Direct Link to Latest News


Did Google Kill Julian Assange?

October 24, 2016


Julian Assange was about to drop 
the hammer on Google.
Did Google get to him first? 

(Disclaimer- The statement by Wikileaks below this article attempts
to dispel these worries but thousands of people still are demanding 
proof Assange is alive. Wikileaks is tweeting a poll asking if 
they would prefer a picture, video, statement by lawyers or 
appearance at window. So far, video has a slight lead over window.) 

by Buddy Schwartz

Rumors abound that Julian Assange, CEO of Wikileaks, is dead.

People familiar with Mr. Assange and his daily habits point to strange anomalies right after the police invasion of the Ecuadorian Embassy October 15, 2016, in the wee hours of the night. Soon after, Julian Assange's internet access and tweets were shut down.

They point out that: 

(1) Wikileaks DNS Server was suddenly pointed elsewhere;

(2) Mr Assange's subsequent tweets were noticeably more hostile and attacked his most loyal supporters; 

(3) Mr Assange's tweets regularly misspelled the names of some of his closest friends whom he has known for decades (Gavin McFadyen became McFayden for example). McFadyen,76, a mentor of Assange's, was found dead.

(4) Streams of disinformation were spewed; 

(5) Themes supported by Mr Assange for years were now being knocked down/discredited by his subsequent tweets and communications;

(6) "Body double" rumors have been circulated and documented; 

(7) New strange hitherto unknown moderators of Wikileaks have suddenly been installed; 

(8) and his "deadman switch" has been activated, wherein much of his stored data and secret website PINS were to be released in the event of his untimely death.

So all signs and evidence point to his death.


Who has the power, wherewithal, connections,  money, influence, and above all the motivation to bypass all norms of international law, the Geneva Convention, sovereign immunity of nation-states, and common human decency to get this done?

The keyword is "motive," which as any criminal investigator will tell you is a main focus of any murder investigation.

On October 5, 2016, Julian Assange tweeted that he was about to do a huge data dump proving that Google routinely collaborates with various nefarious elements of the US Deep State and Military Industrial Complex. 

They would prove his contention that "Google has grown big and bad. Schmidt's tenure as CEO saw Google integrate with the shadiest of U.S. power structures as it expanded into a geographically invasive megacorporation.' 

Assange became concerned about former Google CEO Eric Schmidt's ties with the State Department in 2009 when Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary of State.

He has claimed that Schmidt, who is a chairman at the company, has worked with the Clintons for years, as Donald Trump accused Google of political bias saying that it suppresses negative news about Clinton. 
But now that Julian Assange of Wikileaks is apparently dead, these documents and evidence will most probably never see the light of day.

These allegations of the unitary relationship by and between Google and the US Deep State will forever be just allegations, as this evidence has no doubt been destroyed, and lost forever.

NOTE-  Sunday evening, Wikileaks released the following statement:

On Tuesday, the government of Ecuador issued a statement saying that it had decided to not permit Mr. Assange to use the government of Ecuador's internet connection during the US election citing its policy of "non interference."
Ecuador's statement also clarified that it does not seek to interfere with WikiLeaks journalistic work and that it would continue to protect Mr. Assange's asylum rights.
Mr. Assange has asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where the United Nations has ruled he has been unlawfully deprived of liberty by the United Kingdom and the Kingdom of Sweden for the last six years. He has not been charged.

It is the government of Ecuador's prerogative to decide how to best guard against the misinterpretation of its policies by media groups or states whilst ensuring that it protects Mr. Assange's human rights.
WikiLeaks is a global, high volume publisher that publishes on average one million documents and associated analyses a year.
WikiLeaks publishes its journalistic work from large data centers based in France, Germany, the Netherlands and Norway, among others. Most WikiLeaks staff and lawyers reside in the EU or the US and have not been disrupted.
WikiLeaks has never published from jurisdiction of Ecuador and has no plans to do so. Similarly Mr. Assange does not transmit US election related documents from the embassy.
WikiLeaks is entirely funded by its readers, book and film sales. Its publications are the result of its significant investigative and technological capacities.
WikiLeaks has a perfect, decade-long record for publishing only true documents. It has many thousands of sources but does not engage in collaborations with states.
Mr. Assange has not endorsed any candidate although he was happy to speak at the Green's convention due to Dr. Jill Stein's position whistleblowers, peace and war.



*Google's Pro-Clinton Search Bias Reflects US Tech Firms' Ties to 'Deep State'

*Google now listing Wikileaks as a 'dangerous' site

*Post Julian Assange Fingers Mossadist Jew Jared Cohen in Google Duplicity ...

*Assange: Google as a Creature of the State Department | ... 

*Subverting Free Expression: Assange Accuses Google Of Being A Tool Used By The US To Silence Dissent 

*Israel To Coordinate With Google, YouTube, To Censor Palestinian Videos Of Conflict- 

*Google Investigated by FTC Over Search Abuse 

*White House Official Cozied Up to Google Before Antitrust Lawsuit Was Shelved -

*Israeli Official Meets with Googleand YouTube to Censor Palestinian Videos 

*Google and Israel discuss educational collaboration ... 

*Clinton Emails Show Zeal for Syrian War by Google, Israel, Team Hillary

*Google Manipulates Search Results, According to Study From Yelp and Legal Star Tim Wu ...

*Senator presses FTC to reopen Google antitrust case as EU Commissioner comes to town -

*Google: The Center Of Conspiracy "More Vast Than The Rothschilds And Bilderbergs" | 

*Apple and Google Just Attended a Confidential Spy Summit in a Remote English Mansion

*Subverting Free Expression:Assange Accuses Google Of Being A Tool Used By US To Silence Dissent -

* Pentagon and Google  join forces to advance US military hegemonic capacity

*How the CIA made Google

*Google's deep CIA and NSA connections 

*Assange: Google Is Not What It Seems - 

*Google entrenched in Zionist ethics, politics 

*Google involved with Clinton campaign, controls information flow - Assange -- '

*Revolving door': Google & EU govts' cross-hiring revealed in new report - 

*Google's 'Regime Change' Agent, Jared Cohen

*WikiLeaks: Google & Al-Jazeera Encouraged Civil War In Syria -

*Google planned to help Syrian rebels bring down Assad regime, leaked Hillary Clinton emails claim 

*Clinton Emails Reveal Google's Role In Attempting To Oust Syria's Assad 

*Google this! Hillary Clinton and the Syrian regime-change conspiracy 

*StratforLeaks: Google Ideas Director Involved in 'Regime Change' 

*Subverting Free Expression: Assange Accuses Google Of Being A Tool Used By The US To Silence Dissent ... 

*'If this is true, it is a disgrace': Donald Trump responds to viral video claiming Google's search is biased 

*Wikileaks Global Intelligence Files, Israel Day 18: Google's Covert Role in Arab Uprisings ... 

*Wikileaks' Assange: Google Directly Allied with Clinton Campaign

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Comments for " Did Google Kill Julian Assange?"

Connie said (October 25, 2016):

You'd think Assange would have learned something from Andrew Breitbart. To give prior notice of a significant info release seems just plain nutty at this point. We are almost at the election, and the emails have either worked or they haven't. Whichever is the case, Hillary might soon go after him in some way. As President, she might even go after Ecuador. Whether or not it's true, it would be very clever right now to send out clues that he's dead,

Sid Green said (October 24, 2016):

Google has always seemed like a government database to me. I find it amusing that my life could be of interest to some parasites just because I possess the intellect to understand the obvious.

Anyone who thinks they have privacy on the internet, or who doesn't realize that all social media and search engines are data collecting devices for intelligence agencies (The Church of Satan) is pathetic. I assumed that before I had ever heard of the "conspiracy". The conspiracy itself is nothing but common sense.

People are extremely naive and ridiculously Stockholm syndromed.

I would say most (not all) "truth" sites are CIA operated, I especially suspect "Jim Stone" because of his obviously CIA incendiary anti semitism and incitement to violence. They want to incriminate people looking for information by making "truthers" sound crazy. Ken Adachi is more reliable than Jim Stone but I trust no one.

Trusting a human being is a moronic decision. That is in scripture. I would say most truth sites, wikileaks, the "Alt right", talk radio, ALL OF IT, are part of the puppet show.

But, I only post on google what I know the swine (CIA) can digest and handle. My life contains little content and should be of no interest to intelligence, but I have a book shelf filled with truth, and a mind that understands the way Satan (the system) operates.

Posting anywhere online is like an open conversation with Satan. You should only do it to mock and ridicule Satan with what he already knows. I declare victory in advance over the Illuminati. I am the victor.

Glory to Jesus Christ the Word who will destroy the Synagogue (Church) of Satan with the words of his mouth. Raise the middle finger, online, but don't be stupid and encourage your own death.

MM said (October 24, 2016):

i think many people already know that Google & other popular search engines are operating in association with US intelligence/spy agencies.
in fact, im also sure that Mossad, Interpol, MI5/6 etc also have full access to all of our posts, tweets, emails etc online.

actually, i dont find it sensible for Google to kill Mr Assange for revealing what we already know.
if anything, i would be surprised to learn that they dont spy on us.

everything i do online, i do with the full & certain knowledge that its being intercepted, scanned, filtered etc by the CIA, NSA etc.
i dont care- if they want to waste their time with me, who am i to object?

theres one reason however, that could "justify", from Google & their govt associates point of view, the assassination of Mr Assange:

- he has irrefutable proof of the spying, which will most likely lead to expensive lawsuits, apart from other repercussions.

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at