Trump- Have Americans Been Neo Conned?
November 17, 2016
Direct Link to Latest News
November 17, 2016
Glen said (November 18, 2016):
"Trump- Have Americans Been Neo Conned?"
Of course they have. If Trump was a threat to the true rulers of this country he would not have been let anywhere near the White House. His sorry ass would have been Ron Pauled right off the bat. No matter how many American's supported him, the blue-bloods in the RNC would have made sure he never secured his parties nomination. It would have been stolen from him in broad day light, ala-Bernie Sanders. Reflecting back, I now believe Hillary was allowed to run against him as the elites knew full well she was so hated and despised by true Americans it would be quite easy to get their man Trump voted in.
As I have stated previously, all will know if Trump is the real deal by the cabinet members he choses. If that cabinet is loaded with neo-con, Zionist, big banker, wall street, CFR members, then it can be nothing than more of the same. All you so-called Christians and right-wingers who stand and shout "make America great again" need to realize it is just another meaningless slogan, void of any true meaning, just as Obama's "hope and change" was.
In the end it appears we will have another puppet for our true rulers in Zionist Israel. The only time Trump will remove his lips from the kosher ass that he swears an un-dying loyalty to, is when he moves around front. Sorry America, you have duped again, just as you were last time, and just as you will be next time(if there is a next time).
So get ready America, for more of the same. Get ready for an ever growing police state who's methods and tactics get more brutal every day. Get read for the ever growing surveillance state, a state where every move you make and breath you take is monitored. Get ready for more never ending wars. Get ready to throw more of your children into the meat grinder that is war. Get ready to shovel more of your hard earned cash into an ever expanding and intrusive government. Get ready to again have your government receive it's orders from a foreign government. So get ready America, as your man Trump prepares to give you more of the same.
This one's for you America, maybe it will clear some of cob webs from your head
Brendon O'Connell said (November 18, 2016):
Perhaps one should ask "who is Dr Steve Pieczenik?"
The former psychological warfare expert for the Pentagon said straight out on the Alex Jones Show several times that Israel was behind 9-11. He named Rabbi Dov Zackhiem, Michael Chertoff, Rahm Emmanuel as deeply involved and guilty of treason. He stated repeatedly Trump must ditch the neo-cons. Alex Jones was screaming it too.
Pieczenik is advising Trump from the sidelines.
But we see Trump deep, deep, deep in bed with neo-cons and Netanyahu. Dr Steve Pieczenik has tapped former New York mayor Rudolf Guliani as Attorney General? Guliani is best friends with Netanyahu. WTF is going on?
Is Trump just trying to stay alive till he is sworn in?
They say Israel likes to hit hard at times like this with transitioning governments, like they did during operation Caste Lead in late 2008 between Bush JNR and Obama.
Gaza look out.
Do we continue to give Trump the benefit of the doubt Henry? Or, is it looking far more likely we have been "trumped" with Dr Steve Pieczenik running interference?
Time will certainly tell.
Thanks for the timely article.
Paul S said (November 18, 2016):
It's true that everyone is watching w/ baited breath to see whether Trump is actually the real deal of not. Some things which give me optimism:
(1) The incredibly ferocious full-court press to demonize him in the media, from all sides, and from both Democrats and Republicans. This is went far, far beyond what we're used to seeing in the normal left-right dialectic of Democrats versus Republicans.
(2) Hillary's clear and obvious devastation at having lost the election, as well as that of her followers.
(3) The fact that all told, once everything is tabulated, we probably had over 1 million email leaks and hacks on the DNC side, while Trump's organization was never hacked even once. This to me suggests the surreptitious involvement of U.S. military and intelligence agencies on Trump's behalf, as well as their protection of him (and by this I mean, "good" factions w/in these agencies that do not wish to see WWIII with the Russians, and who wish to see Hillary brought to justice).
Trump is a deal-maker, he seeks "leverage" in every relationship he has. Even if he brings on people potentially antagonistic to him, he won't do it unless he has "leverage" on them and can control them. Trump also manages his organizations with high "turnover", (famously) firing people once he thinks they're no longer useful and replacing them as needed.
It'll be interesting to see how things go, but he's already on the path to normalizing relations with Russia, China and Mexico, and the Fed looks like it's ready to start raising interest rates in December (which was another campaign threat Trump made -- to raise interest rates to help correct the insane financial bubble we're in now). It seems he's getting more done in
Tom said (November 18, 2016):
It is quite possible they have been conned. Remember something similar happened with Brexit when the 'conspiracy' was projected on to the Remain side, which was made to appear to represent the establishment and the 'undemocratic' EU. The Leave side, on the other hand, was portrayed as an angry, grassroots movement of British people against the elite.
In fact, the Remain side was a very broad-based movement of people, some of whom happened to be Jewish, while the Leave side always looked to me to have been a narrow plot by big money and the newspapers to seize control of Britain and destroy people's rights, not to mention as a wrecking strategy by some of Britain's enemies. The jury's out on Trump, although he was almost certainly a better choice than Clinton.
Tony B said (November 17, 2016):
Happy to see an article on the real Donald Trump. Believe me, there will be many more to follow as his rule unfolds.
Until political parties are done away, this will always be the case. When a couple of private clubs control what names can be on the ballot it is always only a matter of time until those clubs are wholly owned by the money creators. From then on EVERY CANDIDATE WHOSE NAME GETS ON A BALLOT AND WHO IS MENTIONED IN THEIR ALREADY OWNED MEDIA IS A CRIMINAL PROSTITUTE TO THOSE MONEY CREATORS.
Jude said (November 17, 2016):
Interesting article. As I understand it, around 70 per cent of Jews who voted, voted for Hillary. That's a very large percentage but it still leaves 30 per cent who voted against her. Unless one believes that Jews are genetically destined to be globalists/supremacists - which I don't - we have to allow for the possibility that some Jews are conflicted.
Such people dilslike many aspects of cultural Marxism but are still fiercely loyal to Israel for nationalist and ethnic reasons. It's not really so difficult an idea to grasp when one remembers the many fanatically pro-Israel evangelical Protestants and Neo-con Catholics.
At least the right-wing Jews have racial reasons for their blind loyalty - though that doesn't excuse the way they justify the oppression of the Palestinians - and react so violently to anyone who points to Jewish corruption in finance, the media and so on.
I still think the left-wing Jews are more of a threat though - not just because they tend to be more militant in their cultural Marxism, but also because when the chips are down they can be relied upon to give "respectable" liberal cover to wars fought on behalf of the Illuminati.
Breitbart may be controlled opposition, but as you have said that's better than no opposition at all.
George said (November 17, 2016):
I would have to say that this article accurately reflects the complexity of the game. However, my own view is that there is such a thing as reality. This is denied by some, as you know, who maintain that everything is perception. According to Pythagoras, the essence of reality is number. Our stated national debt is nearly 20 trillion dollars. Some economists, factoring in unfunded liabilities, come up with figures as high as one hundred trillion. Then there are the derivatives bets of banks, whose actual magnitude can only be guessed at. The TARP bailout was obviously only a precursor to coming bail-ins and other ruthless financial attacks on those unable to resist. I did not vote for Trump. The reasons were threefold. I dislike his lengthy involvement in casinos, an activity that holds out false hope to those who can least afford to lose money. He has no track record of producing goods such as automobiles or computers. Secondly, he has reportedly repeatedly declared bankruptcy. That means that he betrayed the hopes of those who expected him to make them wealthy. Thirdly, his Trump University held out similar hopes of wealth to those who put down money. Perhaps some of them were satisfied, though many were not. The Clintons, involved in similar for-profit university scams, did not dwell on this issue as much as they could have.
Confucius is reported to have asked rhetorically : "In what way is a man's true character a secret?" The reality of the numbers will, IMHO, hit like a tsunami. In that catastrophe it will be the kind of post-apocalyptic world hinted at in so many movies of this era. All the sly maneuverings of perception control will vanish as we face REALITY, a reality that Pythagoras correctly stated to be numerical.
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at
Derek said (November 19, 2016):
Great piece, Henry! Poses many pertinent questions and fleshes out realistic scenarios. I see much potential for further shaking up the criminals in the establishment; Trump's election triggered huge schisms that aren't merely cosmetic (such as exposing the Clinton
Foundation), and that can be used to good effect by a savvy populace, to reclaim power. It won't be easy, but it just got a lot easier.
The "Judeo-Christian" evangelical establishment are basket cases. I guess they never looked into Cyrus Scofield and Samuel Untermeyer.