Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below- Cypto Jew Ted Cruz & the "End-Time" Wealth Transfer (scroll down)

Bob Dylan: Change Agent

April 1, 2015


When Bob Dylan said he "sold his soul to the devil"
what did he mean? Miles Mathis suggests Dylan
betrayed his artistic integrity & audience
in return for fame and fortune.
The Illuminati can make anyone famous. It's called hype.
They choose people who will advance
their satanic agenda, i.e. "social change." 

By John Hamer

In a recent article, Miles Mathis presents a compelling argument that Bob Dylan is a phoney.

He believes Dylan did not write his own songs and while Dylan's stage performances were not devoid of talent, he is not whom we believe him to be.

Dylan, whose real name is Robert Zimmermann, was born into a wealthy Jewish family in Duluth, Minnesota who owned a chain of movie theatres in the small town of Hibbing, MN. They were already in the 'deception' business.
According to Mathis, Hibbing has produced a number of dubious characters that include Vincent Bugliosi, Bruce Carlson and Gus Hall to name three.  Gus Hall is the former leader of the US Communist Party and probably an Intelligence Services asset. Bruce Carlson is Director of the National Reconnaissance Office (an intelligence agency) and a leader of the Mormon Church, believed part of the Elite.  Vincent Bugliosi was the attorney who 'prosecuted' Charles Manson, allegedly another one of the long list of 'Laurel Canyon' assets.
In 1961, Dylan, 20, was "made" by a favorable New York Times review
of his short set before 10 people at 'Gerde's Folk City.' He had been performing for only six months, and had no original material. 

The reciew was written by another Jew, Robert Shelton, (Robert Shapiro.)  Charlie Rothschild was the booking agent for 'Gerde's' at the time. 

MK-ULTRA: "The Times they are a Changin'"

Intelligence was running many black ops and using the music industry as cover in the 1960s. Some of them have since been partially declassified, such as Operation Mockingbird, MK-ULTRA and others.
album.jpgMathis believes that there was an even larger operation called, 'Operation Rolling Stone' designed to promote extreme change in all forms. 

Because humans are naturally resistant to change, Mathis contends, change had to be manufactured and constantly sold. Mathis points to the constant use of the 'Rolling Stone' title such as Dylan's famous song, the band 'The Rolling Stones,' and also the magazine 'Rolling Stone.' 

Mathis believes that the 'Rolling Stone' meme was a creation of Intelligence agencies as part of their social engineering.  In the " Protocols of the Elders of Zion," the author says three times, Our Countersign is "Force and Make-believe."(Protocol 1)

"Make-believe" is the Illuminati's "Magick." Magick is simply deceit or lying which is easy when you own the mass media and educators. The evil magician Aleister Crowley defined Magick as "the science and act of causing change to occur in conformity with will... any willed change in ourselves or in our environment is Magick."

The CIA had taken over all media by 1961.  This may explain why Columbia was so keen to sign the 20-year-old Dylan based on virtually nothing.  So arguably, Dylan's entire career was pre-planned.

Columbia had not heard him playing any of his original songs, because he had none at this time.  He had only two original compositions on his first album, and that was not released until 1962.


In 1963, Newsweek accused Dylan of plagiarism, suggesting that 'Blowin' in the Wind' had been 'acquired' from a high school student.  As Mathis points out, if Dylan had written the song, Columbia would have sued Newsweek as soon as the story appeared.  If Dylan had not written what is his most famous song, what does this say about him as a songwriter? 

In 1965 Dylan was booed off the stage at the Newport Folk Festival allegedly for going 'electric guitar.'  Mathis believes that 'real' folk fans knew that he was a fake, but by 1969, the infiltration and co-option of anti-war movement was complete so Dylan was no longer needed.  He was therefore abandoned. 

Mathis also posits that after Watergate, Dylan was brought back to Columbia in 1974 as part of the grand misdirection so that the American public would not notice that the CIA had just finalized a takeover of the government. 

Mathis thinks fellow Jewish agent  Leonard Cohen was Dylan's ghost writer.  Cohen's record label was also Columbia.   Furthermore it would also explain what Joni Mitchell said in 2010, referring to Dylan: "He's a plagiarist, and his name and voice are fake. Everything about Bob is a deception. We are like night and day, he and I."

joni.jpgJoni Mitchell dated Cohen for a while, so she should know.  She even had an opportunity to change her view, but refused. 

And as Mathis points out, why did Dylan or his record label not sue Mitchell for defamation?  A claim of plagiarism is the most serious accusation that could be directed at a performer.

As a 'former' fan of Dylan, Mathis concludes, "...this is no easier for me than for you...  It hurts.  Talent and real art have been rare enough without losing what little we had to these government disinfo programs... Even more recently, Dylan has been doing Chrysler commercials...  It is like watching Gandhi as the spokesman for Monsanto, or Martin Luther King schlepping pharmaceuticals for Pfizer." 

UK-based author John Hamer has written numerous short articles and several books including the best-seller, 'The Falsification of History' and 'RMS Olympic' and 'Titanic's Last Secret'.

The Vigilant Citizen ad

You can find this article permanently at .html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Below- Anti-Child Hate Speech Allowed to Flourish (scroll down)

Cypto Jew Ted Cruz & the "End-Time" Wealth Transfer

March 31, 2015

left, Sen. Ted Cruz with his Commie father turned evangelist, Rafael Cruz)

Don't be deceived. Ted Cruz is another
Zionist shill, a crypto Jew charged with
herding the Christian Evangelical sheep
with lunatic promises of end times wealth.

Makow Comment:
Humanity is imperiled when people who uphold cabalist doctrines are so close to the seat of power.
Putin Comment - Global war "almost inevitable."

By Tom Mysiewicz


Ted Cruz' father Rafael Cruz is a Cuban communist who actively promoted Castro and is now a "born again" Christian Zionist who preaches the doctrine of "End-Time Transfer Of Wealth."

In this curious doctrine, money, rather than believers, will be "raptured" to the loyal supporters of Israel at the end time. In a 2012 sermon, Rafael Cruz indicated that his son was among the evangelical Christians who are anointed as "kings" to take control of all sectors of society, an agenda commonly referred to as the "Seven Mountains" mandate, and "bring the spoils of war to the priests", thus helping to bring about a prophesied "great transfer of wealth", from the "wicked" to righteous gentile believers.

Zionist Jews and their "righteous Gentile" Christian Zionist helpers will then become "stewards" of the world's wealth by 2016.ii 
Canadian-born Ted Cruz, who announced his Presidential candidacy March 23, has been anointed by evangelical Christians to carry out this mission.

Translation: after a financial crisis and nuclear war, Illuminati Jews and their righteous go-fers will get all the world's wealth.

Judging by his demand as a Passover speaker,  Ted Cruz has some Jewish roots.  After the Cuban revolution, many Cubans chose to evacuate by boat to Florida.  But the more risk-averse 95% of Cuban Jews, also called "Jubanos," were evacuated from Cuba to Canada in a secret deal between the Canadian Government and (Jubano) Fidel Castro.  A popular name chosen by Jubanos who'd been the victims of the evil practice of forced conversion was Cruz or "Cross."

 Since tens of millions, quite possibly billions of people could die in the process of end-time Zionist wealth accumulation, it would be prudent to question at this stage, as Mr. Cruz' anointed son seeks the highest public office, is this "wealth transfer" the  work of some very greedy and evil men?iii

 Firstly, Christian Zionists believe 2016 is the start of the so-called "messianic era." Palestinians will be expelled from Israel; a new temple will be constructed on Temple Mount, and animal sacrifices will be resumed.  (The recent Israeli election must have given them great encouragement.) 

For this reason, a blemish-free red heifer is reported to be under guard in the U.S. to be used to commence temple sacrifice in 2016, when it will be three years old.iv  Accomplishing this will take much wealth and military action on the part of "anointed allies."

So there is certainly a religious element in any such wealth transfer. iii

The following organizations and policies might facilitate this wealth transfer:  Alan Greenspan,  Ben Bernacke,  Janet Yellen and Stanley Fischer (former Bank of Israel head) acting through their Federal Reserve System in the U.S. and the rest of the Anglo Zionist world central banking system.

Blank.jpg(left, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, employer of Cruz's wife, told London Times in 2009 he was "doing God's work.")

Add Goldman Sachs and a quadrillion dollars in derivatives, the lunatic U.S./NATO foreign policy adventures in Ukraine/Eastern Europe, South America, Africa and the Mid East advocated by a host of pro-Israel Neo cons.

Which brings us to the newly announced presidential candidate, Ted Cruz, son of the above mentioned esteemed preacher.

Ted Cruz has had a miraculous rise to power. He helped deliver the Christian Evangelical vote to George W. Bush in 2000 and advanced the Neo Con agenda reality through 911 and the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. As a quid pro quo, Bush pushed through the so-called "faith-based initiative" that funneled, and continues to funnel, tens of billions of dollars of public money into churches, many of whom espouse strongly Zionist doctrines.

As Jeb Bush's future VP, Cruz would be in an excellent position for advocating Benjamin Netanyahu's war with Iran--especially since that country could provide a myriad of end-time wealth!  An indication of this:  Cruz recently lead the recent illegal and treasonous speaking invitation to Netanyahu and threats to sabotage any Iran peace agreement.

On March 2, Cruz shared a Washington podium in D.C. with "holocaust survivor" Elie Wiesel. He described  Rabbi Shmuley Boteach as a "lion in the defense of Israel and the Jewish people," and seconded the statement by Weisel: "To be Jewish in this world is to always be concerned...When enemies make threats, take them seriously.  When evil begins its work, don't give it another chance." vi

Tom Mysiewicz is a science journalist, technical writer and PR account executive. He has written extensively on Mideast policy and Neoconservatism. This article first appeared on his blog.



Bartholomew's Notes on Religion


(Skip to the 52:00 minute mark--ignore the repeated shofar blowing.)

 3.This teaching is closely connected with popular mythology relating to the restoration of a so-called "Jewish Jubilee" or Shemitah and the occurrence of so-called "blood moons" in 2015--all portending the advent of "messiah." Seemingly, a major collapse of western financial markets and world conflict would fit in nicely with this scenario. There is a wealth of easily-found information on these topics available on the internet. A good starting point is:

Israel Rediscovers Shemitah in Time for Blood Moons , World Net Daily, 25 June 2014

 4. Rafael Poch, "Holy Cow, Red Heifer Born in U.S.," Breaking Israel News, 29 June 2014

 5. Bruce Wilson, "Cruz' Father Suggests Ted Cruz "Anointed" to Bring the Spoils of War to the Priests," 16 October 2013 Talk to Action

6. Washington Free Beacon, 2 March 2015


Gary Franchi exposes the NAU, it's background all the way back to Ronald Reagan's administration and Ted Cruz and his wife's  promotion of the sovereignty destroying EU-like proposal

The Vigilant Citizen ad

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Cypto Jew Ted Cruz & the "End-Time" Wealth Transfer"

Marcos said (April 1, 2015):

Unfortunately, there has been much Cabalist influence among weak and heretic Christians these days. The Bible is very clear that the Third Temple will be built in order to establish the worship of the Antichrist, who will be the worst enemy of Christians of all times and who, ironically and tragically, will turn himself against the very Jews who helped him climb to the top (this is the famous passage where Jesus tells the Jews of that future time to flee to the mountains). Supporting the construction of this Temple is to go totally against the Bible.

Things like Bible Codes (Cabalist gematria), moons and Shemitah (why don't the Rothschilds forgive all loans?) are all absent from Bible prophecy. These are inventions from the Cabalists in order to distract and confuse Christians. The Bible is clear: things will get from bad to worse, there is an evil world government coming and people will be forced to worship the Antichrist, who will reign from Jerusalem.

Fortunately, Jesus Christ will eventually return to gather His own and judge the wicked. Anything apart from that is confusion from the evil one.

Duane said (March 31, 2015):

The free jelly and ice cream is being offered.

Join the happy club and you will be excluded from the big bad nasty things....... Thanks for letting all of us be herded like the Eloi alluded to by HG Wells. I get all I want until ....SMACK .... the predator (morlock) hits.

We have a lot of these theologies today..... liberation theology (in my view a socialist variation), the rapture theology based on Matthew 24:40 (except that it doesn’t necessarily indicate whether the one who stays or the one who is taken away is the true beneficiary ... depending on various translations) and dominion theology (a crusader like ideology) where various religious organisations think that they have to take control of the earth for Christ to come down (so he wont come down like a thief in the night then.... and all that bloody gangstalking is really really in Christ's name and not a Stazi spin off!) and various other versions ad nauseum. Its not that I dont want Christians to be Christians ( I spent a time of my life with some really great and wise people who were franciscans)...... Just stop buying into to the power bullshit!.

“Just strive to be popular with the great ones everybody”.... that will save you from the big bad nasty things..... of course not. They have already sold their mothers so why expect them to take care of you.

Al Thompson said (March 31, 2015):

From what I've seen and experienced in so-called "Christian" churches, I wouldn't touch any of them with a ten-foot pole. Just like the government, almost all of them are satanic cults. The last time I went to church, the pastor was asking the congregation to pray for a quick victory in Iraq.

Now, I've always ignored the "Jew" issue because of its racial overtones, but in these last five years I have been on your website just soaking it all in and I'm beginning to form the opinion that all religions are satanic. Interestingly, all of them have the "Jewish" roots: Islam, Hindu, Christian, and Judaism. Religion is the primary tool for the destruction of the minds of men and it is used as the primary instrument for deceit.

I've studied the bible for over 25 years, and given all of the various translations, one would be hard-pressed to say that God wrote it. I believe more in the natural law which all of us are subject to and that God established it for our benefit.

I think it is better to separate from these creeps and never vote again. Voting seems to encourage them to do bad things. In addition, the government has little to no morality, so there's no reason to vote in a system like what we see today: almost complete communist domination.

Below- Ontario Teacher Disciplined for Criticizing Child Procurement Program - (Scroll Down)

Anti-Child Hate Speech Allowed to Flourish

March 30, 2015


You can't criticize gays but heterosexuals are fair game.
Rebecca, 20, exposes the vicious heterophobic
anti-child subculture that flourishes on the Internet.
profoundly anti-human thinking
is another example of many heterosexuals
mirroring homosexual attitudes and behavior.

Related- Young Women Rages Against Feminist Subversion

 "They treat children like they are subhuman scum, the worst things to happen to this planet, seriously."

by Rebecca

I just wanted to make another observation about the evil society we live in.

I've been noticing more and more younger people, age 18-30, jumping on this vicious "I hate children!" bandwagon.

And when I say that this particular bandwagon is vicious, I REALLY mean that it is vicious and mean spirited in the full and serious sense.

People nowadays go on and on about how much they hate children, don't want children, and would hate having to raise children. They loathe everything about children.

Whenever someone mentions children, some idiot always remarks they don't like them and don't want any, as if it's at all relevant to the conversation.


I mentioned before that I was able to break out of my feminist brainwashing and discover the truth. Well, when I was a feminist, I didn't want children either. Now that I've distanced myself from those influences, I see just how disgusting and all around toxic this movement is.

I visit many different Internet sites, blogs, etc. and everywhere I look, I see the disgusting anti-children drivel.

There's this new subculture that's emerged and it's called "childfree." A lot of people make not having or wanting children their main identity. They frequent bulletin boards and forums dedicated to their "childfree life" where they trash talk children and parents alike.

I'm not exaggerating. This is literally all these people talk about on their sad little forums. They treat children like they are subhuman scum, the worst things to happen to this planet, seriously.

childhatersinfashion.jpgHere are a few of the colorful (read: disgusting) names these "childfree" morons have used to refer to children in their little forums: crotch fruit, crotch spawn, poop larvae, walking tumor, toadler ( a play on "toad" and "toddler").

These people also rage against parents. They refer to parents as: Moo (referring to mothers, calling them cows) and Duh (for fathers, because fathers are "stupid.")

Parents are referred to as "breeders" as if they were subhuman for DARING to have children. For example, I was posting in a thread on Reddit once, and the topic of children came up. Out of nowhere, one little puke piped up with "Why don't you not have children and enjoy life instead?"

 As if you can't enjoy life if you have kids? Seriously?


Feminism and the New World Order depopulation agenda is to blame for this. Feminism convinced stupid women that having a family is "oppressive" and "imprisoning." Instead, they should go out and waste their lives on some pointless career.

Feminism has masculinized women and effeminized men. Many men are little girly boys who don't want to get married and care for a family.

Because women would rather focus on being "independent" and spurn the idea of family, many men simply don't know what to do. They feel redundant and pointless. Directionless. They don't have a feminine wife to care for or a family to lead.  Their development is arrested. They have meaningless promiscuous sex with masculine feminist women, work some dead end job, play video games, watch movies, watch sports, surf the internet, etc. They never become men.

Similarly, feminist women are neutered and never become women. Both genders remain androgynous, psychologically mutilated creatures who spend their lives being slaves to the Illuminati system.

People nowadays are so brainwashed it's pathetic! The media is the source of this horrible attitude towards children.  The media deliberately projects a negative image of children!

This is true for ALL media. Think about it, when was the last time you saw the mainstream entertainment portray children in a positive light? Rarely at best, and even when they do, they still have to make children look bad in some way. I've notice the changes in attitudes over the years.

Today, kids are viewed as nothing more than burdens. People think that when you settle down and have kids, your happiness is "over".  I've heard so many idiots describe the fetus as a "parasite."

The illuminati has truly taken a toll on society. The traditional family lies in ruins and people despise the very idea of settling down to have children.

The Vigilant Citizen ad

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Anti-Child Hate Speech Allowed to Flourish"

Tom said (April 1, 2015):

I am not entirely certain if the lady that wrote the above piece realizes how absolutely correct she is about the anti-family agenda of the satanist collective.

My (appointed) wife and I once ended up at a social gathering of local "elites" (I only retrospectively understand this), how this eventuated is a long and tedious story. We were introduced, by the person who took us, to someone of obvious "influence", our escort, when asked what my "wife" and I "do", simply said to this man, discreetly, "they are breeders"...I heard him and I have never forgotten.

Lesley said (March 30, 2015):

Your recent article post really hit a nerve with me.

The idea of children being referred to as "crotch fruit" is beyond the pale in my opinion. I feel really, really ill at this description of babies and children.

I came from a family that believed in zero population growth and other Eugenicist ideas. This is what I was raised with. I am an only child and a child not planned for either.

It was never stressed in my family that I would get married or have children. I really never thought about it until I was nearly forty and yearning for a family. I married at 39 and became instantly pregnant six weeks after my wedding.

I had my first and only child at age 40.5 yrs of age. I wanted him desperately and what a joy I felt when he was born. I can honestly say that when I was pregnant with my son, I have never felt more fulfilled in my life. I was unfortunately going through a divorce at the time but it did not mar my feelings of joy at the life growing inside me.

My son is now nearly 17 years old and is the best thing I have ever done in my life. He unfortunately had to be in the hospital for the first 5 yrs of his life but he is the most compassionate and lovely person you could ever meet. Everyone likes him. He cares for everyone and especially the animals. He is without a doubt a great contribution to life as he cares for everything and everyone he meets without question. He is so not judgmental. He has already contributed more to life than any of the "elites" have ever done.

People that "hate" children, must hate themselves. Babies and children are the light of the world. I pity those who feel otherwise. It is OK to not want children as I was this way for so long. But for those who want them, welcome them and nurture them, it is a magical experience.

Kent said (March 30, 2015):

Mr Makow! Your website and Cluesforum are the only conspiracy minded worth reading, all other are essentially garbage. But please, don't let women contribute to your site. The latest estrogen-poisoned-women-written-piece of child-worshipping propaganda is not what we need or want. Anti-Child Hate Speech Allowed to Flourish by Rebecka is a poorly written defence by a mother who should be ashamed of herself and her decision to bring children to a demon-infested world.

Here in Sweden (the worst socialistic-atheistic-humanistic worshipping country in the world) children are heavily subsidized by the state and families with children are recivers of huge amount of money and privileges. In many parts of Sweden it is only possible to live if you have children and receives welfare. Otherwise you would have to move.

The state wants men (and especially women) to have kids to control them. You can't afford to vote against the state if you have children because you would lose your benefits. You can't speak up your mind because your children would be bullied in the school and you would possibly lose your job and your children would be deemed as unsuitable friends for other children.

A free man is a man that has nothing to lose. Nothing to control him. Nothing to tempt him with. A man with children is not free. He is a slave. He is the cornerstone of the state.

Only rich and powerful men should ever think of getting children. They can afford them without sacrificing their independence. This is the best advice to give young men today. Work hard without sacrificing your health and your sanity, and try to live your own life and get that fortune you need to be independent.

Family, sex and children are temptations for the poor. Don't fall for them if you are.

Kent, Thanks for this Swedish perspective.

Rebecca is 20. She is not a mother but she would like to be. It is stupid and dangerous to generalize about all women. Also, if your father had your views, you would not have been born.



Magda said (March 30, 2015):

Thanks Rebecca, good points - really sad in that many hedonists are present oriented and as such they cannot see that the future and our civilizations depend on how we treat and raise each other. Compassion and mercy for the young and the old is an important way of life that has tangible ramifications. Your treatment of the weak and helpless tells us the kind of values you live by and the merit of your society
Beauties of Islam, Children's Rights Sh. Yusuf Islam

Al Thompson said (March 30, 2015):

love Rebecca's article. I might suggest that us "breeders" routinely verbalize our disgust of queers and ask the following questions:

Are they really Rump Rangers?

Are they really Fudge Packers?

If you hate children so much why don't you abort yourself?

Do you really stick your penis in another man's butt?

Do you really stick your fist up someone's rear end?

Do you really think I would want to use the same office equipment that a homosexual uses?

Don't do this around children but adult queers are fair game.

I've been a homophobe ever since I was a teenager because everyone I've encountered are disgusting wretches. I was constantly being "hit on" when I was a young man and I resented it. On top of all that, homos are full-body assholes.
They have been a scourge to me for most of my life.

Pardon my French, but this article sent me on a rant.

I suggest that people tell the homos to go stuff it (they probably will). And they are arrogant in their perversion. They think they are enlightened and "free" when the fact is they are slaves to their own perversion.

CB said (March 30, 2015):

Ten years ago I kept seven hens and o cock. They made lots of eggs, but did not brood. Initially I thought they may need better conditions, despite abundance of food and space they had. Then I decided to let them forage outside, in the garden, to scratch the earth and live a happy chicken life. Despite these ideal conditions, they still did not breed. They were so genetically damaged by artificial breeding since several generations with the modern technology that they lost the breeding instinct, and so little by little they went down the pipe of time, and went extinct.

Few years ago, I was introduced to a rather pretty woman in Germany. She was very interested by carnal pleasures, but the prospect of a family was rejected with horror as some major peril to her hedonistic lifestyle. Once she got pregnant; promptly, without consulting me, she went for abortion. This was the end of our relationship. I understood then that she was too damaged by the feminist movement. She is a walking dead, but she does not know yet… till one day when she may get out of her profound hypnotic state, and realize how stupidly she spent her life on earth.

I arrived at a rather hurting conclusion: let these feminists and commies and other idiots go on the same way as these damaged chicken, and clean humanity of damaged genes. Let the life spring from healthy people, so the earth may be inherited by undamaged life!

Carl said (March 30, 2015):

Thanks for your article Rebecca, I was recently disowned by a friend who was anti-child shortly after my son was born. I have noticed a lot of left wing "useful idiots" have taken up this mentality and it's fuelled by several places..

The global warming cult loves to think of children as creators of more CO2, "how dare they help destroy the earth."

There is also the overpopulation crowd who chimes in, they might be right about China and India, but they don't stop to think that places like Canada or Japan need immigrants because the birth rate is so low. People need to pay into the CPP to keep it going, something that doesn't even cross the mind of the very socialists who love it so much. Stupid?

There is the new age crowd that doesn't want children to distract them from their enlightenment goals, they seek inward instead of outward (Christian) paths, yet India is the mother of these inward philosophies and they love family there! Stupid?

Perhaps the most disturbing thing however is the 16 - 42 crowd is living the life of perpetual teenagers; video games, easy men/women, pubs/bars, movies, antidepressants and a host of other distractions.

The bottom lines is although I pity the brainwashed, maybe they aren't meant to reproduce? Many will discover when it's too late that they desperately want children and will only have the option of doubling their Prozac dose. Darwin is the god of many of these folk.

If people don't want to have kids well whatever, but child hating? These people have failed at life and likely have some kind of gullible retardation. For God's sake even those Rothschild's have kids, even if they sacrificed a few. Some of the most evil people on earth get this so whats is with Joe commie from the forum? Pathetic.

AG said (March 30, 2015):

What do people expect in a society that not only has allowed the slaughter of over fifty-seven million unborn babies, but a society that encourages abortion on television shows like the feminist Lena Dunham's show, "Girls?"

Quoting Mother Theresa, "America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe v. Wade has deformed a great nation. The so-called right to abortion has pitted mothers against their children and women against men. It has shown violence and discord at the heart of the most intimate human relationships. It has aggravated the derogation of the father’s role in an increasingly fatherless society. It has portrayed the greatest of gifts ~ a child ~ as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience."

When the murder of one's own child is allowed to flourish, one cannot be shocked at the disregard for little ones, or surprised when women outright hate children.


Thanks AG

Reminds me of satanist Sarah Silverman's sick joke:

"My husband and i want to have an abortion but we're having trouble conceiving."


Wynne's Communist Sex-ed Co-opts Your Role as Parent

March 26, 2015

perv.jpg(Sex ed program designed by Illuminati Jew who confessed to incest and promoting child abuse.)

Wynne's Communist Sex-ed Co-opts Your Role as Parent

March 26, 2015
Why does the new Ontario sex-ed curriculum refer children for advice on sexuality to people other than their parents over and over again?

                                    Wynne's Sex-ed Steals Parental Educational Responsibility

The "credible source" a grade 8 child should consult about becoming sexually active is a health nurse and not a parent. 
Grade 5 students experiencing stress in their lives are told to consult a trusted adult or peer and not their parent.
Every totalitarian regime or school of thought has recognized that the elimination of prevailing cultural ideas can only succeed when the influence of parents (those who are the first to "inculturate" children) is removed.
Roots in Totalitarian Ways of Thought
According to Thomas Ward, vice-president and founder of the U.K.'s National Association of Catholic Families, in an  givaddressen in Russia in 2014, communism absorbed the traditional roles of parents into the state: "Communist society will take upon itself all the duties involved in the education of a child." [1920 Alexandra Kollontai, the first Soviet People's Commissar for Social Welfare Kommunistka "Communism and the Family."]
                      Sex-ed as the liberation of children from parents

Ward notes the progressive inroads into parental direction of their children's sexuality in the next few decades by organizations such as Planned Parenthood and its partners, such as the World Health Organization.  For instance, they directed that the parental role of teacher be taken over by sex-ed classes:
"Children have to be freed from... religious and other cultural "prejudices" forced upon them by parents, civil and religious authorities [...] sex education should be introduced in the 4th grade, (i.e. 9 to10) eliminating "the ways of elders" by force if necessary."

[Brock Chisholm, the first director of the World Health Organization in 1948, The Psychiatry of Enduring Peace and Social Progress 1946. Valerie Riches in Sex Education or Indoctrination? (London, 2004; Revised and reprinted version of Sex & Social Engineering 1986).]
Then parents were prevented from being given notice of their children's intent to use birth control or have abortions.  In Britain, says Ward, a government instruction from 1974 prepared with the advice of the birth control lobby "prohibited doctors from contacting 'parents of a child of whatever age' when she requested contraceptives.  When a parent challenged this the Law Lords ruled that when a doctor decided a child fully understood what was  proposed the child could consent to all treatments and parents' rights  stopped."
The International Federation of Planned Parenthood promotes the extension of children's access to so-called "reproductive health" --sex education, contraception and abortion--by collaborating with UN agencies and by lobbying within the EU. 
The birth control mentality separates life and love twice, says Ward:   once, in separating love and procreation in the marital act and again by separating parents from their children.  
                                                Let's stop Wynne's sex ed program 
The Wynne-Levin sex-ed program teaches children to confide in experts who will teach them the medical "facts" about safe sex.  But medical doctors such as Thomas Ward and Dr. Miriam Grossman believe the real medical facts are not being told.  It's not being told that sex education has not been proven to have any effect on lowering teen pregnancy rates. Nor are the destructive emotional effects of casual hookups on young people.
Parents need to call this sex-ed program out for what it is:  the preaching of a harmful doctrine of false liberation.  
It will teach children to think of sex as purely for pleasure and other people as means to an end.  It will erode the natural trust and respect of the child for the parent. 
And then we need to stand up for the inalienable rights of parents.  We need to protest to all the leaders who should be protecting that parent-child bond for the good of families and society.  And then we need to win back protections in every level of policy and law of our human right to be the Primary Educators of our children!
Best regards,
Teresa Pierre, PhD, President
Parents as First Educators (PAFE)  

Norman Finklestein on Anti Semitism (from Dan)

March 23, 2015

We're all aware the Likudniks like to drag all the Jews into their designs, here Finkelstein sums it up perfectly. Norman Finkelstein, Feb. 23, 2015, responding to RT interviewer remark about 'people connecting the rise in antisemitism in Britain to events in Gaza': Finkelstein, "there's no evidence whatsoever of a 'resurgence' of antisemitism. What you find periodically is whenever Israel engages in one of it's murderous assaults there's a spike in what's called 'antisemitic incidents', so you saw that in 2002, 2006, 2009, 2012, and last summer.

This question is, is it antisemitism? Now here you have a state that calls itself the State of the Jewish People, and you have a head of state who happens to be a maniac who goes around saying "I represent all of World Jewry." When he goes to Paris he said "I'm representing all of World Jewry", when he goes Congress in the United States he says "I'm representing all of World Jewry". Should we fault people if they take him at his word? When he says "we should attack Iran, we should attack Lebanon, we should attack Gaza again" he says he's representing all of World Jewry. So you have a maniac who says he's representing all of World Jewry, and people say "okay, if he represents all of World Jewry, then the Jews are a problem."

That's the logical conclusion. So if there's anyone who's causing the problem, it's the State of Israel and it's head of state, who keeps claiming that their murderous actions are in the name of World Jewry. There's a simple way to solve the problem: stop calling yourself the State of the Jewish People because you're not. You're the State of Israel, and stop saying you speak for World Jewry because World Jewry didn't vote you - nobody gave you that title."

No Planes Crashed on 9-11 (from Lisa)

March 20, 2015

methodical.jpgNo Planes Crashed on 9-11 (from Lisa)

I am listening to an interview by George Noory on Coast to Coast radio with a former United Flight attendant who has done years of research into the False Flag of 9-11. Her name is Rebekah Roth and her astounding discoveries of this event have been published in her book "Methodical Illusion".

I have always known that 9-11 was planned from the moment our government told the Air Force to Stand down.

Her revelations about airline protocol and the numerous anomalies that occurred that day are nothing short of shocking. And she has the facts to back it up. I.E. Six of the so called hijackers are alive and well. She has transcripts from passengers who were told it was a drill. Does this sound familiar?

Passengers were told they were going to fly to Chicago where Ms. Roth believes all four planes were taken and placed in Hangars. Phone records from passengers reveal on flight 93 they were told it was a military drill.

Roth believes no planes crashed that day and that the passengers were more than likely killed afterwards. Remember, these planes were carrying light passenger loads. This is new information that goes beyond what Dr. Judy Wood has written.

Makow- Listen to the interview linked here. I have read 20% of the book so far and there is no mention of 9-11 yet. Just a second-rate novel.