Direct Link to Latest News

 

Only Homosexual Degenerates Win Power--Gregory Klimov

November 26, 2009


Klimov.jpegby Richard Evans

(for Henrymakow.com)


In 1981, Soviet defector Gregory Klimov
(left) authored a book for the CIA to secretly distribute  to  members of the senior staff of the KGB.

His title was a play on the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Klimov's Protocols of the Soviet Wise Men. He wrote it as first person narratative of a series of lectures to top KGB insiders. The lectures are a course on the secret history of Civilization. 

In Protocol 3, The Keys to Power, the lecturer reveals that a secret society controls the world.
The lecturer said, "It's names are legion, but so you can understand I will call it the Homintern
(International Brotherhood Of Degenerates)." 

What does it take to acquire and hold power over the lives of millions of people?
 
"Only person with abnormal power drive will win in the race for positions of power. It is an axiom of degeneralogy that degenerates will make it to the top in the majority of cases.  Once this is understood, we can continue with the analogy of an Olympics competitor. Can a person with normal leg muscles participate and win a  race? Yes, he can. On the local school level.  He can also participate and win at town level. He can participate and may win at regional level. He can participate but has no chance to win at national level. He could not even participate at world level competition.

"Did you get the picture? Only person with abnormally developed legs muscles can participate and has chance to win at national or world level competitions.  It is the same in the levels of power in the world. "

GORBKISS.JPGTHE POWER COMPLEX
 
"Now we will talk Hi-Tech. Leaders of the world usually have complex of power which helps them to became world leaders. This complex is usually associated with suppressed sadism, which in turn is a result of latent homosexuality. We all have seen pictures of insane or semi-insane person, not huge at all, but 5-6 well built medical workers have a difficult time subduing him. This is perfect example of incredible energy that a semi-insane sadistical power-hungry person can produce to achieve his goals.

"Normal healthy people don't have this drive.  How does it happen?  We will be talking here about clans. It happened where two families married members to preserve land and wealth close to the clan and if this continues we have inbreeding of genes. Degeneration has three stages: 1. Sexual deviations. 2. Mental illnesses. 3. Inborn physical deformity.

"Once stage 1. infects a clan, degeneration of offspring accelerates.  Clan degenerates now consider sado-masochistic traits superior 'gifts' and seek perpetuation through tightening of mating close inside degenerate bloodlines.

"If a family tree is healthy, has many new branches with many new and healthy leaves (children) - this is certainly a normal and healthy clan. On the other hand, if family tree is drying up (childless couples) [or] has many dying branches (suicides, mental illnesses) - you are looking at clan entering golden stage of decay.
 
"Degenerates hate normal people. It is pleasure for them to watch how one semi-insane sadistic leader, chosen by them, goes to war with another semi-insane sadistic leader of another country, also chosen by them. Millions of normal people are dying for the joy and sadistic pleasure of degenerates...
 
"Masons, Illuminates etc. - are clubs, where degenerates observe behavior of possible candidates and upon verifying real homo-sadistic inclinations of the person - promote him into the real world of power.  Older clans that have reached stage 2. and 3. (losing their ability to produce surviving offspring) will seek secret insemination with new clan of physically 'healthy' psychopaths.

Bruderkuss_propaganda.JPGTHE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY
 
Within the degenerative community there are different types of degenerates--the good, bad or ugly.
 
"No questions about it. There are only one thing left to determine -- is it an obedient clan or rebellious clan. Just look what this clan supports in the real life. Does it spread poison of decadence in art, science, literature or does it support normal causes, normal art, normal science, normal literature? Good degenerates honor the will of God or nature, become celibate, and do not reproduce and enjoy a golden age of decline.
 
It is the ugly degenerate clans which cause the trouble in the world. One historical example whose secrets were made public because they were so hated even among the cult was the House of the Borgias notorious Valencian-Italian  family of the Renaissance. The patriarch Rodrigo promoted Simony to become Pope or Rome  in 1492 .  He committed incest with his daughter Lucrezia who was herself a poisoner. The sons Cesare and Giovanni were also murderers, and rapists.  This family terrorized even the most degenerate families of Italy till Rodrigo was poisoned in 1503, probably by Cesare, so he could have his sister to himself.  There had been bad blood between father and son over incest jealousies. But without the power of the Pope father, Casare's fortunes reversed and he had to flee to Spain,Lucrezia remained under the protection of a powerful degenerate Italian consort.
 
KarlMarx_Monument_Back_penis.jpg(left, a sculpture of Karl Marx, viewed from rear)

But the grandson of Rodrigo through Giovanni became a legitimate priest later.  He performed exorcism of demons on high degenerates, used his wealth to build a university, and was venerated as Saint Francis Borgia after his death.  This is example of good degenerate in the power structure of the world.
 
"Now - what is BAD? Bad do follow God and did not follow leaders of degenerate cult, but try to fool God by marrying normal person and destroying her dreams of normal happy life and healthy children.
 
"They have a weaker power complex and exercise terror at home, but they serve self interests only and cooperate with UGLY.  The Good degenerates recognize the Ugly and the Bad and help normal people protect themselves and fight them in society."

Lucifer is the archetypal revolutionary. Klimov concluded that all social revolutionaries are degenerates. Normal people are content with procreative sex, raising normal families, and do not instigate violence or crave superhuman power.  They are content with traditions which sustain equilibrium of culture.
 
 



Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for "Only Homosexual Degenerates Win Power--Gregory Klimov"

Laura said (November 28, 2009):

If the churches would confront/preach this issue publicly /socially, and show resistance teaching it as perverted lifestyle like years back it would not be looked at now as normal..but since the churches have turned into social clubs with no substance and preachers only interested in money, it's no wonder it has flourished as an acceptable lifestyle the same as having abortions for casual birth control


Eddie said (November 27, 2009):

Two great frauds of all times have broken in the past two weeks and the elite are using the branches of the UN for complete population control and destruction of national sovereignty. The evil of it all is beyond the pale as it is a
political move and all facets of media, corporations, and national political leaders are ignoring reality; they have all sold out the masses, as know the truth.

It is coming right out of Orwell's 1984 as the major point in this book was all human dignity will breakdown under a reality of fear. The illuminati have taken this reality as
if fear don't exist they will simply create an illusion of it with the manipulation of facts as a means to an end and they are going for it with national treaties with the UN.

I am watching this unfold before my very eyes with no end in sight, as the rights of citizens are being taken away with frauds amounting to $trillions and the facts are clear to all,
but such is being covered up without a word being said in the mainstream media and yet it is all on the net.


Joseph said (November 26, 2009):

Tremendous article by Evans.

I am getting caught up in Klimov's "Good, Bad, Ugly" scenario.

To cite an possible example of this, is the Kennedy family.

JFK looks to fit the "Good" degenerate mold, who despite his philandering, sought to protect the innocent or normal Americans (As the article stated, "The Good degenerates recognize the Ugly and the Bad and help normal people protect themselves and fight them in society.") by trying to expose the "worldwide monolithic conspiracy," as JFK described the depraved PTB to a National Press Club ... This speech probably a more suicidal stunt than Jack ever conceived and had to have contributed greatly to his Grassy Knoll murder in Dallas. I have also a quote in which JFK also reportedly said,
"The high office of the Presidency has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom, and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of his plight."

His brother, Robert looked to follow this legacy, and met the same fate. Whereas, Teddy was the "bad" degenerate, who all his life cooperated with the very same forces that killed his brothers. Maybe he was just trying to protect the rest of the Kennedy family, but anyone who did the acts of extreme cowardice as he did in the Mary Jo Kophechne incident is categorically BAD.

The father, Joseph Kennedy, looks to fill the "UGLY" category.

I am sure other readers can come up with similar examples.


Larry said (November 26, 2009):

Thanks for the Gregory Klimov article. To me that should be an obvious fact to most. Whether one chooses to associate this behavior with “psychopathy” or “possession, the fact remains that it is abhorrent. Whether it is a local group or a larger sphere of influence, it is always these self-serving “opportunists” who “rise” to prominence. So, knowing that, it does seem silly to expect them to assist the “normal” underlings with their problems. It seems the only effective thing we more balanced individuals can do, if we actually have anything to say about it, is to keep them away from any office where they wield authority.

As I’m sure you know these people (?) inhabit a very exclusive club. Mr. Klimov has it right. They don’t train them, they recognize them. Lately I’ve been playing with a thought experiment. What if we all just ignore them? Whenever they speak in public, turn your back. Refuse to talk to them or respond to anything they say or do. In other words, declare them anathema. There is nothing more terrifying to a psychopath than being ignored. The Italians actually had this down to an art form. They don’t “resist” openly. They just smile, nod their heads, and go on to do whatever they were going to do in spite of them. It makes “ruling” a bit like herding cats.

Well, again, thanks for the article. It is always encouraging to see others who are aware of a basic problem. It would be nice to see someone develop a “vaccine” for this.


Victoria said (November 26, 2009):

Hi Henry: Perhaps you would be kind enough to tell us exactly who 'Richard Evans' is? I've looked him up on the Internet and the main name that comes up is that of a professor of history at Cambridge U. Is this 'your' Richard Evans? It might be helpful (and give credibility to his reports) for people who are unsure about this information.

This is all most interesting and I was glad to see that someone, too, in a letter, has given the links to the interviews with Kay Griggs. Hers is an amazing story and she is a very brave lady. As I've said to many people - those are the ones to be trusted; those who have made a personal sacrifice or put their physical bodies at risk in order to get out the information. Those protecting the status quo are too cowardly and materialistic to risk all for their beliefs.

Well done, too, publishing the letter from 'Austin Rozzell' who challenged your courage to do just that. The hatred and vitriol imbuing that letter is exactly the venom with which our modern world is awash and shows the intensity of feeling in those who wish to deny God's supremacy over Creation.

--

Victoria,

Richard Evans is the pen name of a longtime friend of mine, who is %100 reliable. I suggested this story to him.

Henry


Richard S said (November 26, 2009):

Kudos on publishing the Klimov article. I think it offers an accurate analysis of the power structures mankind has had to contend with for a very long time.

Powerful men like Caligula, Ernst Rohm and many of the “Bohemian Grove” attendees, etc. have been notoriously homosexual. I don’t think all homosexuals are power-mad psychopaths, but it does seem that many power-mad psychopaths are homosexual or bisexual. It is not surprising that Obama has been accused of being on the “down low” by Larry Sinclair and others. George W. Bush’s public smooching of Jeff Gannon and Saudi Sheiks is well known. Vladimir Putin’s extremely odd compulsion to lift a young boy’s shirt up and kiss him on the belly because “He seemed so nice” can be seen on YouTube for goodness sake!


The other key point that Klimov touches on is the idea that inbreeding among the “Elites” fosters the moral and mental degeneracy so frequently seen among them.

Meyer Amschel’s admonition to his five sons was: “Remain faithful to the law of Moses. Remain united to the end. Consult your mother. Intermarry.” Consider how many US Presidents can trace their genealogy to European Royalty. Even Lynn Cheney has admitted that Barack Obama and Dick Cheney are distant cousins!

Pierre-Samuel du Pont, founder of the du Pont dynasty believed in inbreeding. He told his family: “The marriages that I should prefer for our colony would be between the cousins. In that way we should be sure of honesty of soul and purity of blood.” In 1997, one of the heirs to the du Pont fortune, John du Pont was convicted of murdering Olympic wrestler Dave Schultz. John du Pont had been behaving erratically for years, driving a car into his swimming pool and exhibiting paranoid schizophrenic behavior. He was married in 1983 but the marriage was annulled 90 days later. In truth he was a known homosexual that generously funded training facilities for his favorite sport – wrestling.

The wrestlers that trained on du Pont’s estate are reported to have tolerated du Pont’s often overt advances. A gentle rebuff would allow them to maintain a working relationship with their benefactor. The unfortunate Mr. Schultz, who was married and by all accounts not interested in any sort of homosexual liaisons with du Pont, was shot and killed suddenly and without provocation by an insane du Pont. Du Pont was found guilty (there was no doubt he had done the crime) but “mentally ill.”

There are many such stories out there, and the Klimov article illustrates why.

www.FoundingFather1776.com


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at