Below- Masonic Mass Murder on the Somme -(scroll down)

Do Spiritual Women Hold Men to an Impossible Standard?

July 1, 2016

Are single Christian females 
expecting too much of men?
Men speak out about
the disadvantages of having
a spiritual seeker as a partner. 

by A.K. Kiesling   (a woman) 

Just as women have their hot-button issues with single men, so too have men with women--namely that Christian women... "expect too much" of men and have ridiculously high standards, spiritually speaking.

As one man lamented in response to my online survey, "Lower your standards. I'm not the Apostle Paul! If I don't look like an evangelical, smell like an evangelical, have unattainable character and charisma, spend all my free time at church, have all my issues settled, have all my prayers answered, know Scripture inside out, love children ... good grief!" 

I could picture him throwing up his hands in defeat....

images (52).jpeg
"Christian women are just plain too picky, especially about finding a man who's spiritual enough," said another man. "If they find themselves being pursued by a guy they genuinely think is a believer, whom they find reasonably attractive, and who they think would make a decent husband, they should just marry him. Instead, all the women ... seem to be holding out for some super-spiritual guy who wants to be an overseas missionary in a Third World country, and whom they feel some kind of amazing 'click' or 'chemistry' with."

In defense of the single Christian women I know, most have very realistic spiritual expectations of the men they date and hope to marry.  Yes, they long to find someone who shares their faith, but they know that men are humans too--fallible creatures who mess up sometimes and need grace as much as we do. 

If anything, the women I know err on the side of giving too much latitude to men, sometimes blurring the lines between someone who "believes in God" and a real believer. But that's not what showed up in the responses from men who took my survey. Quite a few vented their frustration about too-high standards.

"Christian women have been fed a lot of misinformation about what actual men are like," writes one disgruntled man. "Reality check: there are no white knights or heroes out there. We can't rescue you, sorry. And the 'Jesus is my boyfriend' thing is a little weird. I am not saying you should lower your expectations. Rather, you need to readjust them. Just as many men need to realize that actual women are not like the airbrushed porn stars of their fantasies. I find that I enjoy the company of non-Christian women far more than that of most Christian women. I just don't think they have bought into the popular tripe about what a man is supposed to be. Real men are rough around the edges."


download (20).jpeg
Just what does the book Wild at Heart (by John Eldredge) say about men? The book's marketing description on reads: God designed men to be dangerous, says John Eldredge. Simply look at the dreams and desires written in the heart of every boy: To be a hero, to be a warrior, to live a life of adventure and risk. Sadly, most men abandon those dreams and desires--aided by a Christianity that feels like nothing more than pressure to be a "nice guy." It is no wonder that many men avoid church, and those who go are often passive and bored to death.... Eldredge gives women a look inside the true heart of a man and gives men permission to be what God designed them to be--dangerous, passionate, alive, and free. 

Perhaps it's the "dangerous, passionate, alive, and free" label that seems like too tall an order for the average Christian male to fill, especially when they feel as if women expect (read: demand) this from them. In reading through the responses of men, I heard plenty of passion and expectations, but also world-weariness. Some seemed even more jaded than women on the state of single Christian America.

"Christians put unrealistic expectations on each other," said one man in his early thirties who answered that he would like to be married someday if he meets the right person. "There seems to be this feeling that because you are a Christian you must be perfect or more normal than others. Fact is we are all human and imperfect so we need to accept that fact or else we will always be frustrated at being disappointed in our significant other."

images (53).jpeg
Unrealistic expectations--and modern singles' propensity to have a checklist of requirements in their ideal mate--actually work against true love. If it looks like love, acts like love, and has the staying power of love, then it's probably the real deal. 

"The dating scene is OK as far as it goes," writes another man in my survey. "It's the progressing-to-marriage scene that's a problem. I wish women didn't feel they need a light shining down from heaven on a man and a voice booming 'he's the one' in order to make a decision. My last girlfriend wouldn't marry me because she wasn't getting a clear signal from God that I was 'the one.' It was incredibly frustrating and her breaking up with me broke my heart." 

Somewhere out there, I can't help but think there's a young woman who realized too late that true love was standing right in front of her, but she let it slip away.

Women who strike a gracious balance between accepting men as they are--admittedly rough around the edges--yet gently prod them to be their best self might find a true knight after all, or at least a knight-in-the-making. We all would do well to learn this lesson about looking for the best in the man or woman right in front of us....

We do ourselves a favor--and open ourselves up to the possibility of true love--when we drop our defenses, shred our checklist, and start seeing people as God does, with all the potential they possess.

A.J. Kiesling is the author of  Where Have All the Good Men Gone? (Harvest House) and the novel Skizzer (Revell).  A religion writer for Publishers Weekly, she has written more than a dozen books.  You can reach her at

First Comment from Tony B:

This article and all the comments I've read ring "protestant outlook" loud and clear.  None of them has any concept of true Christianity nor of true Christian women or men.

There are very good reasons that God put the man as the head of the home.  Today neither the husband nor the wife, in most cases in the western world, have a clue as to what these reasons are although the men seem to at least sense them while the women do not at all in most cases.

A godly woman knows that her castle is the home and she knows what goes with it: the providing of the immediate family needs, the nurturing of the children and OF BEING THE BEST POSSIBLE HELPMATE TO THE HUSBAND, who is the one, in normality, who must face the world for necessary means to physical, material and edified life.  

In this day in the U.S. I believe I have never met more than a handful of women whose first priority after marriage is to back her husband.  Instead there is an almost universal drive to FORCE-CHANGE him into what SHE WANTS him to be, what HE wants to be notwithstanding. Only her material desires are to be satisfied.  This same reasoning persists throughout the marriage as proven by the simple FACT that in almost ever case it is the wife who initiates the divorce.  Her selfishness NEVER abates.  

To her defense, she has been brainwashed with the "princess" syndrome from day one, often at home, always in school and forever by television and trashy books and magazines, etc.

Too often, in the same series as the creation of the princess, the husband has been "feminized" to the point of not having the ability to fulfill his role either.  Still, the husband is almost always the material loser, even losing his children, while the woman is universally granted the win, whether or not she deserves it.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Do Spiritual Women Hold Men to an Impossible Standard? "

Jennifer said (July 1, 2016):

Materialism, Feminism, Worldly Ways, Fornication have infiltrated Christianity and instead of self examination the meme is that women have become too Spiritual-maybe men have become too Worldly?

Women sink or swing via their husbands, therefore, the most crucial decision a woman can make is finding a husband she can respect. Also, I find that if a man is a feminist or not, it is generally determined by a his income. If a man makes a significant income -such that he can afford to support his wife then he is Not a feminist. Of course, there are always exceptions as I have met billionaires that still demand their wife work.

Anon said (July 1, 2016):

The qualities of "being too demanding and having over-inflated expectations" are hardly particular to Christian women. In regard to women, Christian or otherwise, I find that they tend to be little concerned with how well their man lives up to the ideals of Jesus while experiencing something akin to perpetual disappointment because he does not live up to the idol of James Bond i.e. perfection in the worldly sense.

I've met many non-christian women who've
considered themselves to be HIGHLY spiritual persons and while I do not wish do decry every spiritual nuance that does not fall poignantly within bounds of christianity, I have found these women to be some of the WORST females to be around. Utterly exhausting, fabulously unreasonable and self deceiving are some terms that come to mind as well as a phrase I read in the bible recently (the precise wording and location escapes me at the moment, but it was in Judges 19 or 20, I believe) about how the "sons of belial", were so prone to their lower, bestial nature that one "could not even speak to one of them." Of course, today, most of us would consider such a statement to be racist, sexist or bigoted regardless of whether or not it happens to be true.

Such is how it goes with the above described type of woman. I have been end-less-ly chewed out for having the audacity to say anything at all that did not conform to such a woman's preconceived notions of truth which amounted primarily to whatever one of these women wanted to be true at any given time. The quote by Naomi Ragen is typical of these femi-nazis. They routinely claim to be fighting for equality while espousing a belief in female superiority by way of some inherent, unalterable moral virtue.

RL said (July 1, 2016):

Women are more spiritual than men? If that was the case it would be heaven on earth. Just because you helped destroy manhood and Christian patriarchy with free sex, practice yoga and believe what ever society tells you doesn't make you more spiritual.

JJ said (July 1, 2016):

Hello Henry,
Women who are seeking Christian men simply transfer their unreasonable expectations from the secular world to the spiritual. The line about a woman expecting a man to be a third world missionary AND a homebody etc etc. while she's still "searching" and depending on him and not HIM for guidance said it pretty well.
Been there, done that.

Dan A said (July 1, 2016):

My last girlfriend is an Atheist. So she did not have any spiritual expectations of me. Which is why I think this girlfriend was so enjoyable. I gave here all of my male characteristics, including my strength and energy. And that was reciprocated.

B said (July 1, 2016):

Evangelical Christians are anything but spiritual! and it produces very mean and judgmental people. They simply run a behavior modification and religious mind control cult. (Ever heard of the Scribes and Pharisees?) Evangelicals should close the bible. They don’t have the slightest clue what they are reading. I know….I lived around these people for many years, heard way too many of their pointless sermons and was born into the system with parents who were leaders.

It looks good on the outside, but when you sign up….watch out. They own you, and the path does not lead to heaven…it leads to hell. Since Billy Graham and Oral Robert’s are the present day role models for good Christian behavior, that should tell people the system doesn’t work! The sheeple refuse to wake up. Yeshua didn’t start Christianity (nor the Trinity doctrine!!)…..false shepherds, Constantine and pagan Rome did. Yeshua taught the secrets and mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven and those on the outside could not hear or see. The keys are not given to professional Popes, priests and pastors, or religious mind control cults.

Below- Bad Actors at the Faked Orlando Pulse Nightclub Shooting (scroll down)

Masonic Mass Murder on the Somme 100 Years Ago

June 30, 2016

Testament of Youth poster.jpg
Left. "Testament of Youth," poignantly dramatizes lives shattered by Judeo Masonic First World War.

Western Civilization Died on the Somme a Century Ago
On July 1,1916, General Douglas Haig, a Freemason, began the Battle of the Somme which by November resulted in the death of one million ChristianBritish patriots in their prime. Fathers, sons, husbands, brothers, lovers. War is a ruse by which the globalist satanic elite kills patriots under the guise of national duty.  

"When we started to fire, we just had to load and reload. They went down in their hundreds. We didn't have to aim, we just fired into them. " German machine gunner.

from July 12, 2015
by Henry Makow Ph.D.

About 10 million soldiers died in battle on both sides in World War One, one of the costliest wars in history.  The needless slaughter in trench warfare is usually portrayed by the Masonic-controlled media and education system as an unintended consequence. 

In fact, these wars are orchestrated by the Illuminati Jewish bankers and their Masonic minions to kill Christians in order to degrade Western civilization in advance of the Satanic NWO now clearly manifesting itself. (See, World War One- First Christian HolocaustRitual human sacrifice to their god Moloch may also be a factor.

All wars are designed to enrich and empower the bankers while destroying and demoralizing humanity. Warmongering "patriotism" is a ruse. The sooner gullible non-Satanists stop falling on a sword, the better.

I'm going to focus on the Battle of the Somme, one of the biggest battles of the first world war. My information is based on John Laffin's British Butchers and Bunglers of World War One, (1988, p. 63ff.) 

(left, Douglas Haig, Elgin Lodge #91)

Both General Douglas Haig, Commander in Chief, Western Front,  and his principal co-planner Sir Henry Rawlinson were Freemasons. The Somme offensive ("The Big Push") was intended to end the stalemate and win the war. The Allies had 700,000 men, a 7-1 numerical superiority. Haig and Rawlinson anticipated losing 500,000 men. 

The plan was simple: to bomb the Germans for five days and nights then walk to the enemy trench and kill the remaining soldiers or capture those who surrendered. 

However, after 5 days of bombing, the German trenches and their defences were barely scratched. The English neglected to reconnoitre or observe this from the air.  The Germans just had to shoot their machine guns, reload and shoot again. The same type of attack continued from the 1st of July until November 1916. Over a million men died; 58,000 on the first day.

On July 1 1916, 11 British divisions attacked on a 13-mile front. By 7.30 am the six German divisions finished breakfast, wiped their faces with their napkins, and carried their machine guns from comfortable deep cellars. They began spraying the attackers who were advancing in neat rows, "to maintain order." 

A German machine gunner wrote, "We were surprised to see them walking, we had never seen that before. The officers went in front. One was carrying a walking stick...When we started to fire, we just had to load and reload. They went down in their hundreds. We didn't have to aim, we just fired into them. "

A German officer reported his impression of the attack. "Whole sections appeared to fall. All along the line, Englishmen could be seen throwing their arms into the air and collapsing, never to move again. Badly wounded rolled about in agony, while badly wounded crawled into shell-holes for shelter. "

John Laffin: "Of the 110,000 men who attacked, 60,000 were killed or wounded on this one day. About 20,000 lay dead between the lines. Haig and Rawlinson were directly responsible for the assumption bombardment would cut barbed wire and render the Germans vulnerable.  The Germans lost an estimated 8000 men on July 1. 2000 were taken prisoner." (64) 

A hospital station dealt with 10,000 casualties in the first 48 hours. A surgeon wrote:  "Streams of ambulances a mile long waited to be unloaded. The whole area of the camp, a field of six acres, was completely covered with stretchers placed side-by-side, each with its suffering or dying man. We surgeons were hard at it in the operating theatre, a good hut holding four tables. Occasionally we made a brief look around to select from the thousands of patients those few we had time to save. It was terrible. (73) 

Haig's chronicler Colonel Boraston wrote that the attack, "bore out the conclusions of the British High Command, and amply justified the tactical methods employed." (No doubt these men were all Freemasons.) 

Laffin writes: "This is an outrageous statement. It is more accurate to call 1 July 1916, as H. L'Etang does, 'probably the greatest disaster to British arms since Hastings....Certainly never before nor since has such wanton pointless carnage been seen...' (70)

Laffin bemoans the  complete "absence of cleverness" in the military strategy. He emphasizes that, "high casualties were a basic rule of the game and simply had to be accepted." (76)

Who knows how the world would be different if the cream of that generation of Christians had not been trampled into the mud of France in 1915-18?

There is simply no explanation for sending wave after wave of men to their slaughter other than that this was the deliberate goal. Any sane general would have stopped the attack as soon as it became apparent that the strategy was a failure. 

Western society is controlled by a satanic cult whose goal is to degrade and exploit humanity.
It's time we stopped we being complicit in our own destruction.  


Related :

Illuminati Bankers Instigated World War One 
Bankers Extended WW1 by Three Years
First Comment from  Dan

Grand total of combat deaths, all sides 8,230,012

Total active duty including diseases 10,822,343

Total civilian deaths 2,235,457

"Spanish"Flu began in Jan 1918 and ran in two waves till Dec 1920
Death toll:  est, 20,000,000 to 50,000,000

500,000,000 were infected, so I'd go with the higher estimate.  My grandparents remembered it. Whole families died in two days.

Both waves killed the same age as combat soldiers.

It's as if whomever wanted the fittest of that generation of European males culled, came up with a way to kill the girls too. Just one helluva coincidence.

You can find this article permanently at World-War-One .html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Masonic Mass Murder on the Somme 100 Years Ago"

James Perloff said (July 13, 2015):

This article provides yet more great insights into history! I might comment that the German Blitzkrieg of World War II, for all the brutality the Judeo-Masonic press has attributed to it, was designed to achieve swift victory in order to avoid repeating the interminable trench warfare deaths seen during World War I. It started in May 1940, and by June France had capitulated. Although I am not a fan of director Stanley Kubrick, his 1957 film PATHS OF GLORY captured well the senseless lethality of World War I’s trench warfare, as well as the hypocrisy of some of the Allied high commanders:

DB said (July 13, 2015):

Regardless if they are called Masons, Zionists, Communists, Bolshevists, Illuminati or by any
other name, they are still the same people who put Jesus on the cross crying: Crucify, crucify!
And they are sworn enemies of all Jesus’ followers – then and now! Where they are, crime of
of every kind abounds

DKC said (July 13, 2015):

I am intrigued about the amount of woundedness I encounter not only in myself, but of many other men I come into contact in modern Western society. Most are 3rd and 4th generation of those who endured the conflicts of WWI and WWII, not to mention the conflicts that followed, Korea, Vietnam and the Gulf wars. The political, societal, cultural environment that foments conflict and keeps the unwashed masses in constant peril is seemingly orchestrated by a relative few.

I find that most of the religion I’ve encountered, organized and otherwise, keeps many at a child’s mentality. The natural response of children is to be fearful, life by their feelings and to more or less blindly follow those in authority over them. Such a religious environment doesn’t challenge men to move out of their comfort zone, and in many ways provides an emotional catharsis for the conflict happening around them. This is a grievous evil. The outcome of blind men who lead other blind men is not good. Falling into a ditch may mean being killed in a conflict designed with the purpose of taking your life.

I am a believer in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Through much trial I have come to believe that we are intended confront our fears, learn from our experiences and gain a heart and mind toward good judgment. Subsequently, those that gather of like mind ought to enjoy enough liberty to share from those experiences. A proverb states: “as iron sharpens iron, so does a man sharpen the countenance of a friend.” Ought we not also sharpen one another with an understanding toward good judgment with our friends?

Stephen Coleman said (July 13, 2015):

As a child I worked for a retired British captain that spent the war in the trenches when he wasn't in hospitals recovering from wounds. He immigrated to the USA and told me on several occasions that he would have gladly joined the the Continental Army against his homeland. He hated his superiors and their incompetence.

I was aquainted with an American veteran of WWI who lived to be 104 years of age. He told me that a wave of 2000 American soldiers attacked a German position and there was not one survivor. A second wave of 2000 and 3rd wave were likewise wiped out. The forth wave had 16 survivors all wounded including himself.

The press in the USA reported 800 dead in the attack.

CG said (July 13, 2015):

t blows my mind to think how stupid and easily led the common man is, to commit such cruel absurd unspeakable atrocities then look for sympathy and respect with silly buttons(medals). Even with the invention of the internet the masses are still smiling as they line up to poison themselves with vaccines full of mercury and cancer viruses(SV40). We all need to be as wise as serpents because serpents rule the world.

Supposed "Christian civilization" needs to take responsibility for its thoughtlessness and quit blaming others. If supposed "Christians" taught their kids the 10 commandments maybe they wouldn't be machine gunning strangers in ditches. Mohammad Ali said: "I Ain't Got No Quarrel With The VietCong...No VietCong Ever Called Me Nigger". I agree with the following quote as harsh as it sounds:

(Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars - page 6): "...Although the so-called "moral issues" were raised, in view of the law of natural selection [1] it was agreed that a nation or world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals who do not have intelligence. Such people are beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent..."

Paraphrasing - "if we don't use our brains, we don't deserve to have brains!"

KS said (July 13, 2015):

t would be nice to think that we Christians might one day, take responsibility for that which befalls us.

The Abrahamic religions are all forms of control in the interests of the elite. Christianity takes the form of an, obedience / death cult. It sees to have been mainly the construct of the murderous Pharisee Saul ant the astute politician and Emperor Constantine. It's doctrines bare only a tenuous relationship to those of it's nominal founder and are sometimes flatly contradictory to those.

So run it by me again. If I had enlisted in 1914, undergone military training, agreed to be sent to Flanders and then tried to kill people who I had never met and knew nothing about, and then been ordered to walk into relentless machine gun fire and been maimed or killed as a consequence, this would have been THE FAULT OF THE MASONS! There being nothing in even the official version of my Christian religion to prepare me for the notion that any of this might have been a bad idea.

Look around us at the western 'Christian' nations. How is it going for them, mired as they are in unpayable usury and unrestrained immigration? That is probably all the fault of the jews and the masons too.

JG said (July 12, 2015):

My grandfather was a combat WW1 veteran and first generation European immigrant. He died before I was born so I never had the pleasure of knowing him.

His brother did tell me that he was a changed man when he came back home.

There is no glamor or glory in war; it only exists in novels and theatre. However, not all of Hollywood glorified war. I would highly recommend the movie 'All is Quiet on the Western Front' (Lew Ayers) ,it may have been the best anti war movie ever made that was based on a book written by a German's WW1 experiences in the trenches of that insane war.

Yes, patriotism is the common ruse that pits "brother against brother". This patriotism is centered on an ideology of their country that, in reality, really doesn't exist. It's this false ideology that makes them numb to all the killing. It's this idealism over human life and religion that causes man to loose his life.

During the Vietnam War enemy casualties were called "body count"

The higher the "body count", the more medals and promotions for the soldiers.

Their really is no such thing as a "good war".

Al Thompson said (July 12, 2015):

There is no political system on earth that is worth one drop of any man's blood. I don't see any reason why a young man should ever join the military. The military should only exist for defensive purposes and not offensive operations that are deployed all over the world. The people who manage these wars are stupid and psychotic and following their orders will always produce a bad result.

These wars are methods of genocide. The freemasons enjoy inflicting the misery upon others. They are demented to the core of their whole existence. This is what happens when basic moral principles are ignored in favor of the Satanic cult nonsense. This is just one example of the history of what not to do. I blame the leaders, but I also blame the men who blindly follow their orders. We all tend to give too much honor to these false authorities.

Below- 1938 Interrogation Bared Illuminati Jewish Conspiracy - Scroll Down

Bad Actors at the Faked Orlando Pulse Nightclub Shooting

June 29, 2016

Bjorn Jiskoot1.jpg
(left, eye witness "Christopher Hansen" a.k.a.
actor Bjorn Jiskoot.)

People are calling the Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting event the sloppiest false flag hoax ever, full of contradictory and unbelievable narratives spoken by actors who are improvising and often changing their stories.

Gregory Fegel has compiled a series of Youtube links to demonstrate that the "Orlando gay massacre" marks a new low standard in American government hoax terror attacks in terms of script, direction and acting. How do the US government and media have the effrontery to perpetrate these clumsy hoaxes? Is it because the public is so gullible?

by Gregory Fegel
The Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting event, which occurred on June 12, 2016, was a hoax performed by actors in the employ of the US Government, to further the agendas of gun control and the bogus War on Terrorism, which is actually a US war of aggression that was started, and is perpetuated, by the US Government and its allies. 

All of the "terrorist attacks" of the past several decades have been false flag attacks, that were falsely blamed on Muslims, but the attacks were actually perpetrated by agents of the US Government and its allies. 

(Few if any of these people actually died.)

The Sandy Hook School shooting (2012), the Boston Marathon bombing (2013), and the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris (2015) were all hoax attacks that were performed by actors. The 9/11 attacks of September 11, 2001 were a real false flag attack, that was falsely blamed on Muslims, in which the US Government killed nearly 3,000 people to launch the bogus War on terrorism.
People are calling the Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting event the sloppiest false flag hoax ever. The Orlando Pulse survivors and police were filmed carrying the wounded TOWARD the Pulse nightclub, in the opposite direction of the Orlando Regional Medical Center, which is located three or four blocks away. Most of the victims have no visible wounds, nor any bleeding. No ambulances were filmed at the scene of the alleged Pulse nightclub shooting. 

The alleged Pulse nightclub shooter, Omar Mateen, has been, since 2007, an employee of the world's largest security firm, G4S, which does contract work for the US Government. Omar Mateen's father,  Siddique Mir Mateen, is a top official in Afghanistan who has close ties to the US Government and the CIA. Omar Mateen performed as an actor in The Big Fix (2012), a dramatized documentary about the BP oil spill. Omar Mateen's employer, the global security firm G4S, has confirmed that Omar Mateen appeared in The Big Fix
(Movie, "Wag the Dog" was about fake news.)

Survivor Christopher Hansen, who is described by the media as the Pulse "hero", gave several interviews the following day "at the scene", but he was actually interviewed in a TV studio in front of a green screen. Christopher Hansen has been identified as an actor named Bjorn Jiskoot, Jr, who has performed in low-budget horror films.  
The survivor Norman Casiano has been identified as an actor named Luis Burbano, whose acting website features head shots and his acting resume. He appeared in The Sacred (2009). Norman Casiano (Luis Burbano) said that he saw a bullet four inches long sticking out of a victim's leg. There are no small arms bullets that are four inches long.  
Initially, Norman Casiano (Luis Burbano) claimed that he had been shot four times in the back, and that each bullet had gone "all the way through." Later, he said that he had been shot twice in the back. Any bullet that enters the chest will cause the lung to collapse, and the patient will not survive, unless he is placed on a chest tube to continuous suction for several days. Any bullet that enters the abdomen will perforate the intestines, which will require open surgery to repair, and a hospital stay of at least several days. Norman Casiano (Luis Burbano) said that he spent two days in the hospital, yet he was out of the hospital, looking fit as a fiddle, the day after the Orlando Pulse shooting incident, for his interview with Anderson Cooper. 
The bereaved mother Christine Leinonen was interviewed "at the scene", but actually, both she and the news presenter are performing in front of a TV studio green screen. The indoor TV studio lights are reflected on the surface of her glasses. Christine Leinonen made an audition video in which she talked about her acting ability, and about how she wanted to perform on the TV show "Wheel of Fortune". No death certificate, nor any death record, for Christine Leinonen's alleged son Christopher has appeared on the Internet. 
Survivor Patience Carter is an intern, and a news presenter, for Fox News. 
No members of the team of "famous trauma surgeons" at the Orlando Regional Medical Center have any online history of videos, nor talks, nor patient reviews. Six surgeons could not possibly have coped with 44 gunshot trauma victims at once as they claim. The Youtube blogger named Concerned American explains that the Orlando Regional Medical Center has severe long-term financial deficits, and the Orlando Pulse shooting hoax may have been planned, in part, to improve the ORMC's funding, and to boost its reputation as a regional trauma center. See also:

Related- Did Anyone Die in Orlando?
----------------   LA Patsy Confirms Orlando CIA False Flag
------------------ False Fag Attack? Pulse had no event scheduled for June 11-12
------------------Judge Napolitano - No One Died Until 5 am Swat Team Entered 
------------------ Why no footage of inside Orlando? Bodies? 

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Bad Actors at the Faked Orlando Pulse Nightclub Shooting"

James C said (June 29, 2016):

I maintain that these false flag hoaxes are deliberately sloppy and transparent. I think the author Michael A. Hoffman II said it best: It's "a clown-like, grinning mockery of the victim(s) as a show of power and macabre arrogance." It's the Establishment's way of giving us all the finger. They know they have absolutely nothing to fear from the American public.

JG said (June 29, 2016):

This latest terror event has seemed to have fallen through the "memory hole" with a lot of Americans faster than even I thought.
The litmus test for what is real in the world of organized terror and what is false is what stays in the heart such as 911, Columbine, and Oklahoma City.
There have bern so many false flag terror events over the last few years in America that it's actually hard to name them all.
What worries me is that this could be mind conditioning for what's soon to be down the road.
This whole ISIS Psy Op is still being peddled around the world for those who are gullible enough to believe that they are a solely independent Islamic Terror Organization out to conquer the world.
Whatever happened to the Black Widows and Boku Harem?

Glen said (June 29, 2016):

The Jew York Slimes has come out with an article Trying to once again paint anyone with a lick of sense and at least one functioning brain cell as a conspiracy theorist. They do their best to get their message out which consist of.

1) We are the all knowing press and you must never doubt us

2) Your government would never lie to you

3)Any who think differently are bat shit crazy conspiracy theorist

The sad truth is these folks know their game is up. Nobody believes a thing they say anymore. Edward Bernays is turning in his grave. After you have read the article posted by Henry with all its facts and astute observations, please take the time to read what the above mentioned rag portrays as the truth. If nothing else, you'll get a good laugh out of it.

The Latest news from Brazil by Marcos

June 23, 2016

The Olympics will be a failure. Rio is dirty, chaotic and dangerous. Ironically, the scare that everybody is talking about, zika virus, is a hoax, as nobody is sick in the city. It is easier to get shot than to get the virus. Be as it may, the motto for the games has been chosen:   A New World (Order).

by Marcos

Glenn Greenwald now has a good excuse for writing lies in Russian government websites, defending the corrupt Marxist government of Brazil: he did it for love.

His Brazilian gay lover, David Miranda, will run for Rio's City Council by the PSOL party, a radical marxist party which supports Dilma's Workers's Party. It is a bunch of deranged communists. One of its founders was Achille Loro, an Italian terrorist who set fire to the sons of an adversary (one of them an 8 year-old boy) but fled to Brazil. 

This happened in the same week the country found out that another ally, the Communist Party, was getting 30% in bribes in housing construction projects for the poor they say they protect. Becoming a leftist politician means being on the receiving end of a never ending flow of financial help, bribes and all kinds of subsidies for parties and NGOs. It doesn't matter that the country may be bankrupt and people starving. Greenwald's lover has his retirement plan set.

With little more than a month to go to the Olympics, Rio is officially bankrupt and not paying its (too many) public employees. Last week, a gang of drug dealers with automatic rifles and grenades invaded a hospital and rescued one of their brethren, killing a passer-by and wounding others. It was also revealed that criminals patrol the avenue from the airport to town, with machine guns and rifles. Any foreign dignitary coming to the Games will pass right in front of their rifle scopes.

Today the former Minister of Planning for Dilma, Paulo Bernardo, was arrested. The man is also the husband of a Workers Party senator who is in the front of Dilma's defense. He was stealing from public pensioners and sharing his gains with the party. Dilma is being impeached for one crime, but she has six other crimes that can be used against her. The woman is such a mafia boss that even the motorcycle of a friend who became famous by giving her rides in Brasilia was confiscated by the police.

As predicted in this site, the only potential conservative candidate (not aligned with the globalists) for 2018 elections, Bolsonaro, a former Army parachuter captain,  was framed and may not run anymore. Some time ago, a Marxist Congresswoman called him falsely a rapist, and he said jokingly that he would never rape her because she was too ugly. Bad taste, maybe, but a joke in response to defamation (this, a real crime). The Leftist Supreme Court judges want to strip him of political rights for that. These judges are puppets of the Workers Party and have been sitting on Lula's lawsuit for months.

What is interesting is that we know now why there was so much effort and propaganda from the Left about the fake rape of a girl in Rio last month. It was a frenzy. They needed the public outcry in order to convict Bolsonaro, because otherwise it would have been too clear that the judges were doing the work for political reasons. A masterful plan.

There is no end to the flow of news about corruption and scandals, now that Dilma can't stop the investigations. Huge mobile company "Oi", the one which paid bribes to Lula's son, went bankrupt, leaving debts of US$ 20 BI. Most of the debt is conveniently with state banks (approved by Lula) so the poor citizens will carry the burden. 

In another scandal, it was discovered that the presidential campaign and the jet for Marina Silva (Prince Phillip's darling) and her partner Eduardo Campos were paid with bribes. The jet went down in 2014 with candidate Campos in it. Now the head of the bribe scandal was found "suicided" in a motel in his home state of Pernambuco. The only viable candidate left seems to be Aecio Neves, about whom Lord Rothschild said he would be the future president of Brazil.

The chaos and misery we see in Brazil are prototypes of what is coming to the rest of the world. Marxism creates scorched earth so the new world order can advance quicker. Watch and learn.


June 19, 2016


A talk by Jeanice Barcelo, left, about the plot to effectuate dramatic changes in our sexual behavior and attitudes. Jeanice shows pornography is a product of satanic occultism. 

Description by Jeanice:  

Tonight I came across an article stating that 40% of U.S. babies are born to unmarried women.  This article was rather shocking in its content and reminded me of how important it is for people to understand the forces that have driven the concept of "family" into the gutter and used us to create a world that is filled with single parents, fatherless children and endless suffering from the wounds of abandonment and rejection.

In my double DVD set on pornography and the deliberate manipulation of human sexuality, I show how the Luciferian bloodlines have orchestrated the mind control of the American people and totally altered our beliefs and behavior in the realm of sex and relationships. The dark forces did this with the help of Professor Alfred Kinsey (pedophile and sadomasochist) who, through his child raping "research," claimed that children are "sexual from birth," and can benefit from having sex with adults. Kinsey also claimed that women are like cats in heat -- although the difference between human females and felines is that cats "have sex" in order to reproduce, whereas, according to Kinsey, human women just want to get off -- all the time, as much as possible, and without restraint. 

According to Kinsey, what women really want is unrestrained physical pleasure and to hell with the spiritual and psychic consequences of their carnal activity (which consequences include the murder of infants while they are still in the womb as well as the birth of billions of haphazardly conceived children who are gestated in wombs where they are not wanted and who are imprinted for life with the idea that they are not loved and not lovable and will never be loved or wanted).

Kinsey's "research" was cited by Hugh Hefner in the first publication of Playboy, which was released the very same year Kinsey's book about female sexuality was released (1953). All of this was orchestrated and paid for by the Rockefeller Foundation (i.e., the Rockenfelders who are Luciferian Jews). This was also the basis of the "sexual revolution" and the "women's liberation" movement, which led to the legalization of abortion and the creation of the highly satanic and evil organization known as Planned Parenthood.

In just 50 years after the publication of Kinsey's research (along with the mainstreaming of pornography into American culture by Luciferian Jews), the number of women giving birth to children who will likely be fatherless jumped from 3.8% to more than 40%. This is because women have bought into the lies about so-called "female sexuality" and "women's lib" and have come to believe their carnal activity is good for them and the way the Creator wanted it. Nothing could be further from the Truth. And American children (as well as children worldwide) are suffering.

To learn more about what I have just shared, I encourage you to check out my double DVD set and share the information widely. People need to understand what is being done to us -- and the fact that these same Luciferian forces have now moved pornography into kindergarten classrooms (with the help of Planned Parenthood's "Comprehensive Sexual Education Program," of course) should concern us greatly. This "curriculum" is preparing children for pedophilia -- which is exactly what Kinsey and the Rockefellers were after all along.

Here is a link to check out the DVD set.  Thank you for taking the time to check it out.

"Anti-Semitism" Trickery by Bishop Williamson

June 18, 2016

images (51).jpeg
Is "antisemite" wielded like a sword?  Just ask the wielder to define the word.

by Bishop Williamson

There are treacherous words which seem to mean one thing and are used to mean quite another. One of the most treacherous words of all is "anti-semitism." The word seems to mean opposition to all Jews purely and simply because they are Jews, and in this sense it rightly condemns something bad, because some Jews are wicked, but certainly not all. On the other hand it is often used to condemn absolutely any opposition to anything that any Jews do, and then the word is wrongly condemning something good, because whenever Jews do anything bad then opposition to them is good. But do Jews do things bad? Obviously. They created Islam for Arabs, Freemasonry for Gentiles and Communism for the modern world, all three primarily to fight Jesus Christ and Christianity, and so send souls to Hell.

A book which all Catholics should read who wish to defend the Church against Islam, Freemasonry and Communism, now Globalism, is The Plot Against the Church by Maurice Pinay. The book was written just before Vatican II to be put into the hands of all Council Fathers, to warn them of the great danger in which the Church would find herself at the Council. Sure enough. The Council Fathers ended up praising Islam (Unitatis Redintegratio),adopting Freemasonic principles (Dignitatis Humanae) and never mentioning, still less condemning, the evil system of Communism. Here is how in his Chapter on "Antisemitism and Christianity" Maurice Pinay analyses the treachery of the word "antisemitism":--

Down the ages the Jews have always used vague words with a variety of meanings, writes Pinay, to snare Gentile minds and so prevent them from defending themselves against the Jewish drive towards world domination in that 2,000-year war on Christianity which he carefully documents throughout his book. So in a first stage, by three arguments they seek to prevail upon Gentile leaders to condemn "antisemitism" in its first sense, given above, of opposition to everything and everybody Jewish: firstly, Christ, by establishing the equality of all men before God, condemned any such degrading of a whole race; secondly, Christ told all men to "love one another"; thirdly, Christ and his Mother were both Jewish.

But in a second stage the Jews, having once obtained the Gentiles' condemnation of a vague "antisemitism," then proceed to give the word a quite different meaning, the second sense above, of any and all opposition to anything whatsoever that Jews do. Thus "antisemites" become: all patriots exerting their right of self-defence against Jewish subversion of their country; all defenders of the family against the errors and vices of all sorts fomented by the Jews to dissolve it (e.g. abortion, pornography); all Catholics defending their holy religion against every form of corruption being openly or secretly promoted by the Jews to undermine it; all truth-tellers unmasking Jews as the originators of Freemasonry and Communism (now of Globalism and feminism, etc.); and all people in general opposing Jewish subversion of the Church and of Christian civilisation. And by their control of politics, finance, films and above all by their media, the Jews have succeeded in giving such an electric charge to this one little word "anti-semite," that it is enough to electrocute anyone that it touches.

But who is foolish enough to have allowed them to control politics and finance? Who has allowed them to virtually monopolise the film industry and the media? Who thinks it is so smart to have done away with all censorship and is now co-operating with them to enable them to censor the Internet? Gentile liberals in every case, who are therefore being enslaved, by the minute, in their New World Order. Doctor, cure thyself! For who that reads their newpapers or watches their television programmes has anybody to blame but himself for letting them take over his mind,and his civilisation?

Catholics, read The Plot against the Church. If anybody is accusing you of being an "antisemite," it is quite possible you have reason to be proud.

Kyrie eleison.