Hollywood Promotes Wrong Kind Of Girl Power
January 22, 2010
By Donald Jeffries donjeffries@mris.com
(for henrymakow.com)
Hollywood continues a relentless
campaign to celebrate violence and aggression in women.
Movies, television shows and commercials regularly feature fist-fighting
females of all ages.
These role models are not about female empowerment. They promote the false notion that diminutive females regularly can overpower and physically defeat much larger males.
They also glorify fighting in general, which is simply not a part of life for any civilized adult.
This isn't played for comedy
any longer, as it was in the days when Wilma Flintstone and Betty Rubble
would beat up Fred and Barney, or when Mary Tyler Moore would beat up
Dick Van Dyke.
In those days, there had to
be a "gimmick" utilized to explain the obvious improbability
of smaller women overpowering larger men. Usually, this was attributed
to judo or karate lessons.
Now, the female characters
simply are able to punch out larger males, and no questions are asked.
The females are almost always the pretty, thin, super model-types. Thus female viewers identify. On the rare occasions when a fat or large boned woman does the beating up, it is done for comic effect.
AGGRESSORS
The females are not merely defending themselves from male ogres; more often than not, they are actually looking for a physical fight.
They wear the same mean spirited, no nonsense expressions that nearly all actresses seem to wear nowadays, and often they initiate the fights.
Well, it's not normally much of a fight, because the man is usually knocked cold (or at least down) with one mighty feminine blow.
The Lois Lane character on the otherwise excellent show Smallville is one such bully. She has been beating up men, often armed (once she overpowered a huge SWAT team member in full gear), on a regular a basis, with nothing more than her pretty little fists and her magical, flying-Matrix-like drop kicks.
This lady looks for trouble all the time. She is the aggressor, not some Neanderthal male trying to paw at her.
Despite this disturbing character flaw, she is well liked by all the other characters. The audience is supposed to like her too.
If anything, Hollywood scriptwriters are becoming more fanciful. In the recent television series V, the middle-aged female lead rushed an armed assassin from a long distance and tackled him, as throngs of wimpy males looked on in admiration.
This female-as-aggressor campaign has been especially prominent on children's television shows.
On the Nickelodeon teen show I Carly, Carly's best friend Sam is a petite blonde girl who somehow can beat up every male (and is always eager to do so).
On Drake And Josh, the same actress who plays the lead in I Carly, Amanda Cosgrove, then a very young girl, bullies and utterly dominates her older teenage brothers. She beats them up frequently, and they are terrified of her.
The character is completely odious, with not a single redeeming quality yet she never gets her comeuppance and is portrayed positively. Again, the audience is supposed to like this little monster.
WHY?
What is the purpose of pushing this patently absurd notion so consistently and for so long?
Instead of encouraging men to be more sensitive and less brutish and aggressive, we are now fostering a belligerent, in-your-face attitude in females.
As result, females are growing more violent
in real life. In the UK, the number of violent crimes committed by girls 10-17 doubled between 2005 and 2008.
A search of You Tube reveals a spate of videos featuring young girls punching each other. Often, it is a group attack on one hapless victim.
Then there are violent young women in women's soccer.
Clearly, female-on-male violence in movies and television is having an unfortunate impact on today's young women.
Why do we bother to teach our children
that fighting is wrong, if our movies, television and video games constantly
preach the opposite?
-------------------
Donald Jeffries is the author
of the 2007 sci-fi fantasy novel The Unreals and a long time
JFK assassination researcher. Married with two children, he is a keen
observer of pop culture.
-----------
Makow Comment: This is elite social engineering designed to erase gender identity and thus undermine marriage and family. Part of masculine identity is protecting and providing for women and children. Obviously aggressive women become masculine themselves and act to neuter or feminize men.
UPdate-- Huge Increase in Female Violent Crimes
80% School Fights-Girl on Girl
Dan-2 said (January 23, 2010):
About the time I read tonight's article I'd noticed an ad for a new television drama called 'Spartacus'. Curious this meme would be infused into the programming melting pot this year I checked out the first episode online. This show debuted on network tonight.
The show kicked off with a series of incredibly blood splattered fights with no Xena Warrior Princess in sight. But sure enough, about half way through the episode when Sparticus and his babe are subject to coitus interruptus by a band of five barbarian warriors, Sparticus is down for the count when his little woman picks up a sword and broad ax and massacres 3 of his assailants with blows which would require the upper body strength of Jesse Ventura.
That's when I recalled the television programming formula sheets I'd seen, and sent that information in. They really do that.
I saw there are three women in the cast so I expect these ladies will be performing their share of dispatching 250 lb brutes.
Another thing about this show is it's a new level for prime time television profanity and features full frontal female nudity.
In one scene the Roman villain 'goes down' on his fully naked Playboy centerfold wife, the Senator's daughter - notice that's a subtle sign of male submission in movies. I already picked up on the theme that this upwardly mobile Roman's character is pussy whipped rather the way Yul Brenner's Ramses in Cecil B. De Mille's The Ten Commandments (1955). I mean he makes the correct decisions man to man, but then the woman goads him into breaking his word and taking stupid short cuts to power behind closed doors.
Looking over the characters in this thing for future episodes I see they even have a homosexual hero - " Though possessed of a temper and an imposing stature, he tempers this with the tenderness he shows his collection of birds and Pietros, a slave boy."
Anyway, there's a lot of estrogen injection in this testosterone epic.