john said (December 24, 2010):

It is clear to me that 9-11 was a staged event to create an atmosphere of horror and to propel this country into the ensuing wars that followed.

There is no reason to hide the video tapes or other surveillance evidence from the public unless you have something to hide. Not one plane has been identified by part numbers etc. that I know of.

There will come a day when all the rats involved will be forced out of their sewer and pay the ultimate price for their wickedness.

I have 20 plus years in police work including criminal investigations. The official government story stinks to high heaven. Where are the honest police in this country who work in the 911 crime scene jurisdictions? A grand jury needs to be convened in each jurisdiction, not the politicians in Washington.

Sam said (December 24, 2010):

I see some want to push back the thermite theory in support the nuke use. Either way, we both know we have been had and a lawfull investigation must be carried out into two things now, 1)those attacks and 2)the previous cover up of the crimes or in legalese, obstruction of justice coupled with destruction of the evidence and why they did that. It is obvious to me why the Bush administration did that cover up, because they were involved with the first. One lie followed by more is all we had. Who lies when questioned about one horrendous crime like those?

Dennis said (December 23, 2010):

There is a very strong indication that only exotic, unconventional weaponry could have released that much extremely -- unimaginably -- high intensity energy which suddenly appeared just as the towers disintegrated from top to bottom. This understanding means we cannot blame the highly unconventional Ground Zero devastation on thermite/thermate/super thermate and "controlled demolition" any more than we can blame it on "jet fuel" or "box cutters".

Classical government disinfo methods ensued whereby their agents (Dr Steven Jones/Dr Judy Woods) put out supposedly “alternative theories” involving alleged “secret, new technologies” that are either evidence-free and/or impossible. Space Beams/DEW (Directed Energy Weapons), or ludicrous “super nanocomposite thermite burns forever” theories were created by the intel agencies to cover up the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath. (Thermite cools off in minutes or hours.) These “theories” desperately try to claim new phenomena or new laws of physics and chemistry--as does the 9/11 Commission’s ludicrous “findings.”

Other conventional explosives were used for “outside” public consumption, but have nothing to do with the vaporization of the buildings. Thermite does not negate the belief in a false flag, it is a distraction from reality. Dr Jones and the rest of the BYU crew desperately cling to this nonsense to keep people from looking at the scientific facts. The “laws” of science do not lie

Koen said (December 23, 2010):

I think the mini-nuke theory explains the sudden collapse of the the WTC during 9-11-2001 very well (this is a plausible explanation):
http://www.henrymakow.com/911_-_nukes_caused_this_devast.html

It has been refuted by Steven Jones, the man who dismissed "cold" solid-state fussion as a fable (the Fleischmann Ponse affair), and the man behind the thermate theory of the WTC collapse.
Jones' refutation of solid-state nuclear fusion was wrong, so can he be wrong as well to refute the mini-nukes theory : http://www.911review.com/errors/wtc/nukes.html ??
For instance, can the use of thermate explain why the pile of demolished WTC was a very low pile, as if much of the demolished buildings disappeared in a big hole, created by an underground mini-nuke ?

Gary said (December 23, 2010):

The "thermite debunkers" often claim that many tons of thermite would be needed to bring down the three WTC buildings..., but, presumably, the thermite debunkers would expect the world to believe that the buildings 1 & 2 came down exclusively by fires from the aircrafts and building 7 by fire alone? The claim doesn't make sense ! If huge amounts of explosives were needed to bring the structures down, then the official story couldn't have occurred by their own premise.

Keith said (December 23, 2010):

Just read your post on nano-thermite and 911 and thought you might be interested in the following regarding the Pentagon missile on 911. The Pentagram released 5 photos, and in the fourth you can see the aircraft that fired the missile (you know, the one Cheney ordered a stand down on as per Norman Mineta) as it flies over by the fireball. Jesse Ventura had this photo on his recent Pentagon 911 show but failed to notice the fly over.

“The Attack on The Pentagon” is an outstanding article with much photo evidence of what happened, and what did not happen, at the Pentagon on 9-11. The first version of this article appeared on this website on September 13th, 2001.
Go to: http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.htm
then click onto the following two parts to see the CCTV photos of the missile impact (part 3) as well as the photo of what appears to be a predator (part 4) which can be seen clearly to the left of the fireball from the explosion as it passes over and by the the Pentagram after firing the missile.

3) The photos of the Pentagon explosion with the fireball and predator flyover are at: http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pentagon/spencer05.htm

4) What Actually Happened?
http://www.serendipity.li/wtc4.htm