Does UN Control of Internet Endanger Freedom?
September 13, 2016
Will the Internet be vulnerable to interference from
totalitarian regimes? L.C. Vincent thinks so.
by L.C. Vincent
(henrymakow.com)
On October 1st, if there is no real opposition in Congress or from the general public, the Obama administration is prepared to transfer control of ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) from the US to an "international consortium" of nations, nearly all of which are antithetical to the ideas of free speech which the Internet has provided researchers since its inception.
This may entail sweeping new regulations on how Americans use and do business on the Internet.
The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) has recently adopted its insipid "net neutrality" proposal by a 3-2 vote, a vote that was held in secret and only made public after the fact. The change towards "net neutrality" represents a primal shift that will ultimately provide an avenue for direct government involvement in content!
The "net neutrality" proposal represents the camel's nose under the tent - the beginning of the end for free speech - by changing the definition of the Internet from an information service to a "telecommunications" service. The Internet will then become vulnerable to the predatory ambitions of the United Nations if the Obama administration follows thru with their plan to disengage from stewardship of this most American of creations.
While Obama claims that the ICANN registry is largely a clerical procedure, a recent article in the Wall Street Journal correctly notes that "....U.S. control over ICANN and the root zone of the Internet through the Commerce Department contract stops China, Russia and others from interfering with the engineers, developers and others who operate the open Internet."
Or to put it another way, without continued U.S. control over ICANN, foreign governments will begin exerting more influence and control over function and content, which will eventually impact what we will be allowed to read, see and hear on the Internet in North America.
Since its unexpected inception, the Internet has acted as a natural defense against the silent and mostly invisible machinations of the Illuminati as they strive to tighten the noose around governments and economies of the world. It has effectively slowed and sometimes even thwarted Illuminati plans to acquire a stranglehold on the finances of various national economies while manipulating its societies thru outward mechanisms such as the European Union.
The Brexit vote, which affirmed the British people's desire to disentangle from the EU, might never have transpired without the instantaneous communication among peoples which the Internet provides. America's stewardship of both the Internet and ICANN, with our history of freedom of expression, has allowed the Internet to remain relatively unfettered in the U.S., despite disturbing attempts to "reign in" the free flow of ideas, words and communication by the same folks who brought us the concept of "hate speech."
The Illuminati's web of social and economic control thru banking, government regulation, law, education, cultural subversion and media manipulation will be among the very first beneficiaries should control of the Internet be relinquished to an "international" body administered by the U.N.
If the idea of a censored Internet is repugnant to your sensibilities, then you must act at once to do whatever you can to prevent this handover of yet another keystone of freedom to the forces of darkness.
Time is of the essence, and we must use every means at our disposal before our ability to communicate frankly and freely over this electronic cyberscape becomes nothing more than a distant memory... assuming, of course, that such a history of free expression is not itself censured for the "benefit" of future generations.
At this point, all they can really do is contact their representative and Senators. The FCC has already voted and contacting the Obsma administration would be futile.
Of course, an Internet campaign on social media might do the trick. But the problem is that this shift in ICANNs sponsorship does not -- on the surface -- affect content, so the threat to Internet freedom is not readily apparent to most people.
Typical ILLUMINATI stealth deception tactics!
Contact your Senator or Congressman and sign this petition:
I have joined thousands of other patriotic Americans in support of Liberty Counsel Action's call to Stop President Obama's Surrender of the Internet. The Obama administration is surrendering key functions of the United States' oversight of the Internet to members of the international community. This "control group" may be comprised of enemies of our nation, enemies of liberty, and/or radicals who oppose our freedom of speech and freedom of the press. International censorship or a worldwide shutdown of the Internet in a time of crisis will become a real possibility. To learn more about this issue and to sign the petition, please click here:
Related
LCVincent 2016 - Copyright 2016, LCVincent, all rights reserved
Tony B said (September 13, 2016):
Seems to me there is already plenty of censorship on the web and otherwise.
My email has been shut down twice recently by someone, somehow which is supposed to be impossible, changing my password. Therefore THEY can get into my email but I can't. And the provider is very fuzzy about how it happens, since it claims to keep email addresses secure, and those working there are not overly cooperative about getting it back. Of course, that means it is marked in someway by whomever is demanding the censorship which could be the government, those who own the government, Israhell, etc.
On one of these occasions many files on my computer were moved out of place in a general confusion. Had I been using Bill Gates Windows, I'm sure the computer would have been made useless.
Also more and more sites I go to, always those on which I comment, are blocked by Firefox supposedly because connection to those sites is suddenly "not secure" or their "certificate is not valid." Two of them have been Sputnik and RT, both Russian oriented. Some of the sites simply ban my comments with no explanation as to the reason nor the entity desiring it.
On RT, which demonizes the U.S. in every MSM way it can, I often correct lies about the U.S. as the truth is damaging enough. Usually these have to do with RT's fixation (on the U.S. only) concerning purported minority racial problems, not honestly but, MSM style, praising as martyrs thugs killed while trying to kill arresting cops. I'm no lover of today's Mossad trained brutal cops but this one has me wondering somewhat as to just which "side" wants my comments gone as both governments have the power to censor without calling it censorship. To RT's credit, they have changed their comment sections and no longer reveal the commenter, at least to the public.