The Ron & Rand Paul Betrayal
June 10, 2012
Direct Link to Latest News
June 10, 2012
Dick said (June 10, 2012):
This has been an interesting turn of events for opponents of Libertarianism. I think the crucial issue will be whether hard-core ideologues like Adam Kokesh can manage to jettison Ron Paul and
capture any of his momentum for some future purpose. Kokesh's recent "debate" with Webster Tarpley on YouTube seems to be a microcosm of the struggle to-come in the truth community.
Side note – Kokesh's father Charles, a Jewish "venture capitalist" was charged in 2009 by the SEC with misappropriating $45 million of
investor funds in a racetrack scheme. Sounds a bit like Peter Schiff and his "hero" tax-evader father. You've either got to be willfully ignorant or a real sociopath to stay a libertarian.
Anthony, I agree with nearly everything you write, but your next-to-last paragraph that the next controlled opposition is "Hamiltonian
banking" is ridiculous. Are the illuminati going to give us interest-free public credit, infrastructure grants to the states,
and a debt moratorium on the Fed? This is like the "Aloisyous Fozdyke" article on this site claiming the illuminati were going to
destroy America with protective tariffs. What's next – public health insurance and a high speed rail system?
Brian said (June 10, 2012):
Anthony has hit yet another home run with this article. I guess it was Ron who held sway in naming his son after that most vociferous proponent of the Austrian School of Economics, Ayn Rand. Very telling of his obsession to have given your child that name. I guess we've all been Ludwig Mis(es)led.
The traditional Libertarian position on foreign policy is always sound, i.e; stay the hell out of these foreign conflicts which reflect how Americans and their military have been duped. But its a rotten shame that its politics became so enamored with a gold standard, or some variation thereof. And the author is probably right about the new controlled opposition having to do with some Hamiltonian model.
There's a radio commercial in my area of New England for a bank headquartered in Canada. It's in the form of a skit where you hear a knock on the door. One of the actor answers it and says, "Well, if it isn't my favorite father of modern banking, Alexander Hamilton!" Do they know something we don't know?
But could it be that the plan all along has been to eventually bring down the FED themselves, jettisoning it into the dustbin of history after having served its nefarious purpose? Next year is 2013 - exactly 100 years since its inception. And we all know the Illuminati fondness for numbers.
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at
Paul Sheldon said (June 11, 2012):
All criticisms of Rand Paul are well-deserved. However, it is unfair to suggest that Rand Paul deceived all people who claim to be libertarians. On May 24, 2010, Justin Raimondo, director of Antiwar.com, warned readers that:
“He's not half the man his father isâ€
“Since he’s spent so much time apologizing for, and running away from, his own comments – now claiming that he would have voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act – why doesn’t he spend a few moments backtracking from his morally reprehensible refusal to take nuking Iran ‘out of the equation’? Now that‘s something he really ought to get down on his hands and knees and beg forgiveness for – and maybe (just maybe!) libertarians will think about supporting him. Until that apology – or ‘clarification’ – is forthcoming, I wouldn’t give Rand Paul the time of day.â€
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/05/23/rand-pauls-problem-and-ours/
In 1988, Ron Paul was the Libertarian Party’s candidate for President. Why are critics of Ron Paul failing to make a distinction between libertarians and the Libertarian Party (with many leaders who are Zionist warmongers)?
It is fair to claim that Lew Rockwell is obsessed about gold. You can even check the price of gold at:
http://lewrockwell.com/
However, why is there no criticism of communist China’s plan to replace the American dollar within a few years with its own gold-backed currency?
Americans who are truly anti-war supported Ron Paul. Obama and the other Republican candidates are Zionist warmongers. Some supporters of Ron Paul have questioned his position that America should sit by and let Israel and its Muslim neighbors work out their problems—after the West has provided Israel with nuclear weapons.
Opposing the endless totalitarian wars of Zionists and of Neo-conservatives (Neo-Trotskyites) is more important than opposing relatively trivial issues such as usury and monetary reform.