Francis said (July 28, 2012):

Hinduism a British construct?

http://www.raceandhistory.com/historicalviews/NoDefinitionofHinduism.htm

http://www.raceandhistory.com/historicalviews/NoDefinitionofHinduism2.htm

http://www.raceandhistory.com/historicalviews/hindumanyraces.htm

AMBEDKAR WAS A FREEMASON TOO

http://www.livemint.com/2010/09/10214750/A-brief-history.html

David said (July 28, 2012):

Gandhi came from a upper middle class back ground and as in common with most from the colonial days were taught to accept that U.K the mother country and it's institutions were always just and fair.

He enrolled at the ''Inner Temple'' to do his law.most of the ''Inns'' as they are referred to were a heaven for the Masons.
Now to be a member of a Lodge, I gather one has to be 'invited' to join, proposed and seconded by existing members of the Lodge.

Gandhi may have considered it a PLUS to be invited. and may have joined.I am assuming as no evidence is available,elsewhere except your evidence.

None of his biographers ever mentioned this membership.
Gandhi never wanted India divided and wanted Jinnah, a Muslim to be the First PM of India.

As a protest he refused to attend the Independence day ceremonies.

Subas Chandrabose disappearance is a mystery.

I am not from India nor do I claim to be an expert on the continent.

Sandra said (July 23, 2012):

How DARE you call Mahatma Gandhi call a part of the illuminati.... He was a true SAINT !!!
You, I DO believe now, are realy CRAZY and you should be SO shamed to call one the biggeste hero's that has ever lived, he was JUST as important to wold-peace as BIG people like Martin Luther King and Nelson Maldela !!!
You make so sick, cry and I'm sooo VERY angry and sad now !!!
First make a REAL study about his life, like I did... and than talk further !!!
Mahatma Gandhi was a true Saint like Mother Teresa, or was SHE part of the illuminati too ???
Unbelievable... unbelievable... unbelievable !!!
I'm SO in shock now ... how silly you talk !
What about the insinuations about the Englisch Queen and the Vatican called to court??? Talk FURTHER about THAT because you stopped talking about it????
That does not make you believable do you understand that!!!
Please do NO throw mud to saints.... ;-(((

David Livingstone said (July 22, 2012):

Interesting that you should feature a post on Gandhi. He's in my new book, and I just found a great post on him yesterday.

Make sure you watch the video too:

http://aangirfan.blogspot.ca/2012/07/gay-gandhi.html

Here are the paragraphs from my book:

> After the war, a new leadership emerged around Mohandas K. Gandhi, who among those who had written to demand Besant's release, and who had returned from leading Asians in a peaceful struggle against racism in South Africa.

In 1888, he had travelled to London, England, to study law at University College London, when he met members of the Theosophical Society. They encouraged him to join them in reading the Bhagavad Gita. Despite not having shown interest in religion before, as a result, Gandhi began his serious study of the text, which was to become his acknowledged guide through his life.

According to Kathryn Tidrick, Gandhi's approach to the Gita was theosophical.[i] Gandhi had met Blavatsky and Besant in 1889.[ii] And when Gandhi set up his office in Johannesburg, among the pictures he hung on his walls were those of Tolstoy, Jesus Christ and Annie Besant, and in a letter he wrote to her in 1905 he expressed his "reverence" of her.[iii] Besant's distinctive influence on Gandhi was through her contribution to theory was the “Law of Sacrifice”, which was set out most fully in Estoeric Christianity. The Law of Sacrifice was derived from a Fabian reading of the Bhagavad Gita, where Krishna's selfless activity brought the world into existence and continues to sustain it. Action performed in this “sacrificial” spirit, says Krishna, is free from Karma. From this Besant developed the notion of the Law of Sacrifice, a form of “spiritual alchemy”, through disinterested action, “cast upon the altar of duty”. The man who acts in harmony with the divine selflessness animating the universe becomes: "a force for evolution… an energy for progress, and the whole race then benefits by the action which otherwise would only have rough to the sacrificer a personal fruit, which in turn would have bound his Soul, and limited his potentialities.[iv]

[i] Kathryn Tidrick, Gamdhi: A Political and Spiritual Life, (London: I.B. Tauris, 2006) p. 63

[ii] Charles Freer Andrews (Hrsg.): Mahatma Gandhi, Mein Leben. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M. 1983

[iii] Kathryn Tidrick, Gamdhi: A Political and Spiritual Life, (London: I.B. Tauris, 2006) p. 60-61

[iv] Kathryn Tidrick, Gamdhi: A Political and Spiritual Life, (London: I.B. Tauris, 2006) p. 63

Scott said (July 21, 2012):

Of course he was!

Theosophy = Anti Christ New Age Religion

You might want to look into those documentaries Chris White has connecting the New Age Movement and the NWO. I think Keith Thomspon's documentary called New Age Infiltration goes into Ghandi's Theosophy.
http://conspiracyclothes.com/nowheretorun/

Chris is the leading expert in that arena and he shows how all the top Conspiracy Guys (Jordan Maxwell, Tsarion, Icke) are linked in to Helena Blavatsky, Albert Pike, United Nations Anti-Christ program. Livingstone shows how all the false flag Muslims are linked into the same Occult program and Chamish shows how the Labor Zionist leadership of Israel are linked in.

_(signature) __________________________________________________________________
Joint doctrine states that "the fact that deception was used on an operation should be protected. both to allow the use of the same techniques and tactics in later deception operations, and to protect sensitive deception means"

The same basic Hollywood deception technique is being repeated over and over again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJ4DroG2X1E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOMHSgQuuiw

Andre said (July 21, 2012):

Natharam Godse's defense can be found and read here:
http://www.vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplayArticle.aspx?id=365

Indeed, thou shalt not kill. Yet, for those in the West who put Gandhi on a pedestal in their minds (ask yourself how you came to this idea of his supposed greatness i.e. who put this notion in your head?), it is sobering to read the damage caused by Gandhi's actions.

The murderer saw it as his responsibility to defend his own, to stop the selling-out of land and the spilling of Hindu blood, for which he largely held Gandhi responsible. It puts things in perspective although excusing a murderer is quite something else.

The article by Timothy was about Gandhi and reading even the first two pages of the defense will tell you a lot more than the propaGandhi that has been poured out over us in decades past.

Dan said (July 21, 2012):

Not so mysterious. Gandhi's father and family were very highly placed public officials during the British Raj (rule). He was groomed for his career in politics at University College in London and became barrister at the Inner Temple bar. For those that don't know, the Inner Temple in the City of London was founded by none other than the Knights Templar. After that he began his career in South Africa. There are too many Cecil Rhodes connections here to be irrelevant.

With due respect to Gandhi, the 'decolonization' of the old British Empire was part of the long term business plan of Globalization.

India was scheduled to become part of the British 'Commonwealth' - that grand illusion of independence. Without a figurehead leader to be a binding factor the Indian continent would have fallen into chaos when the British left. I think Gandhi was groomed and supported for that role.

I think he was assassinated when he'd served his purpose.
When the master planners need to unify a diverse people into a nation they give them an idealist. Soon as the nation-state exists, the idealists are simply in the way.