Is Ahmadinejad "Controlled Opposition" ?
September 26, 2010
by Anthony Migchels
in Arnhem, Holland
(for Henrymakow.,com)
Of course, it is always pleasant to hear a prominent politician speak some truth about 9/11 and even more so when these words are spoken near the crime scene. It provides a little justice to the 3000 victims of the Mossad/CIA/Globalist mass murder. At least someone seems to speak for them.
It is also fitting that Ahmadinejad would
mention the fact that these 3000 dead have been used as an excuse to
murder hundreds of thousands, and probably millions more.
That it is
ridiculous to keep wailing about a few thousand Americans, when they
kill a few hundred times more Arabs and other Muslims as revenge.
The dead are not to blame. It is their legacy that is besmirched by 'Enduring Freedom', 'Shock and Awe' and all the other wonderful word constructs devised for wholesale slaughter.
However, the real story about the Ahmadinejad speech is the fact that it is a textbook example of the Hegelian Dialectic. He shows himself a cynical whore on equal footing with his supposed Zionist adversaries.
He is a typical example of controlled opposition: two sides struggling towards the desired synthesis.Because the real core of his speech is this:
"For years, the inefficiency of the capitalism and the existing world management and structures has been exposed and the majority of States and nations have been on a quest for fundamental changes and for the prevalence of justice in global relations. The cause of the United Nation's ineptitude is in its unjust structure. Major power is monopolized in the Security Council due to the veto privilege, and the main pillar of the Organization, namely the General Assembly, is marginalized.
In the past several decades, at least one of the permanent members of the Security Council has always been a party to the disputes. The veto advantage grants impunity to aggression and occupation; How could, therefore, one expect competence while both the judge and the prosecutor are a party to the dispute?
Had Iran enjoyed veto privilege, would the Security Council and the IAEA Director General have taken the same position in the nuclear issue?
Dear Friends,
The United Nations is the key center for coordinating the common global management. Its structure needs to be reformed in a manner that all independent States and nations [are] able to participate in the global governance actively and constructively.
The veto privilege should be revoked and the General Assembly should be the highest body and the Secretary-General should be the most independent official and all his positions and activities should be taken with the approval of the General Assembly and should be directed towards promoting justice and eliminating discrimination.
The Secretary-General should not come under pressure from powers and/or the country hosting the Organization for his stating the truth and [the] administration of justice. It is suggested that the General Assembly should, within one year and in the framework of an extraordinary session, finalize the reformation of the Organization's structure. The Islamic Republic of Iran has clear suggestions in this regard and stands ready to participate actively and constructively in the process."
So everything is clear. No, the struggle is not against globalist controllers and their coveted World Government. The struggle is how the power will be divided between the remnants of the Nation States. Ahmadinejad is not defending his country's sovereignty; he wants a bigger piece of the pie for Iran.
So the current Thesis vs. Antithesis = Synthesis in this particular instance reads: US/UK/Zionism vs. Iran = World Government.
There is no reason for us to have any illusions about Iran's leadership. They are solid allies of the World Government Agenda.
In 2008, Ahmadinejad said "mankind's gravest need today is a global government."
Proposing that the rule of single law in the entire world is a bare necessity for the mankind, he said, "The existence of a thousand laws in the world, and then expecting that the global society would reach a status of equilibrium, justice, and tranquility is wishing for the impossible."
He added, "It is not possible to observe global justice under such conditions that each country is ruled based on a different set of laws."
Let us not fall for the old adage that our enemy's enemies are our friends.
Ahmadinejad is a truth teller when it comes to 9-11, but when it comes to world government, he is a traitor and a liar.
---
The entire speech can be found here.
Anthony Migchels is organizing a barter system in Holland. His "real currencies" blog can be found here.
Related- 9-11 Truth Sites Silent on Ahmadinejad Speech
Makow -- World Conflict is Manufactured: Coming Shakedown of Iran & US
AK said (September 27, 2010):
Good article and summation. I had heard two years ago that Iran was controlled opposition and was part of the New World Order. I watched the speech before ever reading this article where he openly calls for a New World Order, in those words. We’ve heard almost all presidents call for it in the past 20 or so years, Russia called for it as did China and a host of other countries. Personally I think we are almost there and they are just getting people use to the term so that last can be implemented.
On the hand sign, notice just how many use it that run governments, are in film, high positions, and considered “successfulâ€. It isn’t a sign by accident or with many meanings. I believe that you have pegged that right on the money. Atheists and even many Christians are deceived to believe that Satan or Lucifer doesn’t exist, and that is his main power these days and the biggest lie he has ever told. Just because one doesn’t believe in him does not mean he doesn’t exist, but even if it were true, it all depends on those who rule and what they believe and base their actions on. Sadly, they are wining as people remain “Willingly Ignorantâ€.