Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

"Apocalypse No!" (I interview Wolfgang Eggert Sunday Sept. 7 at 10 PM CT at www.republicbroadcasting.org )

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Historian Demands Action on Powerful Doomsday Cults

September 4, 2008

eggert.jpg
by Henry Makow Ph.D.

A Munich-based historian Wolfgang Eggert, 46, has launched an Internet petition  to demand action on powerful Jewish and Christian cults that want to instigate a nuclear holocaust to fulfill Biblical prophesy.

He thinks religious fanatics must be exposed and removed from power. He points to the Jewish Chabad Lubavitcher sect who want to hasten Armageddon to facilitate the intervention of the Messiah. Eggert quotes a Lubavitcher rabbi who says:"the world is waiting for us to fulfill our role in preparing the world to greet Moshiach" (i.e. Messiah.)

Their members include Paul Wolfowitz, the architect of the Iraq War which began with an attack named after a Cabalist diety, "Shekinah" ("Shock and Awe").  Especially worrisome now is Chabadnik Joe Lieberman who visited Israel in March with his buddy John McCain. There is concern over Sen. Carl Levin who is Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee. Other prominent Orthodox Jews who might be part of this cult include Bush Attorney General Michael Mukasey, Homeland Security Director Michael Chertoff and former Pentagon Controller Dov Zakheim, implicated in the disappearance of "trillions" of dollars.

While the Chabad Lubavitchers are his focus, Eggert is also concerned about Christian Evangelists like Jack Van Impe and Timothy LaHaye who are close to the Bush administration. Their desired scenario includes the destruction of the al-Aqsa mosque, the restoration of the Third Temple on its site; the rising to heaven of the 144,000 Chosen Ones; the battle of Armageddon; mass death among Israeli Jews and the Final Coming of Jesus Christ.  

The power of the Lubovitchers seems uncanny. (Apparently they are rich.)  On March 26 1991, the US Senate commemorated the birthday of founder Rebbe Menachem Schneerson as "National Education Day."  It also acknowledged the validity of the Talmudic "Seven Noahide Laws." This at a time when all Christian symbolism is being assiduously removed from society.

When Schneerson died in 1994, he was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal for his contribution to "global morals."  According to Eggert, Schneerson taught that Jewish and Gentile souls are fundamentally different. "All Jews are good by nature...Jews are the pride of creation, the Goyim (Gentiles) are the scum."

According to Schneerson, the Goyim still have a role in serving the Chosen ones. The Jews are the Priests while the Noahide Laws provide "a religion for the rank and file." Quoting the Lubavitcher rabbi: "When examining the chain of frightening events [since 9-11] with a Chassidic eye, we see that the US is being pushed toward fulfilling its historic role of teaching the Sheva Mitzvos [i.e. Noahide laws] to the world." 

According to Eggert, Freemasons have always called themselves "Noachids" and incorporated the statutes into their Constitution as early as 1723.

obamachabd.jpgHere is a 2004 picture of Barack Obama meeting with Rabbi Yossi Brackman, Director of the Chabad Jewish Center in Chicago. If you look, you can find pictures of many major politicians in the West posing with this sect. This website features more than a dozen of them.  In this You Tube  the current Chief Rabbi of the Chabad boasts of his rapport with Vladimir Putin. Eggert says Putin's mother is Jewish, which makes him Jewish, and that President Medvedev is Jewish on both sides.  It's hard to say if they are beholden to the Chabadniks.

Eggert, who studied History and Politics at universities in Berlin and Munich, is the author of eight books on hidden history. He believes that all of modern history is influenced by Cabalistic plot to fulfill Biblical Prophesy. However, he is careful to distinguish between the Lubavitchers and other Hasidim who think it is a crime to "force God's hand" and "hasten the redemption."

Nevertheless, as Eggert surveys modern history, the Lubavitchers seem to be in control.

"Every part of modern history is linked to another and in itself to Zionism, state intelligence, lodges and alike. Without the Balfour declaration, there would have been no democratic revolution in Russia and no America into World War One ... We may start at any historical point (even with the American revolution or more far back Oliver Cromwell) [and] we´ll see, that the maker (or profiteer) of all this is Cabalistic Judaism. All serves their plan, to implement biblical prophecy."

Eggert cites World Zionist VP Max Nordau's speech at the 1903 Zionist Convention predicting "a future World War [and] peace conference where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine will be created." ( Eggert, "Israel's Geheimvatikan" Vol.2, pp.21-22)

He says the Zionists sabotaged Germany in WWI (strikes, revolts) because it wouldn't play ball on Israel. He cites a book in Hebrew, "The Historical Moment" by M. Gonzer: "We even find nations who are slow on the uptake and who find it difficult to understand certain relations unless the rebbe--that is world history--gives them some sensible bashes which makes them open their eyes." (Israels Geheimvatikan, vol. 1, p.47.)

Eggert is approaching prominent Jewish figures personally because he believes their support is most needed. So far he has a few prominent signers but has met with some official interference. Eggert wrote to me last week:

"My attempts to find prominent signers in advance were duped. I´ve written to 120 Jewish dissidents in America and Israel; everyone got a separate personal mail. It took me three days. in the first, say two or three hours of my campaign there were regularly mails coming back, with thanks or criticism or messages, that the addressee was absent. quick answers came from Noam Chomsky and the nuclear "spy" Vanunu and a high ranking security officer of the United Nations ordered all my books - but then, immediately after and within one moment all resonance stopped. and since then i haven't received any more answers, although i kept on sending one mail after the other. I think, that some guys are blocking or filtering my mailbox."


CONCLUSION

As we weather the election hurricane season, it is useful to remember that the same people control both parties. Sarah Palin is a distraction. A confection. A cosmetic blush. Her convention speech was written by one of George W's stable of speech writers. She was vetted and approved by AIPAC and Rabbi Joe Lieberman. Rothschild cut-out George Soros funds and controls Obama.

That's why I'll be signing Wolfgang Eggert's petition. It's important that they know we aren't all rubes,  mesmerized by their tired old shell game.
---------

Wolfgang Eggert will be my guest Sunday on "Male Mentoring" 10 PM CT www.republicbroadcasting.org

Related: "The Jewish Crew Behind John McCain"

and my "What Every Jew (and Non-Jew) Should Know"




You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/historian_demands_action_on_do.html
Articles >>

Comments for "Historian Demands Action on Powerful Doomsday Cults"

S said (September 5, 2008):

Hi Henry,

Wolgang Eggert may not be correct about Putin's background. It is true that on his father and grandfather were hard core Bolsheviks. In fact Putin's father,

"Vladimir Spiridonovich Putin, was conscripted into the Soviet Navy, where he served in the submarine fleet in the early 1930s. His father subsequently served with the NKVD in a sabotage group during the Second World War .... His paternal grandfather, Spiridon Putin, had been Vladimir Lenin's and Joseph Stalin's personal cook." (Wikipedia)

The position of a cook is no menial position - it shows that Putin's grandfather was a highly trusted member of the inner circle. People like Lenin and Stalin have generally been paranoid about being poisoned.

However, his mother may be a different story. In fact, "Putin's mother, Maria Ivanovna Putin, was from the Tver Region and also lived through the siege of Leningrad during World War II. Putin's two elder brothers died young and his mother gave birth to him when she was 41. She was a deeply religious woman and had Putin secretly baptized by a Russian Orthodox priest" (source Xinhua http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-10/14/content_2089835_3.htm)

It is interesting that Putin's first child, a daughter, is also named Maria.

Putin was indeed hand picked by the oligarchs to lead Russia, but it appears that his symapthies are mixed. His conduct in jailing the Rothschild man Khodorovsky seems to bear this view out.

R said (September 5, 2008):

Henry, your latest cross-references with Albert Pike ‘prediction’ of three world wars.

It also ties in with recent predictions from my psychic friend.

I’ll briefly outline a few points for your consideration:

First, the book of Revelations talks of the anti-Christ initially being seen as peacemaker (at
least I think it does, I’m no biblical scholar).

Well, now my psychic friend says a clash will begin in April next year. It will start-off as a
limited regional conflict, between Iran and Israel I suspect, however within 12-18 months it will escalate into a global clash, WWIII.

As my psychic friend puts it, it will start “slowly, slowly”.

He also says the Anti-Christ (ahriman or satan incarnate as a man) will rise to prominence in the
next 12 months or so.

Moreover, I suspect, this character may well emerge as some kind of negotiator after the initial clashes with Iran – a “peace-maker”. However his ‘peace’ deal, if any, will fail utterly with Russia and China entering the fray.

From that point on all hell will break loose.

My friend also says Putin is not what he seems. Although he does say that Ahmadinejad is “sincere”,which implies he’s being used to trigger this confrontation.

In other words Putin, the Chabad Lubavitcher sect and so-called Christians like Jack Van Impe and
Timothy LaHaye are preparing for the entrance of this character. His debut on the world stage will
be sanctified with the blood of millions of innocents who will die in this conflagration.

Truly diabolical.

Michael said (September 5, 2008):

Once again, thank you for the timely article and excellent insight into the agenda of our criminal banking masters.

I just wanted to add that, on a side note, I remember very well the Rebbe Menachem Schneerson both in the news, and the day of his funeral procession. I was living in Queens, NY at the time. My best friend was driving me along the Belt Parkway, from Brooklyn back to Queens, when the traffic came to a dead stop. After about 20 minutes of trying to figure out what’s going on, we finally tuned in to the news, and there was the announcement of traffic problems due to the Rebbe’s funeral procession. Even as the announcer was talking, we finally saw, along the service roads NEXT to the highway, first the arrival of hundreds and hundreds of police cars, ambulance, and fire trucks, followed but what seemed like an endless stream of cars! This funeral procession took over three hours to pass by. It was then followed up yet by MORE police cars and other emergency vehicles. The whole time my friend and I were wondering what would happen in case a real emergency came up, and all of our “protectors” were too busy protecting the corpse of this dead guy. Anyway, it was a real pain in the butt. All of us that were stuck in the PARKING LOT that was supposed to be a highway had nothing nice to say.

If I NEVER have to sit through such nonsense again it will be TOO SOON!
--

Thanks Michael

This illustrates the power these people have. -h

Tina said (September 5, 2008):

I will also sign Wolfgang Eggert’s petition because it is important that we don’t fall in the trap of the evangelists and many other cults out there. On one hand these cults claim that our lives are not pre-destined and on the other hand they live by the book of revelation.

I say that Armageddon is inevitable however it is obvious to any reasonable person that some in power, are trying to instigate it sooner. I believe that we have the capacity to hang in and change our destructive behaviour in the positive by following God’s Law, as we have the capacity to change our DNA by changing our bad habits.

I was told recently by someone belonging to a religious group that my fighting for justice and exposing those who are damaging us and damaging our country is harmful because, I am, in the eyes of some religious group, sinning for speaking out when I see things that affects all of us. Thus basically many cults including Buddhism, who is trying to persuade people to get rid of anger all together because it is claimed to be a negative emotion-- wants us to put our head in the sand and be willfully blind to any of the injustice that we see occurring. --- This would include yourself Henry, since your website is all about exposing and educating people.

Obviously I do not agree with the position that some religious group have taken however I do share the same belief as them., which is, I believe in God and I want this earth to be ruled by Him, however I am not prepared to go along with some of them who appear to be inducing a third world war.

Christine said (September 5, 2008):

Good Morning Henry,

It is ironic that Wolfgang Eggert feels threatened by Christian groups when they have no power whatsoever. He should read David Kuo's book "Tempting Faith," about his experience in the Bush White House. Here is an extract from an interview with Kuo:

"'correspondent Lesley Stahl reports, he also says the White House was a place that cynically used religion for political ends and that White House aides ridiculed the very Christian leaders who helped bring Mr. Bush to office.

In his book, Kuo wrote that White House staffers would roll their eyes at evangelicals, calling them "nuts" and "goofy."

Asked if that was really the attitude, Kuo tells Stahl, "Oh, absolutely. You name the important Christian leader and I have heard them mocked by serious people in serious places."' http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/10/14/60minutes/main2089778.shtml

Take care,
Christine



Anthony said (September 5, 2008):

Hello Henry,

An hour ago I was telling somebody about a newspaper article I read in the 70's which described how "Christian" Armageddonists were trying to infiltrate the highest positions of US politics. When I read your article about Wolfgang Eggert and the Lubavitchers I could feel another penny dropping.

This high-level theatre is so well choreographed and predictable that it would be almost embarrassing to use as a plot for a fictional novel. I agree with you completely that Putin, Ahmadinejad, Chavez and others are simply stooges for the real powers behind the scenes.

The spiritual aspect of this becomes clearer with every move the bad guys make. It must be an evil, very powerful force that can corrupt so many influential men and women over centuries to betray their fellow man and even their own souls.

At the same time, I believe very strongly that their is a far greater force for good that will guide and protect us through whatever storms lie ahead. I also believe strongly that God has given each one of us the gift of free will to decide our own personal destiny. This gift is hard for many to comprehend, but I liken it to a loving parent who allows their child to go its own way in life.

These dark days are bringing out the best in many people. We're seeing through the lies that have divided us for generations. Sex, race, religion, etc. are all secondary to our "heart condition". I hope that the Muslims, Jews, Christians, Pagans, feminists, homosexuals who read your words will understand that they have all been duped by evil deceitful liars. We have a wonderful opportunity to redefine our priorities and reject the selfish, hateful materialistic path that much of mankind has been following. Let's continue to expose the lies of the elite and their stooges.

Thank you Henry (and Wofgang!)

Troubled said (September 5, 2008):

I gotta say I like to read your writings.. However, a lot of this stuff is very depressing and hard to take in.. As an American Individual/Family Guy I can't even think of a solution to these problems.. what is one to do in any of these crazy situations where I'm in the lower class living paycheck to paycheck 8-5. Guess that's what the american dream is all about.. lot's of work no vaca. sucking up to your boss, etc etc. .. Then I keep reading about the NWO and all that crap which all seems apparent due to recent events, ie. georgia (caspian basin pipeline) Dutch spies being pulled from Iran due to "imminent" attack. ....All the stuff about who "controls" the world (bankers) + descendents. What does it all add up to? I'm getting paranoid over here, and have no clue and I don't want to be like the "sheeple" that I hear about. Stock up on non-perishable food, water & ammo and dig a bunker that I most likely won't need? I'd like to live my life out & be succesful without all this paranoia so if you have any words of wisdom I would love to hear it. Thanks
Troubled American

---

Dear TA,

Remember that things have always been this way and people have muddled through and had fulfilling lives. Take a few precautions and keep informed, but take breaks from the 'net as well. This info should empower and liberate you, not spoil the good you have.

Henry

Liberty Sacrificed Over Lunch Money--(Below-Tony B Reviews "The Babylonian Woe" )

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Flashback-Canada Destroys a Defender of Freedom

September 3, 2008

privcomm.jpg (From June 29, 2003. Radwasnki seems to have disappeared down the Memory Hole)

Last week, Canada's Privacy Commissioner George Radwanski was hounded from office amid a firestorm of allegations about expense account abuses.

Press hacks and politicians continue to nip at his heels accusing him of misleading parliament and "intimidating" his staff. One Member of Paliament suggested he deserved jail time or even execution.

Why such ferocity?

George Radwanski had been a valiant and eloquent opponent of the Canadian government's new initiatives for repressive public surveillance. His courageous leadership is the reason he has been tarred and feathered. The real scoundrels are the Canadian politicians and press who have abjectly betrayed the public trust.

In January 2003, Radwanski warned Canadians that the government "regrettably has lost its moral compass." Although Canada hasn't had a terrorist attack, planned initiatives will result in the loss "not only of privacy rights that we take for granted but also of ... freedom as we now know it."

He warned "September 11 is being invoked as a kind of magic incantation to stifle debate, disparage critical analysis and persuade us that we suddenly live in a new world where the old rules cannot apply."

"The Government is doing all this in blatant, open and repeated disregard of the concerns that it is my duty to express..." Radwanski said. He revealed that American pressure was to blame, and urged Canadians to assert their sovereignty.

" The right of privacy is at the core of the basic freedoms of our society. Freedom of speech, of thought, of association, to name just a few, are grounded in the idea that we have a private sphere of thought and action that is our business and nobody else's -- not our neighbours', not our employers', not some telemarketer's, and certainly not the state's. In Canada today that fundamental human right is under unprecedented assault."

He foresaw the potential uses of surveillance for political repression. While only thousands march against globalization today, what if millions wanted to demonstrate in the future?

Radwanski compared the "war on terror" to Orwell's 1984, "which takes place against the background of a mysterious chronic war in which it is never clear just who the enemy is or who is winning or losing."

His office was becoming "an international leader in privacy protection" and a thorn in George Bush's side. It focused opposition to the monitoring of communications, biometric passports and identity cards, video surveillance and genetic databases.

"My trips to the US enabled me to raise awareness among American decision-makers about Canada's different approach to privacy rights," Radwanski said in his resignation statement. "Several members of the US Congress expressed an interest in creating an American position of Privacy Commissioner along the Canadian model."

This resignation statement has been removed from the Privacy Commission web site. Soviet-style, Radwanski is already becoming a non-person.

CANADA'S DISGRACE

In a supposedly civilized country, George Radwanski was not given a fair and impartial hearing. No one in authority came to his defence. No one made the obvious connection between his sensitive political stand and his removal. This is the state of public discourse today.

The whole episode smacks of a carefully orchestrated operation. Politicians of all stripes and virtually the whole press corps fell into line like geese. Typical of the press' prescience were disingenuous editorials like "Gorg'in George Had to Go" and "Radwanski's Vainglorious Reign Crumbles."

The Toronto Star had an editorial Sunday (June 29) entitled "Good from Radwanski." Did it take note of his warnings? No. The "good" referred to more scrutiny of future appointments like his and protection for the "whistle blowers" who revealed his expense account anomalies.

The vicious "swarming" of a dedicated public defender sets a bad precedent. It suggests the fate of anybody with influence that stands in Big Brother's way.
We may assume that any target of media defamation is a genuine defender of democratic ideals.

In the years prior to the murderous "Reign of Terror" and the French Revolution, the Jacobins used vile and unscrupulous smear campaigns like this one to eliminate opponents. This process was known as "L'infamie."

RADWANSKI'S ERRORS

A former Editor of the Toronto Star, George Radwanski was a speechwriter and consultant to Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien who appointed him to the seven-year term as Privacy Commissioner in 2000.

Radwanski made good use of his connections. Prior to accepting his $210,000 per annum job in 2000, he declared bankruptcy and was forgiven 85% of $580,000 in tax arrears.

Although these write-offs are pretty common, this one has suddenly become an issue.

Radwanski also made good use of his government expense account. In 2002-03, he and his (female) Communications Director apparently spent $276,000 on travel, including 10 foreign trips. In one instance, the pair is accused of going to Paris just five days after returning from there. Radwanski is also accused of paying up to $450 for business lunches and trying to mislead a Parliamentary Committee about these excesses.

Radwanski travelled for an average of 30 formal speeches a year and claims his conduct and expenses can be justified. "I have at all times conducted myself with honor and integrity," he said.

He asked for an impartial review by the Auditor General but was denied. I am "unable to properly defend myself and set the record straight because of the process deliberately prevents me from doing so," he said.

The Canadian political class is notorious for feasting at the public trough. Many examples could be cited. The Prime Minister secured a large interest-free loan for a hotel with which he had personal dealings. A former Public Works minister gave $2 million in questionable contracts to an advertising firm with close party ties. He got an ambassadorship.

The cost of Canada's unpopular and unnecessary gun registry was supposed to be $2 million. Instead it has ballooned to $1 billion, mostly boondoggle and patronage. Gary Webster, its former head, piled up more than $209,000 in travel and hotel bills commuting between Edmonton and Ottawa over two years. He still has a senior government position.

Radwanski's excesses, real or imagined, are pretty common. He has been targeted for his political stand. His possible indiscretions pale in comparison to the vital work he was doing. While Canadians focus on lunch money, we are losing our priceless birthright and that of future generations.

DOING HIS JOB TOO WELL

George Radwanski doubtlessly became a marked man in January when he delivered his 2001-2002 Annual Report. Here are some excerpts:

"The fundamental human right of privacy in Canada is under assault as never before. Unless the Government of Canada is quickly dissuaded from its present course by Parliamentary action and public insistence, we are on a path that may well lead to the permanent loss not only of privacy rights but also important elements of freedom as we now know it...

The Government is, quite simply, using September 11 as an excuse for new [surveillance databases] that cannot be justified by the requirements of anti-terrorism and that, indeed, have no place in a free and democratic society...

These are not abstract or theoretical concerns. If these measures are allowed to go forward... there is a very real prospect that before long our lives here in Canada will look like this:

  • All our travels outside Canada will be systematically recorded, tracked and analyzed for signs of anything that the Government might find suspicious or undesirable. "Big Brother" dossiers of personal information about every law-abiding Canadian... will be kept by the federal Government and will be available to virtually every federal department and agency...

  • Any time we travel within Canada, we will have to identify ourselves to police so that their computers can check whether we are wanted for anything or are otherwise of interest to the state.

  • Police and security will be able to access records of every e-mail we send and every cellular phone call we make. Information on what we read on the Internet, every Web site and page we visit, will likewise be readily available to government authorities.

  • We will all be fingerprinted or retina-scanned by the Government. This biometric information will be on compulsory national ID cards that will open the way to being stopped in the streets by police and required to identify ourselves on demand.

  • Our movements through the public streets will be relentlessly observed through proliferating police video surveillance cameras. Eventually, these cameras will likely be linked to biometric face-recognition technologies that will match our on-screen images to file photos -- from such sources as drivers' licences, passports or ID cards -- and enable the police to identify us by name and address as we go about our law-abiding business in the streets.

Now I am informing Parliament that ... governmental disregard for crucially important privacy rights is moving beyond isolated instances and becoming systematic.

The bottom line is this: If we have to live our lives weighing every action, every communication, every human contact, wondering what agents of the state might find out about it, analyze it, judge it, possibly misconstrue it, and somehow use it to our detriment, we are not truly free.

That sort of life is characteristic of totalitarian countries, not a free and open society like Canada. But that is where we are inexorably headed, if the Government's current initiatives are allowed to proceed."

CONCLUSION

No one can read this excerpt without being ashamed. As Canadians, we have behaved like little children. We have clapped while our champion has been struck down and humiliated. We will discover that our freedom is a lot easier to squander than it is to regain.

We don't recognize the danger facing us because conditions are still pretty good. But these measures are not planned for good times. They are designed for the bad times that are in store.

Sept. 11 was an audacious act on the part of the world's financial elite. It served the double purpose of providing an excuse to subjugate the Moslem world while at the same time creating an enemy to justify political repression at home.

The crumbling twin towers signalled the final stage in a long-term plan for a world police state governed by the superrich. The New World Order is the work of the devil, and Canadians brought it a step closer last week.



You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/000172.html
Articles >>

Comments for "Flashback-Canada Destroys a Defender of Freedom"

Rich said (September 4, 2008):

In response to Canadas Defender of Freedom.

I actually applaud the man for not paying his taxes. God forbid someone waste the governments(really the peoples) money trying to educate them on their loss of liberty and freedom. Every politician who chastized Radwanski is guilty of the same fraud,waste and abuse. Most who seek out a career in politics these days do so because they are too lazy, or arrogant to actually get a job and work for a living. At least this guy was trying to wake the people up. However we all know that is a huge no no in the post 911 world. If your going to succeed you have to help keep the boogeyman alive. Isn't it obvious... Government will oppress until they create the "Homegrown Terrorist". Then we are all really screwed. Resist peacefully. Don't give them a reason.

Letter from a reader in UK

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

September 4, 2008


Dear Henry

 I am reading your book 'Cruel Hoax' and find it wonderful that at last I am not alone in thinking these things.

Having been a victim of much of what you write about in the past, and finally meeting a 'real' woman 8 years ago from Indonesia who married me, I have learned what it means to be a 'real man'. I am proud of our proper family. My Wife, a former journalist, is more than happy to be my mate, mother and home maker whilst I hunt the bison.

What I want to know is why are you not a )pilloried b) lampooned c) killed even d) allowed to publish your work at all with out getting shut down? Does this mean our society IS free if we are
smart enough to see the chinks in the walls?

I used to think the film 'The Matrix' was silly. I watched it the other day and now feel that although a fantasy, the film maker probably had a point. In a way we are living in a Matrix, but instead of it
being computer generated around us it is inside of our heads. I think you are right. The cure for the illuminati control is knowledge of these plots. I have a very feminist mother who would probably baulk on reading your book, I have so many friends who are trapped with this ideology. The one think they all have in common is they are not happy. They are also miles away from God.

I turned to Islam and so far have found it to be the most liberating experience - reconnecting with God and common sense. Sunni Islam in general is mostly independent of group control which is its strength as there is no hierarchy.

I visited a Mosque in China and the worship was identical to mosques I visited in the UK, South Africa, Indonesia and Egypt. This 'unity' is very impressive as I never found it in the Church. We are in Ramadan at present and our local masjid has a sit down meal for everyone - men women and children from all the countries of the world. Its like a United nations under one roof all following one common faith. It works very well. We are all brothers, there are no secrets. Doctors, wealthy, poor, blue collar, white collar  and cleaners sit together without any prejudice.
 Family is fundamental to the Islamic life style, as it is said that 'Marriage is one half of your religion'.

When I teach the virtues of marriage in Islam  I even tell my students that marriage is taken SO seriously that adultery is punishable with death in some countries. Likewise God promises us that making love to one's spouse is part of ones worship and great blessings and reward is promised. On the other hand sex outside of marriage is a huge sin and punished unless the offenders repent.

 Sadly some Muslims here in the west are also suckered in some are so lost they are beyond help. In fact we get more 'white western' converts to Islam (like me) than lost Muslims coming back into the fold.
 
I look forward to finishing your book.

You could do a lot worse than study http://www.islamonline.net/English/index.shtml


Tony B Reviews "The Babylonian Woe" by David Astle

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

bw.jpg
David Astle, who died this year in Canada, was a seaman from the age of sixteen.  He retired a captain of the British navy after WW2.  Once retired he came to realize that all the things he thought he fought to preserve in WW2 were "melting away" anyway.  This knowledge perplexed him until 1961 when he met people who informed him of the truth of how the world is actually run, and has been run, at least from the first known recordings of history.  Astle took the knowledge beyond their information, studying all reasonably reliable recorded monetary history he could find, juxtaposing it against known political history.  The insights he thus gained he wove into a new look at ancient to modern history in this book.

His basic theme throughout is simply that nothing political happens without monetary backing, which makes the knowledge of an era's money creation, ownership and use all important to understanding real history.  He discovered that throughout recorded history, but never mentioned in connection with it, money and banking have followed the same script as that used by today's bankers. 

Astle came to realize that that script is an unequaled power path for the few but is a patently dishonest, criminal scam on the people of the world whose losses are the gains of these criminal bankers.  Moreover, Astle never ceases to hammer home the fact that this scam is always based on private banker manipulation of precious metals, both real and pretended.  Pretended as in "monetary reserves," i.e., fractional reserve banking wherein the precious metal "reserve" may or may not actually exist.

Astle makes an excellent case for precious metals-based private banking scams being behind all wars, all economic booms and busts, all worldly movements in whatever direction through recorded time, just as he (and more and more inquiring people) realized that is still so today.  He also notes a few instances wherein precious metal money was outlawed and the resulting national success, peace and tranquility using base metal or other "worthless" money instead.

This is not a book which von Mises Libertarians will want to digest but they, above all monetary reformers, should be the first to do so, as the "solution" they offer for existing monetary exploitation of all the world is just the same old scam repackaged for the hoi poli to accept as the antidote for the ancient sickness when in reality it is the same poison without the skull and cross bones label warning.

Not an easy study; Astle was truly educated as people no longer are, making the work difficult for modern "Sesame Street" minds which have trouble contemplating a compound sentence.

 "Scholarly" is the usual, and correct, definition for his work.  If all would-be monetary reformers having the time would acquire and study as many of the works listed in Astle's bibliography as possible, there would be a real chance of meaningful monetary reform in the near future.  Especially should the present meltdown continue in its present frightening direction.

Everyone interested in real life, real events, and how they occur, should make the mental effort this book demands for the rewards of true understanding it will bring.
---

The Babylonian Woe is available for download here.
.

Terms that make Feminists see Red- "Division of Labor" (by Dan, who is on a Roll)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

September 1, 2008

feminist1.jpgThey did it with words. 

They took the words we used to talk about the sexes, words we used to talk about the sacred, and any references to traditions hallowed by time, and they loaded each of the words with a blasting cap and turned the words into mines, laid out in the minefield of conversation.  I realized this when so many words I'd use, and phrases, would trigger a reaction in that woman. I'd say one thing, and she'd hear it through her conditioning.  I had to often insist she explain to me how the hell did she get THAT of something I'd said.  Rather than a 'debate' in the same language, her technique was to keep me on the defensive stammering to explain, 'but I didn't mean THAT!'  Women didn't come up with such advanced Sophistry on their own, it was packaged and taught to them over many semesters of university training.
  
I wouldn't have seen it in action so well if I hadn't gotten involved with a feminist soldier, by that I mean not just one of the girls who decided one morning to tell everyone at the table in the student union, "I'm a feminist", but one who had been indoctrinated into their real network, with a master's degree in educational psychology/sociology with emphasis on "women's studies" straight down the line.

One of the terms she was triggered by was 'division of labor'. By definition, division of labor refers to breaking down a larger task into sub-tasks handled by specialists.

I must give you the example of my 'error' of using this term with were once. Feminists make every exchange between a male and female two things.  1. it's always about gender, no matter what, to them. 2. they make everything complicated.

This came up because on Sundays, we'd take mornings to straighten up the house.  I had no problem with this 'sharing'.  I always enjoyed mopping floors, and vacuuming.  First week she'd actually made a list of tasks, and let me pick what I wanted to do.  So far so good.  I did everything to do with floors; she did the laundry and dishes.

But the second week,  I went and got out the broom, mop and bucket, and she stopped me and said, "no, this week it's your turn to do laundry and dishes."

I said, "huh? Whaddya mean my 'turn'?  Last week you said you hated mopping floors.  I don't, I like it.  I don't mind doing it at all, no problem".

She said, no no, we're going to switch chores each week.

"But why?  I like floors, you don't.  I hate laundry, you're better at it."  

She was gradually moving into her patronizing, one-up attitude and raising her voice a bit.
'BECAUSE we must do everything equally.  That means trading off 'roles' on a rotational basis.'

I was really losing track of her line of thinking.  'What the hell are you talking about?  It's just scutwork.  I like doing floors and you like laundry, and we each suck at the other thing.  What's wrong with having a division of labor..."

That's when she went ballistic.  "WHAT DID YOU SAY MISTER?  DIVISION OF LABOR!! " and best I got out of the tirade was something about me being a throwback for wanting to keep the 'little boy's work' separated from the 'little girl's work'........by now she was triggered and became loud. vitriolic.  The day went straight to hell.  I ended up sleeping in my car.

So that's what a feminist hears, using a term that was never intended to mean what she's been taught in 'gender politics'.  (yeah, that's a course, it's even a degree now.) What they do is interpret EVERYTHING in terms of gender, premise being that gender is an adversarial relationship of one to the other.   You can argue with them that's a fallacy, but they have the weight of their accredited feminist studies departments now to back them up...and law.

Now I should add that this woman wasn't entirely stable.  She had the degrees, had worked as a psychologist counseling people with their problems....
But this was not stable conversation.  It's neurotic as hell.



Dan Comments on Sunday's Show, and Talks about the Traditional Women he Passed Over

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |



ingridbergman.jpgGREAT SHOW Henry.  Articulate guy -- he ("Michael") understands what they're doing to him very clearly.

Poor guy!  He put it perfectly though, "she tries to wear the pants but they don't fit right".    That's the sad truth for everyone in these situations, even when the woman has the upper hand (because of the full authority of the new laws and courts behind her), it doesn't make the pants 'fit right'. 

I can't entirely blame these women personally for this madness.  They've been brainwashed all their lives, as their moms were brainwashed, and the years are getting along to the point you'd have to back to deceased great grandmothers to find the last woman in a girl's family who could have told her what marriage is, what love it, explained men and women and what it's all about, in a natural world.  A human world.

Read Lord Bertrand Russell.  Read Dewey, read Trotsky, Lenin.  They wrote that for a ruling elite to achieve global control,  the first thing that would have to be achieved that had never been done before.   The family unit had to be destroyed. How to do it?

1. Separate children from parents to be put in state schools at least 5 hours per day at the earliest age possible. Result: children learn what the State wants them to learn,  and ignore parental inputs.  And later become violently opposed to parental inputs.

2. Encourage sexual experimentation at the earliest age possible.  Result:  makes deep bonding impossible for the rest of that person's life.

3. Saturate the society with cheap booze, drugs, and condone pornography, promiscuity, and homosexuality..

4. Ridicule marriage, render it meaningless, take it away from the authority of the temples, and hand it over to the legal profession to exploit through divorce cases.

5. Emasculate the males, and empower the females with the full weight of the state behind it.

He's right -- he can't 'roll over' to charges like this.  Once they get a judgment it'll follow him the rest of his life.

I used to think that was just a flaw in the system.  But I understand the system much better now - they don't make mistakes.  Those people who tend to get plowed under by it -- it's designed for them.

Why wreck a basically nice guy's life like this?
Because he was a man.  He dared wear the pants.
Basically they're giving such men troubles to prevent them from having families------children, and sons.

You know, you should write another book for the young fellows about how to choose a wife these days.   One wrong move they could end up in prison!   Always pick a naturally 'service oriented' girl.  There are plenty of 'em, still.  I think the young men simply don't know that's what their supposed to look for in women.

I think he made the same error that a lot of us did - I remember I ditched the ones who would have been good wives for 'intelligence'. What did I think showed intellect in a woman?
 
Quoting Jack Kerouac or Anais Nin.  A taste for snob appeal jazz or atonal music.  Being into 'finding herself', through yoga, zen, or LSD. Neurosis... a touch of nymphomania... and the mental gymnastics ability to argue over absolutely nothing  till the sun comes up.

Yeah, right.  Great recipe for a woman to be the mother of your progeny, and spend the rest of your life with...

I was conditioned to be blind of the better traits in a few other girls who's hearts I broke, just because they had no plans for college - they were wanting children, and saw the family they dreamed of as the entire focus for their future life.   How wrong I was to have let myself be brainwashed into trivializing that role as 'dumb'.

It's natural for males to want to be 'of the world', to be intellectual, thinkers.  The biggest con ever was to convince young men during the 50's and 60's that we wanted women that were like us!  Worldly.
 
In real life, sooner or later a man of the world wants nothing better than a home to go to at the end of the day where he's received lovingly, and can set aside heavy thinking, competition, and power struggles for a while -- in his own home. 

They couldn't tell you who Jung or Nietzsche was - but now I know that kind of knowledge and a few bucks will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks.

I've never forgotten a little book I ordered in 1976.  I saw a cheap back section ad in Penthouse (yeah, I used to 'read' it during the '70's), just a NY post office address, and bold header, all caps.  'HOW TO PICK UP GIRLS'.  Ten bucks.  Being twenty one I ordered it without hesitation.

I wasn't disappointed. It was a generic printing, just white flimsy paperback with black helvetica title, about 90 pages.  It read like the young hustler who wrote it just sat down and wrote it out off the top of his head -- most of it mild braggadocio and little personal anecdotes.  But he delivered the basic facts that had already fallen through the cracks for most young men of my generation.

And the facts are:
1. men and women are different by nature. Not merely physiologically, but think and feel differently.

2. women have no gender attraction at all to men who are 'like' them.  They see such men as 'neuter'. (I think the term the writer used was 'wimps' or 'losers').

3. a woman never feels 'understood' by a man who asks them just explain themselves to him.  They feel understood by a man who calls them on their subtle 'tests' whether she likes it or not.  A man who'll drop her like a bad habit for trying to get the upper hand,  can just walk away. Girls lose attraction instantly when pursued by a male. 

That's not all the facts of life of course, but the young man only promised to set the reader straight on what attracts women initially and what's been turned backwards.  Things any male should understand all along no matter how young, and used to.  But now this is a society with far too many boys growing up fatherless, or with the father held at a distance due to divorce.


"The Seething Energies of Lucifer" -Leading Masons Admit the Truth

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

August 31, 2008

adams.jpeg

  " Masonry ought forever to be abolished. It is wrong -- essentially wrong -- a seed of evil, which can never produce any good". 
 
   John Quincy Adams, sixth President of the Unites States. (Left)


Quotations from Leading Masons, sent by a reader


The true name of Satan, the Kabalist say, is that of Yahveh reversed; for Satan is not a black god, but the negation of God. The Devil is the personification of Atheism or Idolatry.

     For the Initiates this is not a person, but a force, created for good, but which may serve evil. It is the instrument of Liberty or Free will. They represent this force, which presides over the physical generation, under the mythological and horned form of the God Pan; thence came the he-goat of the Sabbat, brother of the Ancient Serpent, and the light-bearer or Phosphor, of which the poets have made the false Lucifer ot the Legend.
 
     Albert Pike 'MORALS AND DOGMA OF THE ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE' page102.
 
 
  Lucifer the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the morning! It is he who bears the light...............Doubt it not!
 
    Albert Pike 'MORALS AND DOGMA' page 321.
 
 
  When the mason learns that the key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned they mystery of his craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands............
      
    Manley P.Hall  'THE LOST KEYS OF FREEMASONRY' page 50-51.

 
    The universal truths of the secret doctrine are stated in terms of politics, industry, economics, management, and labour. International accord, the arbitration of religious and social differences, and the systematic advancement of the plan for world welfare supply the ingredients of a new application of Hermetic chemistry.

   Thus the plan unfolds, the principles remain the same, the needs enlarge, and the mortal crises is perpetual. Three thousand years ago Memphis of the white walls was the college city of the Egyptian adepts. Here the initiates governed their school according to divine and universal laws. Memphis was the archetype of the world city, the union of nations, the one world -- the Philosophic common-wealth which is to come. The goal of the secret schools is the revelation in the sphere of mortal activity of the design of the Invisible College.....
 
 Manley P.Hall 'MASONIC ORDERS OF FRATERNITY' page 95.