male students and the teacher were told to leave the classroom, do rational people obediently stand in the hall outside of the room, like so many Wooden Indians, and just patiently wait for the shooter to finish up his killing spree? Would YOU just stand there? If you're not going to try something heroic to stop him, then any rational person is going to run like hell - IF YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY. And they didn't?
At the same time, it's not surprising that a 25-year-old guy, who was denied a proper family environment with a loving mother and father to guide him, could become so rudderless and unsure of himself that he became enraged by feminist provocations, went off the deep end, and decided to exact some revenge to even out the score. That's possible I suppose. You keep stepping on a young guy's ego - SOMETHING is gonna give. Most rational guys aren't going to start shooting people, but he's going to do something to make his anger known.
The first comment from "JJ" in Dec. 2018, told me a lot about just How Bad Things Have Become here in Pink America. A normal, heterosexual male is not going to be happy working under a woman - period (especially if it's in construction or manual labor work, like an electrician's job or even an apprentice job). The intelligent thing to do is to AVOID the problem, by not immersing yourself IN the problem.
I'm not going to join the military or become a policeman or a fireman, or take ANY job if I have to take orders from a woman. I'm just not going to do it because I KNOW what's going to happen if I did. I would have to give up my pride as a man and suppress my masculinity - and it's not worth it for the sake of a paycheck. I can do any sort of work I want to do - ON MY OWN. Women are physically, emotionally, and psychologically unsuited to be boxers, linebackers, pro baseball players, pro hockey players, pro basketball players, fighting military, policemen, firemen or ANY other job that requires the size, strength, cunning, LOGIC, and intelligent decision-making ability - under pressure - characteristic of most NORMAL, heterosexual males.
REAL women, feminine females, don't WANT to act like men or do men's work, or boss around a male. They want to be desired by and mated to masculine men who want to act the role which God and Nature had intended for them. Real men and real women want to live in sync with the Divine Plan in order to raise a family, lead a happy life, and do what's right in the eyes of God and Mother Nature, in order to be truly fulfilled and content with life.
Hason-
Justine Trudeau is at it again. His anti-violence against women speech, is more of his bias. Why not the obvious Anti-violence against everybody? His push to ban assault weapons and giving mayors the right to ban handguns.
Who has asked "why didn't these trail-blazer, promising, smart, powerful women attack the gunman? Why did all the women in London who saw the terrorist attacking men and women with a knife attack him? They ALL ran away. There is a constant drumbeat about the need to make women's lives better so they will be stronger thus helping out society and the world. Young girls and boys are been shown via entertainment media how what use to be strong men being leaders and heroes are being replaced by tiny stronger women who have no-fault saving everybody. But as we are seeing that in real-life this is not happening. And it's almost toxic how this emotional conflict drains both men and women of their understandings. I don't see any actions taking place of how this might simply be broken open to speaking freely about this dangerous conflict. Are young boys and girls being taught how men and women are different in so many ways? No. Is there real equality between boys and girls, men and women in all things? Or are girls and women still being going advantages? Yes. Most of the time I see an endless deliberate attempt to keep society divided.
GT said (December 6, 2022):
As this is old I’m sure you’ve read but as you mention this shooting was not organized by intelligence here are some points to ponder otherwise in case you haven’t.
http://mileswmathis.com/ecole.pdf