Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below- Illuminati Hand Seen in "Flat Earth" Conspiracy (scroll down)

Edward Hendrie's Defense of Flat Earth

February 13, 2016

Chicago Skyline Joshua Nowicki2.jpg
"If the earth were a globe, none of the buildings, including the Sears Tower (now called the Willis Tower), would be visible from 57 miles away."  Earth circumference is 25,000 miles. 


I wrote Edward Hendrie, author of a new 500-page flat earth book:

We live in a climate of cognitive dissonance and I don't intend to entertain any more. What exactly are you claiming? That if we travel west or east at same latitude, we do not reach the same spot?  That night and day are not caused by earth rotation?

Here is his reply: 




"Part of the glory of God and his handiwork is the fact that the earth is stationary and the sun travels in a circuit over the earth. "

"If the earth were a globe, airliners would not be able to fly on a flat and level path. Any pilot will tell you that once a plane gets to its cruising altitude, the pilot "levels off" and flies in a straight and level path. Indeed, the pilot uses the horizon to ensure that the plane is flying level."






by Edward Hendrie 
author of 9-11: Enemies Foreign and Domestic; Bloody Zion; Solving the Mystery of Babylon the Great
(henrymakow.com) 



This is the mother of all deceptions.  Without heliocentricity, [sun-centeredness] evolution would never have gotten a foothold. Heliocentricity is nothing short of the concealment of God. 

Map of Flat Earth low resolution  restored.png
The attached picture depicts a general portrayal of the flat earth. North is the center of the plane and south is the outer rim of Antarctica. If you travel east or west at the same latitude you will eventually circumnavigate the earth and wind up at your starting point. Magellan circumnavigated the plane of the earth. Circumnavigation does not necessitate that the earth be a globe. 


In Orwell's book, 1984, O'Brien told Winston Smith: "The second thing for you to realize is that power is power over human beings. Over the body -- but, above all, over the mind. Power over matter -- external reality, as you would call it -- is not important. Already our control over matter is absolute." 

It was at that point that O'Brien explained: "We control matter because we control the mind." 

The elite do not have the power to make the earth spin at approximately 1,000 miles per hour at the equator, while at the same time revolving around the sun at approximately 67,000 miles per hour. All they need to do is convince the population of the world that is what happens. That is what O'Brien meant when he stated that "we control matter because we control the mind."

By controlling the mind as to the basic nature of our world, they can control everything else we think and do. In Psalms 19:1 it states that the heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament shows his handiwork. Part of the glory of God and his handiwork is the fact that the earth is stationary and the sun travels in a circuit over the earth. 

God's creation of heaven and earth is part and parcel of his creative powers each day when he forms each person in the womb. If people lose sight of God as creator of all things, then any sin, including abortion can be justified. It is important for people to understand the nature of God's creation, because it reveals his character. In Isaiah 44:24 God states that he alone stretched forth the heavens and spread abroad the earth. A ball is not spread out. You spread out things that are flat, like a flat bed spread. God spread out the earth and he stretched forth the heavens above the earth.

"Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself." (Isaiah 44:24)

Modern science has replaced God's abode of heaven with the myth of the empty vacuum of space, thus suggesting that there is no heaven and there is no God. If there is only an empty vacuum of space, that means that God cannot be above us walking in the circuit of heaven. "Thick clouds are a covering to him, that he seeth not; and he walketh in the circuit of heaven." (Job 22:14)

Map Sun Moon flat earth.jpg
Night and day are not caused by the rotation of a spherical earth. Night and day are caused by the travel of the sun in circuit over the flat earth. The sun is much smaller than the earth, as depicted in the attached picture. It is close to and directly over the earth; it is not 93 million miles away.



Here is Hendrie's full rebuttal to the article  by L.C. Vincent Friday. 

Arthur Schopenauer famously said that "all truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." The truth of the flat earth is now in the ridicule stage. Vincent characterizes belief in a flat, stationary earth as vacuous "lunacy," "primitive stupidity," and a "pernicious and preposterous meme." He is apparently one of the ridiculers.

I once believed in a spinning, globular earth, just as Vincent does now. However, I thoroughly studied the evidence. I invite him to do the same. The evidence drew me to the ineluctable conclusion that the earth is a not a moving globe. 

GRAVITY

hendrie (2).jpeg
My book presents irrefutable proof that the earth is flat and immovable. The answer to what causes objects to fall to the ground in the absence of gravity is density. People and objects are heavier than the air and therefore do not float off the ground. There are some gasses, of course, that are lighter than air, and they float off the ground. Everyone has seen helium balloons float up in the air. Everyone understands that helium balloons are not some sort of anti-gravity devices; they float up in the air, because helium is lighter than air. Why do people not understand that apples fall from trees to the ground, not because of gravity, but because apples are denser than air? They believe in the mystical force of gravity, not because it has been proven true, but because they have been brainwashed into believing in it. Gravity does not exist. 

Isaac Newton's theory of gravity was conjured up out of necessity. A theory was needed to explain how things could stick to a spinning, spherical earth and not fly off due the centrifugal force from the spinning globe. Aren't you the least bit curious why the supposed force of gravity has never been measured or replicated in any way in any experiment? The gravitational theory requires that gravitational attraction to the earth by all persons and objects remains the same at all places on the earth. That means that the gravitational force at the North Pole is the same as the gravitational force at the equator. That poses a very real problem if the earth is spinning as alleged. That is because the centrifugal force decreases every mile toward the north pole, where the centrifugal force is ultimately reduced to zero, because the North Pole is the axis of the supposedly spinning earth. 

On a globe, as you travel north or south of the equator the circumference parallel to the equator becomes less. Consequently, the speed of the earth's spin at those more northern and southern latitudes from the equator would be slower than its speed of spin at the equator. For example, at the 45 degree north latitude, the earth's spin should be approximately 700 miles per hour. One hundred feet from the North Pole, the earth's spin should be reduced to one quarter mile per hour (1,308 feet per hour). 

Edward Hendrie Cropped2.jpg
(Ed Hendrie, left) 

As the speed of the spin is reduced, so also is the correlative centrifugal force.  What is the amount of decrease of the centrifugal force between the equator to one hundred feet of the North Pole? There would be a 4,000 fold reduction (1,000 MPH vs. ΒΌ MPH) in centrifugal force from the equator to a point one hundred feet of the North Pole. That means, assuming (as is required by the theory of gravity) that the force of gravity remains constant over the entire surface of the earth, a 175 pound man at the equator would weigh 700,000 pounds if he traveled to within 100 feet of the North Pole. Assuming the earth is spinning, the decrease in the centrifugal force as one approaches the North Pole, means that a person would be crushed by the force of gravity, before he ever reached the North Pole. The spinning earth and the mystical force of gravity are thus proven to be preposterous fictions.

Vincent's argument that those adhering to the flat earth believe that "moons and stars are illusions or flat spinning discs created by aliens" is simply false. The only flat earther who would make such a claim would have to be a government shill planted to discredit evidence of the flat earth. Indeed, his statement is the first time I have ever heard such a claim.

The evidence of a flat earth is everywhere to be seen. For example, in the photograph the Chicago skyline can be seen clearly. The picture was taken by Joshua Nowicki as he stood at Grand Mere Park, Michigan, which is approximately 57 miles away, across lake Michigan from Chicago.

If the earth were a globe, none of the buildings, including the Sears Tower (now called the Willis Tower), would be visible. They would all be below the horizon. The top of the Sears Tower would be 194 feet below the horizon. The only thing that would be visible in the entire Chicago skyline would be the uppermost 85 feet of the antennae on the top of the Sears Tower. In fact, however, the entire Sears Tower and all of the other buildings along the shore in Chicago can be seen in the Nowicki photograph. That picture by Joshua Nowicki of the Chicago skyline proves that the earth is flat.

AIRPLANES

Arline Flying Off Into Space.jpg
If the earth were a globe, airliners would not be able to fly on a flat and level path. Any pilot will tell you that once a plane gets to its cruising altitude, the pilot "levels off" and flies in a straight and level path. Indeed, the pilot uses the horizon to ensure that the plane is flying level. When visibility is poor, the pilot will use the instruments and fly a level heading, using an artificial horizon. Either way, at all times the plane flies level, once the pilot reaches cruising altitude. If the earth were a globe, the pilot would have to constantly adjust the heading of the plane and dip its nose down to keep a constant altitude. However, the earth is in fact flat, so if a pilot dipped the nose of the plane down, to adjust for the supposed curvature of the earth, he would find that he is losing altitude. If the pilot kept on that downward trajectory, the plane would crash into the earth. The fact that no such downward adjustment is made by pilots for the supposed curvature of the earth is proof that the earth is flat. Indeed, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) assumes a flat earth when training pilots and air traffic controllers using their Target Generation Facility (TGF). 

My book addresses evidence and presents a multiplicity of proofs that the earth is stationary and flat. My hope is that you decide to leave the tranquility of disinformation, and endeavor to study the evidence. An honest man who is shown to be wrong must either admit his error or cease to be honest. Are you an honest man?

--
Related-
Bible Flat Earthers Seems to Have Influenced Hendrie

--
ANTHONY MIGCHELS WADES IN:

I've been following your posts about the FET with a keen eye and was wondering whether I should respond or not. I was actually hoping someone would, but they don't and when you claim 'Anthony Migchels has succumbed', then I MUST respond.

Flat Earth illuminati.jpg
(Predicted to discredit Conservatives in Illuminati card game in 1995)

I have not 'succumbed'. And I do agree FET is a psyop.However, it is also a very important phenomenon, which blows a whole lot of stuff we take for granted out of the water.

All good disinformation is 90% correct, and this is the case with the FET too. They have exposed a number facts of absolutely fundamental importance. I have investigated the issue thoroughly and have facilitated a lot of debate on Facebook on the issue. This was not easy: most people simply can't handle the idea of the Ball Earth being wrong, or they become FET fundamentalists over night. It's a very polarized debate. But it has been very instructive.

To give you an idea:

- They have exposed NASA as an utter hoax. It goes way beyond the hoaxed Moon landings. As it stands now, I highly doubt that they can launch anything into 'space'. Most likely (until other evidence becomes available) I'm assuming telecommunications is run through land based antennae, which gained a global reach in the early fifties, when the first presumed 'telecom satellites' were launched.

- We have NO picture of the Globe Earth. The famous Apollo picture is one of the few of which NASA itself claims it's a 'real' photograph. All other pics they feed us, they admit themselves are Computer Generated Images. And the famous Apollo picture has been PROVEN to be a fraud: there is footage available of the astronauts faking the pic by photographing the Earth from high altitude through a round window of the airplane (and not 'space ship').

- Because there is no NASA, there is also no real proof of Heliocentrism. Geocentrism is very much back at the center of Astronomy, for those who realize what the implications of the FET are. Copernicus, Newton, Galileo, they were all highly connected individuals, who could offer absolutely no proof for Heliocentrism, but who were promoted incessantly by the Hidden Hand.

- The key criticism of the FET towards the Globe Earth is really eminent in its simplicity: we simply cannot see curvature of the Earth.
There is footage of dozens of amateur weather balloons up there, and they all show a flat horizon from 30km height. Curvature plays no role whatsoever in architecture and engineering, which it definitely should.
The idea that the Eart is to big to make curvature noticeable in daily practice is nonsense. Curvature should be omnipresent. It should be easily provable, and it isn't.

antony-migchels.jpg
(left, Migchels) 

So why claim the FET is a hoax?

Because their own positions aimed at positively proving the Flat Earth don't add up. They are right about the lack of curvature, but unfortunately their positions concerning the Sun's movement are incorrect. For instance: they claim the Sun simply disappears on the horizon because of the limits of our eyesight, but daily practice shows that the Sun disappears behind the horizon while its full size is visible. It's not becoming smaller as it sets, while the FET claims the Sun is simply moving away from us.

FET is also unable to explain many astronomical events. Furthermore, I agree the FET has been launched in an absolutely typical manner, trying to suggest a grassroots movement, but in actuality undoubtedly from higher up.

I also STRONGLY disagree with the FET's idea that the Globe Earth and Heliocentrism is the lie of lies. No, people don't get up in the morning because they were lied to about the shape of the Earth.

They get up to wage slave away, to pay off the Bank. The REAL basic lie of our existence, is that we are 'free', while we are total slaves to the Banking Cartel through its Usury.

Knowing the scientific facts concerning astronomy (for as far as they are known, if anything, the FET raises a whole lot of questions) does not alter the human condition, while printing some interest-free credit for normal people ends slavery and the New World Order. 

And the FET distracts from this.  So there it is: a balanced appraisal of the pros and cons of an important phenomenon!






Scruples - the Game of Moral Dilemmas


You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2016/02/Edward-Hendrie-Flat-Earth-Defense.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Edward Hendrie's Defense of Flat Earth"

Derek said (February 14, 2016):

Instead of admitting they faked the moon landings, the criminals and liars behind NASA concocted the flat-Earth deception operation as a rearguard action against their critics. NASA is utterly without honor and ought to be defunded.


Bryan said (February 14, 2016):

"Curvature plays no role whatsoever in architecture and engineering, which it definitely should."

That's funny.

Curve per inch works out to .000126263. And .3409101 for the width of Sears tower.


Pete P said (February 14, 2016):

I can't believe that in the 21st century there are still people who still believe that the Earth is flat. Especially readers of Henry Makow's site. I guess some people will go for any crazy conspiracy theory out there. People like Pythagoras, Philolaos, Plato and Aristarchus already knew that the Earth was a sphere and that it revolved around the Sun centuries before Christ's time. I'm astounded that some people still haven't caught up to those discoveries 2,500 years later.

Forget about reading long-winded books with convoluted theories. Here's the only proof you need. Take a series of airplane flights headed in the same direction, say eastward. Take a plane flight from New York to London. Then from London to Moscow. From Moscow to Tokyo. Tokyo to Los Angeles. Los Angeles right back to New York. Would this be possible if the Earth was flat? Case closed.


Tony B said (February 14, 2016):

I very much like what Migchels wrote on this latest promoted insanity. Agree totally on the moon walking crap. It's no different from the Navy Seals killing bin Laden for the third or fourth time that he died.

BTW, it is simply logic concerning the "level" flight of airplanes. They set their altimeters, I think they are called, to keep the plane on an even keel with the earth. An equal distance from the general surface. That is, they more or less follow the surface of the earth. So nothing is proved either way by that "level" flight. However, as another commenter wrote, if the airplane flew constantly in one direction it would fly off the flat earth into space. Or there would be one hell of an upheaval (or is it "downheaval") if it lunged underneath to follow the bottom surface since no more top surface existed. Maybe that's where all the aliens hang out. Or would they all fall off?


JF said (February 13, 2016):

I am reading the Hendrie article. He makes some embarrassing errors. The ratio between forces is all wrong. Gravity -- by all accounts I've read, one of the weaker forces -- is still mighty enough to bend light around a star, which I'm pretty sure was empirically proven. We are tiny little bits on a mighty mass of a planet. I'm certainly no scientist, but it makes sense to me that gravity would trump centrifugal force by orders of magnitude.

Hendrie also fails to explain an observation that I have challenged multiple flat earthers to explain: the fact that the sun SINKS OVER THE HORIZON. Every sunset I have ever seen features a sun sinking VERTICALLY. If the disk scenario were true, then we would expect to see the sun swerving (right or left) and receding from view. On top of this, the flat earthers like to claim that light only travels so far. Very well. Then explain why the sun doesn't recede laterally to a pinpoint before vanishing every night.

I have leveled this challenged to multiple flat earthers, and not a single one of them has bothered even to try to give me a logical explanation. The sunk SINKS. Case closed.


Doug P said (February 13, 2016):

Flat earth conspiracies are ridiculous, as ridiculous as rockets getting outside the Van Allen radiation belt. The moon landings are quietly laughed about in the engineering community. No discussion of them is permitted in classrooms, like 9-11.


Ed said (February 13, 2016):

'll tell you why so many non-operatives fall for the FE nonsense. Eric Dubay uses a form of hypnotic induction that is discernible to the lay person by noting the measured cadence of his speech. Joel Osteen does the same thing. Not only is Eric able to put them under through a youtube video, but once he does he can program them to do his bidding, provided that it doesn't fall outside the range of their normal behavior.


Sheila C said (February 13, 2016):

Over the years of my conspiracy research, I've had my assumptions proven wrong again and again. So I've become very open minded about researching conspiracies, regardless of how improbable they initially appear.

I took a week last summer to research the flat earth theory. I gave it a good chance. I watched many videos on the topic and read many articles. And I concluded that it was a bunch of bunk.

There are many things claimed by flat earthers that I cannot verify for myself. But they are all overshadowed by the one thing that I am absolutely sure of.

Like millions of others worldwide, I have stood on the edge of the ocean and watched the sun set below the horizon. The sun disappears completely and it gets pitch dark where I live. This is not possible on a flat earth. As L. C. Vincent notes, on a flat earth the sun would always be visible from every part of earth.

I have posed this question to numerous flat-earth forums and always got a condescending lesson in "perspective," ie, the fact that things get smaller and appear to disappear as they recede into the distance. This seems to be their knee-jerk rebuttal, but it's irrelevant. For one, I already knew this, and for two, I do NOT see the sun get smaller and smaller until I can't see it at all. I see a big, fat sun sink beneath the horizon. Flat earthers can't explain this and it is the nail in the coffin for this ridiculous theory.


Below-Betty Friedan-Mommy was a Commie (scroll down)

Illuminati Hand Seen in "Flat Earth" Conspiracy

February 12, 2016

th-3.jpg
Flat Earthers impersonate conspiracy researchers 
much the same way FBI and crisis actors 
impersonated patriot militia in Oregon. More disturbing,
a few legitimate researchers like Anthony Migchels &
Edward Hendrie seem to have succumbed.




See Below - 9-11 Truther and critic of the NWO, Edward Hendrie, has caught the Flat Earth virus with a daunting 500-page book The Greatest Lie on Earth: Proof that Our World is Not a Moving Globe. 




by L.C. Vincent
(henrymakow.com) 

 "The Flat Earth Conspiracy Theory" is the latest rage in the conspiracy research community-- the ultimate insult to our intelligence and the ultimate Illuminati psy-op.  

Flat Earth Theory serves to marginalize and denigrate legitimate conspiracy research by injecting this most pernicious and preposterous meme. The end result is that the average person rejects the entire field when they learn that some members of this community also embrace the primitive stupidity of The Flat Earth "theory."

THEIR  PREPOSTEROUS CLAIMS 

1.) Flat Earthers claim that Earth is really a flat plane, a round disc, on which we all live, not a globe or sphere and the ends of the Earth's disc are surrounded by a wall of ice.  

2.) There really is no such thing as outer space, as the planets, moons and stars are illusions or flat spinning discs created by aliens.   The Earth really has no curvature; gravity does not exist, and our sky is covered by a glass dome.   NASA was founded by Nazi scientists as a public relations cover for evil deeds; rockets can't reach space, and all NASA missions were public relations spectacles designed to further the conspiracy "they" started thousands of years ago to keep "us" in the dark about where we really live.

time-zones (2).jpg
How do Flat Earther's explain our days and nights?  According to them, the Sun (only a few thousand miles away, not 93 million) simply circles above a different area of the Earth's disc.   But even this "simplistic" explanation fails to explain the obvious fallacy in their cartoon cosmology -- that even a star which circled a Flat Earth would still be visible from all parts of the disc.

How do Flat Earther's explain such predictable phenomena as lunar and solar eclipses?   Simple.... Something they call "The Shadow Object" moves in front of the Earth or Moon, temporarily blocking out the sunlight!  So if their own explanation unravels, based upon their own false assumptions, then they just make something up to cover the vacuity of their lunacy.

According to Flat Earther's, gravity does not exist either.   What causes objects to fall down to the ground is what they call "Upward Acceleration", a result of the continuous thrust of our Flat Earth into an upward trajectory (by forces unknown.)   

Based on this unique perspective, it follows that NASA and all space exploration is a complete fraud, since space does not truly exist (which makes one wonder where our Flat Earth is headed as it continues to accelerate from all that Upward Thrust!). 
 
THROWING US A CURVE

The flat earth YouTube, "Learning Curve" , reveals an Illuminati mind game of epic proportions.

Mixed in with the Flat Earth theory, "Learning Curve" sprinkles the following words, thoughts and phrases as part of their proof that the earth is flat: "mind control, brainwashing, core beliefs, programming, textbook, Tavistock Institute, Masons, Freemasons, NASA, Nazis, powerful Jews, the Federal Reserve, the mainstream media," etc., etc.

They also transform the word "globalist" from a mild pejorative (someone who seeks control thru world government) into an epithet. It now refers to someone who perceives the world as a globe rather than a flat disc!

fakery.jpg
(left, "fakery")

The true agenda of the Illuminati is revealed after the narrator hypocritically expresses his dismay in being unable to disprove the "Flat Earth" theory. He bemoans that proving the theory is taking his time away from his "true" pre-occupation, his "normal" life of exposing chemtrails and secret societies!  
 
By resurrecting the Flat Earth Theory as the truly penultimate example of ignorance and illusion, the Illuminati have crafted a meme which has the ability to persuade the average person that conspiracy theorists and researchers are part of a lunatic fringe.

This meme and this video reveals the hand of The Illuminati at their most twisted:  to keep mankind in ignorance of their continued machinations while discrediting those who seek to make the world aware of their plans for war, pestilence, famine and enslavement.   Can there be a better definition of Evil?

----
LCVincent  is a renaissance man living in Arizona. He enjoys hearing from the lunatic fringe. lcvincent888@gmail.com

Related - Flat Earth Psy Op is the Real Conspiracy 
-------------------- Video- The Flat Earth Psy Op 
------------------- Comic Relief
------------

hendrie.jpeg
This book reveals the mother of all conspiracies. It sets forth biblical proof and irrefutable evidence that will cause the scales to fall from your eyes and reveal that the world you thought existed is a myth. The most universally accepted scientific belief today is that the earth is a globe, spinning on its axis at a speed of approximately 1,000 miles per hour at the equator, while at the same time it is orbiting the sun at approximately 67,000 miles per hour. All of this is happening as the sun, in turn, is supposed to be hurtling though the Milky Way galaxy at approximately 500,000 miles per hour. The Milky Way galaxy itself, is alleged to be racing through space at a speed ranging from 300,000 to 1,340,000 miles per hour. What most people are not told is that the purported spinning, orbiting, and speeding through space has never been proven. In fact, every scientific experiment that has ever been performed to determine the motion of the earth has proven that the earth is stationary. Yet, textbooks ignore the scientific proof that contradicts the myth of a spinning and orbiting globe. Christian schools have been hoodwinked into teaching heliocentrism, despite the clear teaching in the bible that the earth is not a sphere and does not move. This book reveals the evil forces behind the heliocentric deception, and why scientists and the Christian churches have gone along with it.
 


Update: Edward Hendrie's full Defence of Flat Earth will be posted Saturday. 

First Comment by Dan:

"Practical politics consists in ignoring facts."   Henry Adams (1839-1920)

What did he mean by that?   He understood that the crowd forgets anything heard in lectures;  they get mad at debates.   But there's no defense against a consistent message hammered over and over again.    Doesn't matter if it's true or not.  What matters is saying it over and over again until enough people believe it.
Sad fact is that 80% of the general public believe stupid lies just because it's on television every day.

I've listened to the lead promoters of the this flat earth psyop on Youtube, and there's no doubt about it: they're playing  practical politics.  Anytime you say anything about  'chemtrails' or '911', or anything that challenges Mainstream News & Gov narratives, you're going to get a flash mob of "Flat Earthers".   They know exactly what to say.  They all know the talking points.  They're trolls.

What can you do about them?   I'll tell you right now:

Stay on your focus.  Everyone reading this (except the trolls) KNOW that this isn't YOUR issue.  Whatever you were talking about on a forum or social media, just stay on your own topic. Treat the Flat Earth troll the way you would any stranger that tries to butt in on an important conversation with something irrelevant.

Do NOT engage in a debate on their topic (Flat Earth nonsense), stay on yours.   The troll wants to get your defense response up so that he can exploit the emotional advantage.  This game is rife on forums because trolls and bullies are actually using their truther targets so they can sew their seeds of mass distraction in the minds of an audience.  It neutralizes legitimate questioning.

Just make it a rule; "don't debate irrelevant issues".  Don't be distracted.   Stay on point.  Invite the troll to join YOUR conversation on YOUR topic - or go away.

Let's move on.







Scruples - the Game of Moral Dilemmas


You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2016/02/Illuminati-Hand-Seen-in-Flat-Earth-Conspiracy .html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Illuminati Hand Seen in "Flat Earth" Conspiracy "

Bernard said (February 13, 2016):

I read your site first thing every morning when I awake. Great work on exposing NWO and their agenda. Got into Icke way back in 98.... not so keen on his style these days. There is one issue however, which you seem to have dismissed out of hand. This is the Flat Earth theory (don't dismiss me here now Henry, persevere). I guess I began some research into this about a year ago when it first appeared.

As you know, truthers should not believe anything until they research it themselves or it is self evident. There are many, many disinfo sites out there now and it is difficult to know who to watch to gather some relative info. I personally stick to yourself, Mr.Cati and Dr. Paul Marko of pineconeutopia.

I know you are perhaps a very busy man, but I believe it may be of interest to you and your research if you were to listen to Paul Marko on the Flat Earth topic. I know the subject may be distasteful to you (as it was to me) but, truth may demand some more info on this subject.

I wish you all the best Henry. There are many thousands of people out there who rely on you and others to try and come to grips with reality.


Beatrice said (February 13, 2016):

Not surprised at all Sir.

If you find the the geocentric model ridiculous why so have an article on it. Quite obvious so.

And not a very good one either I'd say. Any halfwit like myself can see water always lies flat. Or how about this then...

Six months from January 1 midday or 180 degrees on the heliocentric model you will find the day and night will flip. Another example is what I can see and sense. How come I can see the coast of Wales from the fishing port of Kilkeel in Northern Ireland with the aid of a good telescope?

Impossible on a globe of 25,000 kilometres according to spherical trigonometry.

There are hundreds of examples or proofs that say we do not live on a spinning ball going millions of miles per hour through open space. Your attempt to discredit where we really live is very poor indeed.


Ric said (February 13, 2016):

Ya know Henry, I have read your stuff over a long period of time and have always been a little bothered as to whether you were the 'real deal' - I've had to change my mind about quite a few over the years - some are a little slicker than others but, eventually the fakes, trolls and 'controlled opposition' agents turn the gun on their own feet and empty the mag. Think you just did the very same thing Henry. This 'flat earth' thing is going to bring a whole lot of inflated egos a whole lot of pain. Your panic-stricken, knee-jerk response to the rapidly growing movement is palpable.

So, Henry, you are either a full-on paid whore for the dark cabal OR you are too dumb/lazy/comfortable (whatever) to confront the matrix. My money is on the door that carries the sign 'Henry Makow - Illuminati Controlled Opposition'. Try and prove me wrong.
---

Ric

Everyone who disagrees with you is not controlled opposition.

I guess this means the Jewish Masonic conspiracy does not exist and Feminism is just wonderful.


henry



Tony B said (February 13, 2016):

Egad, Henry, has practically everyone except you and me gone bats? This Steve guy (CIA?) uses the exact argument that made people agree that the earth is ROUND to try to discredit it. It was watching sailing ships gradually disappear starting from the waves washing the bottom sides to the very top of the highest point as they sailed further away that sealed "roundness" as truth.

I tend to think that the nations putting up all those satellites don't buy the flatness.

Do we know of any miners falling through the other side? Some of those mines get pretty deep, you know.

Also, since mathematics is used to explain all the things God made (to the points we understand), let's hear from real mathematicians on the subject. (I'm not pushing Einstein here, don't think he was all that accurate on such things.)

Perhaps we should turn the Hubble telescope toward earth. If these guys are correct it would be the only more or less permanent thing ever seen in space that isn't shaped pretty much like a ball. I'd like to see it myself, just for the novelty. God's biggest Frisbee.

But the best comment here is simply, "SO WHAT?" The world works as it is so who cares? Other than your site I never heard of this nonsense. Gee, guess I'm just out of touch.

BTW, what's to gain by lying to all the world's people about the shape of the earth? I suppose it's all in the book. (Sigh)


Steve said (February 12, 2016):


The flat earth theory is one of the fun ones, it doesn't mean much true or not to 99.999% of people, life goes on. The reason I like it is that I find all these pictures on the net of distance shots of 50 to 100 miles or more away that can't exist because they would be below the horizon on a round earth. Never has there been shown a 360 degree pan of earth and space in NASA history, I can view live cams world wide yet no one's left on in space watching earth and the Hubble telescope has never been aimed at the earth. What bothers me more is I can't find someone to refute these things well.


Below-Bernie Sanders is a Freemason & Communist (scroll down)

Betty Friedan: "Mommy" was a Commie

February 11, 2016

45921206.cached.jpg

With Bernie Sanders poised to take the Democratic nomination

I reprise this key 2003 essay as a reminder of how Communists

like him use duplicity to subvert society. (Ironically, these

Communists sometimes are well-meaning dupes themselves,

i.e. "useful idiots.")

Communism is Cabalist Judaism which is Satanism

We have all been inducted into this satanic cult. 


Related-  Makow - We have de facto Communism       and What is Communism?


"Comrades, you will remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy ... The attacking army was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan Horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy camp."

--George Dimitrov, Comintern General Secretary, August, 1935.


by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Betty Friedan, the "founder of modern feminism" pretended to be a typical 1950's American housewife who had a "revelation" that women like her were exploited and should seek independence and self-fulfillment in career.

What Friedan (nee: Betty Naomi Goldstein) didn't say is that she had been a Communist propagandist since her student days at Smith College (1938-1942) and that the destruction of the family has always been central to the Communist Jewish plan for world tyranny. 

Friedan dropped out of grad school to become a reporter for a Communist news service. From 1946 -1952 she worked for the newspaper of the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, (UE) "the largest Communist-led institution of any kind in the United States." In 1947, Congress targeted the UE as a Communist front and its membership began a steady decline.

horowitz.jpg

Daniel Horowitz, a History Professor at Smith with impeccable Liberal and Feminist credentials documents all this in his book, Betty Friedan and the Making of the Feminine Mystique: The American Left, the Cold War and Modern Feminism (University of Massachusetts Press 1999). Horowitz cites a union member who described how a Communist minority "seized control of the UE national office, the executive board, the paid-staff, the union newspaper and some district councils and locals."

Betty Frieden doesn't want anyone to know her radical antecedents. Throughout her career, she said she had no interest in the condition of women before her "revelation." She refused to cooperate with Professor Horowitz and accused him of "Red-baiting."

Why? Because her book "The Feminist Mystique" (1963) would not have sold over five million copies if her subversive background were known. 

Communists operate by subterfuge -- pretending to be just like us. This is the "Popular Front" strategy that consisted of starting idealistic movements in order to ensnare well-meaning people, usually students, workers, women, artists or intellectuals. The membership was ignorant that their organization was funded and controlled by people with a totally different agenda. This is also the principle behind freemasonry, Zionism and Communism itself. Essentially the adherents are dupes.

Willi Munzenberg, an early confidante of Lenin, organized the Popular Fronts in the 1920's and 1930's and referred to them as "my innocents clubs". He pioneered the protest march, the demonstration, the radical bookstore and publication, the arts festival, and the recruitment of celebrities ("fellow travellers.")

Screen-shot-2012-05-07-at-1.35.22-PM.png

In the words of historian Stephen Koch, Munzenberg, left, "was amazingly successful at mobilizing the intelligentsia of the West on behalf of a moralistic set of political attitudes responsive to Soviet needs. In the process, he organized and defined the 'enlightened' moral agenda of his era." (Double Lives: Spies and Writers in the Secret Soviet War of Ideas Against the West, New York, 1994, p.14.)

In a 1989 interview, Babette Gross, the wife of Willy Munstenberg, described the Popular Front modus operandi:

"You do not endorse Stalin. You do not call yourself a Communist. You do not call upon people to support the Soviets. Never. You claim to be an independent minded idealist. You don't really understand politics but you claim the little guy is getting a lousy break." (Koch, p. 220)

Friedan observed this principle when she helped start second-wave Feminism, which is a classic "Popular Front." The very name, "the woman's movement" and claim to be for "equality" are but a smoke screen for a diabolical crusade to destroy the institution of the family. For example, feminist professor Alison Jagger calls the nuclear family "a cornerstone of women's oppression: it enforces women's dependence on men, it enforces heterosexuality and it imposes the prevailing masculine and feminine character structures on the next generation." ("Feminist Politics and Human Nature," 1988)

The "Congress of American Women," a Popular Front organization founded in 1946 reached a membership of 250,000. It was disbanded in 1950 after being required to register as a "foreign agent" by the U.S. Government. Feminist historian Ruth Rosen writes that the "CAW's agenda prefigured much of the modern women's movement that emerged in the sixties." (Ruth Rosen, The World Split Open: How the Modern Women's Movement Changed America, New York, 2000, p.28.)

The FBI kept tabs on the "Women's movement" but found no direct connection with Soviet subversion. Ruth Rosen, herself a veteran, finds this ironic.

carl.jpeg

(Husband Carl revealed that Betty was never a real housewife but a pill-popping psychopath.)

"Ironically, the FBI searched for signs of subversion in the Women's movement but couldn't recognize what was truly dangerous. While they looked for Communists and bombs, the women's movement was shattering traditional ideas about work, customs, education, sexuality, and the family. Ultimately the movement would prove far more revolutionary than the FBI could ever imagine. Feminism would leave a legacy of disorientation, debate and disagreement, create cultural chaos and social change for millions of men and women, and, in the process, help ignite the culture wars that would polarize American society. But at the time these ideas were not what the FBI considered subversive." (260)

By attacking the social fabric, feminists inflicted more damage to Western society than Communists ever dreamed. Domestic violence hysteria has driven a wedge between men and women. Women have been psychologically neutered. They are encouraged to pursue sex and career not family. The US birth rate has plummeted from 3.9 children per woman in 1960 to 1.9 today, the lowest level in history. [Replacement is 2.1] The marriage rate has declined by 1/3 while the divorce rate has doubled since 1960. Forty per cent of all first-born US children are conceived or born out of wedlock. 

The feminist Trojan Horse has proven extremely effective. The question is why? How could a sick subversive philosophy that openly pits women against men have been able to succeed?

The disconcerting answer is that monopoly capitalists are behind both Communism and Feminism and use them to undermine the political and cultural institutions of Western Civilization.

Rockefeller-Rothschild cartels own most of the world and naturally assume they should control it too. They own most of our politicians, media and educators. Their goal is a "new world order" (a.k.a. "globalization") in which they remake mankind to fit their nefarious ends.

Betty Friedan, take a bow.

----------

Related-

Makow-  Betty Friedan- How Jewish Dysfunction Became Universal







Scruples - the Game of Moral Dilemmas


You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/000185.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Betty Friedan: "Mommy" was a Commie"

Peter said (February 13, 2016):

I have so many cherished friends who cannot accept the truth of this.

There is nowt so blind as doesn't want to see.


Dan said (February 12, 2016):

The ghost of Munzenberg lives on at liberal arts college campuses everywhere. When you know his history, it's creepy to know he was a psychopath with a 1960's American sit com comedic face. One of his routine jobs was fingering 'fellow travelers' he'd recruited if they became 'disloyal'. He ended out of favor himself and was found hung in a forest in France by hunters in 1940. Probably killed by an NKVD assassin.

With a face like that, though, if he'd stayed in Hollywood he would have ended up a producer, making mainstream movies. Of course that wouldn't have lasted either -what with the 'witch hunt' of The House Un-American Activities Committee, and the Hollywood Blacklist of 1947. But these days he'd be a billionaire media mogul.


JG said (February 11, 2016):

Political Idealism is what divides family, starts wars, and leads the masses astray.

This large wave of support that is coming from young voters for Bernie Sanders don't have a clue who he really is and they don't care to know either.They also don't understand that this "revolution" he is talking about is aimed at them.
Yes, a lot of your Communist leaders were also duped themselves into believing this rouge ideology only to find out that they were being used as shills for a bigger picture and plan that they were not privy to. I think Martin Luther King may have figured that one out before he was murdered.

No one ever said that the Communist Jews were stupid on the ways of this world and how to play the vulnerable who are in it.


Why are Jews behind Gun Control? Because the NWO is Jewish Tyranny?

February 10, 2016

Jewish-Gun-Control-Agenda.jpg
What is Behind Gun Control? Jewish Tyranny?

Most U.S. Federal gun control legislation has been written, introduced, and sponsored by Jewish Congressmen and Jewish Senators.

U.S. Federal Gun Control Legislation, 1968 - present

1968: 
The Gun Control Act of 1968 comes from Congressman Emanuel Celler's House bill H.R.17735. It expands legislation already attempted by the non-Jewish Senator Thomas Dodd. America's biggest and most far-reaching gun law came from a Jew.


1988: 
Senator Howard Metzenbaum sponsors Senate bill S.1523. It proposes legislation turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense, allowing a gun owner to be charged with federal racketeering offenses.


1988: 
Senator Howard Metzenbaum co-sponsors a bill - S.2180 - to ban, or limit/restrict, so-called "plastic guns."


1990: 
Senator Herbert Kohl introduces bill S.2070, the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, which bans gun possession in a school zone. The law will later be struck down in court as unconstitutional.


1993: 
Senator Howard Metzenbaum sponsors Senate bill S.653. It bans specific semiautomatic rifles, but also gives the Secretary of the Treasury the power to add any semiautomatic firearm to the list at a later date.


February, 1994: 
The Brady Law, which requires waiting periods to buy handguns, becomes effective. Senator Howard Metzenbaum wrote the Brady Bill. Senator Metzenbaum sponsored the bill in the Senate. The sponsor of the bill in the House was Congressman Charles Schumer.


1994: 
Senator Howard Metzenbaum introduces S.1878, the Gun Violence Prevention Act of 1994, aka "Brady II." Congressman Charles Schumer sponsored "Brady II" sister legislation [H.R. 1321] in the U.S. House of Representatives.


September, 1994: 
The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 goes into effect, including a provision that bans the manufacture and possession of semiautomatic rifles described as "assault weapons." [Note: true assault weapons are fully automatic, not semiautomatic]. That gun-ban provision was authored in the Senate by Senator Dianne Feinstein and authored in the House by Congressman Charles Schumer.


1995: 
Senators Kohl, Specter, Feinstein, Lautenberg and others introduce the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1995, an amended version of the 1990 school-zone law which was struck down in court as being unconstitutional.


September, 1996:
The Lautenberg Domestic Confiscation provision becomes law. It is part of a larger omnibus appropriations bill. It was sponsored by Senator Frank Lautenberg. It bans people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence from ever owning a gun.


1997: 
Senate bill S.54, the Federal Gang Violence Act of 1997, proposes much harsher sentences for people violating minor gun laws, including mandatory prison sentences and forfeiture of property. It was introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein and Senator Hatch, among others. It returns the idea of turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense.


January, 1999: 
Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.193, the American Handgun Standards Act of 1999.


January, 1999: 
Senator Herbert Kohl introduces bill S.149, the Child Safety Lock Act of 1999. It would require a child safety lock in connection with transfer of a handgun.


February,1999: 
Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.407, the Stop Gun Trafficking Act of 1999.


February, 1999: 
Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces S.443, the Gun Show Accountability Act of 1999.


March, 1999: 
Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.560, the Gun Industry Accountability Act of 1999.


March, 1999: 
Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.594, the Large Capacity Ammunition Magazine Import Ban Act of 1999.


May, 2000: 
Senators Feinstein, Boxer, Lautenberg, and Schumer sponsor Senate bill S.2515, the Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2000. It is a plan for a national firearms licensing system.


January, 2001: 
Senators Feinstein, Schumer, and Boxer sponsor Senate bill S.25, the Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2001. It is a nation-wide gun registration plan [apparently there were two versions of that Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act bill].


May, 2003: 
Senators Feinstein, Schumer, Boxer, and others introduce legislation that would reauthorize the 1994 federal assault weapons ban, and, close a loophole in the law that allows large-capacity ammunition magazines to be imported into the U.S. The ban expired in September, 2004.


October, 2003: 
Senators Feinstein, Lautenberg, Levin, and Schumer co-sponsor bill S.1774, designed to stop the sunset [ending] of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988.


Gun_control_political_cartoon.jpg
March, 2005: 
Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.645, "to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act," in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the "Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994"] which expired in late 2004.


March, 2005: 
Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.620, "to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act," in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the "Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994"] which expired in late 2004.


July, 2005: 
Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.A.1621 - Fifty-Caliber Sniper Weapons. This amendment would convert all .50 BMG firearms to NFA weapons.


July, 2005: 
Senator Dianne Feinstein introduces bill S.A.1622 - Fifty-Caliber Exclusion to S.397. This amendment would modify S.397 to allow suits when the firearm involved was a .50 caliber weapon.


July, 2005: 
Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.A.1633 - BATFE Safety Standards. This amendment allows law suits to continue/be brought if the product did not meet the safety standards as defined by the BATFE.


July, 2005: 
Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.A.1634 - 'Sporting Use' on Domestic Handguns. Applying 'sporting use' clause requirements to domestic handguns could, almost completely, dry up the handgun availability in the United States.


This is only a partial list and ONLY for the USA. 
Jews have been successful almost everywhere in disarming all others but themselves.

Pro-Western Fifth Columnists in and around the Kremlin

January 25, 2016

The-5th-column-in-the-Kremlin.jpg

Pro-Western Fifth Columnists in and around the Kremlin




by The Saker
(Abridged by henrymakow.com)

The problem for Putin today is that it makes no sense to replace some of the worst people in power as long as the system remains unchanged. But the main obstacle to a reform of the political system is the resistance of the pro-Western Fifth columnists in and around the Kremlin. They also the ones who are still forcing a set of "Washington consensus" policies upon Russia even though it is obvious that the consequences for Russia are extremely bad, even disastrous. There is no doubt that Putin understands that, but he has been unable, at least so far, to break out of this dynamic.

So who are these Fifth columnists?

I have selected nine of the names most often mentioned by Russian analysts. These are (in no particular order):

Former First Deputy Prime Minister Anatolii Chubais, First Deputy Governor of the Russian Central Bank Ksenia Iudaeva, Deputy Prime Minister Arkadii Dvorkovich, First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov, Governor of the Russian Central Bank Elvira Nabiullina, former Minister of Finance Alexei Kudrin, Minister of Economic Development, Alexei Uliukaev, Minister of Finance Anton Siluanov and Prime Minister Dmitri Medvedev.

This is, of course, only a partial list - the real list is longer and runs deeper in the Russian power structure. The people on this list range from dangerous ideologues like Kudrin or Chubais, to mediocre and unimaginative people, like Siluanov or Nabiullina. And none of them would, by him or herself, represent much of a threat to Putin. But as a group and in the current political system they are a formidable foe which has kept Putin in check. I do believe, however, that a purge is being prepared.

One of the possible signs of a purge to come is the fact that the Russian media, both the blogosphere and the big corporate media, is now very critical of the economic policies of the government of Prime Minister Medvedev. Most Russian economists agree that the real reason for the current economic crisis in Russia is not the falling price of oil or, even less so, the western sanctions, but the misguided decisions of the Russian Central Bank (such as floating the ruble or keeping the interest rates high) and the lack of governmental action to support a real reform and development of the Russian economy. 

What is especially interesting is that vocal opponents of the current Fifth column now get plenty of air time in the Russian media, including state owned VGTRK. Leading opponents of the current economic policies, such as Sergei Glazev, Mikhail Deliagin or Mikhail Khazin are now interviewed at length and given all the time needed to absolutely blast the economic policies of the Medvedev government. And yet, Putin is still taking no visible action. In fact, in his latest yearly address he as even praised the work of the Russian Central Bank. So what is going on here?

First, and to those exposed to the western propaganda, this might be difficult to imagine, but Putin is constrained simply by the rule of law. He cannot just send some special forces and have all these folks arrested on some kind of charge of corruption, malfeasance or sabotage. Many in Russia very much regret that, but this is fact of life.

Screenshot_2016-01-24-12-44-10.jpg
In theory, Putin could simply fire the entire (or part) of the government and appoint a different Governor to the Central Bank. But the problem with that is that it would trigger an extremely violent reaction from the West. Mikhail Deliagin (left) recently declared that if Putin did this, the West's reaction would be even more violent than after the Crimean reunification with Russia. 
---------
Upon learning of a plan to use two swift boats as a bait, and to turn the Persian Gulf into a "pearl harbor," the Russia's Air Forces, who just happened to be in the neighborhood apparently used their mysterious capacity to turn off the US swift boats' systems, and allegedly, the Israeli submarine' systems, also. Boats became deaf, blind and motionless. Exactly like in November 2014in the Black Sea, the Russian Sukhoi Su -24 with the newest jamming complex paralyzed the most modern American combat management system "Aegis" installed on the destroyer "USS Donald Cook."

http://thesaker.is/nuland-meets-surkov-to-warn-about-imminent-nato-attack-by-scott/



Cops Arrest Politically Active Student After he Visits a Doctor for help

January 24, 2016

I

Cops Arrest Politically Active Student After he Visits a Doctor for a Referral 

From Marvin Goldswag:

"I would  like to introduce a video to you about how a Ryerson University student by the name of Steve Katsikaris who was seeking medical help from the university clinic Ryerson Medical Centre around November 18, 2015. Instead, Dr. Brooke A. Hogarth summons the Toronto Police to have Steven detained, handcuffed and institutionalized against his will.
 
To make it worse, a week after the incident, York Regional Police enters the jurisdiction of Toronto to arrest Steve Katsikaris in his own home in Toronto. The York police officers did not present a warrant before entering his home, and it was only until repeated attempts to ask for a warrant was a warrant provided.
 
The video claims that the doctor, Dr. Hogarth pressed charges against Steve Katsikaris as though he was mentally competent if he indeed made "threats" to her inside the university clinic. However, if Dr. Hogarth felt afraid of her safety, why did she go back into the office and try to instigate Steve Katsikaris into committing violence? All it appeared was that Steve was exercising his rights and advised her that he will not tolerate police abuse of authority.
 
I am not trained in law nor psychiatry, but the recorded footage does look like either the doctor at the Ryerson Medical Centre and/or law enforcement have overstepped their power.
 
I wonder what would have been the case if the doctor was a male and the patient was a female."