Black Woman Defends "Racism"
December 7, 2011
'WE WILL UNDERMINE EVERY COLLECTIVE IDENTITY BUT OUR OWN, say the Protocols of Zion. Identity refers to race, religion, nation and family (gender.)
By Mary
(for henrymakow.com)
(from July, 2010 and more relevant than ever)
I've been thinking about the push to be interracial because it's troubling. There always has been and always will be some mixing between racial, cultural and ethnic groups, and that's fine when it happens naturally.
But, if a teenager were to look at VH1, MTV, cable shows, and network tv and commercials, they'd soon conclude that besides enforcing negative racial stereotypes (unsexy Asian geek males, Black men as jocks, musicians, and always from the 'hood even if they're now educated and professional), that interracial socializing and dating is the norm.
In fact, if you prefer to stay with your own, you're racist and uncool. That's very dangerous thinking.
A White American woman wrote advice columnist Carolyn Hax because she prefers to date only White men. She does not wish to go through the stress of interracial dating. Her friends have strongly denounced her as being racist. Of course, Hax agreed that she was being racist and chided her.
The White woman didn't say she thought Jews were scum or Asians inferior; she said that she's more comfortable with White men and White culture.
That's her prerogative and should be respected. Hax's response is going to become the norm; mark my words. And as it does, the dangerous supremacist groups will become more troublesome, rebellious and active.
PRESERVING RACE
I'm American to the bone and Black American to the marrow. Encouraging and socially bullying folks into interracial unions is dangerous for us. We're only 13% of the population; we will not exist as a people if we mix out.
Now, I know people that would be happy about that, but since these are my people I'm a little less thrilled,thank you.
But, I think that's the plan. I study Latin American culture and one of their ways of dealing with Blacks has been to encourage mixing out. It works; how many dark skinned Afrochileans do you know?
Exactly. The immensely popular Mexican educator and philosopher, Jose Vasconcelos, was definitely a racist; he considered non-Whites to be inferior. He suggested racial mixing in part as a way to form a superman with all the best qualities of each race (who can really ensure that that happens? Ridiculous, but wildly popular idea in Latin America.) but also as a way to mix out "undesirables".
Minorities were told that they were inferior and that mixing with Whites or at least other more successful minorities would "improve" the race. To this day you can find mixed Latinos waxing poetic about how their mixed existence improved their DNA. But these same folks get upset if you tell them that they have minority features.
I've heard that in England, racial mixtures are encouraged for the same reason, but Whites get very upset when first generation Brits choose to marry someone from their own ethnic, racial or cultural group.
LIBERAL COP OUT
I know many American White liberals uncomfortable with race relations who are so happy at the idea of just mixing up and forgetting everything.
That's a cop out, and the only one that benefits is the White liberal. I've never met a minority or someone strongly attached to an ethnic or cultural group that was overjoyed at the prospect of mixing into nonexistence.
Years ago I read about a White American woman who formed a group for Black and White Americans to work out grievances. She soon realized that people felt uncomfortable really digging down and admitting the deep feelings driving their racial ideas and opinions to someone of another race, and she very wisely decided that since she was a White woman, that it was best for her to have a White only racial strife group.
Of course folks rant and put out their anger and frustration first, but only with one of their own will a person feel comfortable going beyond the initial feelings and digging deep.
I do not discuss race with non-Blacks exactly for that reason and I don't expect a non-Black to tell me their deep down feelings about race either.
Why should they make themselves vulnerable to me or vice-versa? All the so-called race discussions on TV are bull for that very reason. This needs to be worked out privately first, just like in a family.
That White woman was on to something big. Unfortunately,with today's coercive multicultural, diversity crap, this woman would be forced from her job and ostracized as a .... racist (sigh).
New immigrants are being allowed to introduce their racial stereotypes and prejudices-which are pretty primitive and frightening, truth be told- into the already volatile mix. That doesn't bode well since they're well educated and in two generations will hold positions of power.
Thanks for listening.
---
Makow comment: "Racism" like "sexism" are Illuminati terms designed to erase our racial and gender identity. This is part of their program to re-engineer humanity to taken our identity from them, i.e. to be their servants. See Tony Blizzard "The Right to be Racist" with my expanded comment.
Related, Makow - Scotibank Prepares Whites for Minority Status
RH said (December 8, 2011):
The woman defending her right to be respected for union with her own species is not racist. She is 100% right…I am a full blooded indigenous American female. aka Amerindian, Negro, I am not a mixed breed, furthermore ,NOT all people in existence today are products of race mixing, this is a myth. There are only 8million mixed race people in the US, however the United States has a population of 250 million people Millions of people still desire their culture and their genetic breed .
However , the definition of racism cannot be applied to anyone defending their right to preserve their genetic inheritance right to continue the genetic quality of their species on their home from Earth their population was created on. The word racism is a term applied when one race is committing acts of genocide or extermination agendas against the existence of another from their inheritance to Earth .. The reason behind Encouraging and socially bullying folks into interracial unions is to make ethnic cleansing consensual.
The truth is Miscegenation is form of
Genocide. If this conversation was put into the context of forced race mixing, then everyone would not look at it so glibly. The purpose for race mixing is genocide weather you influence a race to abandon their collective responsibility to maintain the existence of themselves on the planet or force impregnation thru raping the females that create it , the end result is the same, extinction of the species as they were created by the Earth herself. This is the real elephant in the room.
The hidden
agenda by homo sapiens (mankind) to exterminate the indigenous people of the Earth created by indigenous females out of the Earth has been the Manifest Destiny behind the imperial agenda for over 5000 years. In the United States 200 year occupation of lower North America the largest
indigenous American population in America aka black Americans are always being influenced to abandon natural unity for a preference to interracial unions as a method for the transfer of their heritage genetic inheritance to support the occupying people colonizing of America for themselves.
I commend the sister for having enough consciousness to see
the racism behind the social agenda of politically accepted Race
mixing. Race mixing is a another form of ethnic cleansing. In other words Genocide.